 |
|

06-12-2011, 02:54 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,977
|
|
|
I would like to add my favorite wedding gowns from our current queens
1.Anne-Marie(She is still really a queen!)
2.Sofia
3.Margrethe(I wouldnt wear but I still loved it!)
Worst
1.Raina
2.Silvia
3.Beatrix
4.Sonja
Elizabeth's and Paola's were nice but I did'nt love them.
|

06-20-2011, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 1,891
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellydofc
|
I just discovered this one a few days ago and I agree that it needs to be mentioned. It is very beautiful and I wish a famous modern bride would wear it so we can get better pictures.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
|

06-20-2011, 08:33 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Coast, United States
Posts: 98
|
|
|
My favorite overall looks:
The Duchess of Cornwall on the day of her marriage to The Prince of Wales. Great outfits and headpieces - the best she had ever looked in my opinion.
The Crown Princess of Sweden - I would say she had one of the more boring wedding dresses, but her whole ensemble with the tiara and veil were a knockout.
Sarah, Duchess of York - Another British Royal bride I would say looked her best ever on her wedding day. Though I have qualms with her dress (the "A" on the train *shudders* so tacky), she made a beautiful bride.
|

06-21-2011, 02:12 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Palm Springs, United States
Posts: 3,977
|
|
|
Here are the dresses I love but,would not wear.
(In no specific order)
Mathilde
Fabiola
Martha Louise
Margrethe
Alexandra of Kent
Princess Anne
Lady Sarah Chatto
|

06-21-2011, 03:21 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 1,891
|
|
|
:giggles: I just have to say that ever since I saw that picture that Super Baroness used for her avatar I have thought that William is posing for a boyband picture.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
|

06-21-2011, 07:24 PM
|
 |
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Coast, United States
Posts: 98
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by XeniaCasaraghi
:giggles: I just have to say that ever since I saw that picture that Super Baroness used for her avatar I have thought that William is posing for a boyband picture.
|
I think he's pushing out his lips to keep the strap of his hat in place! Which makes for quite the picture.  I laugh every time I look it!
|

06-21-2011, 07:28 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kellydofc
|
That gown is sooooo stunning isn't it?? I don't know why it is so overlooked...it is straight out of a medieval fairy tale. It's beautiful!
IloveCP...I feel the same way about Fabiola's gown...it's gorgeous but I would not wear it because...well...it looks like something only a QUEEN or someone on a movie set would wear!
|

06-22-2011, 04:41 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 1,891
|
|
|
Which woman got married first, Margaret or Katherine, Duchess of Kent. The gowns look like they had similar styles of skirts; so I wonder if they were inspired by each other.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
|

06-22-2011, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
|
Margaret married first, in May of 1960...then Katharine Worsley followed one year later in June 1961.
That era of bridal gowns had very big bouffant skirts as well as hair styles!
|

06-22-2011, 09:31 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 1,891
|
|
|
I'm surprised, for some reason when I think of the 60s I think of hippy wedding dresses, or was that the 70's? Either way a royal couldn't get married in that kind of gown.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
|

07-02-2011, 03:47 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Worcester, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,338
|
|
Charlene is right up amongst the top imo
Charlene
|

07-02-2011, 05:20 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 1,903
|
|
|
She was magnificent. Just stunning. Head to toe.
|

07-02-2011, 05:29 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 2,997
|
|
|
I agree with you COUNTESS.
I think Kate was a beautiful bride, but there was somthing missing...she would not have looked out of place in a village church wedding.
Charlene? Can anyone see that dress at some regular parish church with it's magnificent diamonds, crystals and 20 foot court train?
That is how a Royal bride should look, imo.
|

07-02-2011, 05:43 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Close to The Hague, Netherlands
Posts: 744
|
|
|
Still Catherine is among my favourite brides, she was dressed as how a proper bride looks in my eyes.
Charlene, not so much. There was something missing for me and I don't like how her veil was positioned.
|

07-02-2011, 05:43 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 1,903
|
|
|
Yes, Kate was lovely, but her train was too short, something was missing. You are right, moonmaiden23, Charlene was "royal". Very elegant. Very simple.
|

07-02-2011, 05:49 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Close to The Hague, Netherlands
Posts: 744
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by COUNTESS
Yes, Kate was lovely, but her train was too short, something was missing. You are right, moonmaiden23, Charlene was "royal". Very elegant. Very simple.
|
Well, that's what opinions are for - they can be the same or differ  .
Charlene was too simple for me - the same story as Princess Victoria. I do like the embroidery on the front of her gown, but that is not enough for me. To each his/her own, I say  .
|

07-02-2011, 06:06 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: n/a, United States
Posts: 107
|
|
|
Catherine was the best for me, it looked like a wedding dress to me. I liked alot of the dresses various ladies wore but I liked hers the best.
|

07-02-2011, 06:12 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 1,891
|
|
|
I think Kate had one of the best trains out of all royal brides. Some of these women just go long just because they can, not caring if it actually goes with the dress.
__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
|

07-02-2011, 06:19 PM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,720
|
|
|
For me Kate remains the more distuinguished bride then Charlene,if we take the style.But Charlene's style anyway was very graceful and suited her perfectly,both outfits reflected two brides personalities.Charlene's train was a bit too long I think.
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|