The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall

Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #21  
Old 01-14-2014, 03:36 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Top End, Australia
Posts: 330
General News and Information on Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
They ring for DoE because he is the spouse of the sovereign and the parent of the heir. Should Charles out live his mother and become king, then it would be traditionally appropriate to ring them for Camilla. At the moment she is NOT the spouse of the monarch, only the spouse of the heir, and will never be a parent of the heir. That would be the difference IMO. It has nothing to do with how many anniversaries they have celebrated.


Catherine is not the parent of the heir either - she is the parent of the heir's heir's heir.

Personally i think it would be simpler to ring for the monarch, the monarch's spouse, any living Queen or Prince Consort (the position not the title) and the monarch's children only but if they're going down the track of spouses then if Catherine's in so should Camilla be. Who they ring for should be based on rank not parenting status.
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-14-2014, 03:54 PM
scooter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,427
^ When did Camilla get named the heir's heir's heir?
__________________

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-14-2014, 03:54 PM
Royal_Royal's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: City, Denmark
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by VictoriaB View Post
Who they ring for should be based on rank not parenting status.
I agree. The Duchess of Cornwall is the second most important lady in the land. I suppose she is the fourth most important person in the country (?).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-14-2014, 04:13 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal_Royal View Post
I agree. The Duchess of Cornwall is the second most important lady in the land. I suppose she is the fourth most important person in the country (?).
I think you're confusing important, with royal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VictoriaB View Post
Catherine is not the parent of the heir either - she is the parent of the heir's heir's heir.

Personally i think it would be simpler to ring for the monarch, the monarch's spouse, any living Queen or Prince Consort (the position not the title) and the monarch's children only but if they're going down the track of spouses then if Catherine's in so should Camilla be. Who they ring for should be based on rank not parenting status.
Not but she's the mother of the future heir which by WA's standards allows her to have bells rung. Like Ish said, in crude terms, she has provided genetic material to a future monarch. That's the only reason I can see for including Catherine and not Camilla.
I agree that it should be Monarch, Spouse and the heir, and that's it.



Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
^ When did Camilla get named the heir's heir's heir?
She hasn't, VictoriaB never mentioned anything like that.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-14-2014, 04:18 PM
Royal_Royal's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: City, Denmark
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
I think you're confusing important, with royal
I'm talking about the order of precedence.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-14-2014, 04:25 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal_Royal View Post
I'm talking about the order of precedence.
That doesn't mean they're important, that's just an order for seating arrangements and when to walk in. Sorry.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-14-2014, 04:29 PM
Royal_Royal's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: City, Denmark
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
That doesn't mean they're important, that's just an order for seating arrangements and when to walk in. Sorry.
That's okay. We have different points of view. In my opinion, the order of precedence can be seen as an order of importance.

May we agree to disagree?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-14-2014, 06:17 PM
MARG's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 4,152
But we are told that while they rang for Catherine, they did not ring the bells for Diana and she was the mother of the heir's heir. So they rang for Catherine, who is the mother of the heir's, heir's, heir but not the heir's heir. Confused? Don't blame you!

Perhaps they will clarify.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-14-2014, 06:48 PM
scooter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumutqueen View Post
I think you're confusing important, with royal.



Not but she's the mother of the future heir which by WA's standards allows her to have bells rung. Like Ish said, in crude terms, she has provided genetic material to a future monarch. That's the only reason I can see for including Catherine and not Camilla.
I agree that it should be Monarch, Spouse and the heir, and that's it.





She hasn't, VictoriaB never mentioned anything like that.
She edited the post. I didnt quote it at the time just used the up^. then she edited it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-14-2014, 06:54 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,271
Scooter, I think VictoriaB's original mention of Camilla was meant to be a start into a new paragraph that got mostly deleted - not an attempt to call her the heir's heir's heir.

I just looked at the site, and Camilla's birthday has been added.

As for Diana's birthday, has the Abbey said that they didn't previously ring for her birthday (between either her marriage or the birth of William and her divorce or separation)? Can anyone remember if 18 years ago they rang the bells for Diana's birthday? Or even longer? The list that has been provided is for the 2014 ringing days - Diana's birthday is off the table at this point.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-14-2014, 07:03 PM
scooter's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,427
^ Yes I know. I was being funny. She said, heir's heir's heir Camilla. I knew she didnt mean that. Sense of humor boys and girls....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-14-2014, 07:06 PM
Nico's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 1,317
On a side note the Union flag is raised on Uk government buildings for the birthdays of all the senior Royals (including of course the Duchess of Cornwall. Bet some will see charles's hand too ha ! ).

https://www.gov.uk/designated-days-f...on-flag-flying
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-22-2014, 07:38 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 397
Quote:
Charles’s visit to the Somerset Levels triggered the hasty arrival of both the Prime Minister and the head of the Environment Agency, Lord Smith — both of whom took his wake-up call and tried to make capital out of the royal initiative.
People instinctively knew who cared most for the flooded-out populace. But Camilla? Lost in the detail of the YouGov poll was a single damning statistic.
It showed that a mere 17 per cent of the population want her to be Queen. A striking 27 per cent want her to have no title at all when Charles ascends the Throne.
Can the woman who helped make Cheryl Cole a star persuade Britain to accept Queen Camilla? | Mail Online
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-23-2014, 08:57 AM
Queen Camilla's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 670
Another trash article by the trash writer Christopher Wilson from the Daily Mail.

Man needs to follow Richard Kay & give it up.

FYI, Middlewick House was sold after her divorce from APB & Raymill House was purchased. (Wilson can never get his information correct.)
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-14-2014, 08:22 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westmeath, Ireland
Posts: 9,160
State hopes Charles will attend 1916 ceremonies

State hopes Charles will attend 1916 ceremonies
__________________
October 31st,2005,Birth of HRH The Princess of Asturias
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-14-2014, 08:53 AM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 17,152
That webpage is unavailable? Also this is the DOCo thread the link says Charles?
__________________

__________________
We Will Remember Them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Additional Links
Popular Tags
abdication birth charlene chris o'neill crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit current events dutch royal history fashion genealogy grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri hohenzollern infanta leonor infanta sofia jewellery jordan king abdullah ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg olympics ottoman poland pom pregnancy president hollande president komorowski prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince maurits prince pieter-christiaan princess aimee princess anita princess beatrix princess charlene princess laurentien princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess marilene princess mary queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal royal fashion russia sofia hellqvist spain state visit sweden the hague visit wedding



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]