the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Other Things Royal > Royal Weddings > Royal Weddings General Discussion





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 01-11-2005, 03:28 PM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

I agree that princess alexander of denmark looked terrible and laura ponte has to take the prize as the worst dressed,i know that ones wishes to be different on their wedding day but her outfit was different alright,different and weird!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 01-12-2005, 01:59 AM
cute_girl's Avatar
cute_girl cute_girl is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hania
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/attachment.php
attachmentid=72463&stc=1&thumb=1
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...&stc=1&thumb=1hi guys,can anyone explain to me why these muslim brides have these on their heads,i have many muslims friends,and none of them had to cover their heads in this way.is it only specific to their country,it does not do much to highlight their features and actually hides their pretty faces.
beacuse they care about covering their hair as a must in islam
ps.so many moslem women dont wear scarves cause they dont care
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-12-2005, 05:34 AM
galuhcandrakirana galuhcandrakirana is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hania
I agree that princess alexander of denmark looked terrible and laura ponte has to take the prize as the worst dressed,i know that ones wishes to be different on their wedding day but her outfit was different alright,different and weird!
Personaly I like Alexandra's wedding gown it's style realy suitable for Denmark winter...but her hairstyle is not my favorite one, its too big and with her big veils its looked more dominant than her tiara . I love the kind of Laura ponte veils (embroderry) but the gown so
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-12-2005, 04:16 PM
semisquare semisquare is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 832
Default

can we say there is a winner for the worst dress bride.
1st place is laura ponte's dress with the upside down tiara .
__________________
ain' no sunshine when i gone
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-12-2005, 05:37 PM
Jo's Avatar
Jo Jo is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somewhere, United States
Posts: 181
Default

I didn't like Letizia's dress. It's looked too big for her and the neck style didn't do anything for her either. :(
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-12-2005, 07:14 PM
Nichola's Avatar
Nichola Nichola is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: , United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Default

It must be so difficult for a Royal bride-to-be to choose the 'perfect' dress.

One which particularly stands out for me as being the worst was that of Princess Mabel, what was she thinking with all of those bows!
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 01-13-2005, 06:37 AM
ladybelline's Avatar
ladybelline ladybelline is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: *, France
Posts: 457
Default

I agree both for Laura Ponte and Mabel Wisse Smit.

I would add Marie Chantal Miller: her dres was a copy of Princess Grace, but I don-t really think it fits her...and I don't like the veil and tiara either.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 01-13-2005, 11:37 AM
semisquare semisquare is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 832
Default

i fine it hard to believe that a princess cannot find the perfect wedding dress, they have so many people to help then chose a dress and money(i'm guessing) is not a problem. but as this thread shows a lot of them have made the worng choice of gown. nice case of poetic justice-any of us have look great in our wedding gowns and have spent a fourth of what theirs gown cost. sweet
__________________
ain' no sunshine when i gone
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 01-13-2005, 02:53 PM
Fashionista100's Avatar
Fashionista100 Fashionista100 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 586
Default

I agree, royal bridal gowns have gone downhill. They often are ill fitting, and ugly. I think the court has a lot to do with it. They dictate the the woman marrying the prince not outshine him, and the gowns must be old fashioned and bland. Look at Mary. I have no doubt that the court and Queen Margarethe, and an old man for a designer did that to her. I doubt she spoke up b/c she did not fell it was her place. She probally said "oh this is fine" but deep down I am sure it is not the dress she wanted.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 01-14-2005, 09:22 AM
cute_girl's Avatar
cute_girl cute_girl is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,148
Default

I really dont think they're forced to wear a certain kinda dress,it's their taste of fashion and style which is not always good for every1
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 01-14-2005, 05:29 PM
mgrant's Avatar
mgrant mgrant is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charleston, United States
Posts: 386
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by cute_girl
I really dont think they're forced to wear a certain kinda dress,it's their taste of fashion and style which is not always good for every1
Yeah, but I wonder if they're not forced to a certain, gentle degree. The wedding gowns are always very demure without too much ornamentation and not too much exposure of the flesh at the arms, neck or legs.

The only thing the brides seem to be allowed free rein is their hairdos and even at that, the hair can't too outlandish because those tiaras have to go somewhere

I seriously doubt that we would ever see a royal bride in a gown that is strapless, off the shoulder, shortsleeved, with a sweetheart or scoop neckline. But, I always look for it I figure that one day one roayl bride will be daring enough to marry in gowns like one of those.

Laura Ponte is not one of those brides...not by a long shot
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 01-14-2005, 10:45 PM
Alexandria Alexandria is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: , Canada
Posts: 4,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgrant
I seriously doubt that we would ever see a royal bride in a gown that is strapless, off the shoulder, shortsleeved, with a sweetheart or scoop neckline. But, I always look for it I figure that one day one roayl bride will be daring enough to marry in gowns like one of those.
For her 1997 wedding, Cristina of Spain wore a strapless, off the shoulder gown and got a lot of flack for going bare-shouldered, especially for a Catholic ceremony. Personally, her dress is one of my all time favourite royal wedding dresses, and if you compare her strapless, bare-shouldered number to other similarl styled dresses in bridal shops or magazines, her dress was pretty demure. Nothing about it revealed very much flesh. It came well above her chest and had long sleeves. The only visible skin were (barely) the tops of her shoulders and her collar bone. Most modern day brides show a lot more skin than that!

Claire of Belgium's dress was also strapless and bare-shouldered. (I think Claire's dress actually showed more than Cristina's.) Probably two of the most "revealing" royal bridal gowns in recent history!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SP-cristina-inaki-wedding-527f.jpg (50.4 KB, 469 views)
File Type: jpg BM-laurent-claire-wedding-196.jpg (27.3 KB, 551 views)
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 01-15-2005, 03:35 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

i personally think that the above two looked beautiful on their wedding day and even mary's dress has a hint of her shoulders showing!i also thought that marie chantal had a terrible dress and her whole appearnce was so not her.i think that although a princess or royal does have a pretty dress or hair, her happiness can make up for it
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 01-15-2005, 06:08 AM
Louise's Avatar
Louise Louise is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Denmark
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fashionista100
I agree, royal bridal gowns have gone downhill. They often are ill fitting, and ugly. I think the court has a lot to do with it. They dictate the the woman marrying the prince not outshine him, and the gowns must be old fashioned and bland. Look at Mary. I have no doubt that the court and Queen Margarethe, and an old man for a designer did that to her. I doubt she spoke up b/c she did not fell it was her place. She probally said "oh this is fine" but deep down I am sure it is not the dress she wanted.
I would just like to point out, that the designer of Marys dress (Uffe Frank), is quite young, he's 41, he works in Milano, and is quite a wellknown designer. And as far as I've heard the only thing Queen Margrethe had any influence on was the dresses and colours of the bridemaids dresses.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 01-15-2005, 11:10 AM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

as i was sayin early,even maxima didnt have a fabolous dress(the high neck was too plain)but the fact that she looked so bubbly and happy and exudes such happiness and the way she cried in the church made her beautiful and lokk like a really blushing bride,even mary looked the same way,they gave off this warmt5h
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 01-16-2005, 10:32 PM
james james is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: glasgow, United Kingdom
Posts: 377
Default

I think the simplicity of Maxima's dress was breathtakingly beautiful. I am not one for frills and flounces and thought she looked georgous.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 01-16-2005, 11:01 PM
Nathalian's Avatar
Nathalian Nathalian is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 388
Default

I didn´t like Rania´s dress.....no no no...Also, deslike Mabel´s, Caroline´s and Stephanie´s...
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 01-19-2005, 05:09 PM
Humera's Avatar
Humera Humera is offline
Super Moderator
Picture of the Month Representative – Brunei, Dubai,
Jordan, Malaysia, and Morocco
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Canada
Posts: 5,798
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hania
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/attachment.php?
attachmentid=72463&stc=1&thumb=1
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums...&stc=1&thumb=1hi guys,can anyone explain to me why these muslim brides have these on their heads,i have many muslims friends,and none of them had to cover their heads in this way.is it only specific to their country,it does not do much to highlight their features and actually hides their pretty faces.
that is the daughter of the Turkish PM. I haven't seen girls that wear the hijab (head scarf) in their day-to-day life wear it at their weddings. But it all depends on the woman's culture, and her family. In the case of the Turkish PM's daughter, she obviously wore it because all the women in her family do.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 01-21-2005, 02:54 PM
hania hania is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 213
Default

i see,but does that mean that they have to cover their entire head?
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 01-22-2005, 12:44 AM
cute_girl's Avatar
cute_girl cute_girl is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,148
Default

I dont think they cover their hair because their family do,it's a matter of belief and I think some people do it because they believe in hijab,and yes hijab is covering all your hair and body exept hands and feet(just from the wrist to fingers or toes) and face
Reply With Quote