|
|
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||
 |
 |
 |
|
||
 |
 |
|
|||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
08-28-2006, 10:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
"The Way We Were: Remembering Diana" - Paul Burrell
Ex-royal butler planning more Diana disclosures
 LONDON: Paul Burrell, the former royal butler, is planning to disclose fresh details about Diana. http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topic...8&parent_id=20
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three 
|
|
#2
08-31-2006, 11:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
. . .
|
|
#3
08-31-2006, 12:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
|
|
#4
08-31-2006, 01:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If Paul Burrell is about anything, it's self-aggrandizement.
|
|
#5
09-03-2006, 12:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Paul Burrell's "secrets"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=403351&in_page_id=1770 'Phew!' a relieved Diana sighed. Dodi had given her a ring but hadn't asked her to marry him The Butler's Last Secret, by Paul Burrell and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=403364&in_page_id=1770 'I could have saved Diana,' wept Hasnat Diana only went on holiday with Dodi to make a point to her true love - a gifted heart surgeon left distraught by her death, Paul Burrell reveals
__________________
aka Janet on some other forums
|
|
#6
09-03-2006, 05:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
|
|
#7
09-03-2006, 12:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Burrell: Diana Wanted To Marry Hasnat Khan
http://www.theroyalist.net/content/view/1165/1/
__________________
If you find someone you love in your life, then hang on to that love. - Diana, Princess of Wales http://groups.yahoo.com/group/diprincessofwales/
|
|
#8
09-03-2006, 05:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Poor old Burrell. The book just isn't selling is it?
__________________
Abnormal Service has been resumed.
|
|
#9
09-04-2006, 06:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#10
09-04-2006, 10:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh another final secret! That's the 3rd one isn't it?
__________________
Abnormal Service has been resumed.
|
|
#11
09-04-2006, 04:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
he only want money, this day are hard for william and harry, 9 year without they mother and now this book again.  I dont know if the princes can do something (somthing with the law) about this, may be we have a official notice as 4 year before when a royal duty was out. william in the official notice was fury
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana. As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess". -www.theroyalist.net-
|
|
#12
09-04-2006, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
not sure it's been posted yet...on Diana and Hasnat Khan, from the Daily Mail.
|
|
#13
09-10-2006, 01:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Royal Thelma and Louise
By PAUL BURRELL Last updated at 22:00pm on 9th September 2006 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
|
|
#14
09-10-2006, 07:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I saw Burrell this morning on the ABC news show. What could he possibly have to say that's new or revelatory, that he hasn't already said?
And he claimed that he is the only one interested in protecting the Princess's memory and reputation, not her former husband or her children. I thought that was a pretty outrageous statement as far as the young princes go. Although I'm a voracious reader about Diana, I'm going to give this book a pass. I'm so disappointed in Mr. Burrell.
|
|
#15
09-13-2006, 07:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Princess Diana wanted to be America's First Lady, claims butler
London, Sept 13: Her divorce from the heir to the British throne Prince Charles may have ended her hopes of one day being the UK’s queen, but it seems that Princess Diana also had hopes of becoming America’s First Lady http://www.newkerala.com/news4.php?a...lnews&id=20856 Diana Wanted to Become America's First Lady, Butler Says NEW YORK, Sept. 12, 2006 — In his new blockbuster book, "The Way We Were," Paul Burrell says that Princess Diana had ambitions to become the first lady of the United States http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=2423394&page=1
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three Last edited by Skydragon; 09-13-2006 at 07:22 AM.
|
|
#16
09-13-2006, 07:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know it's probably better not to comment on any of this, but... what gave Burrell the right to bestow the Princess's private possessions as gifts to others after she had died?
And has he ever given a satisfactory explanation as to why he kept so many of those possessions in his home? Apart from that laughable excuse of "safekeeping", that is.
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs. Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups
|
|
#17
09-13-2006, 08:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Still, I don't understand why Burrell decided to tell these stories, even if they were true. He must realize that he paints Diana in a very unfortunate light and that these claims are going to stick, even if it is only bits and pieces and the rest of the book is referential and positive. So why does he it? I mean, this is clearly material Charles and Camilla would have loved to have while the media war raged around the divorce. Burrell surely was clever enough to realize very soon after Diana's death that he had no place in the way Diana's estate and a memorial fund would be dealt with. So he used the trust of the princes and Diana's family in letting him taking care unobservedly of her home to not only take things "for safekeeping" but taking pictures - material for the upcoming sale of his "memoirs". It's disgusting. I'm sure if he had a chance to photograph the dead princess in her burial finery he did it and will sell the pictures one day. What are his motives? One point I already wrote about is surely revenge on the princes. But there must be more to it. Maybe the message conveyed by Diana's friends and family after Burrell's first book hit their target: a lot of people have claimed in their dismay over the book that Burell was over-valueing his place in Diana's life, that he was a mere instrument for her to lead a comfortable life and certainly not one of the most important persons in her life. I can imagine that he really believed himself to be in a kind of real relationship with Diana. When he figured that this wasn't the truth or that she conveniently forgot about him in her will, he felt betrayed by the late princess and now wants to destroy her memory in order to "punish" her posthumely through killing the positive image she still possesses in the public. On using his "insider knowledge" to ridicule people like duchess Sarah who have managed to still move within the Royal circles, he showed himself as her superior, as the one who can hurt her public image. Or is it a coincidence that he "remembers" the story about how Sarah allegedly used princess Eugenie to get back into Diana's good graces when there has a public discussion about if Sarah uses her daughters to further her own aims? One could say both are doing the same but Sarah is much better in acheiving this aim, while Burrell failed with the princes. So it's probably jealousy there which makes me mistrusting the whole story or the way it's presented. So for me his motives are clear. Thinking about how less knowledge of human nature Diana obviously possessed when it came to her "men" (There is not one I would want to spent an evening with, apart from The Prince of Wales, that is) and how she was deceived by Burrells subservient behaviour, I don't wonder it came to such a terrible end for her. If it's true what Burrell wrote about the princess giving hints to the paparazzi about Paris in order to make Hasnat Khan jealous, then it's anothere proof of the old saying that mistakes and errors of judgment sometimes add up. And then it only takes such a little additional mistake as to trust a drunken driver and the security of a luxurous limousine and not using the safety belt that lead to such a bitter end.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview. Last edited by Jo of Palatine; 09-13-2006 at 08:16 AM.
|
