The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #541  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:38 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
camilla have defenct too and never talk about this, because i dont konw her like person, so if I don't know anout something I don't speak.
__________________

__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #542  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:39 PM
selrahc4's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 760
corazon,
I have looked back through this thread at your posts, and I can not find any in which you called Charles a monster.

I think what may have inspired the most recent exhanges is your following post

Quote:
Originally Posted by corazon
When diana said that charles was with camilla (in '80), the people said ''diana is inestable'' the time said she was right (charles ever was with camilla).
Others have simply been trying to substantiate that there WAS a time (however few the years were) when both Charles and Diana were committed to their marriage and were trying to make it work and that Charles was not always with Camilla.
__________________

  #543  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:42 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
Quote:
chasrles and camilla must marry in the '70 , i am totally sure about that.
I have never had trouble understanding you Corazon but I am having a little trouble hear. First of all the didnt marry in the 70's and didnt need to. They had a passionate and loving relationship that ended. Camilla moved on and got married. The marriage didnt work out after they had children and they agreed to an open marriage. Charles moved on and had many girlfriends after Camilla before meeting Diana. They did not marry Diana and could not. He would have to face the fury and wrath of the RF. The wrath of the Queen Mother, Duke of Edinburough, and Lord Mountbatten is enough to scare me to do anything they wanted. They relationship ended and didnt work out. Later on in life in the mid 80's they found comfort in each other and fell in a deep passionate love again.
  #544  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:42 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by selrahc4
corazon,
I have looked back through this thread at your posts, and I can not find any in which you called Charles a monster.

I think what may have inspired the most recent exhanges is your following post





Others have simply been trying to substantiate that there WAS a time (however few the years were) when both Charles and Diana were committed to their marriage and were trying to make it work and that Charles was not always with Camilla.

Exactly, I never said charles is a monster, and you're right was a time (short) of happines, when diana was pregnant with harry the cuple was REALLY happy, the hell come on later.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #545  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:44 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
I didnt say Corazon called Charles a monster I said that the posts made it seem like Corazon treated him that way. Never believing he was good and anything that bad said about him is the truth. It was a figure of speech on my part.
  #546  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:45 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
Quote:
Exactly, I never said charles is a monster, and you're right was a time (short) of happines, when diana was pregnant with harry the cuple was REALLY happy, the hell come on later.
Then why did you so diehardingly insist that Charles loved Camilla before and after the marraige. That Charles slept with Camilla the night before the wedding and that Charles continued his affair right after the marriage too. Be more clear and constant in your posts.
  #547  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:46 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princejonnhy25
I have never had trouble understanding you Corazon but I am having a little trouble hear. First of all the didnt marry in the 70's and didnt need to. They had a passionate and loving relationship that ended. Camilla moved on and got married. The marriage didnt work out after they had children and they agreed to an open marriage. Charles moved on and had many girlfriends after Camilla before meeting Diana. They did not marry Diana and could not. He would have to face the fury and wrath of the RF. The wrath of the Queen Mother, Duke of Edinburough, and Lord Mountbatten is enough to scare me to do anything they wanted. They relationship ended and didnt work out. Later on in life in the mid 80's they found comfort in each other and fell in a deep passionate love again.
because if married in the 70 many things never had happened, no diana, no andrew parker bowles, no scandals, no pain for charles diana camilla laura tom william harry and the monarchy.
Is very simple. Later they become lovers, divorces etc .......
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #548  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:47 PM
selrahc4's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by corazon
Exactly, I never said charles is a monster, and you're right was a time (short) of happines, when diana was pregnant with harry the cuple was REALLY happy, the hell come on later.
Then, corazon, you should not have said "Charles ever was with Camilla". In a phrase like that the word "ever" means "always".
  #549  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:47 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Princejonnhy25
Then why did you so diehardingly insist that Charles loved Camilla before and after the marraige. That Charles slept with Camilla the night before the wedding and that Charles continued his affair right after the marriage too. Be more clear and constant in your posts.
I am constant, charles was with camilla before and later diana, but like I said before the happiness of charles of diana was in 1984 when diana was pregnant (a few months).
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #550  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:49 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by selrahc4
Then, corazon, you should not have said "Charles ever was with Camilla". In a phrase like that the word "ever" means "always".
.

exactly, my english is terrible. thanks
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #551  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:51 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
Quote:
because if married in the 70 many things never had happened, no diana, no andrew parker bowles, no scandals, no pain for charles diana camilla laura tom william harry and the monarchy.
Is very simple. Later they become lovers, divorces etc .......
They didnt marry cause they knew the marriage would never work. Camilla knew herself very well. She was an indepedent women. She knew she could not have handled the RF and the royal protocals back in the day. She knew she would explode and want her freedom more than charles after marring. Charles knew that his family would never accept Camilla as his wife back in the day. Things were different back then. Thankfully, things have changed and they can get married now. They are much more mature and they dont have as many restraints anymore.

Quote:
no diana, no andrew parker bowles, no scandals, no pain for charles diana camilla laura tom william harry and the monarchy.
Charles and Camilla werent the only ones to cause them pain. Diana caused much more pain to the monarchy. She could have kept her trap shut and her children would not have had to go through that and the monarchy would not have been ridiculed. The kids may have suffered somewhat but they have grown up into wonderfull accepting kids who dont creat drama and have fun.
  #552  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:54 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
Quote:
I am constant, charles was with camilla before and later diana, but like I said before the happiness of charles of diana was in 1984 when diana was pregnant (a few months).
Charles and Diana were happy from before their marriage and througout their marriage until the mid 80's. Not just for a few months but for years they tried to commit and be happy. Camilla was before Diana a long with many other women and Camilla came after Diana. That is the truth and I dont see were your trying to get at by pointing that out.
  #553  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:54 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
so, why charles marry with a women tha he not leved? I s avery simple question, and diana caused pain to me monarchy, maybe be true but is true to diana have a future king for the monarchy.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #554  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:56 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
''Charles knew that his family would never accept Camilla as his wife back in the day.'' why charles don't leave all for love?
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #555  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:57 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
and married camilla, have many childen and live inpeace an happines?
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #556  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:57 PM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
Quote:
so, why charles marry with a women tha he not leved? I s avery simple question, and diana caused pain to me monarchy, maybe be true but is true to diana have a future king for the monarchy.
Charles did marry the women he loved. Even you said they were happy. They were in love. That love brought two children into this world. Diana didnt bring a future king into the monarchy by herself she needed Charles for that too. They both brought a future King into the monarchy. That was one of their jobs and they did it well.
  #557  
Old 11-26-2005, 09:59 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
I said because he don't leave all for her real love, marriage with the women he love in the 70 or 80, have children and live in peace
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #558  
Old 11-26-2005, 10:00 PM
selrahc4's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by corazon
.

exactly, my english is terrible. thanks
Not terrible, corazon. I think you're very gutsy to try to present your views (whether I agree with them or not) even though you think your English is terrible. Missing the special nuances of a language, though, can certainly lead to misundertanding!
  #559  
Old 11-26-2005, 10:01 PM
tiaraprin's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Near NY City, United States
Posts: 1,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by corazon
.

exactly, my english is terrible. thanks
Corazon, I speak Spanish. If you want me to translate important posts for you into English I would be happy to.
  #560  
Old 11-26-2005, 10:01 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by selrahc4
Not terrible, corazon. I think you're very gutsy to try to present your views (whether I agree with them or not) even though you think your English is terrible. Missing the special nuances of a language, though, can certainly lead to misundertanding!
thanks, I try do my best :o
__________________

__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
Closed Thread

Tags
camilla, diana princess of wales, duchess of cornwall, prince charles, prince of wales, princess diana, relationships


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Relationships of Prince Charles and His Parents love_cc The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall 140 09-18-2016 07:18 AM
Diana's Relationships with The Queen and Other Members of the Royal Family Beck Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 572 09-08-2016 10:54 PM
Relationships between members of the Princely Family michelle Princely Family of Monaco 315 01-19-2012 12:18 PM
Diana/Charles/Camilla's Relationships Part 1 blondebeauty123 The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall 342 11-07-2005 08:15 AM




Popular Tags
ascot 2016 best gown best gown september 2016 best hat best outfit catherine middleton style coup d'etat crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion crown princess mette-marit current events duchess of cambridge duchess of cornwall's fashion e-mail fashion poll germany grand duke jean greece kate middleton king abdullah ii king felipe king felipe vi king willem-alexander member introduction monarchy new zealand nobel gala norway november 2016 october 2016 opening of parliament picture of the week poland state visit to norway prince bernhard prince charles princess madeleine princess marie princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mary fashion princess mary hats queen juliana queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia style queen mathilde queen mathildes outfits queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania in oslo royal fashion september 2016 spencers state visit state visit to denmark succession sweden the duchess of cambridge the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016
Jelsoft Enterprises