the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > Royal House of Jordan





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 08-15-2004, 07:54 AM
La la's Avatar
La la La la is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Posts: 1,132
Default

That's a billion dollar question.

Last edited by La la; 08-15-2004 at 09:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 08-15-2004, 08:08 AM
wymanda's Avatar
wymanda wymanda is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,123
Default

"In what may be our last couple weeks together"

What do you mean? I ain't going anywhere!
__________________
60th Birthday of HRH Charles, The Prince of Wales on November 14th 2008

Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 08-17-2004, 12:22 AM
Balqis's Avatar
Balqis Balqis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 430
Default

I would watch what I say girls. Slander is a serious thing. To allude here and in other threads that aid from abroad is going into the private accounts of the Jordan Royal Family is a serious accusation. To accuse somone in the Arab world of stealing money is very offensive. If you have proof then that's another matter. Speculating in a totally unfounded way with no real evidence to back up what you say is very tricky.
The JRF have their own private wealth, accumulated way before King Abdullah II ascended to the throne. Most families in power in the Middle East have private wealth that has nothing to do with their country's wealth. Some flaunt their wealth in an extravagant way, some keep it very private. I think being descended from the Prophet Mohammed has given the Hashemites a profound sense of duty to the well-being of their subjects. It is part of their code of honour. To say that money meant for the poor is used to line their pockets, well what can I say? It's incredibly scandal-mongering, what a way to sling mud...
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 08-17-2004, 12:40 AM
Humble
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

And if they are descendent of the prophet Mohamed, shouldn't they be the first to practice the religion (e.g. their women should wear Hijjab). We know how Jordan was created and for what reasons. We know that the country relies dramatically on foreign aids. Don't underestimate people on this board. There are many people who are well read, who have visited the country, who have ties with Jordan...and so on..Given how small the country is and knowing what the "resources" of the country are and knowing "Jordan" is a newly created country and based on other facts and reports, It is obvious from the way the family spends money that it is beyond its so called private wealth to be living the way they do now...

Last edited by Humble; 08-17-2004 at 12:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 08-17-2004, 01:20 AM
Balqis's Avatar
Balqis Balqis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humble
And if they are descendent of the prophet Mohamed, shouldn't they be the first to practice the religion (e.g. their women should wear Hijjab). We know how Jordan was created and for what reasons. We know that the country relies dramatically on foreign aids. Don't underestimate people on this board. There are many people who are well read, who have visited the country, who have ties with Jordan...and so on..Given how small the country is and knowing what the "resources" of the country are and knowing "Jordan" is a newly created country and based on other facts and reports, It is obvious from the way the family spends money that it is beyond its so called private wealth to be living the way they do now...
The wearing of hijab is a totally diferent matter, Humble. Let's not get sidetracked.
In regards to the topic, do you have proof, any real evidence for these serious allegations?????? No? So stick with what you know you can prove, which is nil. I am sick of people spreading lies. Freedom of speech does NOT equal slander.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 08-17-2004, 02:26 AM
shelley shelley is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 500
Default

[quote=Humble]And if they are descendent of the prophet Mohamed, shouldn't they be the first to practice the religion (e.g. their women should wear Hijjab).

The question of Hijab, as so many other things in Islam, is I believe, a question of interpretation - the only really black and white 'givens' are the '5 pillars of faith' - affirming that there is only one God, accepting the Kalma or Shahada ; fasting, giving of alms, pilgrimage to Mecca ( and even this last is for those who are able - in other words, healthwise or fianancially) There are many who intrepret hijab as a modest non provocotive dress style for both men and women. Even in Morocco, where the Royal Family is by and large more traditional in its day to day life than the Jordanian, the ladies do not cover their head in public.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 08-17-2004, 09:40 PM
Humble
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balqis
The wearing of hijab is a totally diferent matter, Humble. Let's not get sidetracked.
In regards to the topic, do you have proof, any real evidence for these serious allegations?????? No? So stick with what you know you can prove, which is nil. I am sick of people spreading lies. Freedom of speech does NOT equal slander.
right?!!! you convinced me, Rania....hahahaha...
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 08-17-2004, 10:25 PM
Balqis's Avatar
Balqis Balqis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humble
right?!!! you convinced me, Rania....hahahaha...
Umm...I guess you have nothing intelligent to come back with, except more nonsense?
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 08-17-2004, 11:22 PM
Balqis's Avatar
Balqis Balqis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shelley
The question of Hijab, as so many other things in Islam, is I believe, a question of interpretation - the only really black and white 'givens' are the '5 pillars of faith' - affirming that there is only one God, accepting the Kalma or Shahada ; fasting, giving of alms, pilgrimage to Mecca ( and even this last is for those who are able - in other words, healthwise or fianancially) There are many who intrepret hijab as a modest non provocotive dress style for both men and women. Even in Morocco, where the Royal Family is by and large more traditional in its day to day life than the Jordanian, the ladies do not cover their head in public.
This belongs to another topic, Shelley. But you are definitely right in what you say. The wearing of Hijab is up to the believer. Modesty above all is what is important. But Humble's original comment was really to show, in my interpretation, that the Hashemites are not really religious because their wives and daughters do not wear a veil. I totally disagree with this. In actual fact because they do not enforce any code for dress for women in Jordan, rather give them the choice, it shows enlightenement and intelligence.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 08-17-2004, 11:44 PM
Angie Angie is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 125
Default

Balqis why do you care what the posters say about the royal family?
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 08-18-2004, 12:11 AM
Humble
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balqis
Umm...I guess you have nothing intelligent to come back with, except more nonsense?

WOW...I am impressed..you are right!???????????

Meanwhile, entertain youself by this Clip about king Abdellah 2 (a prince back then)

http://www.arabtimes.com/StarTrek_NEW.wmv
Star Trek - Voyager, Episode 35: Investigations - 1995
Have fun!

Last edited by Humble; 08-18-2004 at 12:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 08-18-2004, 01:20 AM
Balqis's Avatar
Balqis Balqis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angie
Balqis why do you care what the posters say about the royal family?
Why? Because the negative comments are deeply offensive, unfair and without merit, Angie. How would you like it if people were spreading misconceptions and lies about you? Some posters are using the JRF like a punching bag. Freedom of speech entails a little bit of responsibility, I think. It's one thing to write about the feelings you have for someone, it's another thing to accuse a head of state and his family of criminal activity when you have nothing to back it up with.
I've been following this board for a while and the negativity about the JRF bewilders me. There is no balance of positive comments versus negative. Posters have been allowed to run riot with inconcievably biased comments about the Jordanian royals, particularly Abdullah and Rania. Let's just say I would like to readdress the balance so that a newcomer who's just joined this board to seek information or someone becoming interested in the JRF for the first time doesn't come away with an unecessarily bad view of them, just because some individuals have nothing else to do but bash them and talk rubbish about them.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 08-18-2004, 01:27 AM
Angie Angie is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 125
Default

[quote=Balqis]Why? Because the negative comments are deeply offensive, unfair and without merit, Angie. How would you like it if people were spreading misconceptions and lies about you?


I see your point. I would be really pi***d off if someone was spreading lies about me. I take it from you comments that you know the royal family personally? or am I wrong?

Last edited by Angie; 08-18-2004 at 01:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 08-18-2004, 01:50 AM
Balqis's Avatar
Balqis Balqis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angie
I see your point. I would be really pi***d off if someone was spreading lies about me. I take it from you comments that you know the royal family personally?, or am I wrong?
No, I don't know them personally, Angie. I respect and admire Abdullah and Rania as individuals. From what I've seen they are doing a great job, which is a difficult one. They don't deserve all this hate and nonsense that's being posted about them. At then end of the day they are normal human beings with feelings. I think people forget that. No need to trash them.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 08-18-2004, 02:10 AM
Angie Angie is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balqis
No, I don't know them personally, Angie. I respect and admire Abdullah and Rania as individuals. From what I've seen they are doing a great job, which is a difficult one. They don't deserve all this hate and nonsense that's being posted about them. At then end of the day they are normal human beings with feelings. I think people forget that. No need to trash them.

In all fairness you don't know either if it's false what some of the people say here.

Yeah they are normal human beings with feelings, we all agree on the one!
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 08-18-2004, 05:51 AM
sommone's Avatar
sommone sommone is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,600
Default

You haven't seen anything to you see what is written about Haya...but I can respect people's opinion even if I don't agree. They are after all entitled to it. There are royals that I'm not fond of, but I don't bash...at least I try not to. Far be it from me to step on anyone's toes...Unless you step on mine first.
__________________
My little Laila has arrived!

Last edited by sommone; 08-18-2004 at 05:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:41 AM
Balqis's Avatar
Balqis Balqis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angie
In all fairness you don't know either if it's false what some of the people say here.

Yeah they are normal human beings with feelings, we all agree on the one!
Angie, as long as someone can prove to me without a shadow of a doubt that what it's being said about the JRF is true, then I will rest my case. In any court in most civilized countries all individuals are innocent UNTIL proven guilty. People here are basically passing judgement and what is very alarming - without providing evidence of any sort. It's nasty gossip at best, serious slander at worst. SLANDER is a serious offence, especially if you are alleging what these posters are. What does slander really mean? Bismirching someone's good name, dragging it through the mud. It's one thing to have a serious discussion, it's quite another thing to jump to conclusions and slander a head of state and his wife. People should watch what they say and how they say it. There is a wise saying - if you don't have something nice to say about a person, then don't say anything at all.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:49 AM
Balqis's Avatar
Balqis Balqis is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sommone
You haven't seen anything to you see what is written about Haya...but I can respect people's opinion even if I don't agree. They are after all entitled to it. There are royals that I'm not fond of, but I don't bash...at least I try not to. Far be it from me to step on anyone's toes...Unless you step on mine first.
Opinions and feelings are fine, slander isn't. I don't like certain people in the public eye but I don't go out of my way to trash and slander them. There is a point I wouldn't cross. It's not in my nature to be nasty like some individuals here and also I believe that what you dish out comes back at you in some form or another. Think of the internet as a collective pool. What you say here DOES have an enormous effect on your real world. Be nice and people will be nice to you. Be nasty and you will get the same.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 08-18-2004, 12:35 PM
Angie Angie is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balqis
Angie, as long as someone can prove to me without a shadow of a doubt that what it's being said about the JRF is true, then I will rest my case. In any court in most civilized countries all individuals are innocent UNTIL proven guilty. People here are basically passing judgement and what is very alarming - without providing evidence of any sort. It's nasty gossip at best, serious slander at worst. SLANDER is a serious offence, especially if you are alleging what these posters are. What does slander really mean? Bismirching someone's good name, dragging it through the mud. It's one thing to have a serious discussion, it's quite another thing to jump to conclusions and slander a head of state and his wife. People should watch what they say and how they say it. There is a wise saying - if you don't have something nice to say about a person, then don't say anything at all.

I agree, some of what is brought up here is without any evidence.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 08-18-2004, 12:38 PM
Angie Angie is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sommone
You haven't seen anything to you see what is written about Haya...but I can respect people's opinion even if I don't agree. They are after all entitled to it. There are royals that I'm not fond of, but I don't bash...at least I try not to. Far be it from me to step on anyone's toes...Unless you step on mine first.

Yeah the Haya bashing is really mean spirited but people are entitle to their opinions.
Reply With Quote
Reply