![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Portal | Blogs | Articles | Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room |
![]() |
|||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also, it doesn't hurt to remember that in these tapes it was Diana saying she claimed Charles had said, in the same way that she claimed that the Queen had said that Charles was hopeless; they weren't said directly by the people who were supposed to have said them, they were reported by a person who was supporting her own case, not trying to be objective. Not to say they aren't true, but there's no independent verification of them from the sources (that I know of). |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dont know her... she could have a great heart... mabye be an ok person... but to sleep with a married man... THATS WRONG... no matter who you are or where u live... people that dont see that as wrong dont have class...
and i know its not entirely her fault as it does take two to tango... i just dont think she should get any title... would she ever be queen? would we want her as a role model to all these little girls? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think we all need to remember that there are two sides to every story and it is all a matter of perception. You and I can see and hear the same thing but perceive it in two totally different ways.
I am guilty of watching the Diana tapes and do think that they should have remained private for the sake of her children. However, Iit would be interesting to hear Charles side of the story though highly unlikely to happen. I was and still am a big fan of Diana's, though I don't see her as infallible. I realize that she had her fault but I do believe that she tried her best to use her position to do good. As for a title for Camilla, if she and Charles married the titles are hers by marriage whether we like it or not. Last edited by Ennyllorac; 12-06-2004 at 10:59 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope that the Queen has at least another 25 years of life left so that neither Charles nor Camilla will be much of a factor in the future. I'm surprised that Charles has not yet married Camilla, given that they are both "free".
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Even if the laws have been or are being slackened on the laws of marrying a divorcee, Charles and Camilla still need the approval of the Queen and Parliment, and because of public opinion I just don't see how they would receive those permissions.
__________________
Have you ever wished on a star? It's a magic everyone needs to experience! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
it just makes me sad to even think of it... when i was a little girl i always looked up to diana because she was so caring kind and truely compashionate... i also pray the queen stays around for that long
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
oh ok thats for the clarification i didnt realise that :)
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not a problem.
__________________
Have you ever wished on a star? It's a magic everyone needs to experience! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As long as Camilla isn't Catholic, there's no legal requirement for Charles to step out of the line of succession if he marries her. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
We now know that Camilla will be known as Duchess of Cornwall so perhaps the Administrators will be kind enough to close this thread?
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sara Boyce |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I am still hearing debates about legislature taking place to prevent Camilla from being called Queen when Charles ascends to the throne and what the (emotional) implications of Camilla (unofficially) still being the Princess of Wales even if she is not addressed as such publicly. A lot to discuss still on this matter of a title for Camilla, I think. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
She won't be called Queen. The current Queen has said so. Besides, I don't think the people would let her become Queen.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But the fact is, if Charles and Diana were married right now and Charles became King tomorrow, Diana would automatically become Queen by virtue that she is married to the heir to the throne. Likewise for Camilla. Upon her vows on April 8 she will be married to the heir to the throne and unless there is a move by the government to change hundredsd of years of legislature, Camilla will be queen when Charles becomes king whether people like her or not. Just as William's wife will become queen when he succeeds his father. Legislature is legislature; you can't pick and choose when and whom you want to apply the law to just because you don't like someone or prefer someone else for the role. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
The point that has been made is right. It is a matter of law that Camilla will become in fact the Princess of Wales the same way she will become "HRH the Duchess of Cornwall": by virtue of her marriage to the Prince of Wales and Duke of Cornwall. She may choose to be called only HRH Duchess of Cornwall for obvious reasons ( Diana-oloatry
) but it would take an Act of Parliament and/or a public act of the Royal Prerogative to prevent her becoming P'cess of Wales. "A fortiori" the title of "Queen" upon the accession of her husband. This business of "Princess Consort" is my opinion a device..there is no such title; it would have to be created and ratified before Charles' acession. That does not seem in the offing. I do not blame them in that regard; the couple are waiting to see how the public will react to the new Duchess of Cornwall before facing the very real serious questions of depriving her of the title of "Queen."
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
The fact is that when Camilla marries Charles she will automatically become Princess of Wales and when he becomes King she will automatically become Queen. The greatest legal minds in Britain have stated that it would would take take an act of Parliament to change both situations. Diana, for example, automatically assumed all of Prince Charles' titles upon marraige including Princess of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall. Naturally she was known as the former as this was the most senior title but Camilla wanting to be known as the latter has no bearing on the fact that she will still be Princess of Wales upon her marraige.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
So they are just making up a tilte?
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Which is why the initial announcement said that Camilla would be KNOWN as HRH the Duchess of Cornwall. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
How about NO TITLE?? Gee, I know I am living in my fantasy world on this one!
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| camilla, duchess of cornwall, princess consort, queen consort, styles and titles |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Princess Madeleine Current Events Part 3 (August 2004 - June 2005) | Josefine | Current Events Archive | 279 | 06-26-2005 09:56 PM |
| Royal Family of Belgium Part 2 | Alexandria | Current Events Archive | 190 | 03-30-2005 12:56 PM |
| Felipe and Letizia, News and Pictures - Part 3. October - December 2004 | Alexandria | Current Events Archive | 274 | 12-04-2004 09:11 AM |
| Crown Prince Frederik And Mary Donaldson Current Events: January 2003 - December 2003 | samitude | Current Events Archive | 409 | 12-30-2003 03:29 AM |
| King Carl Gustaf & Queen Silvia - Current Events Part 1 (November 2002-December 2003) | Josefine | Current Events Archive | 155 | 12-15-2003 08:24 PM |