The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1521  
Old 02-02-2015, 09:24 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by COUNTESS View Post
By the time they are living in BP, Camilla's grandchildren, probably will not be racing up and down halls.

Let's hope so


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #1522  
Old 02-02-2015, 09:42 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 7,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by COUNTESS View Post
By the time they are living in BP, Camilla's grandchildren, probably will not be racing up and down halls.
It is very possible that one of Camilla's granddaughters has already had the joy of running in BP's halls (maybe even with a playmate called Harry). As fact, one of Camilla's granddaughters, Eliza Lopes, (Laura Parker-Bowles Lopes' daughter) has even been on the balcony at BP. She was three years old at the time and a member of William and Kate's bridal party.

From what I've read, Camilla's children and Charles' children get along pretty well. There was an article with an interview with Tom Parker-Bowles a while back where he says that they've always called Charles "Sir" but as time went on, it became more of a affectionate term as "Uncle" would be rather than stiff and formal. I believe if you scan back in the thread dedicated to Camilla's family, you can find that article.
__________________

__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #1523  
Old 02-02-2015, 11:43 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Camilla View Post
Richard Kay and Geoffrey Levy strike again.

The headline is states how Camilla keeps Charles happy but there are 28 mentions of Charles' ex-wife with of course her picture.

All the so called sources are unnamed.
You counted them ?


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #1524  
Old 02-04-2015, 09:08 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 2,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
You counted them ?


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
This surprises you? There are a lot of people here counting quite a few things!
Reply With Quote
  #1525  
Old 02-07-2015, 05:51 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,193
Yes finding that out. 💐


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #1526  
Old 02-07-2015, 08:32 AM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Camilla View Post
Richard Kay and Geoffrey Levy strike again.

The headline is states how Camilla keeps Charles happy but there are 28 mentions of Charles' ex-wife with of course her picture.

All the so called sources are unnamed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
You counted them ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter View Post
This surprises you? There are a lot of people here counting quite a few things!
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
Yes finding that out. ��
You bet your booties baby! That's how people keep up with the play! After all, it is not unreasonable to expect that Charles ex wife who died 17 odd years ago would not be getting top billing in an article entitled;

Separate lives and a rather saucy secret: An intimate portrait of their marriage reveals how Camilla has kept Charles happy

Read more: How Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall has kept Prince Charles happy | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Ricky and Geoffy will have to do much better than that. Next we'll be counting the number of cut-and-pastes from their previous posts.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #1527  
Old 02-07-2015, 08:48 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARG View Post
You bet your booties baby! That's how people keep up with the play! After all, it is not unreasonable to expect that Charle ex wife who died 17 odd years ago would not be getting top billing in an article entitled;

Separate lives and a rather saucy secret: An intimate portrait of their marriage reveals how Camilla has kept Charles happy

Read more: How Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall has kept Prince Charles happy | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Ricky and Geoffy will have to do much better than that. Next we'll be counting the number of cut-and-pastes from their previous posts.
I understand the counting. I can promise you the person didn't count from the beginning, but after reading the article for a while and seeing a name (not related to the article) pop up time and again you might think to yourself "God, they are mentioning Diana more than Camillia) and that start you counting. It's probably not a hobby
Reply With Quote
  #1528  
Old 02-07-2015, 09:42 AM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,495
You can't talk about Charles and Camilla without bringing up Diana. Those were and are the two most famous and important women in his life.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1529  
Old 02-07-2015, 09:56 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
You can't talk about Charles and Camilla without bringing up Diana. Those were and are the two most famous and important women in his life.
Yeah, I know. I just said that I understand the counting since it's a little odd the dead ex-wives name being named more times than the current wife when the article is about the current wife.
Reply With Quote
  #1530  
Old 02-07-2015, 10:11 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Washington, United States
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
You can't talk about Charles and Camilla without bringing up Diana. Those were and are the two most famous and important women in his life.
I think most people can talk about Charles and Camilla's marriage without bringing up either of their ex-spouses. They have been married for many years and there are many aspects of their lives that have nothing to do with their ex-spouses.
Reply With Quote
  #1531  
Old 02-07-2015, 11:48 AM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by US Royal Watcher View Post
I think most people can talk about Charles and Camilla's marriage without bringing up either of their ex-spouses. They have been married for many years and there are many aspects of their lives that have nothing to do with their ex-spouses.
Well, I think the general population does not think about C and C.

But of the many that bother to comment here, most of us have problems not bringing up off topic comparisons. We do it all over the place, not just on C & C threads.
__________________
The Force is my tiara.
Reply With Quote
  #1532  
Old 02-07-2015, 12:25 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by hernameispekka View Post
Yeah, I know. I just said that I understand the counting since it's a little odd the dead ex-wives name being named more times than the current wife when the article is about the current wife.
Yeah, I really don't bother counting stuff like that. I find it irrelevant. The late ex-wife will be forever be part of their current marriage. I just don't like how the media make it seem like she's the big and bad ghost that hangs over them. The memory is there, but no longer in a bad way, IMO.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1533  
Old 02-07-2015, 12:29 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: ***, Sweden
Posts: 1,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Yeah, I really don't bother counting stuff like that. I find it irrelevant. The late ex-wife will be forever be part of their current marriage. I just don't like how the media make it seem like she's the big and bad ghost that hangs over them. The memory is there, but no longer in a bad way, IMO.
Me neither. Just understand the "huh, seriously, how many times can they put Diana in an article about Camilla?" :P
Reply With Quote
  #1534  
Old 02-07-2015, 12:35 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by hernameispekka View Post
Me neither. Just understand the "huh, seriously, how many times can they put Diana in an article about Camilla?" :P
LOL, that's her history.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1535  
Old 02-07-2015, 12:37 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 1,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
You can't talk about Charles and Camilla without bringing up Diana. Those were and are the two most famous and important women in his life.
Don't let HM hear this!
__________________
"If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will.”

Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #1536  
Old 02-07-2015, 12:41 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 12,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladongas View Post
Don't let HM hear this!
Lol, I did mean intimately.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #1537  
Old 02-07-2015, 02:09 PM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Netherlands
Posts: 6,589
It is the corporate model of the Daily Mail: the more clicks on their site, the more unique IP's visiting them, the more revenue the newspaper generates. So every juicy story, every miraculous diet to slim into a supermodel in two weeks, every case of adultery amongst celebrities, every rant againts "scroungers", thick fat headlines, even about fungus on the Prince's nail: it does not matter. Just click, click, click and the Daily Mail thanks you. That is the sole reason for milking old cows again and again.
Reply With Quote
  #1538  
Old 02-07-2015, 04:44 PM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
You can't talk about Charles and Camilla without bringing up Diana. Those were and are the two most famous and important women in his life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Yeah, I really don't bother counting stuff like that. I find it irrelevant. The late ex-wife will be forever be part of their current marriage. I just don't like how the media make it seem like she's the big and bad ghost that hangs over them. The memory is there, but no longer in a bad way, IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hernameispekka View Post
Me neither. Just understand the "huh, seriously, how many times can they put Diana in an article about Camilla?" :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
LOL, that's her history.
And that is why this thread is not a "History" thread, but one that is specifically titled "Charles and Camilla:The Marriage(2005 and on)", just so that people can keep on topic.

As hernameispekka has pointed out, "how many times can they put Diana in an article about Camilla". Had she still been alive it could perhaps have been relevant. But as things stand, it is not.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #1539  
Old 02-07-2015, 04:56 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,193
So your comment about counting to keep up with "the state of play" means who has more coverage ???


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Reply With Quote
  #1540  
Old 02-07-2015, 05:08 PM
Lady Nimue's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Pacific Palisades, United States
Posts: 2,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
So your comment about counting to keep up with "the state of play" means who has more coverage ???
I would say it's more about how it's still all about Diana. In certain journalistic quarters. That's the 'state of play'. When I read that article it was clear I was reading dog-whistle journalism. Counting how many times Diana was mentioned is simply a way of supporting the contention that what was being engaged was pot-stirring. The mentioning of Diana was very much ott. I can understand counting the number of times in an article that was supposedly detailing something else (equally pot-stirring).
__________________

__________________
Russian National Anthem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGoNaLjQrV8
O Magnum Mysterium: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWU7dyey6yo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
camilla, duchess of cornwall, marriage, prince charles, prince of wales


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
albania ascot 2016 beatrice borromeo best gown september 2016 best hat best outfit best outfit june 2016 birthday british catherine coup d'etat crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion denmark duchess of cambridge duchess of cambridge visit to canada duke of cambridge fashion fashion poll jewels king abdullah ii king carl gustaf and queen silvia king willem-alexander member introduction monarchy nazi new zealand norway november 2016 october 2016 picture of the week picture of the week november 2016 prince charles princess beatrice fashion princess madeleine daytime fashion princess marie princess marie fashion princess mary princess mary casual style princess mary daytime fashion princess mary fashion princess mary hats princess sofia queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen margrethe queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania daytime fashion queen rania fashion queen silvia satan september 2016 state visit succession sweden the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats tiara vatican


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises