Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Larzen
The court is not amused with an article written by Daniel Nyhlen for TV4. He had publushed yesterday at 8.45 an article describing Carl Philips party night out at the posh stureplan club The White room, it describes how he and his frineds got very drunk and splashed champagne on each other, danced on the tables and wrestled with each other, further some guest said they had never seen the Prince so drunk. at 9.45 the article was removed. In TV4 they say the needed to do some double chcking and that things had gone alittle fast. Nyhlen is suprised the article was removed, and says he stands by it 100%
The Courts press woman Nina Eldh says the Princes was at a party, but there was deffenetly NO splashing of champagne, and NO wresteling, and that even Princes must be allowed a night out with his buddies. She has talked to the Prince, and he felt that the article had exaggerated
http://www.expressen.se/index.jsp?a=657176
The court has dropped that case and does not want an apology 
Ulf Frederik von Ruth says the Prince was at the White Room but he did not experience the Prince as drunk rather he was having a good time |
Well, I´m for freedom of speech...the Royal court is allowed to present the Royal youngsters as super good, perfect and lovely honeymakers, so why shouldn´t ppl like Daniel Nyhlén be allowed to present it their way. At least that´s what I would understand under democracy. Ppl, who don´t like that can always read other media (Svensk Damtidning for example)
Personally I´m tending to believe the Nyhlén version a little more...it seems Carl Philip doesn´t always say no to binge parties (do you remember the story of him getting injured, when sliding on a serving tray) So what...better admiting it, than playing the saint. At least in my opinion it´s more likeable...
BTW aren´t many friends of the Royal family working at TV4