![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not to get TOTALLY off subject. But what is the criteria for the rankings? I assume we are going on how long the actual sovereign is on the throne? So that's why Sonja would be before Paola, etc.? And Beatrix (80) before Juan Carlos (75)?
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
They did the smart thing a few years ago to leave this open since there was too much debate back than. Now that she is such a popular and respected person, they'll fill in the blanks they left back then. |
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
- Máxima is a Princess in her own right. This has never happened before to female spouses. - Catharina-Amalia will be The Princess of Orange. This has never happened before to daughters of a King. - The children of the two younger Princes did not become a Prince or Princess. This has never happened before. - To Princesses exactly the same honours wil given as to Princes. This has never happened before. - Princesses no longer have a 'lower' feminine style of arms but are equal to Princes. This has never happened before. - Catharina-Amalia will become Queen. A brother will not take precedence above her. This has never happened before. - an abdicated King will loose his royal style by law. This has never happened before, fixed in the law. So many things have been changed. But everybody is focusing on the question 'Will Máxima be Queen'? No one asks: 'Why is she not The Princess of Orange, like Letizia is The Princess of Asturias and like Mathilde is The Duchess of Brabant?' But in that lies exacty the answer to your question and this is totally according the new Act 2002 and this the forebode of what the lawmaker has meant for the future. But once again: you are always free to call her Queen if you want. You are already free to call her The Princess of Orange (which nobody does!). You are also free to call her Mrs. van Amsberg, by the way. ![]() Last edited by Henri M.; 01-31-2007 at 05:22 PM. |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
i was curiously talking with a dutchman yesterday who told me about maxima's popularity... ![]()
__________________
Sign the United Nations Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare: http://www.animalsmatter.org/ YOUR DAILY CLICK HELPS ANIMALS SURVIVE! Your daily click provides food for an animal in a shelter or sanctuary. Feed an animal in need, click for free. http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ |
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks to all that have posted such great info about this 2002 law. And wow Henry M., you sure are up on all this stuff. You rock!
I think it makes perfect sense what they did with the law and it has made things more equal for little Catharina. And I totally agree with what Henry M. said about it not being about popularity this is a royal house we're talking about. The government did the right thing, in my opinion. |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dutch readers can find in on Home - Overheid.nl
Handelingen 2000-2001, nr. 333, Eerste Kamer, pag. 15-27 (84 Kb)Behandeling toestemmingswet huwelijk van Prins Willem-Alexander, Prins van Oranje en Máxima Zorreguieta, see page VV25. The premier spoke the following words: "Since the beginning of the Kingdom, the title of The Prince of Orange has always exclusively been used by the Heir-Apparent. It is in the intention of the Government that there will no more difference in gender. This means that a female Heir will become The Princess of Orange equal to the existing situation for a male Heir. This is no new development at all. This intention was already announced during the process of the modernization of the Constitution in 1983. This means we have taken a long time to work this out. The exclusive relationship between the title The Prince of Orange or The Princess of Orange and the temporarily function of being the Heir-Apparent, does conflict with the use of this title by the female spouse, like it would have conflicted with the use of this title by a male spouse. After all: the spouse of a Heir-Apparent is not the constitutional presumptive successor to the King. I think I did the right thing to stress what the intention is of the Government. Has all been said by this? No. This brings me to the title of the spouse to the Heir-Apparent on the moment of an accession to the Throne. I want to stress that we are discussing the Bill of Consent for the marriage of the Heir and not a future title of the spouse to the King. I know that Mr Rosenmöller would like to hear my opinion on this. It sounds very formal but it is not on my way to give an answer to this question, raised by Mr. Rosenmöller. The answer will be given by the Government when the moment of the accession to the Throne is there. That is the right moment for the Government to give its viewpoint on this. Of course the feelings of the States-General (=Parliament) are important in this, but I'm a stickler to the old credo: 'all in its own time'. I have no desire to say anything about it." Last edited by Henri M.; 01-31-2007 at 06:06 PM. |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is certainly is very complicated. I thought she would automatically become Queen.
|
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So the idea of the Government was to take away all discriminatory differences and treat them equeal: The King & The Princess of the Netherlands ................................ (This probably will be the situation under King Willem IV Alexander) The Queen & The Prince of the Netherlands ...................................(This was the situation under Beatrix, Juliana and Wilhelmina) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Prince of Orange & Princess [.....] of the Netherlands ..............................(This is the current situation with Willem-Alexander and Máxima) The Princess of Orange & Prince [.....] of the Netherlands .................................(This will be the situation with Catharina-Amalia and her spouse) But there is opposition to that because tradition is strong. That is why the Government refuses to give clarity right now. Last edited by Henri M.; 04-08-2007 at 04:35 AM. |
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Bernhard zur Lippe-Biesterfeld was no King of the Netherlands Claus von Amsberg was no King of the Netherlands Albert von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha was no King of Great-Britain Philip of Greece and Denmark is no King of Great-Britain Henri de Laborde Montpezat is no King of Denmark Making the future spouse of Queen Catharina-Amalia a King would equally be a breach with tradition. |
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And secondly, Parliament has no say about royal titles. Parliament 'wishes' Máxima to be known as 'Princess of Orange'. This has not happened, did it? The same Parliament approved the present Act on the Membership of the Royal House 2002 which states in article 8, second part ad. a: Artikel 8 De titel «Prins (Prinses) der Nederlanden» kan bij koninklijk besluit uitsluitend worden verleend aan de volgende leden van het Koninklijk Huis: a. de echtgenoot of echtgenote van de Koning; |
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Me personally, I think Máxima should be titled Queen |
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#57
|
||
|