The Royal Forums

The Royal Forums (http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/)
-   British Royals (http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f23/)
-   -   UN calls for referendum on Royal Family (http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f23/un-calls-for-referendum-on-royal-family-17334.html)

Skydragon 06-13-2008 01:11 PM

UN calls for referendum on Royal Family
 
The United Nations has said that the UK must consider whether they should keep the Royal Family.

UN: Should Britain scrap Royals? - Yahoo! News UK

GlitteringTiaras 06-13-2008 01:17 PM

Bizarre. Simply bizarre. The UK has more pressing issues to deal with then this nonsense.

Elspeth 06-13-2008 01:22 PM

Given that by the standards of the UN's own Human Development Index, constitutional monarchies appear to be the most successful form of government there is, I wonder why they're bothering.

Maybe they should look at Zimbabwe and Libya before getting too hung up on demanding that Britain "think about" scrapping its monarchy.

Rebafan81 06-13-2008 01:25 PM

I personally think the UN is a scary body and has completely lost the reason why they were set-up in the first place and should focus on more pressing issues.

Madame Royale 06-13-2008 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GlitteringTiaras (Post 778802)
Bizarre. Simply bizarre. The UK has more pressing issues to deal with then this nonsense.

Better yet, I'd have thought the UN has more pressing issues to deal with than that of a perfectly successfull and stable form of government. What a bunch of t@ssers!!

Nitefeatherz 06-13-2008 01:42 PM

This seems like a silly proposition to me. The Sri Lankan envoy proposed it? For what reasons? How does it benefit Sri Lanka for Britain to be a republic?

kimebear 06-13-2008 01:50 PM

Wow! I can think of a few countries where the monarchy should be abolished before the UK. Just another example of the futility of the UN. :bang:

Amelia 06-13-2008 02:01 PM

The UN Human Rights Council with members including Saudi Arabia, Cuba and Syria. Seriously :eek:.

Regina 06-13-2008 02:07 PM

I am atonished with all this nonsense from UN....

The UN serves to be a place where nations can discuss their concerns, and to address humanitarian needs. They have no authority to suggest a referendum like this one! It's simply bizarre. They should be more concerned with the countries with poor Human Rights records that are allowed to be on Human Rights Commissions! :eek:

fearghas 06-13-2008 04:40 PM

So iran complains about Sexual discrimination! What can you say about that! Syria complains about the UK disrimination against Muslims (I thought that the UK was too soft) and what on earth has it got to do with Sri Lanka?

bbb 06-13-2008 05:18 PM

we have a much ruder word on the farm than nonsense ********, another example how the UN is the biggest waste of time and resources in the world. with all the things this organization could be focused on this is it? crazy just crazy, the wolves are guarding the henhouse. the UN is part of the problem not part of the solution, grand ideal ends with.....corruption at it's worst. i think we need a referendum on the UN

btw what on earth has it got to do with sri lanka???? LONG LIVE THE QUEEN

PrincessofEurope 06-13-2008 05:36 PM

:angry: :furious: im mad :bang: at this stupid idea what right have they to interfere in a democratic country the UN is really a waste of time and money :censored:

why dont they sort other major problems in the world rather than attempting to deal with a system that appears to working perfecly
:boxing:who in the UN came up with this idea by the way :boxing:

the UN needs to :bee:out of the UK's busines and deal with real issues



:royalstandard:

Elspeth 06-13-2008 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrincessofEurope (Post 778887)
:angry: :furious: im mad :bang: at this stupid idea what right have they to interfere in a democratic country the UN is really a waste of time and money :censored:

why dont they sort other major problems in the world rather than attempting to deal with a system that appears to working perfecly
:boxing:who in the UN came up with this idea by the way :boxing:

the UN needs to :bee:out of the UK's busines and deal with real issues




:royalstandard:

Sri Lanka. Goodness only knows why. Course, it might have to do with all the criticism about human rights abuses in Sri Lanka by Amnesty International recently - perhaps they think that Britain's having a constitutional monarchy is a bad enough human rights abuse to deflect people's attention from their own sorry record.
I'm surprised Saudi Arabia went along with it. If they're so keen to promote republican forms of government, they might want to start at home.

kimebear 06-13-2008 06:57 PM

Right now I would pay money to see HM The Queen go to the UN herself. She could hand the Saudi Ambassador all the jewels they give the BRF like candy and politely tell him where he can put them.:whistling:

Russophile 06-13-2008 07:45 PM

The UN HAS pressing issues:
Insurgent attack frees hundreds from Kandahar prison

CasiraghiTrio 06-13-2008 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elspeth (Post 778897)
Sri Lanka. Goodness only knows why. Course, it might have to do with all the criticism about human rights abuses in Sri Lanka by Amnesty International recently - perhaps they think that Britain's having a constitutional monarchy is a bad enough human rights abuse to deflect people's attention from their own sorry record.
I'm surprised Saudi Arabia went along with it. If they're so keen to promote republican forms of government, they might want to start at home.

So it's only at the General Assembly level then? Then it means nothing. It's just some random ambassadors from random countries making a cry about nothing at all. The UN as a whole is NOT a waste of money though. It's just that some quarters acting in the UN's name bring discredit on it as a whole.

COUNTESS 06-13-2008 09:13 PM

Yes, you are right CT about the U.N. No one but the British, themselves, should decide when or if the RF should stay or go.

Maura724 06-13-2008 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COUNTESS (Post 778928)
No one but the British, themselves, should decide when or if the RF should stay or go.

Absolutely! For the UN to tell the British to think about getting rid of their centuries-old monarchy is insulting!:bang:

Winnie 06-13-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebafan81 (Post 778806)
I personally think the UN is a scary body and has completely lost the reason why they were set-up in the first place and should focus on more pressing issues.

I agree--I just can not believe that they have the nerve to even suggest such a thing. Are they a bunch of ego maniacs that feel they have the right to tell everyone how they are permitted to live and rule?

jcbcode99 06-14-2008 12:19 AM

I should think that the UN would have more important concerns to focus their time upon than the BRF. It really does not make sense to me. The monarchy is an important and vital part of both the present and the past in the UK. To abolish is simply assinine.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises