The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 01-04-2014, 07:20 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 211
"The Mystery of Princess Louise" by Lucinda Hawksley (2013)

Has anyone else read this book - I do not agree that Princess Louise had a secret child before her marriage for the reasons explained in my review of the book.

The Mystery of Princess Louise: Queen Victoria’s Rebellious Daughter by Lucinda Hawksley (Review) | Carolyn Harris: Royal Historian

v cover
illustration used for promotional purposes
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Princess Louise.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	43.6 KB
ID:	290934  
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2014, 07:46 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cincinnati, United States
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarolynHarris View Post
Has anyone else read this book - I do agree that Princess Louise had a secret child before her marriage for the reasons explained in my review of the book.

The Mystery of Princess Louise: Queen Victoria’s Rebellious Daughter by Lucinda Hawksley (Review) | Carolyn Harris: Royal Historian
Unfortunately, this author, the man claiming to be her son (or grandson, whatever) and any other person can write whatever they want to write about Princess Louise because the Royal Family will never comment and there will be no DNA tests so we will never know the truth. I refuse to think about, read about or believe any speculation based on rumors regarding the life of this woman. What's the point?

So, the short answer is . . . NO I have not read this book and I will never read it or your review of it. I have better things to do with my time, thankyouverymuch!!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2014, 09:16 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,026
@CarolynHarris: here you say that you believe Louise had a secret child because of the book's argument, but I got the impression from your review that you weren't impressed with the book itself or the way that the author didn't seem to get her history right. What exactly about this book made you believe the secret child argument?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2014, 10:18 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 211
Whoops - I meant to say I do not agree - sorry about the typo!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2014, 10:26 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,026
Haha, that makes a lot more sense.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2014, 10:28 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,730
One thing Queen Victoria was very, very strict about was that her daughters were never left alone with a man, any man from about the age of 12 - 13 (except Albert with the two older ones before he died of course) until they were married - not even their brothers or fiancées.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2014, 10:32 PM
kathl29's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 482
I read your review with interest and agree that it is very unlikely that Princess Louise had a secret love child for some of the reasons you mentioned.

It seems to be a common theme in authors that do not have strong arguments to claim that all documents are being with held from their research. While in some circumstances this is undoubtedly the case it is also a convenient way of not citing actual evidence to prove your claims.
__________________

__________________
Above all, be the heroine of your life ... (Nora Ephron)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
aif british royal family british royal history camilla chris o'neill clothes corruption crown princess victoria current events danish royal family daughter daughters duchessofcambridge duchess of york duke of york extramarital affairs fashion gloucester grandchild grand duke henri hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume history infanta cristina iñaki urdangarín juan carlos king carl gustaf king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander line luxembourg meghan markle norwegian royal family philippe porphyria prince prince carl philip prince charles prince daniel prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas princess beatrice princess claire princess diana princess eleonore public opinion queen letizia queen mary of teck queen mathilde queen maxima royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal ladies royal wedding soldier state visit stephanie surname sweden swedish royal family visit from sweden wedding windsor castle windsor wedding working visit



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises