The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #1021  
Old 10-10-2015, 01:42 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 6,649
Sadly the link to the article has been taken down but y'know, I can completely agree with that last paragraph and the comparison of Camilla to QEQM. They do share quite a few similar traits. Perhaps this is what attracted Charles to her in the first place as he was very close to his grandmother.

When the public meets Camilla, they're meeting the real person and not a painted on facade persona. That's what endears her to people and wins them over. She's not afraid to be herself.
__________________

__________________
“When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.”
― John Lennon
Reply With Quote
  #1022  
Old 10-10-2015, 01:46 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,210
Unfortunately the article was down. However, Charles and Camilla have been married for over a decade and the British people haven't taken her to their hearts to any great extent. Admittedly Camilla is more popular now with the British public than she was when she first married into the BRF, but she could scarcely do worse. Her poll figures are still dreadful and lag behind other senior royals by a mile.

I'm sure that personally Camilla is pleasant and jokey and good natured. However, a large proportion of the British people still don't want her as Queen Consort. She remains a divisive and controversial figure, even today. I could point to huge differences in moral character between Camilla and the Queen Mother, whom I greatly admired, but I won't.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #1023  
Old 10-10-2015, 02:34 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 1,455
Google Vanity Fair Camilla

And it should pop right up! The title is something like Charles and Camilla Together at Last
__________________
"If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will.”

Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #1024  
Old 10-10-2015, 04:58 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 5,925
Don't underestimate the automatism of rallying around the new King and his family in the sad event of a departure of Queen Elizabeth II. When the officers-of-arms and the heralds in their impressive uniforms assemble at St James' Palace (or other residences), preceded by a triumphant ceremonial fanfare, and solemnly proclaim that Prince Charles is now the rightful King, then a page will be turned.

There is a new King. He leads the nation into mourning. His son becomes the Duke of Cornwall and Rothesay. Together with the other family members the new royal family will appear there, at that famous balcony and the British will embrace them, feel with them and join them into mourning and wish the new King well. Camilla is an organic part of the new King's life and -as the First Lady- will become of so much more prominence, so much different as now, in the shadow of other royals. She will be as visible as Prince Philip now, always sit next to the King, be the Lady of the House at State Banquets, name it all. She has every chance to become a sort of "Princess Lilian of Sweden"-figure: a most beloved "auntie". Mark my words.
Reply With Quote
  #1025  
Old 10-10-2015, 08:48 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,210
Princess Lilian of Sweden led an honourable life in Sweden after her divorce in England, while her future husband did his duty by his young nephew. Bertil wasn't married and Lilian played no part in breaking up the marriage of one of the most popular married-in royals of modern times.

There is a great difference between playing a prominent role on the national stage and being popular with its people. I have no doubt that as the King's consort Camilla will be more to the fore than she is now. That's no guarantee of popularity, however, especially when there are younger senior royals who are considered more appealing by media and the public.
Reply With Quote
  #1026  
Old 10-10-2015, 12:49 PM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,447
If you isolate the Duchess today from her fairly distant past, what does she currently do that bothers the public? Why not like her?
She's not dowdy, but she does not overspend on clothes. Her dress is age appropriate and her hair is flattering and dependable rather than trendy. She supports Charles in very visible ways and seems to have made him happier as we see him at public events. People that know her say she is a loyal chum, has a nice sense of humor and is not at all offensive. She adores dogs, seems to have a way with children and will gamely try all the silly things she gets asked to do at events. Her demeanor with the rest of the RF is always positive, calm and appropriate for her place in the Order of Precedence. She does not fuss with her hair and is able to stand/sit at events with calm and grace.
If you judge her for her contribution today, I think she comes up a winner. And if people want to hold a grudge, they will, whatever she does today. But I do think the grudge holders are increasingly in the minority.
Reply With Quote
  #1027  
Old 10-10-2015, 12:56 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,210
I think it's pretty clear why she's disliked, and her poll numbers reflect this, as do the numbers who do not want her to become Queen Consort.
Reply With Quote
  #1028  
Old 10-10-2015, 01:12 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,079
As has been stated MANY times before, Monarchy is not a popularity contest.. in short it isn't 'X Factor'..

If the Prince of Wales wishes his wife to enjoy her legal rights as Queen Consort [if that is 'non negotiable' for him] then she WILL be.. only time will tell, but as Duc et Pair states, it would be wrong to underestimate the effect on public opinion that might be wrought by the present Queens death, and how it is likely swing behind the new monarch, making any attempt to downgrade his wife, and helpmeet seem as petty and retrograde looking as they really are.
Reply With Quote
  #1029  
Old 10-10-2015, 02:19 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 1,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
As has been stated MANY times before, Monarchy is not a popularity contest.. in short it isn't 'X Factor'..

If the Prince of Wales wishes his wife to enjoy her legal rights as Queen Consort [if that is 'non negotiable' for him] then she WILL be.. only time will tell, but as Duc et Pair states, it would be wrong to underestimate the effect on public opinion that might be wrought by the present Queens death, and how it is likely swing behind the new monarch, making any attempt to downgrade his wife, and helpmeet seem as petty and retrograde looking as they really are.

Prince Charles made a vow to the British public when he got married that Camilla would be neither princess of Wales nor queen. So far, he's stuck to the first part of the vow and I don't see how he can possibly go back on his word when the time comes to deliver on the second part. The Camila fan club here on TRF should just accept it and let it go.
Reply With Quote
  #1030  
Old 10-10-2015, 02:25 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,079
Quote:
just accept it and let it go.
In the most polite way i can muster.. NO !
Reply With Quote
  #1031  
Old 10-10-2015, 02:27 PM
Queen Camilla's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 1,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Princess Lilian of Sweden led an honourable life in Sweden after her divorce in England, while her future husband did his duty by his young nephew. Bertil wasn't married and Lilian played no part in breaking up the marriage of one of the most popular married-in royals of modern times.

There is a great difference between playing a prominent role on the national stage and being popular with its people. I have no doubt that as the King's consort Camilla will be more to the fore than she is now. That's no guarantee of popularity, however, especially when there are younger senior royals who are considered more appealing by media and the public.
Didn't that woman take 50% credit for the breakup of her own marriage. If a couple divorces and each are to blame how can the public blame a third party.

I guess the people who are holding a grudge failed basic math.

And 1+1+1+1=4 not three.

50% + 50%=100%.
Reply With Quote
  #1032  
Old 10-10-2015, 02:31 PM
eya eya is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: -, Greece
Posts: 5,457
The Camilla will be the wife of King Charles. She become the first lady of the country. Now if in front of the Camilla is the Queen, the Princess or nothing has little importance.
Reply With Quote
  #1033  
Old 10-10-2015, 02:35 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,079
Not so. eya... the wives of our Kings have always been Queens.. and I want that to remain the case !

Principally because she has weathered [beautifully] a storm of adversity and downright ABUSE from people who were 'not in her shoes', and because nowhere in this world does a second wife not take the title 'mrs' because of some misplaced consideration to her predecessor.. a second wife is not 'less' than a first...
Reply With Quote
  #1034  
Old 10-10-2015, 02:51 PM
eya eya is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: -, Greece
Posts: 5,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
Not so. eya... the wives of our Kings have always been Queens.. and I want that to remain the case !
I believe I do. But if the Charles said that Camilla will not get the title of Queen how then will get back ?
Reply With Quote
  #1035  
Old 10-10-2015, 02:58 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,079
If Elizabeth II said, in a speech [something like] 'when my son and his wife are King & Queen...' opposition would melt away and that unfortunate and hasty statement by the Princes OFFICE [not, by the Prince himself, please note] would be forgotten.
Reply With Quote
  #1036  
Old 10-10-2015, 03:00 PM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
Prince Charles made a vow to the British public when he got married that Camilla would be neither princess of Wales nor queen. So far, he's stuck to the first part of the vow and I don't see how he can possibly go back on his word when the time comes to deliver on the second part. The Camila fan club here on TRF should just accept it and let it go.
I cannot recall Princes Charles "vowing" anything like this.

Can you give me the source of the "vow"?

Statements may be have been made, ie Camilla's preference to be known as Duchess of Cornwall but that is a very different.

She is Princess of Wales and she will be Queen (assuming Charles succeeds to the throne) - how she is styled is another matter.

I think this is a non-issue for the majority of the country. Some might not like it but there wont be any demonstrations in the streets over it.
__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
  #1037  
Old 10-10-2015, 07:07 PM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 10,194
There was no 'vow' or 'promise'. The wording was very clear:

a) she would use the title Duchess of Cornwall

b) the intention is that she will be known as Princess Consort

An intention is NOT a vow but a statement of what is probably or possibly going to happen. Intentions change all the time e.g. I intended to retire at 55 but am still working full-time a number of years later. Why did my 'intention' change - because circumstances change.

That could easily happen with the intention that Camilla will be known as the Princess Consort.

Regarding the Duchess of Cornwall title versus the Princess of Wales title - the PM of the day - when asked - made it clear that Camilla would be the Princess of Wales even though she would be using Duchess of Cornwall.

It should be noted that Charles has been Duke of Cornwall for longer than he has been Prince of Wales so it is the more 'senior' of his title in that sense.

As for the blame for the marriage - I put that down to two people who simply should never have married. Charles said he returned to Camilla after his marriage to Diana had 'irretrievably broken down, both of us having tried'. Diana herself took 50% of the blame for the breakdown so if Camilla played any part it would be less than either Charles or Diana as Diana took on 50% herself.

The people who blame Camilla do so because they can't put any blame on Diana - even though she herself took 50% - and they don't want to believe that Charles was telling the truth. Why, I don't know. Charles and Diana's stories tally with the happiness to begin with but the marriage over by 1984 - 1986. Charles, according to Diana, returned to Camilla about 1986 and that is when she also started her affair with Hewitt.

These people also refuse to move on and are stuck in events from a quarter of a century ago - and the fact that Diana died young - but that was as much her own fault as the driver's and the chasing photographers - she made poor decisions that night and paid with her life. That was nothing to do with Charles or with the BRF at all.
Reply With Quote
  #1038  
Old 10-11-2015, 12:01 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,210
^ Actually Diana said that things were never the same following Harry's birth, which occurred in 1984 not 1986. She also stated that she felt then that Charles 'had gone back to his lady'.

However, it has been ten years of marriage and largely positive PR for Camilla, whether spun from Clarence House or from the tabloids. Ten years and she, according to the polls, (which are the only things we have to go on,) is still not fully accepted by the British public as far as her future role is concerned. Nor is she popular.

How do you explain this, other than her role in the breakup of Charles and Diana's marriage? If her non-acceptance is based on recent polling, that is a large percentage of British people who 'have refused to move on'. Even more worrying for Clarence House are the numbers of young people who can't even remember Diana but feel that she would have made a better Queen than Camilla.

It's not as if Charles is widely popular with the British public himself and is able to sweep Camilla along in his wake. He is regularly in the mid section of senior royals behind his mother and his sons/daughter in law. There are many factors to explain this, but one of them would certainly be his actions during his first marriage as perceived by the public.
Reply With Quote
  #1039  
Old 10-11-2015, 12:52 AM
Lady Nimue's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Pacific Palisades, United States
Posts: 2,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Princess Lilian of Sweden led an honourable life in Sweden after her divorce in England, while her future husband did his duty by his young nephew. Bertil wasn't married and Lilian played no part in breaking up the marriage of one of the most popular married-in royals of modern times.
If you are suggesting that Diana and Charles were popular as a couple, I'm confused. One just needs read the press reports from the mid to late 1980's to see that they were far from popular as a couple. Diana's behavior with Charles in public was an embarrassment. I could post the videos I have seen if you want.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
There is a great difference between playing a prominent role on the national stage and being popular with its people. I have no doubt that as the King's consort Camilla will be more to the fore than she is now. That's no guarantee of popularity, however, especially when there are younger senior royals who are considered more appealing by media and the public.
You present a reality that is not shared by my British acquaintances. I have given up on TRF site when it comes to certain British royals, and Camilla is one such. There is a spin taking place here (a hammering away at a Diana vs Camilla scenario) that I just do not find justified in reality. Very sad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
^ Actually Diana said that things were never the same following Harry's birth, which occurred in 1984 not 1986. She also stated that she felt then that Charles 'had gone back to his lady'.
Of course the marriage wasn't the same, Diana had entered into what would be the longest running relationship with a man she would ever have, a man she admitted in public 'she adored' (James Hewitt). Diana had to have Charles 'go back to his lady' because otherwise she was the one who was adulterous first. It's a spin that is patently self-serving, with clear self-serving motives. Why Diana is believed in this regard is puzzling to me given what we know of Diana's relationship with the truth.

Why Diana, a clothes horse with a string of lovers, would be considered a 'better' queen than a woman who is steadfast in her loyalty to the monarchy with no ambition for herself, makes no sense. If anything, Diana would have continued to be an embarrassment to the BRF, what with her continuous ridicule of her husband, the heir to the throne, and her attempt to undermine his position and the monarchy itself. Color me confused.
__________________
Russian National Anthem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGoNaLjQrV8
O Magnum Mysterium: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWU7dyey6yo
Reply With Quote
  #1040  
Old 10-11-2015, 01:04 AM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,892
At the start of the marriage they were a popular couple. Your view of the the marriage Charles affair and Diana is so different I can't begin to say. I lived though that time I know how I and others felt.
I won't go any further into it as I get to angry and will say too much. But if you weren't around during that time you really won't understand
It just goes round and round on this forum same old rubbish.
So all hammer away at me but I won't be reading it


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
camilla, duchess of cornwall, public opinion


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
90th birthday of queen elizabeth ii ascot 2016 best gown best gown september 2016 best hat best outfit best summer outfit 2016 catherine middleton style coup d'etat crown prince haakon crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion crown princess mette-marit current events duchess of cambridge e-mail fashion fashion poll grand duke jean greece hereditary grand duchess stéphanie kate middleton king abdullah ii king felipe king felipe vi king willem-alexander member introduction monarchy new zealand nobel gala norway november 2016 october 2016 opening of parliament picture of the week prince bernhard prince charles princess marie princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mary fashion princess mary hats princess sofia and alexander queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia style queen mathilde queen mathildes outfits queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania casual outfit royal fashion september 2016 sheikha moza state visit state visit to denmark succession sweden the duchess of cambridge the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016
Jelsoft Enterprises