the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall



Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2004, 10:47 PM
Reina Reina is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,731
Default

I can't respect a person who would be a homewrecker either-man or woman. It is so evil.
And why not America instead of just middle America (better known as the Midwest)
__________________
*Under Construction*
  #2  
Old 11-14-2004, 11:26 PM
wymanda's Avatar
wymanda wymanda is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reina
I can't respect a person who would be a homewrecker either-man or woman. It is so evil.
And why not America instead of just middle America (better known as the Midwest)
There has to be a home to wreck! A marriage where there is no love left and no respect ceases to be a home IMO.

The reference to "middle america" was to illustrate the high moral ground taken by people from the colloquially named Bible Belt who seem to have to sit in judgement on everyone else.

I don't want to cause offence but it seems to me that if anyone in the world has an opinion that should be taken into account it should only be those of us who are HM's subjects or who are citizens of Commonwealth countries. IMO it is no business of anyone else in the world.
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
  #3  
Old 11-14-2004, 11:46 PM
Ennyllorac's Avatar
Ennyllorac Ennyllorac is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wymanda
There has to be a home to wreck! A marriage where there is no love left and no respect ceases to be a home IMO.

The reference to "middle america" was to illustrate the high moral ground taken by people from the colloquially named Bible Belt who seem to have to sit in judgement on everyone else.

I don't want to cause offence but it seems to me that if anyone in the world has an opinion that should be taken into account it should only be those of us who are HM's subjects or who are citizens of Commonwealth countries. IMO it is no business of anyone else in the world.
Because a person says they don't mean offense by somthing doesn't mean it isn't offensive. If people who do not live in Great Britain cannot have an opinion about Great Britain, then people from Great Britain shouldn't have an opinion about "Middle America" or America as a whole. Or is this a double standard?

Just a thought...

I apologize for the digression.Now back to the topic.... I guess it is for Her Majesty to decide. However, since Camilla is divorced the Prince of Wales is not allowed to marry her and remain heir. Am I correct with this? Therefore the case would be moot.

Last edited by Ennyllorac; 11-15-2004 at 12:11 AM.
  #4  
Old 12-04-2004, 04:38 AM
Ellie2 Ellie2 is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 34
Default

When I said home wrecker I meant it!



My statement is no less productive than the concept of Camilla receiving a title! An act of infidelity can never be justified regardless of the state of a marriage, despite claims to the contrary at no point was Charles forced to marry Diana, if he genuinely loved Camilla he would have made a stand to marry her...but he wanted both worlds, rather than fight to alter a dated religious legislation which prevents a monarch from marrying a divorcee he decides to marry Diana and keep Camilla a mistress...Diana is a victim of Charles's coward ness and laziness to change a system!



I respect Camilla for not commenting about the whole scenario, yet in the public eye she is and will always remain the woman who made Diana's married life a misery. A woman who perused her own happiness at the expense of someone else’s.... therefore the whole question of a title for Camilla is an unproductive one and would only produce equally unproductive responses!
  #5  
Old 12-04-2004, 11:13 AM
Britters's Avatar
Britters Britters is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denver, United States
Posts: 721
Send a message via AIM to Britters Send a message via MSN to Britters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reina
I can't respect a person who would be a homewrecker either-man or woman. It is so evil.
And why not America instead of just middle America (better known as the Midwest)
Well then you couldn't possibly respect Diana either... As she had affairs with married men (one actually claims she stalked him and his family), and therefore is a homewrecker herself. She also did damage to her own marriage by infidelity therefore helping her to be just as much of a homewrecker in her own marriage as Charles and Camilla.
__________________
Have you ever wished on a star? It's a magic everyone needs to experience!
  #6  
Old 05-22-2007, 12:09 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mount Chewster, United States
Posts: 5,531
Default

I wish that Camilla would use her most senior title, HRH The Princess of Wales.
I know that people associate it with Diana, and I love Diana as much as anyone, but I still feel that it is right and proper for Camilla to have this title now. I wish that Camilla would use her highest title and not be called merely Duchess of Cornwall. I just feel this simply and strongly. I think it is sad that she feels it necessary to use a secondary title.
__________________
My twitter page
  #7  
Old 05-22-2007, 03:14 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CasiraghiTrio
I wish that Camilla would use her most senior title, HRH The Princess of Wales.
Camilla has the title, she probably just isn't that bothered about using it. I firmly believe that she would be happy to be plain old Mrs Windsor. Another thing to remember is that Charles was the Duke of Cornwall before he was PoW. The Scots don't have a problem with it, Camilla is the Duchess of Rothesay, the same as Diana or any wife of Prince Charles would be.
  #8  
Old 05-22-2007, 04:42 PM
Jo of Palatine's Avatar
Jo of Palatine Jo of Palatine is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydragon
Camilla has the title, she probably just isn't that bothered about using it. I firmly believe that she would be happy to be plain old Mrs Windsor. Another thing to remember is that Charles was the Duke of Cornwall before he was PoW. The Scots don't have a problem with it, Camilla is the Duchess of Rothesay, the same as Diana or any wife of Prince Charles would be.
And I guess that Charles calls her Camilla and she him Charles or whatever name they like at the moment and all the other people except family and frineds call them Royal Highness so the actual title doesn't mean anything in their normal lives. It would have been different, though, if Camilla was deprived of her rightful title as HRH. IMHO.
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview.
  #9  
Old 05-22-2007, 05:10 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mount Chewster, United States
Posts: 5,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydragon
Camilla has the title, she probably just isn't that bothered about using it. I firmly believe that she would be happy to be plain old Mrs Windsor. Another thing to remember is that Charles was the Duke of Cornwall before he was PoW. The Scots don't have a problem with it, Camilla is the Duchess of Rothesay, the same as Diana or any wife of Prince Charles would be.
Of course you are right but it is still not fair because Camilla should also be able to use anyone of her titles. The fact is, as long as she isn't comfortable saying she is the Princess of Wales, it won't be a fair situation. She should feel comfortable doing that and she should do it, and say to all who tell her she's disrespecting Diana or whatever. Yes, she is Duchess of Cornwall, Rothesay, Countess of Chester, Carrick, and all the rest, but she is above all Princess of Wales and there shouldn't be any discussion or debate or confusion about it. There. I've had my rant.
__________________
My twitter page
  #10  
Old 11-15-2004, 01:35 AM
wymanda's Avatar
wymanda wymanda is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,130
Default

The church is relaxing it's policy on remarrying divorcees and the current Archbishop of Canterbury has said that he would be prepared to marry Charles & Camilla. As the policy stands currently however it does exclude marriage to a party who was instrumental in the breakdown of the other parties previous marriage so I guess that means that Charles can't marry Camilla & she can't marry him because each could be seen as being instrumental in the breakup of the others marriage.
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
  #11  
Old 11-15-2004, 01:46 AM
sara1981's Avatar
sara1981 sara1981 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,500
Send a message via AIM to sara1981 Send a message via Yahoo to sara1981
Default

i have agree with wymanda!

because his grandmother and his mum have rights! because Prince Charles wouldnt allowed getting remarried again to Camilla because under the British Law and many people would knew about many people would feels hurt over Princess Diana's death in 1997 but i knew about it! but i have to tells many times! but Charles and Camilla cant slept together following his mum's rules oh good grief! because Charles is still remarry since Diana's death because of chase from paparazzi but cant won!

I think Prince William wont wanted to get his dad married again and Camilla wont become Princess of Wales because many people wont support and Camilla cant become Queen of England NEITHER! im sure Prince William would knew!

Sara Boyce
  #12  
Old 11-15-2004, 03:00 AM
MoonlightRhapsody's Avatar
MoonlightRhapsody MoonlightRhapsody is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Garden Grove, United States
Posts: 952
Send a message via AIM to MoonlightRhapsody Send a message via Yahoo to MoonlightRhapsody
Default

Regardless of whether or not there is still love in a marriage, married is still married. No 'if's, 'and's, or 'but's. As long as in the eyes of the law AND in the church you are still married, I don't care if you can't get along, you entered into that situation and you remain in that situation until you take yourself out. To say it otherwise is like saying that you can commit adultery as long as you don't want to sleep with your own spouse anymore.

Anyway, I agree with Ennyllorac. It's a moot point.
__________________
*~* In matters of style, swim with the current. In matters of principle, stand like a rock. *~*
*~* Judge not those who try and fail. Judge those who fail to try. *~*
Sweden's Picture of the Month Represenative
  #13  
Old 11-15-2004, 02:57 AM
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 17,183
Default

Quote:
I don't want to cause offence but it seems to me that if anyone in the world has an opinion that should be taken into account it should only be those of us who are HM's subjects or who are citizens of Commonwealth countries. IMO it is no business of anyone else in the world.
Realistically, in terms of real life and what actually happens with the Prince and Camilla and her titles should they marry, the opinions of most of us who are HM's subjects aren't relevant either. Unless there's a feeling that public opinion within the UK will be so massively opposed that it poses a danger for the continuation of the monarchy or somehow threatens the stability of the government or the church, I don't see public opinion being that big a deal. THey're not going to hold a referendum and decide what happens on the basis of a majority vote or anything. And it's not as though this was a marriage involving William, who's the real future of the monarchy. Camilla is beyond child-bearing age, and Charles is getting to an age where most people would start thinking about retirement; I think the Establishment will just try to marginalise him as much as possible and focus on William.

In terms of these boards, all posters' opinions are relevant.
  #14  
Old 11-15-2004, 12:59 PM
Britters's Avatar
Britters Britters is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denver, United States
Posts: 721
Send a message via AIM to Britters Send a message via MSN to Britters
Default

It seems everyone is putting the blame on Charles for the end of the marriage, let's not forget Diana played a HUGE part in the break up of her own marriage, she was by no means innocent. Yes Charles and Camilla had an affair, but Diana had her affairs too...with MULTIPLE lovers...she was unstable as well...the marriage breaking up was a two party deal.

As for the title deal-it's kind of a wait and see sort of a deal for me I guess. As I said in my earlier post anyone who takes on that title next is going to have a hard time "beating" Diana (whether there are people under the age of 18 who remember her or not, there are still a ton of people who have sanctified her...those are tough footsteps to follow in) but I also don't think it's really fair, IF Charles and Camilla were to marry, it doesn't seem it would be fair for Camilla to be denied a right that would leagally become hers (also I don't think the argument about it being denied out of William and Harry's sake is fair, as it has been stated they both like Camilla.)
__________________
Have you ever wished on a star? It's a magic everyone needs to experience!
  #15  
Old 11-15-2004, 08:36 PM
RoseMary's Avatar
RoseMary RoseMary is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 142
Exclamation

I don't think there was a marriage in the sense of love in the first place. Whether or not Charles loved Diana or vise versa Camilla had no right to step in between them. Just because the bank vault is wide open doesn't mean it is okay to take money from it. Diana was not perfect but she was a 20 year old woman who was placed in a tough position and she did not handle it very well but who would with her lack of experience.

Whether or not Charles and Camilla get married is really up to them. Do I think Camilla should be Queen? No but if she does become Queen, all the more power to her.

No one comes out of this spotless of blame but Diana is not here to defend herself so the only people left to answer questions are Camilla and Charles.
__________________
If you want something done right, do it yourself.
  #16  
Old 12-04-2004, 01:20 AM
sara1981's Avatar
sara1981 sara1981 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,500
Send a message via AIM to sara1981 Send a message via Yahoo to sara1981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoseMary
I don't think there was a marriage in the sense of love in the first place. Whether or not Charles loved Diana or vise versa Camilla had no right to step in between them. Just because the bank vault is wide open doesn't mean it is okay to take money from it. Diana was not perfect but she was a 20 year old woman who was placed in a tough position and she did not handle it very well but who would with her lack of experience.

Whether or not Charles and Camilla get married is really up to them. Do I think Camilla should be Queen? No but if she does become Queen, all the more power to her.

No one comes out of this spotless of blame but Diana is not here to defend herself so the only people left to answer questions are Camilla and Charles.
not my problems!

Princess Diana got fell in love with Prince Charles because someone said about when Diana was young she put posters of Prince Charles because she would become Queen of England.But Prince Charles propose to Diana on February 1981 when she was 20 years old but she will become Princess of Wales and she will become Queen of England not as Camilla! you know because Prince Charles's MISTRESS for more over 30 years.

many people wont wanted Camilla become Princess of Wales and become Queen of England many people would reminded of famous Princess Diana in 1997 who died and more respect of Princess Diana.

im sure Diana always is SO POPULAR Princess and she is Perfect! she dont unperfect many people and children still love Diana lots than Camilla you know that!

im sure his mother the Queen wont let Prince Charles get married to Camilla because of reminded Princess Diana lots for 7 years of her death.

have any question,rosemary

Sara Boyce
  #17  
Old 12-03-2004, 11:31 PM
bad_barbarella's Avatar
bad_barbarella bad_barbarella is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ..., Canada
Posts: 797
Default

I look at diana and think how did she cope im only 20 and can barely cope with everyday normal life... I dont understand why Charlse didnt marry her in the first place... like if shes so good then why didnt he wait to marry her instead of pulling diana along for the ride... he didnt even really lovce her as she quoted in the tapes... Camila should never be queen... he should just find a new wife like how he got diana
  #18  
Old 12-04-2004, 01:23 AM
sara1981's Avatar
sara1981 sara1981 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,500
Send a message via AIM to sara1981 Send a message via Yahoo to sara1981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad_barbarella
I look at diana and think how did she cope im only 20 and can barely cope with everyday normal life... I dont understand why Charlse didnt marry her in the first place... like if shes so good then why didnt he wait to marry her instead of pulling diana along for the ride... he didnt even really lovce her as she quoted in the tapes... Camila should never be queen... he should just find a new wife like how he got diana
not my problems!

Prince Charles chose Diana to become his wife and become Princess of Wales for 300 years of Englishwoman for first time not from Camilla! but Princess Diana really younger Princess but many people still known she is Queen's hearts and people's princess the PM Tony Blair says when Diana was died.

but Camilla cant become Princess of Wales nor become Queen of England because of following death Princess Diana for 7 years.

Sara Boyce
  #19  
Old 12-04-2004, 04:17 AM
susan alicia's Avatar
susan alicia susan alicia is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: , Netherlands
Posts: 2,109
Send a message via AIM to susan alicia
Default

title for camilla: royal crumpet
  #20  
Old 12-04-2004, 11:44 AM
Vicomtesse's Avatar
Vicomtesse Vicomtesse is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: , Canada
Posts: 117
Default

In the Diana tapes that aired there was a part where Charles said that he would not be the first Prince of Wales NOT to have a mistress.
The only people who are not to be blamed in for Charles and Diana's marriage breaking up are William and Harry and Camilla's children.
Diana was no matyr in this marriage either. Charles cheated on her with Camilla but that doesn't make it okay that Diana had multiple affairs too. No one can say that their spouse drove them to cheat. If Diana really loved Charles as much as she claims she did and was hence betrayed by Charles's extra marital relationship with Camilla there were other options available to her. Cheating on him with James Hewitt and whoever else doesn't excuse her actions.
The end of Charles's and Diana's marriage isn't a case of Diana being the angel and Camilla being the devil. If that's what it comes down to both women were as much at fault as Charles.
__________________
When a man gets up to speak, people listen, then look. When a woman gets up, people look; then, if they like what they see, they listen. ~Pauline Frederick
Closed Thread

Tags
camilla, duchess of cornwall, princess consort, queen consort, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Princess Madeleine Current Events Part 3 (August 2004 - June 2005) Josefine Current Events Archive 279 06-26-2005 09:56 PM
Royal Family of Belgium Part 2 Alexandria Current Events Archive 190 03-30-2005 12:56 PM
Felipe and Letizia, News and Pictures - Part 3. October - December 2004 Alexandria Current Events Archive 274 12-04-2004 09:11 AM
Crown Prince Frederik And Mary Donaldson Current Events: January 2003 - December 2003 samitude Current Events Archive 409 12-30-2003 03:29 AM
King Carl Gustaf & Queen Silvia - Current Events Part 1 (November 2002-December 2003) Josefine Current Events Archive 155 12-15-2003 08:24 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 PM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009
Jelsoft Enterprises
Forums Directory
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0