The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #101  
Old 01-28-2018, 12:56 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NN, Lithuania
Posts: 1,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
The way I see it, the wedding wouldn't be televised mainly because Eugenie isn't actually a working member of the British royal family and is therefore a private citizen. People, also, just aren't that interested in the York girls to warrant airing the wedding.

I may be wrong and it'll be televised but I seriously doubt it will be.
It has nothing to do with being "a working member".
If any British TV company wants and BRF agrees we will see the wedding.
Obviously people want to see all royal family including Kate and Meghan at any wedding
__________________

  #102  
Old 01-28-2018, 01:23 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 515
It won't be fully televised - Peter and Zara's weddings weren't - but there'll be loads of TV cameras there and plenty of coverage, and Hello magazine will make a big fuss about it :-). We even got a load of TV footage of Pippa's wedding.


I'm not convinced about James being a pageboy: he's 10, and boys of that age aren't usually too keen on dressing up in cute outfits and parading about!
__________________

  #103  
Old 01-28-2018, 01:40 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,491
Peter and Zara were fully private citizens, not a good comparison. Better comparison is Edward and Sophie, who when they married, were not intending to be full time working royals. They had continued their careers.

Really it isn't about if they are working royals or not. It will come down to public interest or not. If there is enough interest in seeing the wedding, there will be coverage.

I don't think it will televised. Not because she isn't a full time royal, but because she isn't very popular. There will always be interest 1. to see the other royals and guests in attendance 2. see her dress and the clothes 3. somewhat also because first princess to marry since Anne. But that will likely be covered by the media covering coming and going.

Quote:
I'm not convinced about James being a pageboy: he's 10, and boys of that age aren't usually too keen on dressing up in cute outfits and parading about!
10 is not out of question. William Lower-Pinkerton was 10 when he was in the Cambridge wedding (the other page boy was 8).

That said James is a bit of a fire cracker. He is known for his faces and such. One can hope he perhaps has matured a bit by the wedding, or if he is used, we may have another William and Zara at Andrew's wedding happen. But William was 4 and that was to be expected. The 'page boy get up' might not help his outlook on the event.
  #104  
Old 01-28-2018, 01:58 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 5,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post


10 is not out of question. William Lower-Pinkerton was 10 when he was in the Cambridge wedding (the other page boy was 8).

That said James is a bit of a fire cracker. He is known for his faces and such. One can hope he perhaps has matured a bit by the wedding, or if he is used, we may have another William and Zara at Andrew's wedding happen. But William was 4 and that was to be expected. The 'page boy get up' might not help his outlook on the event.

Yes, and Lord Nicholas Windsor was eleven at Charles and Diana's wedding.

I think attendants like Andrew had, Boy-Girl in graduated ages, in three or four pairs, would look better than the usual cluster of girls with two page boys.
  #105  
Old 01-28-2018, 02:20 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,906
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spheno View Post
we don't know yet



Please, provide source (see the forum's rules)

The source is me using common sense and past history of the BRF behavior.


LaRae
  #106  
Old 01-28-2018, 02:41 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,923
I don't think it will be televised simply because, to be frank, the RF won't want it to be and Eugenie and Jack don't want it to be. Everything from BP and even more recent statements from Andrew point to the girls having their own jobs as well as doing occasional duties for the RF for charities they are specifically linked to. The focus of the RF is on 'the core members'. Also I don't think Eugenie particularly embraces the attention of being a HRH.
At the end of the day, the public will be able to see the comings and goings around the Castle so why not let cameras film that, but letting them into the Chapel itself is very different.
IMO even if Eugenie wanted to allow cameras in to broadcast the wedding itself I suspect the Queen and her aides would step in and stop it. Remember Edward was the Queen's son, all his siblings had wedding sth at were broadcast, and indeed, much bigger and grander.
  #107  
Old 01-28-2018, 04:49 PM
HereditaryPrincess's Avatar
Heir Apparent
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,620
I agree, I don't think the ceremony will be televised either. Eugenie and Jack seem to be a more private couple, and as others have stated, I can imagine they would like their wedding to reflect that. There will of course be snippets of the wedding on the news, and we'll get photos; but I doubt there will be a full, official broadcast.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
I agree!

Or, a nice bridal party would be Beatrice as MoH, and Jack's brother Thomas as Best Man.
Then pair Savannah Phillips with Viscount Severn, and Maud Windsor with Prince George.

That way they'd have a range of ages.
That would be a lovely bridal party indeed; although I think George will most likely be a page boy at Harry's wedding so two weddings in a year might be a bit much for him - I still think it would be nice to include a Cambridge in the bridal party though; so perhaps Charlotte.
__________________
"For beautiful eyes, look for the good in others; for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness; and for poise, walk with the knowledge that you are never alone". Audrey Hepburn

*
"Think of all the beauty still left around you and be happy". Anne Frank
  #108  
Old 01-28-2018, 05:10 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 5,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereditaryPrincess View Post

That would be a lovely bridal party indeed; although I think George will most likely be a page boy at Harry's wedding so two weddings in a year might be a bit much for him - I still think it would be nice to include a Cambridge in the bridal party though; so perhaps Charlotte.

But then Charlotte would be the one to be in two weddings in the same year.
  #109  
Old 01-28-2018, 05:31 PM
HereditaryPrincess's Avatar
Heir Apparent
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 12,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
But then Charlotte would be the one to be in two weddings in the same year.


No, she wouldn’t if she wasn’t included in Harry’s bridal party and George was instead, as I had envisioned.
__________________
"For beautiful eyes, look for the good in others; for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness; and for poise, walk with the knowledge that you are never alone". Audrey Hepburn

*
"Think of all the beauty still left around you and be happy". Anne Frank
  #110  
Old 01-28-2018, 06:58 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 5,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by HereditaryPrincess View Post
No, she wouldn’t if she wasn’t included in Harry’s bridal party and George was instead, as I had envisioned.
I thought George and Charlotte are both in Harry's wedding?

Anyway, the two weddings are far enough apart that it shouldn't prove too much.
  #111  
Old 01-28-2018, 07:21 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 11,906
Has it been released by KP yet? I've been waiting on that to see if both of the Cambridge kids will be in the wedding.


LaRae
  #112  
Old 01-28-2018, 07:31 PM
Leopoldine's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommy100 View Post
I don't think it will be televised simply because, to be frank, the RF won't want it to be and Eugenie and Jack don't want it to be. Everything from BP and even more recent statements from Andrew point to the girls having their own jobs as well as doing occasional duties for the RF for charities they are specifically linked to. The focus of the RF is on 'the core members'. Also I don't think Eugenie particularly embraces the attention of being a HRH.
At the end of the day, the public will be able to see the comings and goings around the Castle so why not let cameras film that, but letting them into the Chapel itself is very different.
IMO even if Eugenie wanted to allow cameras in to broadcast the wedding itself I suspect the Queen and her aides would step in and stop it. Remember Edward was the Queen's son, all his siblings had wedding sth at were broadcast, and indeed, much bigger and grander.
I agree with this, and I also think that Harry's broadcast particulars will be limited.

When the most important guests are in their 90's, a modicum of privacy might ensure a bit more comfort and enjoyment.
  #113  
Old 01-28-2018, 07:39 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirabel View Post
I thought George and Charlotte are both in Harry's wedding?

Anyway, the two weddings are far enough apart that it shouldn't prove too much.
The tabloids have speculated that they are both in the wedding party. Their so called 'inside sources'. Seems a pretty safe speculation, but one that has not been confirmed.

Honestly if only one was in Harry's, I would see Charlotte. Charlotte is a bit more confident, and likely would handle it better then her brother. I know they both had practice at Pippa's and older now, but this is a much bigger occasion. If only one is in Harry's, I'd actually expect Charlotte, George maybe for Eugenie.

I don't think the kids will be in both weddings. Not because it would be too much for them. But just as there is a lot of family, and I think they may use different so to involve more kids. Might be wrong.
  #114  
Old 01-28-2018, 07:43 PM
Leopoldine's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post

I don't think it will televised. Not because she isn't a full time royal, but because she isn't very popular. There will always be interest 1. to see the other royals and guests in attendance 2. see her dress and the clothes 3. somewhat also because first princess to marry since Anne. But that will likely be covered by the media covering coming and going.
I don't see this particular woman as unpopular. She's not as well-known as her parents, who get bad press. She works full time, her fiance is cute and seems like a nice guy, and I hope everything goes swimmingly for her.

I am sure that there will be multiple companies who will clamor to broadcast the wedding, if only for the hats or the Philip/Fergie Frosty Frown Face-off.
  #115  
Old 01-28-2018, 08:13 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leopoldine View Post
I don't see this particular woman as unpopular. She's not as well-known as her parents, who get bad press. She works full time, her fiance is cute and seems like a nice guy, and I hope everything goes swimmingly for her.

I am sure that there will be multiple companies who will clamor to broadcast the wedding, if only for the hats or the Philip/Fergie Frosty Frown Face-off.
Well as you said she isn't that well-known which in itself is a factor. Televising an event would be based a lot of the interest in the wedding, people attending.

The problem what she is known for is not good. Her and Beatrice are painted by the media in the same light as their parents. The only publicity they get is coming out of the bar at night, or on vacation. Even when they are on a trip for work or charity, it is painted as a holiday. Unfortunately because of the likes of the DM, they are seen as spoiled little girls who do nothing but party and go on holiday.

Like Pippa, there will be reporters there taking photos. There will be interest in fashion. But that's not the same as televising the entire event.
  #116  
Old 01-28-2018, 08:56 PM
Leopoldine's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post
Well as you said she isn't that well-known which in itself is a factor. Televising an event would be based a lot of the interest in the wedding, people attending.

The problem what she is known for is not good. Her and Beatrice are painted by the media in the same light as their parents. The only publicity they get is coming out of the bar at night, or on vacation. Even when they are on a trip for work or charity, it is painted as a holiday. Unfortunately because of the likes of the DM, they are seen as spoiled little girls who do nothing but party and go on holiday.

Like Pippa, there will be reporters there taking photos. There will be interest in fashion. But that's not the same as televising the entire event.
I would expect a big media company wanting to film certain parts of the wedding inside the chapel, like the walks up and down the aisle and everyone gathered on the steps after. She has an opportunity here to be seen as an individual, a pretty and nice girl with a good job who is getting married, not Fergie's poorly dressed revenge pawn like she was at William's wedding and what she is best known for. I hope it is filmed just to make her look good.
  #117  
Old 01-28-2018, 09:29 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 5,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
Has it been released by KP yet? I've been waiting on that to see if both of the Cambridge kids will be in the wedding.


LaRae
Ii it a necessity that KP gives out the information? Could not the public just find out on the actual wedding day?
  #118  
Old 01-28-2018, 10:05 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
Ii it a necessity that KP gives out the information? Could not the public just find out on the actual wedding day?
Its not necessary, but its what happened in the past. William and Kate announced their bridal party the February before their wedding.

Quote:
I would expect a big media company wanting to film certain parts of the wedding inside the chapel, like the walks up and down the aisle and everyone gathered on the steps after. She has an opportunity here to be seen as an individual, a pretty and nice girl with a good job who is getting married, not Fergie's poorly dressed revenge pawn like she was at William's wedding and what she is best known for. I hope it is filmed just to make her look good.
Oppurtunity??? She has done plenty to be seen as an individual. She did an article with Harper's. She is involved in plenty of charity work. The issue is, there is no public interest. The only time the public pay attention to her is for 'she is on another holiday', she 'is out drinking again'.

They aren't going to see the 'nice girl with a nice job'. All they would see is her wedding dress and flowers.

And if she sold her wedding to the media like Peter did she would be slammed even harder. She is already bad mouthed as a spoiled freeloader, the last thing she needs is to be seen as selling her wedding to a magazine or news show.
  #119  
Old 01-29-2018, 01:01 AM
Leopoldine's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post
Its not necessary, but its what happened in the past. William and Kate announced their bridal party the February before their wedding.



Oppurtunity??? She has done plenty to be seen as an individual. She did an article with Harper's. She is involved in plenty of charity work. The issue is, there is no public interest. The only time the public pay attention to her is for 'she is on another holiday', she 'is out drinking again'.

They aren't going to see the 'nice girl with a nice job'. All they would see is her wedding dress and flowers.

And if she sold her wedding to the media like Peter did she would be slammed even harder. She is already bad mouthed as a spoiled freeloader, the last thing she needs is to be seen as selling her wedding to a magazine or news show.
She's not involved with that much charity, and, at this point, that is not a bad thing. She enjoys a career she is qualified for, and distancing herself from her mother's idea of charity is only a good thing.

Her interview with Harper's Bazaar laid bare her daily routine and the gym she goes to. That wasn't so good if there was a security concern, but nothing bad came of it, as she is not that prominent.
  #120  
Old 01-29-2018, 01:06 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,491
Again thank you for proving my point

Nothing came of it, she is unimportant.....your very words.

These are not the words that describe a woman who people will be rushing to watch a televised wedding of. Those people who know who she is, think she is a party girl freeloader with horrible taste in clothes.

Giving an interview to Harper's is not the same as selling her wedding coverage to a magazine or tv station. That would include private photos of the royal family. Peter is being slammed to this day for selling his wedding photos. Eugenie would fair no better, if anything, she likely would fair worse. Peter people were neutral on. Eugenie, because of her parents, people are already prepared to hate her. They are looking for any sign to think her a freeloader out to make money any way she can.

Eugenie actually does quite a bit of charity work. Like her sister, she has close to a dozen patronages. The issue is, the DM and other media don't give two cents. They only cover her work when they can spin it as a holiday.

And she does do the kind of charity work her mother does- Both Beatrice and Eugenie are involved in several charities their mother has worked with. Even those she gets slammed left and right, Fergie has continued with some of her patronages from her royal days. Including the teenage cancer trust which we see both Eugenie and Beatrice attend events with her for (Fergie has been patron for 28 years). And Children in crisis which her mother founded.


The only chance of her wedding being broadcast, is if its broadcast officially like the Cambridge wedding. And not seen as 'sold' to a media company. And Eugenie's wedding is not likely to garner that pull.
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engagement of Princess Eugenie of York and Jack Brooksbank: January 22, 2018 JessRulz The Duke of York, Sarah Duchess of York, and Family 228 03-15-2018 09:50 PM




Popular Tags
anastasia 2020 armstrong-jones belgian royal family canada chittagong clarence house coronavirus countess of snowdon cover-up crown princess victoria current events danish history denmark dna duke & duchess of cambridge; dutch history dutch royal family family tree future haakon vii henry v hill history house of glucksburg house of grimaldi house of orange-nassau house of saxe-coburg and gotha interesting introduction jumma kent king philippe languages list of rulers lithuanian castles mailing marriage mbs monaco royal naples norwegian royal family official visit pakistan palaces palestine popularity prince charles princess elizabeth queen mathilde queen maud romanov family royal balls royal events royal family royal spouse royal tour royalty royal wedding shakespeare spanish royal startling new evidence state visit stuart sweden swedish history swedish royal family tracts usa von hofmannsthal wedding gown


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2020
Jelsoft Enterprises
×