The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 03-22-2011, 11:23 PM
windsorbrides1's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Branson, United States
Posts: 87
Interesting Facts About British Royal Brides

I found this article on Yahoo. Thought everyone would like to see it.

Facts About Royal Brides - Associated Content from Yahoo! - associatedcontent.com
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-23-2011, 12:27 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: snowsville, Canada
Posts: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by windsorbrides1 View Post
I found this article on Yahoo. Thought everyone would like to see it.

Facts About Royal Brides - Associated Content from Yahoo! - associatedcontent.com
Most of it was just basic known stuff. But it was cute, Elizabeth recieved 200 pairs of nylons for wedding gifts. I guess back then they were a luxury, since even the queen had to use ration coupons to buy her dress. She likely didn't have to, but it showed real integrity, that Elizabeth would follow the rules the people had to.

I didn't realize Princess Anne actually dated Andrew Parker-Bowles, Camilla's ex husband, but broke up because he was catholic and she'd have to give up her right to succession. And that Andrew met Camilla, while dating Charles' sister, and went after her when Charles left for the navy.

Or that while Diana, a virgin, was believed to have lived with the queen mother at Clarence house during the engagement so the woman could shield her innocence, she was actually at Buckingham palace. She was worried Charles would not give up Camilla. She almost backed out but her sister Sarah told her 'your face is already on tea towels, it's too late to chicken out now.'

Sarah's father was Andrew's polo manager so they knew each other as kids. But it was Diana who introduced them as adults. Diana invited Sarah to sit with them at Ascot. Andrew tried to force feed her chocolate cream puffs since she was on a diet. Her train because of his initial on it was dubbed the 'a train', how original.

Sophie and Edward are the most interesting, probably for me since they were the wedding I got to watch, old enough to remember. The sun had sold a picture of one of Sophie's friends lifting her bikini top. The palace went after them for premeditated cruelty, and the newspaper donated all the profits to Sophie's favorite charity as an apology. They were criticized for some very expensive gifts on their gift list including camera equipment. The wedding was mainly family and celebrity friends. Prince William taught line dancing, the Queen and York girls did YMCA dance, and the queen mother did the twist.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-23-2011, 12:52 AM
PrincessKaimi's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hilo, Malibu, United States
Posts: 1,329
Meilissandrian, you just made my whole day/week/month worthwhile. It's so wonderful that you share your memories. I remember only Diana and Charles's wedding ( I think perhaps I was without television during part of the rest), but even had I been paying more attention, I probably wouldn't remember all these details.

More please!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-23-2011, 01:12 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by melissaadrian View Post

Or that while Diana, a virgin, was believed to have lived with the queen mother at Clarence house during the engagement so the woman could shield her innocence, she was actually at Buckingham palace. She was worried Charles would not give up Camilla. She almost backed out but her sister Sarah told her 'your face is already on tea pots, it's too late to chicken out now.
It's amusing how everyone hears something different. I've only ever heard, or read, that her sister told her that her face was already on the tea towles, not tea pots.

It often becomes a sort of royal 'chinese whispers'.
__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2011, 01:33 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: snowsville, Canada
Posts: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincessKaimi View Post
Meilissandrian, you just made my whole day/week/month worthwhile. It's so wonderful that you share your memories. I remember only Diana and Charles's wedding ( I think perhaps I was without television during part of the rest), but even had I been paying more attention, I probably wouldn't remember all these details.

More please!
Madam Royal, you're right the quote was tea towels, I fixed it.

Edward VII rejected his dad's wish for him to marry German, he thought they were all not attractive enough. Victoria and Alexander II both wanted Alexandra for their heirs. When Alexandra agreed to marry Edward, she cemented her sister becoming Maria Federovna of Russia (formerly Princess Dagmar of Denmark). Though their dad was heir to the throne, their parents were not rich, the sisters shared a bedroom, and even sewed their own dresses. They wed after Albert died, so other than the bride and her ladies, all the ladies of court had to wear gray or lilac, as the court was still in mourning.

George V was station in the navy in Malta with his Uncle the Duke of Edinburgh. He fell in love with his cousin, Lady Marie. His father and Uncle supported it, but both their mothers were opposed. Marie eventually became queen of Romania. His brother was set to marry Princess Mary 'May' a beloved goddaughter of Victoria, when he died of pnemonia before the wedding. May lay her wedding boquet of orange blossoms on the grave. Her and George bonded as they mourned, and though basically an arranged marriage, were extremely happy and had 6 kids.

Duke of York proposed for two years before the queen mum said yes. His mother went to her family castle, to meet this woman who stole his son's heart. She was said to approve, but would not step in. The newly founded BBC wanted to air the wedding live on the radio, but the archbishop said no. He worried it would be broadcast in Brothels and Pubs.

Elizabeth met Philip, when he was assigned to escort her, when his Uncle was giving her and her parents a tour of Dartmouth naval college. She was smitten and they wrote many letters. Her mother disapproved at first, and was known to call Philip 'The Hun'. His sisters were unable to attend the wedding as they were German princesses, and it was after the war. The Princess Royal refused to attend, officially due to illness, but it was known because her brother Duke of Windsor was not invited.

Or Prince Edward and Andrew put the customary 'just married' sign on the back of the carriage for Diana and Charles, raising huge smiles. They took the carriage to the train station, as they took a train to start their honeymoon.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2011, 08:10 PM
PrincessKaimi's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hilo, Malibu, United States
Posts: 1,329
Wow - so many great details.

I didn't realize the Princess Royale refused to attend on account of her brother - that's touching. What a difficult time that was for the family. I think it changed them forever. It was almost as if the Duke of Windsor insisted on modernizing the family, in his own way - and now we actually have the future heir married to a divorced woman (although not an American and not twice-divorced, but still).

And then there was Queen Victoria, who seemed to try and make time stand still for almost a century...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-24-2011, 12:50 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: snowsville, Canada
Posts: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincessKaimi View Post
Wow - so many great details.

I didn't realize the Princess Royale refused to attend on account of her brother - that's touching. What a difficult time that was for the family. I think it changed them forever. It was almost as if the Duke of Windsor insisted on modernizing the family, in his own way - and now we actually have the future heir married to a divorced woman (although not an American and not twice-divorced, but still).

And then there was Queen Victoria, who seemed to try and make time stand still for almost a century...
I love even queens have to listen to their mother. Queen Victoria was single when she took the throne. Because she was a single woman in those times, she had to live with her mother. Her and mother didn't get along though so she shoved her mother in the furthest wing of Buckingham palace, and often refused to meet her. Lord Melbourne suggested her only out was marriage, and she eventually proposed (pretty modern of her to propose) and married Albert. Her mother was kicked out on her royal bum to Ingestre house finally. After the death of Princess Augusta, Victoria's Aunt, she was given Clarence and Frogmore houses. Albert seemed a peace maker between the two.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-24-2011, 05:32 AM
Esmerelda's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,215
Didn't Victoria have to propose because she was Queen? She probably resented her mother because of all that had happened before she came to the throne.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-24-2011, 07:39 AM
wymanda's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by melissaadrian View Post
George V was station in the navy in Malta with his Uncle the Duke of Edinburgh. He fell in love with his cousin, Lady Marie.

She was not "Lady Marie", she was correctly titled "HRH Princess Marie of Edinburgh"
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-04-2015, 08:01 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 3,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esmerelda View Post
Didn't Victoria have to propose because she was Queen? She probably resented her mother because of all that had happened before she came to the throne.
Esmeralda, You are correct.
Because Albert was only a Prince and she was the Queen Regnant of England, Victoria proposed to Albert.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-04-2015, 08:28 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 2,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by melissaadrian View Post
Madam Royal, you're right the quote was tea towels, I fixed it.

Edward VII rejected his dad's wish for him to marry German, he thought they were all not attractive enough. Victoria and Alexander II both wanted Alexandra for their heirs. When Alexandra agreed to marry Edward, she cemented her sister becoming Maria Federovna of Russia (formerly Princess Dagmar of Denmark). Though their dad was heir to the throne, their parents were not rich, the sisters shared a bedroom, and even sewed their own dresses. They wed after Albert died, so other than the bride and her ladies, all the ladies of court had to wear gray or lilac, as the court was still in mourning.

George V was station in the navy in Malta with his Uncle the Duke of Edinburgh. He fell in love with his cousin, Lady Marie. His father and Uncle supported it, but both their mothers were opposed. Marie eventually became queen of Romania. His brother was set to marry Princess Mary 'May' a beloved goddaughter of Victoria, when he died of pnemonia before the wedding. May lay her wedding boquet of orange blossoms on the grave. Her and George bonded as they mourned, and though basically an arranged marriage, were extremely happy and had 6 kids.

Duke of York proposed for two years before the queen mum said yes. His mother went to her family castle, to meet this woman who stole his son's heart. She was said to approve, but would not step in. The newly founded BBC wanted to air the wedding live on the radio, but the archbishop said no. He worried it would be broadcast in Brothels and Pubs.

Elizabeth met Philip, when he was assigned to escort her, when his Uncle was giving her and her parents a tour of Dartmouth naval college. She was smitten and they wrote many letters. Her mother disapproved at first, and was known to call Philip 'The Hun'. His sisters were unable to attend the wedding as they were German princesses, and it was after the war. The Princess Royal refused to attend, officially due to illness, but it was known because her brother Duke of Windsor was not invited.

Or Prince Edward and Andrew put the customary 'just married' sign on the back of the carriage for Diana and Charles, raising huge smiles. They took the carriage to the train station, as they took a train to start their honeymoon.
Phillip's sister were not invited because they were married to German Princes, several of whom were Nazis.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-04-2015, 10:49 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,222
Why are people answering questions or commenting on posts from 2011 - that is three years ago???
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-05-2015, 02:55 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Detroit, United States
Posts: 367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Why are people answering questions or commenting on posts from 2011 - that is three years ago???
The particular poster who did that is very fond of pulling up very old posts with inane comments or questions. I read this forum a lot less since he's started posting.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-12-2016, 01:23 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,497
I don't see what Is wrong with a new member looking at old posts and trying to get a discussion going again..
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-12-2016, 01:35 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,961
I really don't either and think its kind of nice when someone "bumps up" an old, dusty thread. It puts it back out there to the attention of people that may not have known such a topic or thread even existed and perhaps spark a continuing conversation.

Some threads here started waaaaay back when. TRF is really like a huge archive that has to be the best over the years. Iluvbertie's continuing the thread on the British Royal Engagements is a godsend that even years from now, we can go back and find out exactly what someone was doing on what day and where if we wanted to.

Knowledge is power.
__________________
To finish the moment, to find the journey's end in every step of the road, to live the greatest numbers of good hours, is wisdom.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-12-2016, 11:30 PM
CyrilVladisla's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Conneaut, United States
Posts: 3,160
Isabella of Valois was six when she wed Richard II.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-12-2016, 11:39 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,961
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyrilVladisla View Post
Isabella of Valois was six when she wed Richard II.
Now there is a clear example of a dynastic, arrainged marriage eh?
__________________
To finish the moment, to find the journey's end in every step of the road, to live the greatest numbers of good hours, is wisdom.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-13-2016, 12:09 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,014
What's the alternative? That some of these more esoteric threads slumber in the mists for three, five, seven years? Of course they should be take a look at and be posted in!

Isabella was widowed by the time she was nine or ten, wasn't she? I think Richard grew fond of her in a big-brotherish sort of way. He tried to protect her while the dynastic fighting was going on. She returned to France and later married again, dying very young giving birth to her only child.

At least most of these child brides were not forced to consummate the marriage until they'd reached puberty. In this regard I always think of the difficult birth of Henry VII when his mother Margaret Beaufort was only 14. She was widowed soon afterwards as well. That birth must have damaged Margaret gynaecologically as, although she married twice more, there were no more children.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-14-2016, 07:50 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
What's the alternative? That some of these more esoteric threads slumber in the mists for three, five, seven years? Of course they should be take a look at and be posted in!

the marriage until they'd reached puberty. In this regard I always think of the difficult birth of Henry VII when his mother Margaret Beaufort was only 14. She was widowed soon afterwards as well. That birth must have damaged Margaret gynaecologically as, although she married twice more, there were no more children.
we don't know that though. she might have jus been unlucky (or maybe lucky) and did not conceive again.
I think that generally royals were carful with young people, they didn't want them to not produce at least a couple of children and so, tended to try and ensure that they were guarded from consummaton and child bearing too soon. I believe that Richard was fond of Isabelle and looked after her..and he didn't want to consummate the marriage too soon.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-14-2016, 08:32 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,881
Historians (from what I have read) indicate that M. Beaufort was so damaged from the birth of Henry she was unable to have more children.

Perhaps there are some old documents they've seen discussing it.


LaRae
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Favourite British Royal Name? carlota Royal Chit Chat 162 08-21-2017 09:28 AM
Your Favourite Historical British Royal? LLaura Royalty Past, Present, and Future 227 04-18-2014 10:42 PM
Questions about some recent British Royal Weddings Liamdarcybrown Royal Weddings 8 02-05-2011 11:48 AM




Popular Tags
birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill coel hen crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events denmark duchess of cambridge cocktail dresses duchess of cambridge eveningwear earl of snowdon family general news gloucester hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume hereditary princess sophie infanta cristina infanta elena infanta leonor infanta sofia italy iñaki iñaki urdangarín king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy morgan news prince prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince jean prince liam prince nicholas prince oscar prince sebastian princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess mary casual style princess of asturias princess sofia princess sofia style princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia eveningwear queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen mathildes hats queen maxima queen silvia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises