![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do you know which countries?
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's what I read:
Felipe's and Letizia's wedding was the most watched one! 2 100 000 000 people saw it in TV. Charles and Diana's Wedding was was watched by 750 000 000 people.
__________________
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() That's an impressive reasult! I guess it was broadcasted in all Spanish/Portuguese-speaking countries, and some internetional channels too (I remember a life, albeit brief, broadcast by Euronews). ![]() All I can say is, I was one of those 2.100.000.000 people. ![]()
__________________
Queen Elizabeth: "I cannot lead you into battle, I do not give you laws or administer justice but I can do something else, I can give you my heart and my devotion to these old islands and to all the peoples of our brotherhood of nations." God, Save The Queen! |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
probably the next wedding that would draw in huge viewing figures across the world will be William (and Kate)
__________________
This is the stuff of fairytales
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think Crown Princess Victoria's! (It will probably be huge)
I think William will wait a few more years. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spanish and British royal weddings would draw the most TV audiences because of the number of former colonies each had worldwide. A royal wedding of any Scandinivian country would not be comparable because their small population and few audiences outside of their own country. Victoria will have to marry an American movie star to get an audience of any size. Fred's wedding was probably watched by 25 millions even if everyone in Denmark and Australia tuned in.
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, no, i agree it will probably not be send in the US, they are mostly only interested in the British royalty.
But it will be send in Scandinavia, Germany, Austria, The Netherlands, France and a bunch of other European countries. So it will draw more visitors then, let's say Marie and Joachim's wedding. Royal weddings are something even people watch that normally don't care for royalty. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Grace Kelly married in the 50s. In the early 60s, the old American Telephone and Telegraph Company hired the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to put a spherical object into orbit that was girdled with antennae. It was called Telstar and it flew in a highly elliptical orbit.
Telstar was rapidly joined by the first modern communications satellite, Syncom, that orbited once a day just like most communications satellites do today. Diana's wedding was watched in real time by a huge number of people linked by geosynchronous satellites. But culture is also a factor. Letizia's wedding was broadcast in the USA on Univision, a Hispanic network. The Anglo media paid no attention. But there are many millions from the Rio Bravo to Cape Horn who are Hispanic, plus Europeans. Television sets probably made more inroads everywhere too between Diana's wedding and Letizia's. The difference between Diana's and Letizia's audiences can be accounted for by there being more Hispanics than Anglos and more television sets everywhere. I don't think the Swedish Crown Princess' wedding will get much attention outside of Europe, satellites or no. Sweden did not establish a far flung Swedish-speaking commonwealth. The UK wedding will be followed, with help from satellites, in Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand as well as the USA. Most Americans do not know who Mary Donaldson Glucksberg or Letizia Ortiz Borbon are, so it is hard for an American to guess at audiences for a royal wedding. But I predict that if Victoria marries at the time of some unpleasantness like OJ Simpson's or Scott Peterson's trials, her wedding will hardly be noted in the USA. The US media spent minutes on Peterson's trial and just thirty seconds on North Korea the day North Korea announced they had nuclear weapons.
__________________
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
Samuel Johnson - April 7, 1775 |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Charles and Diana for sure!
__________________
MaryDfan YOUR DAILY CLICK HELPS ANIMALS SURVIVE provides food for an animal in a shelter or sanctuary. Feed an animal in need, click for free.http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it is the Charles and Diana wedding. Grace was popular but not many people had a tv at that time.
I think The spanish wedding and the danish are also popular. Maybe they are second and third. |
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow! 2.1 billion people watched Letizia's wedding?! That is huge. I always thought that it was Charles and Diana's wedding that attracted the most viewers, but I was wrong. I wonder how many people will watch William's wedding when he marries? I wonder if the number will be more than the number for his parents?
|
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I totally believe that Letizia's wedding was the most watched royal wedding. All South America was interested and here in Europe, all the Portuguese people I know didn't lost a piece of it
![]() |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, It has to be C&D beyond all doubt. But I will add here that I have never seen a royal wedding (although I did see Charles and Camilla's blessing) as there really isnt anywhere near enough demand here in NZ. Which has frustrated me no end.
|
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
The marital perturbations of Charles and Di and Di's later antics made their marriage the most "watched" "marriage" in history even if more people watched the wedding of Letizia and Felipe!
![]()
__________________
"Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
Samuel Johnson - April 7, 1775 Last edited by gogm; 02-25-2008 at 11:34 PM. Reason: Substitute correct word. |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
I remember watching the weddings of Felipe & Letizia, Fred & Mary, and of course Charles and Diana. However, I'm certain I didn't see W-A and Maxima's.
I was not aware that Letizia and Felipe held the distinction of having the most watched wedding. Wow! |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
According to this blog, Charles and Diana's wedding was the most watched ever : over 17 million viewers.
But if you look at wikipedia's record here, it went to 28.40 million viewers. (as you can see, her funeral attracted more people ...)
__________________
The Truth is out there ... Never interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
In my personal opinion, I believe that the most watched Royal Wedding is Princess Dianaīs. Because British Royalty is known in the world. On the other hand, I donīt agree 2.1 billion people watched letizia and felipe wedding, for example in United States donīt know about spanish royals. There, is popular Princess Diana, her sons: William and Harry; maybe Caroline, Albert and Stephanie of Monaco.
|
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
MARTHA, I am from the USA and watched the entire wedding of Letizia & Felipe along with almost everyone else that I know here. We, also watched Diana & Charles but since it was rerun on cable the following Saturday, most of us went to work the actual day. Never even saw a blip about Maxima and Alexander's wedding on the news. Since over 13% of the population of America are now Spanish speaking, Felipe's wedding was quite a draw on the TV.
I do not speak the Spanish language, but some of the cable stations did have sub titles. |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Winnie, yes I know that in United States have a lot of spanish population. However, 13 percent is about 18 million more less, If you suposse that all people watched letizia and felipe wedding.
|