No I didn't think it was aggressive at all. I agree with Curryong that the media build up will happen as the wedding date approaches. I believe that once the June activities are completed that we'll start receiving some more information, but I expect more details to come out in early autumn. ?I hope nobody thought my mess was aggressive, it was not, just an honest question because in the British mags I buy they rarely talk about it....
Well to be fair to the KP team, there was a big event (Louis' birth) and a serious situation (Thomas Markle's health issues) that were occurring right before the wedding that were out of their direct control. IMO that did contribute to the KP team choosing to release information at a later than expected date.Andrew and his family's announcements and PR are handled by Buckingham Palace, which is much more efficient than KP, at least I hope is.
You never know. The media has an interest in hyping this wedding up.
Why wouldn't they want to hype it up? All they're interested in is clicks and sales and if they can get it by reporting on their wedding, they will.
Why wouldn't they want to hype it up? All they're interested in is clicks and sales and if they can get it by reporting on their wedding, they will.
^This can be of no surprise..
The Princess is fairly 'low-profile', and Mr Brooksbank is 'no-profile'. As an entirely private event, with no state or media participation what else would one expect ?
This tabloid claims it has the location of Eugenie's bachelorette party
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ex...ty-ibiza-princess-beatrice-sarah-ferguson/amp
Nice to bring in Eugenie's party girl past to infer she's going to wild out at her do. Harry's Vegas shenanigans was reported but he allegedly told Meghan he will not repeat Vegas.