The Royal Forums

The Royal Forums (http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/)
-   Crown Prince Frederik and Crown Princess Mary and Family (http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f32/)
-   -   Mary on Magazine Covers (http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f32/mary-on-magazine-covers-9809.html)

pinkylou 05-28-2006 07:24 AM

Mary on Magazine Covers
 
other crown princess' seem to feature dominantly on magazine covers, surely mary has too, can anyone post any?

JessRulz 05-29-2006 07:20 AM

Hi pinkylou!!
you're right, Mary sure has
Here are a few that I have, they mainly are from after Christian was born, because that's when I became interested in royalty and Mary as well

When Christian was born:
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/8...ver26lz.th.jpg http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/3...ver35hb.th.jpg http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/1...over2bq.th.jpg http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/4...ver46ir.th.jpg http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/8...ver53oc.th.jpg
#1 - Herald Sun
#5 - WHO

Leaving the Hospital:
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6...over8zc.th.jpg Herald Sun

Christian's Christening:
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/7...over0gm.th.jpg http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/1...ver25zr.th.jpg
#1 - Herald Sun

Two before Christian was born:
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/4...rets6tr.th.jpg http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/7...thin7re.th.jpg
#1&2 - New Idea

Sources: All photos I took of my own copies of said magazine/article - the last two are cut outs of the covers

Mary's first outing since the birth:
http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/4...umph3yi.th.jpg New Idea

And some recent (2006) covers:
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/4...nley2er.th.jpg http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/5...rgets0s.th.jpg http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/7...alia6dn.th.jpg http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/2...twar1de.th.jpg
#4 - Women's Day

Sources: All photos I took of my own copies of said magazine/article - first and last images are cuts outs of covers

Some from Royalty Magazine
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/2...ding6fy.th.jpg http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/610/mary0eh.th.jpg http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/6...nant7hr.th.jpg http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/6...ning4bn.th.jpg

Source: http://www.royalty-magazine.com/

BurberryBrit 05-29-2006 01:32 PM

Are those mags Australian?

robby86 05-29-2006 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JessRulz
Mary's first outing since the birth:
http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/4...umph3yi.th.jpg New Idea

And some recent (2006) covers:
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/4...nley2er.th.jpg http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/5...rgets0s.th.jpg http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/7...alia6dn.th.jpg http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/2...twar1de.th.jpg
#4 - Women's Day

Sources: All photos I took of my own copies of said magazine/article - first and last images are cuts outs of covers

What are they talking about? Mary's secret tears. :confused:

Margrethe II 05-30-2006 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BurberryBrit
Are those mags Australian?

All except for the Royalty magazines.

I have bought every Australian magazine which has featured HRH the Crown Princess and needless to say I am running out of storage space :eek:

Quote:

What are they talking about? Mary's secret tears.
Complete crap of course.lol. It said "Tearfurl Mary lonelier than ever as rivals try to steal her place as most loved Princess" .

A direct extract...

"The gloves are off in the house of Denmark as a bitter royal row erupts around Princess Mary and the women in her brother in-law's life. Insiders say Prince Joachim's new girlfriend Marie Cavallier and his ex-wife Princess Alexandra are desperate to topple Mary from her place at the top of the royal pecking order - and will stop at nothing to steal her limelight."

Nothing worth paying attention too, of course!

"MII"

Lizy 05-30-2006 04:38 PM

It's interesting to see that once magazines get bored of all the happy and good things about Mary they start concoting stories about her being sad and loney. Why can't people just be happy for Mary instead of trying to unpick the fairytale?

Lee27 05-31-2006 02:31 PM

It is sad how the media loved to tear down marriages of public figures.

No matter what, Mary is the crown princess of Denmark and the mother of a future king

Jo of Palatine 05-31-2006 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margrethe II
All except for the Royalty magazines.

I have bought every Australian magazine which has featured HRH the Crown Princess and needless to say I am running out of storage space :eek:



Complete crap of course.lol. It said "Tearfurl Mary lonelier than ever as rivals try to steal her place as most loved Princess" .

A direct extract...

"The gloves are off in the house of Denmark as a bitter royal row erupts around Princess Mary and the women in her brother in-law's life. Insiders say Prince Joachim's new girlfriend Marie Cavallier and his ex-wife Princess Alexandra are desperate to topple Mary from her place at the top of the royal pecking order - and will stop at nothing to steal her limelight."

Nothing worth paying attention too, of course!

"MII"

I wonder sometimes what people who publish this kind of nonsense actually think about their readers...

Margrethe II 06-02-2006 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piaa
I guess because fairytales do not last.....

If this were a fairytale marriage, I would probably agree Piaa, but it is not. It something very real as HRH the Crown Princess has made known.

Unfortunately there is that constant stigma of their union being a fairytale and most likely, it shall stay.

Quote:

Totally agree with you MII!
Hello RachelD and welcome to the Forums :)

Glade you agree ;)

"MII"

Piaa 06-02-2006 09:34 AM

I agree that it is very real for Mary....however how many of you have posted so many times what a fairytale her life has been so far....her marriage, her husband, her baby...the constant stigma you write about comes from all of us because face it for us her life is a fairytale.

The media have always tried to spin the negative side to marriages whether they are royal or celebrity....Mary is no different.

Zonk 06-02-2006 09:38 AM

I would love to read the "Mary's secret tears" for a good laugh.

Where do the editors/writers come up with these ridiculous stores. Anyone with a half a brain would question the article. I mean let's think about it...and ex wife and a girlfriend (who may or may not be around in a couple of months time) who are desparate to topple the Next Queen of Denmark!

Margrethe II 06-02-2006 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piaa
however how many of you have posted so many times what a fairytale her life has been so far....her marriage, her husband, her baby...the constant stigma you write about comes from all of us because face it for us her life is a fairytale.

I certainly have not commented on her life being a fairytale & I never shall!

You see, I dont believe in fairytales, I believe in the reality of the situation.

I do see where you are coming from though.


"MII"

carlota 06-02-2006 09:40 PM

i think it's terrible how these magazines can say she is "lonely", "tearful", "living in fear", "runnaway" or telling her pregnancy secrets... and, worse, people buy them? i mean, if any of the royals said this explicitely and a magazine covered it completely with a good and logical research, i would run and buy it the first one, but this is obviously (even for non-royal watchers, it's not difficult to tell) something they invented. are all these all australian magazines?

zonk, i will have to disagree about the statement on the other ladies though. i'm not going to say anything about marie, but i think alexandra will always be there for the danish people. she still has her title, and in case she decides to re-marry, her majesty decided to give her another title. i doubt she would have done that if people in denmark weren't interested in her.

Margrethe II 06-02-2006 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlota
are all these all australian magazines?

As stated on the first page, all the magazines in this thread, discluding Royalty & Point de Vue magazine's are either Australian magazine or newspaper extracts.

"MII"

Zonk 06-03-2006 09:23 AM

Carlota...perhaps your misunderstood me or I didn't make myself clear. My comments about Alexandra had nothing to that the fact that she is not admired, respected and loved by the people of Denmark. That is evident by the fact that she is invited to family events and the Queen did not take her title. Despite all those things and unless Frederick and Mary divorce..in the scheme of things she is still not going to be Queen of Denmark. My main point is this..the title and the focus of the article is just laughable that the future Queen would be in tears of two people trying to upstage her. And this is not arrogrance but simply a fact of life regarding their stations in the the DRF.

JessRulz 06-05-2006 03:21 AM

Mary is on the cover of this week's Women's Day. Wouldn't worry about the story, I thought it was total rubbish

http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4...ered0lz.th.jpg
Source: A photo of my own copy

Margrethe II 06-05-2006 04:56 AM

JessRulz has got it right..the story is pure garbage, nothing more..that's one edition I certainly left on the shelf!

Our tabloids are disgusting.

"MII"

missjane 06-05-2006 08:16 PM

I agree, the story is pure fabrication, a load of crap. In a way its flattering to think that they will grasp at straws to put Mary in the magazine, I just wish that they would come up with something that is close to being true. Where do they come up with this? Its embarrasing.

Lizy 06-06-2006 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missjane
I just wish that they would come up with something that is close to being true. Where do they come up with this? Its embarrasing.

Probably because it catches people attention and makes them pick up the magazine and possibly buy it. "Princess Mary Blisfully Happy" as a headline doesn't really pack the same tabloid punch!

JessRulz 06-06-2006 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lizy
Probably because it catches people attention and makes them pick up the magazine and possibly buy it. "Princess Mary Blisfully Happy" as a headline doesn't really pack the same tabloid punch!

What Lizy has said is pretty true, many people wouldn't buy a magazine if it had "Mary's Fantastic Life" on the cover, week in week out, but they will if they see that there is some "gossip" on the cover about her, whether true or false

Here's this week's New Idea. Mary is in the bottom left corner. Sorry about the flash :o
http://img111.imageshack.us/img111/1...shop4fu.th.jpg
Source: Photo of my own copy


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises