the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Non-Reigning Houses > Russian Imperial Family





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #121  
Old 08-23-2008, 09:38 AM
Michael HR's Avatar
Michael HR Michael HR is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 53
Default

The "Vlads" have always wanted to rule. But many have not forgotten or forgiven Kyrill's actions in 1917 and view him as a traitor to the Crown, Dynasty and Russia and hence he should have been de-barred from the line of succession. Of course there are other reasons why some do want want his line and it is only Maria who argues that she is head of the house and therefore Empress but gets on a lot of peoples nerves in doing so.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 08-27-2008, 07:15 PM
AnastasiaEvidence's Avatar
AnastasiaEvidence AnastasiaEvidence is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: -------, United States
Posts: 152
Send a message via MSN to AnastasiaEvidence Send a message via Yahoo to AnastasiaEvidence
Default

Quote:
I understand. Throughout history some never got away with anything, even when things happened that were beyond their control. One could think that if Nicholas had married someone who was vivacious, more open, less shy that Alexandra, he could be more loved and forgiven by the Russian people. Even if he still reigned the way he did.
Well, I think the 'bloody sunday of 1905', Russian revolution and the world war I, had so much to do with the decline and of Nicholas II. So sad, how Nicholas eventually abdicated in 1917. Lenin and the bolsheviks made Russia even worse with dictatorship.
__________________
You would always need evidence...
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 08-27-2008, 07:29 PM
Russophile's Avatar
Russophile Russophile is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 1,383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnastasiaEvidence View Post
Well, I think the 'bloody sunday of 1905', Russian revolution and the world war I, had so much to do with the decline and of Nicholas II.
Do you think it's because Nicholas was not a forward thinker? He lived too much in the here and now and not preparing his country for the industrial revolution and other growing pains it was experiencing?
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 08-27-2008, 08:37 PM
COUNTESS COUNTESS is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 473
Default

Nicholas wasn't a thinker. He was highly influenced by the last person to whom he spoke. And, unfortunately, his wife had a great deal of influence, first or last and both were frozen in time and thought.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 09-04-2008, 04:19 PM
AnastasiaEvidence's Avatar
AnastasiaEvidence AnastasiaEvidence is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: -------, United States
Posts: 152
Send a message via MSN to AnastasiaEvidence Send a message via Yahoo to AnastasiaEvidence
Default

Quote:
Do you think it's because Nicholas was not a forward thinker? He lived too much in the here and now and not preparing his country for the industrial revolution and other growing pains it was experiencing?
I agree, he wasn't hard enough, he was too lenient. He didn't have enough experience, it just wasn't the job for Nicholas to be a tsar. I think being a father, instead of a ruler would have been a good enough job for Nicholas. He lacks tough behavior.
__________________
You would always need evidence...
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 09-04-2008, 04:28 PM
AnastasiaEvidence's Avatar
AnastasiaEvidence AnastasiaEvidence is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: -------, United States
Posts: 152
Send a message via MSN to AnastasiaEvidence Send a message via Yahoo to AnastasiaEvidence
Default

Quote:
I understand. Throughout history some never got away with anything, even when things happened that were beyond their control. One could think that if Nicholas had married someone who was vivacious, more open, less shy that Alexandra, he could be more loved and forgiven by the Russian people. Even if he still reigned the way he did.
I agree. But, the people in the Russian court disliked Alix because she was born in Germany and her original religion was Protestantism. I've read that, they would make fun of her and call her the woman in the shoe in french. I think it's understood that a shy person, who's not so social like, Alix wouldn't like the Russian court much. Alix really didn't like to go out, and talk. She didn't want to be around so much people. I understand how she felt, because this is exactly how I am, I'm not social at all. I don't think it's right, how they mistreated Alix becuase of her character.
__________________
You would always need evidence...
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 09-04-2008, 04:51 PM
COUNTESS COUNTESS is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 473
Default

If she wanted to be a recluse, she should have married some minor German Prince. When you get the big bucks for the big job, you have to perform.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 09-04-2008, 06:09 PM
Al_bina's Avatar
Al_bina Al_bina is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taraz/Almaty, Kazakhstan
Posts: 835
Default

Right you are, COUNTESS... Alexandra Fedorovna had a clear idea about the Russian Imperial Court because her sister was married to Grand Duke and she visited the country. Thus, it would be fair to assume that Princess Alix did know what she was getting into.
__________________
Similar to tea ceremony, perfection should have an element of chaos to be absolute ... but at the same time ... perfection is "simplicity devoid of unnecessary elements"...
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 09-04-2008, 07:17 PM
Russophile's Avatar
Russophile Russophile is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 1,383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnastasiaEvidence View Post
I agree, he wasn't hard enough, he was too lenient. He didn't have enough experience, it just wasn't the job for Nicholas to be a tsar. I think being a father, instead of a ruler would have been a good enough job for Nicholas. He lacks tough behavior.
I don't necessarily think it was lack of tough behavior as opposed to no clear direction. I don't think anybody was steering that ship. Nobody knew what was going on, there was no direction, no focus, nothing to work towards, no goals, nothing. So they just floated around. . .
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 09-04-2008, 10:44 PM
Odette's Avatar
Odette Odette is online now
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 965
Default

I believe he was basically a very kind decent man who was ill prepared to become Tsar. His uncles did not help him either. Between the sycophants, Alexandra's dependence on Rasputin and his influence on the Empress and the changing mood of the masses put him in a position he could not win no matter what he did. In essence he could not do much since he did not believe in democracy and he tried to rule in an autocratic way a people who wanted freedom. Little did they know of what was to come.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Elisaveta Feodorovna, Grand Duchess Serge (1864-1918) gaoshan1021 Russian Imperial Family 54 08-20-2008 10:26 PM
Tsar Alexander III (1845-1894) and Empress Marie Feodorovna (Dagmar) (1847-1928) TOMMIX Russian Imperial Family 58 08-19-2008 09:03 PM
Tsar Nicholas I (1796-1855) and Empress Alexandra Feodorovna (1798-1860) lexi4 Russian Imperial Family 10 03-29-2008 04:31 AM
Prince Nicholas of Greece (1872-1938): his daughters Olga, Elisabeth and Marina Princess_Elizaveta Greek Royal History 32 12-26-2007 01:36 PM
HH Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan (1918-2004) Akilah Ruling Family of Abu Dhabi 88 01-11-2005 10:44 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 PM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Yoga Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - U2 Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008
Jelsoft Enterprises
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0