the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #721  
Old 05-11-2008, 01:19 AM
Elspeth's Avatar
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United Kingdom
Posts: 14,707
Default

So why is it so difficult to come up with the actual wording from the actual book? By the time people have got hold of something and put their spin on it, and it's been repeated by other people putting their spin on it, a second- or third-hand account isn't necessarily all that reliable.

Diana is supposed to have said in several places that she and Charles did love each other at some stages of their marriage. So I guess one unsubstantiated account will cancel out the other, right?

Last edited by Elspeth; 05-11-2008 at 01:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #722  
Old 05-11-2008, 02:00 AM
judith14011 judith14011 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 70
Default

< ed aggressive response - Warren >
Here is my last bit of research - I cannot find my Dimbleby book but here is Tina Brown on page 143 of "The Diana Chronicles:"

His (Prince Charles') authorized biographer Jonathan Dimbleby stated "The Prince made it clear he was never in love with Diana and felt he had to propose after he came under pressure from his father - a revelation that was duly splashed on the front page of the News of The World as 'I Was Never in Love with Diana'."

This quote comes directly (according to Tina Brown) from Jonathan Dimbleby's book, "The Prince of Wales, A Biography," page 284.

Perhaps someone on this thread has quick access to the Dimbleby book and can confirm that this quote comes directly from Dimbleby's bio of Charles, thus putting to rest any speculation of who said what and in what context it was stated.

Last edited by Warren; 05-12-2008 at 08:42 AM. Reason: removed aggressive response
Reply With Quote
  #723  
Old 05-11-2008, 03:07 AM
wbenson wbenson is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, Canada
Posts: 520
Default

If that's offensive sarcasm, I know of members here who may as well be killing puppies.
Reply With Quote
  #724  
Old 05-11-2008, 03:08 AM
Elspeth's Avatar
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United Kingdom
Posts: 14,707
Default

Well, it'd be nice if someone could find out where he's supposed to have stated it and actually post the wording. My copy doesn't say anything of the sort on page 284 but it could be a different edition.

There have been countless examples where people have claimed "Charles said this, Charles said that," and when you finally come down to it, it was actually Diana saying that Charles said it. Which isn't exactly the same thing. So before we get any more repetition of this charge that Charles told Jonathan Dimbleby that he never loved Diana and it's right there in the book, would someone who's making this claim PLEASE give us the exact quote.

As I said before, if people aren't prepared to back this up with the exact quote, this part of the thread is going to end up deleted. This is ridiculous.


ETA: Scooter came up with this quote from page 283 (in post 703):

pg 283: 'If his betrothal to Diana Spencer was hardly the love match for which his friends had hoped, that she perhaps wanted, and which the nation certainly assumed, he was determined tht their marriage should suceed'.

Which is a very different thing from a statement from hm in the mid-1990s that he'd never loved Diana. As I suspected, people have played fast and loose with this statement in order to try and make it say something it didn't say. And rather than going back to the source, others have just taken the spin and claimed that it was the original statement. No surprise there, then.

Last edited by Elspeth; 05-11-2008 at 02:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #725  
Old 05-11-2008, 03:16 AM
Mandy's Avatar
Mandy Mandy is offline
Administrator
Newsletter Advisor
Articles Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 6,564
Default

This thread is closed for moderator review
Reply With Quote
  #726  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:59 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,336
Default

Well, that was unedifying.

After some deletions, edited posts to remove aggressive and insulting remarks, and one banning, we are ready to risk all and re-open the thread.

A couple of points first:

Some parts of the Forums are concerned with lighter topics while some make an attempt to examine issues of substance. To this end, if members want to quote a source or author in support of their argument, they need to quote the source. Stating "it was in the News of the World" or "Tina Brown said he said it" or "it said so in Vanity Fair" or "it was in all the newspapers" doesn't cut the mustard. Becoming aggrieved (and/or aggressive) when another member requests the precise wording from the claimed source demonstrates a disregard for historical accuracy and a disregard for verifiable fact.

Challenging moderator decisions in the threads and continuing to argue moderator decisions in the threads violates one of the basic rules of the Forums. Without wishing to come across as heavy-handed but pointing out the obvious, there are repercussions for doing so.

When we are discussing topics where some members have obvious emotional involvement it is important to respect the differences of opinion and to discuss (or debate) in a rational, adult and civil manner. It is also important to be able to back up 'statements of fact' with precise attribution if requested to do so.


Thanks for everyone's cooperation in ensuring we are able to continue this discussion in a spirit of civility and mutual respect.

Warren
on behalf of Elspeth, Avalon, Polly and TheTruth
the British Forum and Diana subforum moderators
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs.
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups
Reply With Quote
  #727  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:23 AM
jcbcode99's Avatar
jcbcode99 jcbcode99 is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Richmond Area, United States
Posts: 1,395
Default

So, all drama aside, I have been searching for the transcript to the Dimbleby interview with Prince Charles and I can't find one. Or, at the very least, a video link. Whenever I do a search all I seem to turn up is the Panorama interview.
__________________
Janet

"We make a living by what we do; we make a life by what we give" Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #728  
Old 05-12-2008, 03:40 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England and Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 8,702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
So, all drama aside, I have been searching for the transcript to the Dimbleby interview with Prince Charles and I can't find one. Or, at the very least, a video link. Whenever I do a search all I seem to turn up is the Panorama interview.
Like you, I cannot find a transcript or video link. I did find a statement that nobody can show or print it due to legal limitations(?).

The only reference to Dimbleby that I can find in the Diana Chronicles between pages 141 - 144 is
Quote:
What is harder to go along with is the assertion by Jonathan Dimbleby, Charles insistence on delivering the gift to Camilla in person was an act of 'courtesy'
__________________
The Past is the Past
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers
?
They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three
Reply With Quote
  #729  
Old 05-12-2008, 03:53 PM
TheTruth's Avatar
TheTruth TheTruth is offline
Super Moderator
Picture of the Month Representative - Britain
Articles Picture Editor
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: -, France
Posts: 2,406
Default

For the moment, it looks much more like the contrary. Actually, if you go on this page, a reader said :
Quote:
His biographer says that Charles did everything he could to make the marriage work and didn't see Camilla Parker-Bowles again romantically until his marriage had irretrievably broken down.
I know you're probably aware of this already but my thinking is that you don't force yourself to make a marriage work if there's not a single feeling inside you.

I'm doing some research right now and see if I get luckier. I'll post if I find anything.
__________________
The Truth is out there ...
A good head and a good heart are always a formidable combination — Nelson Mandela
Please, check out the TRF Rules and FAQ before posting.


TRF Chat, enjoy!
Reply With Quote
  #730  
Old 05-12-2008, 07:11 PM
BellaFay BellaFay is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merseyside, United Kingdom
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
So, all drama aside, I have been searching for the transcript to the Dimbleby interview with Prince Charles and I can't find one. Or, at the very least, a video link. Whenever I do a search all I seem to turn up is the Panorama interview.
I doubt that you'll find a link or a transcript. Dimbleby did the programme as a freelance & it was only ever broadcast once on the ITV. The BBC apparently turned it down - this was when Marmaduke Hussey (husband of the Queen's Lady in Waiting, Susan Hussey) was still on the trustee board of the BBC. I think after it was broadcast the once it was deposited in the Windsor Castle archives and you would have to ask permission to view or broadcast it again. So far permission has never been given. Whereas the Panorama interview is BBC copyright and so can be re-broadcast ad infinitum. From my memory Prince Charles never said in the interview that he had never loved Diana. He admitted to having an affair but only after the marriage had broken down "us both having tried" to make it work as he put it. Furthermore, like Elspeth I could find no reference to Charles denying he had loved Diana on p.284 (or for that matter 283 or 285) of Dimbleby's book, contrary to what Tina Brown claims.
Reply With Quote
  #731  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:46 PM
scooter scooter is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: katonah, United States
Posts: 596
Default

It's at the very bottom of 283 continuing on 284.
Reply With Quote
  #732  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:51 PM
Elspeth's Avatar
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United Kingdom
Posts: 14,707
Default

The wording on page 283 is

pg 283: 'If his betrothal to Diana Spencer was hardly the love match for which his friends had hoped, that she perhaps wanted, and which the nation certainly assumed, he was determined tht their marriage should suceed'.

which isn't the same as saying that he'd never loved Diana. I don't think it comes as any surprise to people that Charles wasn't head over heels in love when they married, but then he'd said in an earlier interview that he thought friendship was a better basis for a marriage than infatuation. And saying that he wasn't head over heels in love at the time of his marriage (which is what Dimbleby said, it wasn't a direct quote) isn't the same as saying in the mid-1990s that he'd never loved Diana.
Reply With Quote
  #733  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:59 PM
Russophile's Avatar
Russophile Russophile is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 1,836
Default

No, it doesn't say that he (Charles) never loved Diana. But I think it reveals a lot about him, that he was very well prepared to do his duty for his country and was hoping to fall in love.
Reply With Quote
  #734  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:10 PM
COUNTESS COUNTESS is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 508
Default

No one but Charles will ever know the truth. That he defended his position with his biographer is just that. That, as Prince of Wales, keeping a mistress, was not outside the relm of his "position", was certainly a possibility. That he would have liked the match to have worked, publicly, certainly. He wanted to be Edward VII, but it didn't work. Diana was not Alexandra.
Reply With Quote
  #735  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:15 PM
Russophile's Avatar
Russophile Russophile is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, United States
Posts: 1,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by COUNTESS View Post
Diana was not Alexandra.
No, she had MUCH better hearing.


Reply With Quote
  #736  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:41 PM
LadyCat's Avatar
LadyCat LadyCat is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: WM, United States
Posts: 372
Default

Russo you are sooooo bad!!!
Reply With Quote
  #737  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:00 PM
COUNTESS COUNTESS is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, United States
Posts: 508
Default

Maybe not, if she had lived long.
Reply With Quote
  #738  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:16 PM