 |
|

05-28-2010, 02:24 PM
|
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada, Canada
Posts: 1,225
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idriel
Or, alternatively, she could have flown to meet Andrew face to face on Friday then done the Oprah interview on Monday, either by flying back to America (would it be inconvenient? Maybe, but her convenience should be the last thing on her mind right now) or buy doing the interview long distance.
|
That would mean extra airmiles, though. Which Sarah can't afford and which people now know she can't afford, so the media would definitely notice if she flew back to England on the weekend and then flew into America again.
|

05-28-2010, 02:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,422
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay286
That would mean extra airmiles, though. Which Sarah can't afford and which people now know she can't afford, so the media would definitely notice if she flew back to England on the weekend and then flew into America again.
|
Do you think that will actually bother her?
She'll find someone to pick up the bill.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

05-28-2010, 02:58 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,555
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuntyTam
I understand that Sarah has to make a living, but why doesn't she find a career that will give her a sense of dignity? Fifty is not too old to train for a new career...
|
Find a career? I'm sure she won't be doing that anytime soon. Having the Duchess of York title and being the mom of heirs to the British throne, must give her a sense of "I shouldn't have to work." When in reality, she does need to work. But really, after all these years and being in her position, is it right to say she must get a job? Her days for being a doctor, lawyer, etc are over. She must know that too or she wouldn't be in such a tangle now. I think she should find something she loves to do and stick with it. Her circumstances aren't going to change, the Queen is not going to reward her with a load of cash. I don't want to see her working at McDonald's, but she should find something to do to make this world beter (Oops...*better*).
__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living. -Steven Spielberg
|

05-28-2010, 03:06 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
Yes, my point exactly. Aristocratic ancestry doesn't make one an aristocrat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumutqueen
She has distant aristocratic blood in her.
Doesn't make her one today, she has no royal title. She wasn't a lady before marriage or anything like that.
|
|

05-28-2010, 03:13 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
She could get support from some wealthy friends to support her doing humanitarian work overseas...as long as the cameras are left home. A lot of people do this, raise private funding and work for non-government organizations. Even working in an NGO office would be a contribution for good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownPrincess5
I don't want to see her working at McDonald's, but she should find something to do to make this world beter.
|
|

05-28-2010, 03:15 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Crete, United States
Posts: 1,160
|
|
Maybe she could become a lady-in-waiting to one or both of her daughters? Or is the Queen the only person entitled to have ladies-in-waiting?
|

05-28-2010, 03:20 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 80
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownPrincess5
Find a career? I'm sure she won't be doing that anytime soon. Having the Duchess of York title and being the mom of heirs to the British throne, must give her a sense of "I shouldn't have to work." When in reality, she does need to work. But really, after all these years and being in her position, is it right to say she must get a job? Her days for being a doctor, lawyer, etc are over. She must know that too or she wouldn't be in such a tangle now. I think she should find something she loves to do and stick with it. Her circumstances aren't going to change, the Queen is not going to reward her with a load of cash. I don't want to see her working at McDonald's, but she should find something to do to make this world beter.
|
Perhaps she could polish up her writing skills, and write more books. ( Not the tell-all kind. ) She enjoys children; she could write more books for them. It is a competitive business, but she already has her foot in that door. I am sure she could be published again.
Or maybe she could become a full time, professional spokesperson for one of her charities, like the motor-neurone one. Could she get paid for deeper involvement in something like that?
There must be some way that she can build on what she already knows, develop those skills, and create a new and dignified role for herself, free from scandal. That's all I'm saying. You say, "I think she should find something she loves to do and stick with it". I agree.
__________________
"Grief is the price we pay for love." - HM Queen Elizabeth II
|

05-28-2010, 03:38 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middlewich, United Kingdom
Posts: 21,422
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasillisos Markos
Maybe she could become a lady-in-waiting to one or both of her daughters? Or is the Queen the only person entitled to have ladies-in-waiting?
|
This is a beautiful suggestion. 
I don't think she is, Lady Di had some, Camilla must have one at least.
But I doubt they would employ their own mother, and to employ LOW anyway, would cause scandal for the girls.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
|

05-28-2010, 03:57 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,555
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid1962
She could get support from some wealthy friends to support her doing humanitarian work overseas...as long as the cameras are left home. A lot of people do this, raise private funding and work for non-government organizations. Even working in an NGO office would be a contribution for good.
|
Thats true. I didn't think of that. They could support her in her endeavors. But I doubt she'd want to be tied down with an office job, even though that would be good for her  .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasillisos Markos
Maybe she could become a lady-in-waiting to one or both of her daughters? Or is the Queen the only person entitled to have ladies-in-waiting?
|
Can she actually do that? Wouldn't that be weird?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuntyTam
Perhaps she could polish up her writing skills, and write more books. ( Not the tell-all kind. ) She enjoys children; she could write more books for them. It is a competitive business, but she already has her foot in that door. I am sure she could be published again.
Or maybe she could become a full time, professional spokesperson for one of her charities, like the motor-neurone one. Could she get paid for deeper involvement in something like that?
There must be some way that she can build on what she already knows, develop those skills, and create a new and dignified role for herself, free from scandal. That's all I'm saying. You say, "I think she should find something she loves to do and stick with it". I agree.
|
All of these options are good  . I was wondering about her writing skills. I know she wrote a book based on Weight Watchers. I think she would do good in the book market. Not the tell-all kind, but maybe tell-my-side-of-the-story kind of book. I 'm sure lots of people would want to hear from her.
__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living. -Steven Spielberg
|

05-28-2010, 04:18 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: --, United States
Posts: 19
|
|
To be honest I am not very sympathetic to Sarah. She simply lives beyond her means and should tone down her lifestyle. Being chaffeured around in a Bentley and buying expensive Hermes products while broke does not inspire any sympathy in me.
And to all the Americans or outsiders who don't know the history of the family and Sarah's extravagant lifestyle, I say to them don't be fooled. I hate the way everyone this side of the pond is pitying her and saying the royals mistreated her. Sarah brought this on herself.
|

05-28-2010, 04:30 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Troy, United States
Posts: 4,156
|
|
Well said, LadiEncore!! I totally agree with you. Sarah has fooled soo many people over the years and it really almost sickens me that they still fall for her nonsense. Time to put a stop to this...
|

05-28-2010, 05:21 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
The last thing I want is any more telling-my-side-of-the-story books or interviews from Sarah. Children's books, history books, yes, but no more about her...please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownPrincess5
Not the tell-all kind, but maybe tell-my-side-of-the-story kind of book. I 'm sure lots of people would want to hear from her.
|
|

05-28-2010, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maidenhead, United Kingdom
Posts: 632
|
|
Well not me for sure, I am getting heartily sick of the woman and her childish excuses.
Anyway how can the inexcusable be excused?
|

05-28-2010, 05:35 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Troy, United States
Posts: 4,156
|
|
Not for me , either, Wisteria!
Now That is a good question... Let the debate begin!!
|

05-28-2010, 05:50 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NYC, United States
Posts: 17
|
|
|

05-28-2010, 05:54 PM
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ., United States
Posts: 49
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadiEncore
To be honest I am not very sympathetic to Sarah. She simply lives beyond her means and should tone down her lifestyle. Being chaffeured around in a Bentley and buying expensive Hermes products while broke does not inspire any sympathy in me.
And to all the Americans or outsiders who don't know the history of the family and Sarah's extravagant lifestyle, I say to them don't be fooled. I hate the way everyone this side of the pond is pitying her and saying the royals mistreated her. Sarah brought this on herself.
|
I agree. I posted my feelings on this a few pages back (page 12). There is little sympathy for someone who is willing to cause potential damage and harm to another to simply get what they want. While her finances and lifestyle are part of this scandal, the big issue is that she was willing to cause potential harm for money.
What I did not say in that post has been bothering me: Just because you marry a prince does mean that you are entitled to the fairy tale. However, Sarah believes that she is more entitled than anyone...she does not care who gives it to her or in what country, as long as she gets her fairy tale and can live like an aristocrat. She could not find it in England, so she comes over to the US...the land where dreams come true.
Much has been said in this thread about her divorce settlement. Sarah said that she left the royal family not with money, but with freedom and friendship. It was her choice not to get any money. Even with all the scandals that surrounded her at the time, I feel strongly that she could have gotten a few million especially since the girls were so young and could not touch their trust funds for several more years. Since she made this choice, why did/does she feel that she would not have to change her standard of living? A royal title does not dismiss anyone from financial responsibility - if anything, it makes one more financially accountable than the average person.
I think that after her Oprah confessional, nothing will change...she will continue to want her aristocratic lifestyle and will expect the US to support her in all her endeavors. Well, Sarah, if you are reading this post and this is what you want, then go for it honey. But keep in mind that the US has changed its view on extravagant living in the past two years and your actions have left a very bad taste in many, many, many mouths. America may be the land where dreams come true, but many people have had to sacrafice to live their dreams....now it is your turn.
Again....just my teeny tiny two cents worth!
|

05-28-2010, 06:04 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 4,069
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyHylton
|
Hola Lady!  Welcome to the Forums.
Nice article. Can the woman NOT speak? "My children pay for me."
YIKES!!
__________________
"Not MGM, not the press, not anyone can tell me what to do."--Ava Gardner
|

05-28-2010, 06:15 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ****, Spain
Posts: 979
|
|
This is just getting worse by the minute 
Can she renegotiate the divorce settlement now?
|

05-28-2010, 06:16 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 80
|
|
Welcome, LadyHylton!
Interesting article. How reliable is the Daily Mail? I don't know much about the various British papers.
__________________
"Grief is the price we pay for love." - HM Queen Elizabeth II
|

05-28-2010, 06:40 PM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,305
|
|
The Daily Mail is a tabloid that's notoriously hard on the Yorks. They run negative articles about Andrew and the princesses as well as Sarah. That said, they probably get it right sometimes.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|