View Single Post
  #22  
Old 03-31-2004, 10:15 PM
renats renats is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jacqueline+Mar 31st, 2004 - 7:28 am--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Jacqueline @ Mar 31st, 2004 - 7:28 am)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-kittencrews@Jan 3rd, 2004 - 4:16 am
I believe I read Camille wasn't in line to the "throne" because Stephanie hadn't announced who her father was... but that could be wrong
I thought that only children who had been legitimized by their parents' marriage could be in the line of succession. Isn't this why Camille isn't included, because her parents were never married?

Has it changed and now children need only be accepted by their fathers and given his surname? [/b][/quote]
You're right Jacqueline! Camille was never in the line because her parents were never married. Even though the little Ducruets were born out of wedlock, their parents married later.

By the way, the first thought is not even an option since it is an invention from the ever creative press. Camille does not have an undeclared father. Her father is JR and her last name is Gottlieb, not Grimaldi like many people think. Take a look at the end of the text in the link:

http://www.palais.mc/wwwpal.nsf/ABDA2D1C46...1256BA7002D737E
__________________
Renata (heh-NAH-tah)
Reply With Quote