 |
|

06-07-2006, 02:17 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: N/A, France
Posts: 1,636
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PreDoc
There was a question recently on the American game show Jeopardy! about the world's youngest billionaire (I don't quite remember the wording) and the answer referred to a Prince in this family. I was out of the room and didn't hear the correct answer ... does anybody know?
|
Yes, it's Albert, the current Fürst von Thurn und Taxis (born 1983).
The difference between a Fürst and a Prinz: the Fürst is the "titular", the Head of the Family, and would be the regnant prince if the family still ruled a principality. The Prinz is a member of the family, who has the right to use a princely title, but is not the Head of the family.
|

06-08-2006, 08:16 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 141
|
|
the article from Vanity Fair mostly talked about how Gloria survived her husbands depts and has made her sons money. Also it talks about her huge support for the catholic church  and the current pope that she knew before he was pope. She wants all the italian (because she lives in rome )royal families to have a connection with the church again.
Albert is very much a mommys boy and attends the univ.of edinburgh. Princess micheal of yugoslavia or greece said she sat by albert at prince Rainer's funneral and found him very charming.
|

06-25-2006, 01:43 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: nyc, United States
Posts: 14
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Warren
Albert will probably marry in accordance with the House Rules.
|
does anyone know what the house rules are? all these royal rules *sigh*
|

06-25-2006, 04:19 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,452
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jeneve_valois
does anyone know what the house rules are? all these royal rules *sigh*
|
Albert, as Head of the House, can make his own rules, but the pressure will be on him to marry: 1. a Roman Catholic, 2. a princess or countess from a reigning/former-reigning/Mediatised House, 3. a noble-born woman at the least. But of course he can marry anyone he chooses.
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

07-20-2006, 06:41 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 661
|
|
Thank you very much Teresa, for all the information and pictures,
its really nice of you :o
So cool you live in Regensburg
|

07-26-2006, 11:59 AM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 10
|
|
|
non-reigning houses?
Thurn und Taxis made me pose this question, but any examples would be great. I was just curious, non-reigning houses (german/austrian especially) are just following old tradition? Do they all still follow male primogeniture out of tradition or has there been huge trusts set up to perpetuate the family legacy? i.e. TnT helped to protect her husband's fortune for her son Albert. Why did it not pass by way of partible inheritance? All other houses seem to follow this pattern of male-primo. What is the reason they still use Prince/Princess for the family members? Had Albert not have been born would 'prince of tnt' and it's inheritance have passed to some distant nephew of Johannes and not his wife and daughters? or would the princely house simply have died with Johannes?
I know someone is just going to say the titles don't mean anything and it just depends on how the will is left...
... but there is usually crazy answers to this stuff.
Thanks in advance.
|

07-27-2006, 06:34 AM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, United States
Posts: 854
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Simeon
I was just curious, non-reigning houses (german/austrian especially) are just following old tradition? Do they all still follow male primogeniture out of tradition or has there been huge trusts set up to perpetuate the family legacy? i.e. TnT helped to protect her husband's fortune for her son Albert.
|
I don't know of any families that don't use male primogeniture.
Quote:
|
Why did it not pass by way of partible inheritance? All other houses seem to follow this pattern of male-primo.
|
To keep the inheritance intact.
Quote:
|
What is the reason they still use Prince/Princess for the family members?
|
They're still entitled to use the title, so why not?
Quote:
|
Had Albert not have been born would 'prince of tnt' and it's inheritance have passed to some distant nephew of Johannes and not his wife and daughters? or would the princely house simply have died with Johannes?
|
It would have passed to the nearest eligible male relative.
__________________
Kelly D
|

07-27-2006, 09:15 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somwhere, Sweden
Posts: 3,415
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Simeon
i.e. TnT helped to protect her husband's fortune for her son Albert. Why did it not pass by way of partible inheritance?
|
Well as her husband died, she had to stop her incredible spending and start to protect the Thurn und Taxis estate for the future. Which was good. I think it's good that they try to keep the family's assetts together, instead of shattering them to distant family here and there. It's a historic heritage, it should be kept for future Fürsts.
|

07-27-2006, 01:10 PM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 10
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kelly9480
I don't know of any families that don't use male primogeniture.
To keep the inheritance intact.
They're still entitled to use the title, so why not?
It would have passed to the nearest eligible male relative.
|
After Weimar all germans were equal in the eyes of the law. If Johannes had left his fortune in state (without a will) it probably would have had no choice but to follow partible inheritance (I do not know for a fact if germany does follow this system if someone dies in state). Or personally, if I had no son I would find it hard to pass a huge inheritance on to a "distant stranger" to follow tradition of an instrument of government that had lapsed 100 years ago rather than my daughters. An explaination or reference of why german nobility follows this practice, or if they have been granted some special dispensation from the republic would be appreciated. Maybe it is just tradition, suprised no one has broke with it though.
Also, along the same thought, the princess/prince title. Why are they "entitled to use the title" was that part of being mediatized? Is there some instrument that allows them to from the government? i.e. the Greek government allows the King and his family to still use their titles, albeit only for thier lifetime. Or the Iraqi family is granted the title HRH Prince/Princess from the Hasemite kingdom of Jordan, Hannovers were technically princes of great britain et. al. for a time being, etc. Anyway, would appreciate a little clarification, and thank you.
|

07-27-2006, 01:39 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Esslingen, Germany
Posts: 2,095
|
|
|
There are no Titles in germany since 1919. The titles became a part of the Surname. for example Carl, Herzog von Württemberg. Legally when in a Princely Family like the Thurn and Taxis the Fürst dies there is no right t ochange the Name of the Erbprinz to Fürst but mostly it is recognmized if the Titles are in use band known by in the Area the live.
|

07-27-2006, 08:57 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, United States
Posts: 854
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Simeon
After Weimar all germans were equal in the eyes of the law. If Johannes had left his fortune in state (without a will) it probably would have had no choice but to follow partible inheritance (I do not know for a fact if germany does follow this system if someone dies in state).
|
I think you mean "intestate", not in state. The TnT fortune is tied up in trusts and agreements that likely predate Johannes' passing (and inheritance, for that matter). If the estate is entailed to the next head of the house, it wouldn't matter whether Johannes had a will or not.
Quote:
|
Or personally, if I had no son I would find it hard to pass a huge inheritance on to a "distant stranger" to follow tradition of an instrument of government that had lapsed 100 years ago rather than my daughters. An explaination or reference of why german nobility follows this practice, or if they have been granted some special dispensation from the republic would be appreciated. Maybe it is just tradition, suprised no one has broke with it though.
|
It is tradition, and most, if not all, the German families have entailed their assets, or placed them in a trust for the use of the head of the house. Johannes probably couldn't have handed it to his daughters without facing angry relatives. And there's an understanding that the head of the house should be able to live as the head of the house. Running the large estates, managing the castles, etc, is a time-consuming job, which is why you see some instances of elder sons resigning their rights to the headship in favor of younger sons who are willing to do the job.
Quote:
|
Also, along the same thought, the princess/prince title. Why are they "entitled to use the title" was that part of being mediatized? Is there some instrument that allows them to from the government?
|
Germany, unlike Austria, allowed titles to be made into surnames. Germany allows royals to change their surnames as their titles change. For example, in Germany, an Erbprinz (Hereditary Prince) would be allowed to change his name to Herzog (Duke, and presumably head of the house), once he inherited. In Austria, however, the surname-title wouldn't exist at all (Archduke Otto of Austria is simply Otto Habsburg), and no name changes would be allowed, or would be very difficult.
__________________
Kelly D
|

07-30-2006, 09:31 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,328
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stefan
There are no Titles in germany since 1919. The titles became a part of the Surname. for example Carl, Herzog von Württemberg. Legally when in a Princely Family like the Thurn and Taxis the Fürst dies there is no right t ochange the Name of the Erbprinz to Fürst but mostly it is recognmized if the Titles are in use band known by in the Area the live.
|
There had been a legal case when bureaucracy did not allow an hereditary prince to change his name to "Fuerst" after his father's death. it went, IIRC, up to the highest court of Germany and was resolved that this kind of name change is based on a historical custom, which makes it into the required "Wichtiger Grund" (Important reason) for a name change in Germany. Thus, it is legal to change your name when you become the head of your family.
|

08-29-2006, 04:33 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Neuilly, France
Posts: 514
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by qui mal y pense
Gloria is something like Madonna. She is constantly re-inventing herself. After her husband died, she shed her bad girl image and devoted herself to her children. She also donated (sold?) many of her historically important jewels to France.
|
She did sell many of the jewels (but also kept quite a few). To my knowledge, she donated the Empress Eugenie Pearl tiara to France (where it now resides).
|

08-29-2006, 10:50 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, United States
Posts: 854
|
|
|
The Eugenie tiara was sold to France, IIRC, for 6 million (I think francs). She didn't donate any of the jewels.
__________________
Kelly D
|

09-02-2006, 01:52 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Neuilly, France
Posts: 514
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kelly9480
The Eugenie tiara was sold to France, IIRC, for 6 million (I think francs). She didn't donate any of the jewels.
|
Thanks, I actually wasn't sure, although I have seen one source that used the word "gave" (I suppose it depends on one's interpretation--France can certainly afford it, and did sell it in the first place--it is only fair that they should buy it back).
Most of what was sold was relatively small, although several of the larger tiaras (those seldom used by Fuerstin Gloria) were sold, along with several large necklaces and brooches. It's amazing what is left, though. And I don't think she got rid of that awful emerald, ruby, and diamond choker that everyone hates so much (at least on the worst royal jewels thread).
|

11-09-2006, 05:41 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Neuilly, France
Posts: 514
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Katie
But there is no direct blood line connecting Gloria and the Bavarians.
|
Well, let us not be hasty. It is easily possible to find a link between all royal and noble families, particularly those in the former HRE. The distinction is that it is not a recent link, and certainly not one that would merit saying that she is a "relative" (implying a fairly close tie) to the younger Wittelsbachs (the Bavarian Ducal-Royal family).
|

12-30-2006, 11:22 PM
|
|
Commoner
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 50
|
|
|
i heard a rumour that the Thurn und taxis family is related to the Orleans family is that true? LIke maybe cousins or something?
|

12-31-2006, 02:15 AM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ******, United States
Posts: 871
|
|
|
Princess Gloria of Thurn and Taxis had the nickname Dynomite or Tnt back in younger years because of her wild and party side but since now she is a responsible and loving mother . And it is true for son Albert only being 23 yrs.old he is the youngest billionaire in the world so much money and so young I wonder what does someone that young do with a heavy load of cash.
__________________
Patience is a virtue.
I'm head of a dynastic house no matter what others say.
Princess Kamorrisa,Countess of Welle
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Links |
|
|
|