The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #241  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:24 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,926
Anthony Armstrong Jones didn’t get his title on his wedding day
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:26 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,537
Maybe when Eugenie becomes pregnant...Jack may get a title. However, it would be strange since Jack wasn't given a title today. What is the significance of giving Jack a title later?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:31 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Anthony Armstrong Jones didn’t get his title on his wedding day
I just looked that up and it is true. He didn't get his title until 6 October 1961. That is more than a year after his wedding.
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:35 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 2,735
Rob Jobson replied to Chris:

"She will remain HRH Princess Eugenie, Mrs Brooksbank. Princess Alexandra became Princess Alexandra, the Hon. Lady Ogilvy when she married Sir Angus."

The plot thickens.
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:36 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO View Post
Rob Jobson replied to Chris:

"She will remain HRH Princess Eugenie, Mrs Brooksbank. Princess Alexandra became Princess Alexandra, the Hon. Lady Ogilvy when she married Sir Angus."

The plot thickens.
Which plot?
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:39 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 5,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO View Post
Rob Jobson replied to Chris:

"She will remain HRH Princess Eugenie, Mrs Brooksbank. Princess Alexandra became Princess Alexandra, the Hon. Lady Ogilvy when she married Sir Angus."

The plot thickens.
Had Angus been already knighted when he married Princess Alexandra ? I believe she was The Hon Mrs Angus Ogilvy before becoming The Hon. Lady Ogilvy.
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:40 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,926
That’s because Angus Olgivy didn’t receive a title. Chris Ship is implying a title is in works for Eugenie and Jack
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:41 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terri Terri View Post
Maybe when Eugenie becomes pregnant...Jack may get a title. However, it would be strange since Jack wasn't given a title today. What is the significance of giving Jack a title later?

Her being pregnant has nothing to do with a title. No husbands that have married into the family, in decades, have been given a title.

Eugenie is not a working royal. Jack is not going to be a working royal.



LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:46 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 2,735
I think the pregnancy tie was because that is why Anthony Armstrong Jones was given his. It was right before Princess Margaret gave birth.

I still doubt it but then again Andrew has power over his mother. So I will never under estimate that man. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:46 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 5,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
That’s because Angus Olgivy didn’t receive a title. Chris Ship is implying a title is in works for Eugenie and Jack
Angus didn’t have a title, but he used an honorific predicate as the youngest son of an earl. That is why he was “ The Honorable Mr Angus Ogivy” before he became “ The Honorable Sir Angus Ogilvy”.
Reply With Quote
  #251  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:51 PM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 8,926
I was explaining Rob Jobson’s tweet about Princess Alexandra. Chris Ship doesn’t tweet lies. He must have heard something through sources.
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 10-12-2018, 12:58 PM
ACO ACO is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 2,735
Oh I don't think he is lying. He has clearly heard chatter. Whether it is accurate remains to be seen but likely where there is smoke...
Reply With Quote
  #253  
Old 10-12-2018, 01:00 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Wherever, United States
Posts: 5,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACO View Post
I think the pregnancy tie was because that is why Anthony Armstrong Jones was given his. It was right before Princess Margaret gave birth.

I still doubt it but then again Andrew has power over his mother. So I will never under estimate that man. LOL
Margaret's children were much closer to the throne. Given the fact that Queen only had young children then (though Charles and Andrew never flew in the same plane as 1st and 2nd in line, so that was safer). There is now three families basically ahead of Eugenie, in addition to Beatrice. Earl of Snowden did say he took the title for the sake of his son, and it would be awkward if the former Mr. Armstrong Jones were ever to become king.
Reply With Quote
  #254  
Old 10-12-2018, 01:25 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,311
Quote:
never under estimate that man
Like you I'd never discount the persuasive power of the Duke of York when it comes to HMQ.. but this would be an unprecedented example of it...
Reply With Quote
  #255  
Old 10-12-2018, 01:32 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Alexandria, United States
Posts: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
I was explaining Rob Jobson’s tweet about Princess Alexandra. Chris Ship doesn’t tweet lies. He must have heard something through sources.
Exactly, Chris has been correct on almost every aspect of the wedding that he's tweeted about that wasn't confirmed until it was. To tweet something like that he must have heard something...Does anyone remember if an announcement was made about what Princess Anne would be referred to after either her first or second wedding?
Reply With Quote
  #256  
Old 10-12-2018, 01:39 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,311
A baronetcy would be ideal.. giving the eldest Brooksbank Son a title to inherit, [and I suspect] that is the minimum the DoY would angle for..
Reply With Quote
  #257  
Old 10-12-2018, 02:36 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: alpine village, Germany
Posts: 2,462
HM could easily make him a Knight Commander of one of the orders she has personal control over, for services to her - I mean he did promise to protect and worship her granddaughter, a Princess of the Blood Royal, so this is certainly worth a knightship. IMHO. That would not give the children titles, but I am sure that great-grandchildren of a souverain in the male/female line do not need a title. But it would be nice if the couple would be introduced as HRH Princess Eugenie, Lady Brookbanks and Sir Jack Brookbanks. It would not sound so far away from TRH The Duke and Duchess of Sussex as an example of a married male grandson. We'll see. But I am honestly happy for Eugenie that she got the wedding fit for a Royal princess and that we got to see it and wish for her Jack to be honoured for making his girlfriend a honarable matron (LOL).
Reply With Quote
  #258  
Old 10-12-2018, 02:44 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kataryn View Post
HM could easily make him a Knight Commander of one of the orders she has personal control over, for services to her - I mean he did promise to protect and worship her granddaughter, a Princess of the Blood Royal, so this is certainly worth a knightship. IMHO. That would not give the children titles, but I am sure that great-grandchildren of a souverain in the male/female line do not need a title. But it would be nice if the couple would be introduced as HRH Princess Eugenie, Lady Brookbanks and Sir Jack Brookbanks. It would not sound so far away from TRH The Duke and Duchess of Sussex as an example of a married male grandson. We'll see. But I am honestly happy for Eugenie that she got the wedding fit for a Royal princess and that we got to see it and wish for her Jack to be honoured for making his girlfriend a honarable matron (LOL).
He has not done anything to merit a knighthood or any title...
Reply With Quote
  #259  
Old 10-12-2018, 02:57 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herefordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,311
Quote:
not done anything to merit a knighthood or any title...
Hmm..well if we're 'going down that road'...
Reply With Quote
  #260  
Old 10-12-2018, 03:33 PM
Zonk's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere in, United States
Posts: 12,673
Yeah, I don't see a title in Jack's future and honestly, I don't think he wants one.

He seems like someone who happened to fall in love (and marry) someone who happened to the Queen's Granddaughter and a Princess to boot!

You will see him at special events but he will be low key and work to support his family. Much like the late Angus Oglivy.
__________________

__________________
.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jack Brooksbank: Family and Background Zonk The Duke of York, Sarah Duchess of York, and Family 78 12-01-2018 03:15 AM
Engagement of Princess Eugenie of York and Jack Brooksbank: January 22, 2018 JessRulz The Duke of York, Sarah Duchess of York, and Family 228 03-15-2018 10:50 PM
Daniel's Future: Discussion (his role, title, orders, pressure etc.) Yennie Crown Princess Victoria, Prince Daniel and Family 441 01-13-2017 07:38 PM




Popular Tags
alqasimi aristocracy armenia belgian royal family chittagong cht clarence house countess of snowdon cover-up crown crown prince hussein crown prince hussein's future wife crown princess victoria current events cyprus danish history denmark duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex dutch dutch history dutch royal family french revolution future genealogy germany henry v hill historical drama house of bourbon house of glucksburg house of grimaldi house of orange-nassau house of saxe-coburg and gotha jumma kent kiko king philippe languages lithuanian castles mail marriage mbs meghan markle monarchist monarchy monogram naples norway norwegian royal family official visit palaces palestine potential areas prince charles prince harry prince of wales rania of jordan romanov family shakespeare south korea spanish royal startling new evidence state visit sweden swedish royal family tracts united kingdom usa


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×