![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Crown Prince Phillipe has received a lot of critisism over the last years, some fair and some not. We can use this thread to discuss these media stories.
__________________
TRF Community Rules & FAQs & July Picture of the Month Poll & August Newsletter & The Royal Book Club
Last edited by Marengo; 10-16-2007 at 05:30 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is a new book coming out about prince Philippe.
It's called 'Prins Filip' (how original) and it's written by Barend Leyts. I heard an interview with the author. There was an extraordinary cooperation from people who are close to the royal family and prince. New sources have spoken. He checkt if the diploma's of the prince are real. In secondary school when he studied in Flanders (Loppem) he had a privileged postition, because the prince didn't speak Dutch very well. After that the prince went to Stanford University. The author has proof that the prince did exams, made papers etc. So, not a stupid prince ... The author also found former girlfriends of the prince. More than one. There was one relationship that lasted for 3 years, with a girl named Barbara. She was a common citizen, not heraldic. A daughter of a wealthy businessman. But Philippe had to stop the relationship because she wasn't nobel. (Princess Liliane (common citizen) was at that time fresh in the memory of the people and the relationship with Leopold was controversial) The character of the prince is made clear also: obstinate, impulsive some of the time. That's why he sometimes makes mistakes, like in South-Africa, when there was a lot of critics about his behavior. The autor claims to be objective, and of what I have heard, I'm ready to believe it. But of course, we first have to read the book. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do you know when the book will be published? It sounds interesting.
I always thought that Filips had a relationship with a countess de Lalaing, or something like that? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Here´s a link to the publishing house (in Dutch): Uitgeverij Houtekiet It´s written by the journalists Barend Leyts and Brigitte Balfoort and by the respected historian Mark van den Wijngaert and it seems to be the first profound biography on Prince Philippe. The book was presented in Brussels today and one of the presenters was the former Prime Minister Wilfried Martens. He emphasized it´s about time to introduce the function of the crown prince into the constitution. Up to now it´s not mentioned there at all and this does not make things easier IMO. As for the Stanford diploma. I don´t get why so many folks are willing to believe the diploma was bought. This is surely not the way it works in Stanford or in any other university with reputation. So it probably says more about these people than about Philippe himself. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
When Philippe received a 'doctorat honoris causa' (Phd) at the Catholic University of Leuven. There were a lot of people who had the opinion that he doesn't deserve a doctorat, seen his mediocre results at school, and who knows how he has managed to have a diploma in Stanford. Lots of gossips...
Also, the prince is seen as generally stupid. He's a icon in jokes for someone stupid. I think it means a lot to him that journalist now have to admid that he has a universitary degree. In the meanwhile it has been proved that he can't be that stupid after all. It's a quit important thing |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And why should this specific “revealment” mean so much to Philippe? He knows how he has gotten his master and he also knows that these folks, who do not believe in him, are not interested in reading this book and probably also not in changing their mind. Maybe it´s more the overall result what means a lot to him: a profound biography (this being said without having seen the book) written in a non-sensational style … and under citation of reliable sources (and as a graduate with scientific skills himself he sure knows to worship this ). |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well we follow every step the prince takes. But if you are an ordinary person, who has no great interests in royalty, imagine you'd only see the prince on television news. When was the last time he was on the 7o'clock news with a positive story? He's only in the news when there is something 'spectacular' to say, when there is another proof of how clumsy he is.
A lot of people just don't know what he does the whole day, beside saying stupid things and being stiff in front of the camera. As you say, those people won't read the book and discover who he is. But there is a slight chance that the media will pick up some quote's... |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
IMO it´s a question of approach and IIRC you are in favour of a very unconventional way to change Philippe’s image via participating in a TV make over show . I agree with you, he sure will never be a charismatic person. But he at least deserves a chance and I think it´s wrong to expect each and every public persons to be a media darling these days. Did you ever look at old clips of Albert during his economic missions? It´s exactly the same attitude as shown by Philippe. He was insecure, no good orator and he even wiped his eyes in the very same annoying way as Philippe does. So I still think it´s an uncomfortable combination of Philippe´s shyness and camera aversion with the media´s disinterest in pointing out positive things from time to time. To name examples: VTM, which still seems not to have gotten rid off the Pol Van Den Driessche influence or HLN which favours pure populism sometimes. Then again this is an approach which is not limited to Belgium - see the image change of Angela Merkel in Germany for example, first she was the frumpy, ugly Ossi (person from Eastern Germany) and now she is everybody’s darling. But well time will tell and somehow I can understand you have given up hope, but I did not arrive at this point as well. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
And here are some details from the book – and no I had no look inside yet, it´s just a summary of what I read at nieuwsblad.be and gva.be and in the newspaper De Morgen.
Philippe´s youth: Philippe has been very lonely. He had barely friends, was isolated from other kids but had a personal nanny and turned into a spoiled and headstrong child. With the arrival of Astrid (called Titi by him) this changed a bit, but Albert and Paola were absent and did not care in an adequate way for the upbringing of their three children as they were completely busy with their personal problems. About Stanford: Philippe went to a university abroad to prevent the publication of his exam results. He was just supposed to stay there one year by the court, but it was his very own wish to finish with the master grade and he was headstrong enough to get his way and to endure the extra work he had to do to finish. About 1993 and the succession to the throne: It was Baudouin´s will that Philippe should succeed him and not Albert. He took care for private lessons for Philippe by former prime minister Wilfried Martens, etc. pp. But Baudouin´s untimely death changed the situation and Philippe was frustrated (to say the least) when his father took over the throne. It seems Albert and Philippe are in an unfavourable state of competition. Albert and his cabinet also prevent Philippe from networking with politicians and members of the government. When Philippe tried to contact politicians after the China and South Africa incidents, he was stopped by his father. And in complete opposite to his brother Laurent, Philippe accepts his father´s will and does not continue his contacts behind his father´s back. About his relationship to the commoner Barbara Maselis, daughter of a Flemish producer for forage: Philippe and Barbara went to the Zevenkerken school in Bruges and fell in love and are described as soul mates. This relationship lasted 3 years, but Barbara was not welcome in Belvedere Castle and Albert forced Philippe to break up, since a commoner wife was not suitable in his eyes. The break up left Philippe in loneliness and this did not change until he met Mathilde. About the controversial economic mission to South Africa 2006: Seems Philippe was absolutely fed up with his advisors and told them he was old enough to do things himself. He fell out with his advisor Jan Grauls, changed the agenda and was disinterested and not focussed for the rest of the trip. The result is the well-known storm of criticism. The book: The court thought it’s too early for a biography on Prince Philippe and did not support the work, but also did not constrain it. In the beginning the work was frustrating for the authors since politicians loved their Philippe bashing and this way a balanced description was not achievable. But in the end they also succeeded in interviewing Philippe’s confidents. Their conclusions: Philippe is a very dutiful person, who is willing to serve the Belgians and their unity and who wants to do his best. But he is also too headstrong and too outspoken sometimes. And he is not supported properly by the politicians and his family (read his father) Barend Leyts (one of the authors) “I leave it up to the reader to form a view on Philippe´s qualification for the kingship. But maybe he should get the opportunity to proof he is able to be a good king.” And the former Belgian Prime Minister Wilfried Martens opens the political debate by bringing up a constitutional status for the crown prince in Belgium. He thinks Philippe should be put under ministerial responsibility like it´s done in GB. This way Philippe had to seek approval of the government for his speeches and actions and he would also get the needed support, as the government would be responsible for him. Another advantage: This would also enable him to meet politicians and members of the government in an informal way and to start the much needed networking. Martens also said he has no doubts Philippe will do well within a semi-ceremonial kingship. ---- That Albert´s and Philippe´s relationship isn´t the very best, is quite obvious IMO. Philippe´s, Astrid´s and Laurent´s unhappy childhood and their insufficient upbringing are also no secret. But that Albert/his entourage works against Philippe or at least do not support him sufficiently is quite astonishing to read IMO. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you for this, it is interesting, some old news but esp. the part of South Africa is new to me.
I hope this wil change the public attitude a bit, or at least spark the start of a change. And I also hope that the bashing by politicians will stop indeed, by putting the prince under ministerial responsibility this would be a start I think, though it will limit his freedom of movement. I am surprised that Albert didn´t want a commoner for Phillipe, I wonder why he did allow one for his other son. Maybe because Laurent will never be king? Or because Laurent is more ´difficult´? Or the King changed his view in the last 10 years? Last edited by Helena; 10-11-2007 at 09:35 AM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: the biography,
I am was struck by Alberts reaction to Phillipe´s relationship with a commonor too, as P was in school when this all happened, I assume it is a while ago and the King changed his mind. Claire Coombs isn´t a noble after all and still allowed to marry laurent for example, and Mathilde´s background is noble indeed, but of the ´lowest´ nobility around. Another thing what usually surprises me is that everybody assumed that Albert would be skipped in 1993, according to the book apparently even Phillipe thought so. I am glad Albert/ the government thought otherwise though! Bad relations between Coburgs and their heirs is nothing new, I think only the relationship between Albert I and Leopold III was good, even the one between Leopold III and Baudouin went sour after a while. Anyway, that Albert/the court prevented Philipe to network to closely with members of parlament etc can be a sensible thing to do too, as it wouldn´t be wise for an heir to be too politically involved. But where there other examples in the book that they court worked against Phillipe?
__________________
TRF Community Rules & FAQs & July Picture of the Month Poll & August Newsletter & The Royal Book Club
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And of course the infamous blabbermouth Jan van den Berghe (the term royalty watcher isn´t posh enough for him any longer, he now calls himself Monarchylogist) has something to tell too. According to him everybody knew about the relationship between Barbara and Philippe, the palace just tried to keep it secret and both Albert and Baudouin told Philippe to break up since it was too early for a serious relationship ending up in a marriage. Barbara´s father in the meantime suggests it was indeed her non-noble background which caused the breakup. Quote:
That Philippe was surprised and had to cope with it for a while I can somehow understand. He certainly spent the time before August 1993 in the awareness of being the next king and successor to Baudouin. This seems to be what Baudouin put in his head and if he would have lived longer it sure would have been this way. And then Baudouin died all of sudden, everybody was shocked, quite an emotional and confusing situation. So I think Philippe´s reaction is understandable. He just has to get over it. And – this is a general remark – I think a 30-something can “survive” being king. And there are also advantages of becoming king in earlier years and not just past 60 as it will be the case with Prince Charles for example. Quote:
2007: China meeting with the vice premier, the trade minister and Hong Kong´s chief executive Donald Tsang. All in all a quite impressive list, which does not give the impression Philippe is put on the sideline. Again I did not read the book, but it seems the court/Albert prevent Philippe to meet the Belgian top politicians at all. I agree, getting too much politically involved isn´t clever, but informal networking a la meeting the Prime Minister every three months for example to talk about the global state of affairs is no bad idea at all. Especially if you look at the complicated relationship between outgoing Prime Minister Verhofstadt and Philippe. Probably some discussions here and there would have prevented some incidents. And IMO it´s quite telling that the former Prime Minister Martens comes up with the idea of ministerial guidance and informal contacts and even says this is a advice he likes to give his fellow party member and future Prime Minister Yves Leterme. IMO many key players are really fed up with the way Jacques van Ypersele de Strihou and co. run the court. They just can´t get rid off him it seems. And in the end it´s like in every other family company: if the owner isn´t willing to leave his successor some space and try things, the company will get into trouble. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Apprantly a new book has been released...titled Kroon-Prins Filip by Marc Van den Wijngaert, Brigitte Balfoort and Barend Leyts. Published by Houtekiet.
Apparantly it goes into great detail about Phillipe's huge stubborn streak. Refer to Uitgeverij houtekiet. Type in the search engine Kroonprins Filip. Has this book been provocative in the Belgian/Benelux media? |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, people will always gossip about those that have it better than them in their eyes. Personally, I am not at all sure that I would want to be in these royals positions. I would not want every minute of my life scrutinized to the enth degree.
I suppose that Laurent was allowed to marry Claire as he was/is not the heir to the throne?
__________________
Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with TRF's Rules and Guidelines and FAQ |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
For those who want to know how Barbara looks, take a peek at this video.
__________________
TRF Community Rules & FAQs & July Picture of the Month Poll & August Newsletter & The Royal Book Club
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|