the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Weddings > Royal Weddings General Discussion





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #181  
Old 09-01-2005, 09:47 AM
mtbcm's Avatar
mtbcm mtbcm is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 1,132
Send a message via MSN to mtbcm
Default

I remember that when I saw the pics of this wedding I thought "What a brave Bride!". The way she choose her wedding gown against all that 80's big dresses.

I like this picture very much. The expression on Victoria make me think she was more serene at this time.


Her previous expressions made me think that she was going through a lot that day:( . We must concede that she was anorexic at that time, she had all that pressure in entering this family, she was going to be the sister-in-law of Diana (when Victoria considered herself the uggly duck), she and her fiancé aimed for a low-key wedding but the simple attendance of Diana her sons and Prince Charles threw that expectations to ground... when she thought this day couldn't get more difficult she arrived late (around 30 minutes) due to a storm that made her wet to the bones while walking from the car to the church.

I have a picture of Victoria covered with the veil but I wont show it because it will ruin all my defense .

Regards.

(I forgot the credits :o . Pictures from Hola magazine and posted Thanks to ImageShack for Free Image Hosting)

Last edited by mtbcm; 09-01-2005 at 10:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:26 AM
mtbcm's Avatar
mtbcm mtbcm is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 1,132
Send a message via MSN to mtbcm
Default

Ok! You're the boss!


I must add in defense that the dress, the veil and the bouquet are absolutely stunning. And the shoes... well they are original, don't you think?!


Forget the expression of relieve that Victoria must have below while enters the church hiding ....

Regards.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 09-02-2005, 04:52 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

shame but the last pics did nothing in her defense!!!
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 09-02-2005, 05:25 PM
iowabelle's Avatar
iowabelle iowabelle is offline
Royal Highness
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Des Moines, United States
Posts: 1,678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hania
shame but the last pics did nothing in her defense!!!
I didn't mind the dress (I actually thought it was pretty and different), but combine the dress with the veil and you have another burka. Maybe it would have worked with a more opaque veil, one that gives less of an impression of a sack hung over the bride.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 09-05-2005, 04:10 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

I think so too, the dress was nice but the veil gave a tent effect.shame, is there any pics of her more recent dress!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 09-05-2005, 10:33 AM
Harry's polo shirt's Avatar
Harry's polo shirt Harry's polo shirt is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: my paradise, United States
Posts: 2,092
Default

the color is awful

but I think the worst was Fergie.
__________________
What a dog I got, he found out we look alike, so he killed himself.--Rodney Dangerfield

Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 09-05-2005, 12:00 PM
Incas Incas is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: , Canada
Posts: 1,420
Default

I rather liked Sarah's dress. It's not so Cinderella-frills and puffs. It suited her age at the time of her wedding. Actually, I was quite surprised by her choice. Her wardrobe had lots of frilly collars and fringes before and even after her marriage. Her dress was considerably simpler and she looked great in it.
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 09-05-2005, 12:09 PM
sm1939's Avatar
sm1939 sm1939 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United Kingdom
Posts: 748
Default

I too was suprised about her wedding dress, it was much nicer than what I thought it would be , because she really didnt have the best taste in the world at that time .

Last edited by sm1939; 09-05-2005 at 12:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 09-05-2005, 05:46 PM
kelly9480 kelly9480 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, United States
Posts: 857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iowabelle
Isabel, I agree. I wonder why they didn't do a "mock up" and put the dress in the coach and see how it would travel. (Maybe they just weren't thinking about that.)
They once admitted to not taking into account how small the coach was and how large Earl Spencer was. Between the size of the dress, the size of Diana, and the size of Johnnie, it's no wonder the poor thing got wrinkled. Of course, a different fabric, one resistant to wrinkling, would have been a better idea, but hindsight's 20/20.
__________________
Kelly D
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 09-06-2005, 03:16 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

I dont think at the time, they knew about other fabrics and things!!!
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old 09-06-2005, 09:31 AM
Fashionista100's Avatar
Fashionista100 Fashionista100 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 586
Default

Countess Spencers dress imo was beautiful. What I hate most about royal weddings is that the dresses are dull, dull, dull. At least Victoria's was unique. Her dress was gold, not yellow or brown. Her hair was up, but it fell down in the carriage and there was not time to put it up again. It is one of my most favorite wedding gowns.
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 09-06-2005, 11:23 AM
pollyemma's Avatar
pollyemma pollyemma is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington,DC, United States
Posts: 2,066
Send a message via AIM to pollyemma
Default

Princess Elena's dress is not that bad. just kind of old-fashioned. not nearly as bad as some of what we've seen in this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:10 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

i also think the same, it is just a bit boring for the time and era!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 09-08-2005, 08:09 PM
lashinka2002 lashinka2002 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,102
Default

Countess Spencer looks like a very stylish ghost at Halloween!
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 09-09-2005, 06:25 AM
Mahoogie's Avatar
Mahoogie Mahoogie is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 348
Default

Countess Spencer looks like a very stylish ghost at Halloween!

I hate to say this but I guess you are right..She didnt look good on her wedding day.She was very thin and the dress seemed bigger and the Spencer tiara didnt look good on her.The Spencer tiara looked better when it was worn by Lady Diana on her wedding day.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 09-14-2005, 02:58 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

Annette Sekreve is one of the prettiest orange daughter in law but her dress was such a ill choice!!!! the veil seemed to overpower her!~!!!



Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 09-14-2005, 04:12 AM
galuhcandrakirana galuhcandrakirana is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 938
Default

This veil style reamined me with the one queen Beatrix wore in her wedding but she has the short one. Just quite simmilar but Betrix's veil looked much better.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 09-14-2005, 05:04 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

this one was to envelopin and overpowered her!!!
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 09-15-2005, 04:32 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

did anyonme see camilla daughter in law's dress????what did u think??
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 09-16-2005, 07:48 PM
Lillia Lillia is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,032
Default

My goodness -- Laura Ponte actually did manage to smile a couple of times on her wedding day !

http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...chmentid=41570

Beltrán Gómez-Acebo Borbón & Laura Ponte 2004
Reply With Quote
Reply