The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #841  
Old 09-11-2015, 10:45 PM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
YouGov conducted a poll between 3-4 Sept 2015 on the popularity of the monarchy.

The question of Camilla's future title was asked.

16% believe Camilla should be called ‘Queen’ when Charles becomes King compared to 38% that prefer the title of ‘Princess Consort’. Just less than a third (32%) feel she should be given no title at all. 13% don't know.

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/09/08...chy-here-stay/
I wouldn't bet the house on those polls. At the last General Election all polls had the Opposition winning by a landslide and then . . . .
__________________

__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #842  
Old 09-12-2015, 01:07 AM
AfricanAUSSIE's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roslyn View Post
Because a surprisingly large number of people believe that Camilla is a home-wrecking witch who cast a spell on Charles that caused him to fall out of love with the saintly Diana and leave her and run to Camilla's arms and that since she is to blame, that it is all her fault and that therefore she should be punished by not being known as Queen Consort in due course.
Hahahaha! Well put. My mother has those sentiments exactly! And they have not abated over time.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #843  
Old 09-12-2015, 01:38 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 7,587
I'm of the opinion that when the time does come, no matter what title is chosen and used for Camilla, it will be what it is and if there is controversy surrounding what she is known as, it won't be Camilla or Charles that instigates it.

Regardless of if she's called HM, Queen Camilla or HRH The Princess Consort or just plain Gladys, her role and support of her husband will be the same as it is now.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #844  
Old 09-12-2015, 02:26 AM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Southern California, United States
Posts: 20
I think the problem is creating a new title like "The Princess Consort" just specifically for Camilla that seems to be an issue. Right now she's the Princess of Wales but uses her next highest title, Duchess of Cornwall. No one has a problem with it because Cornwall is one of her titles. When Charles is King she will be Queen but couldn't she use her next highest title, Duchess of Lancaster?

HM The King and HRH The Princess Consort just sounds weird. We are used to HM The Queen and HRH The Duke of Edinburgh. HM The King and HRH The Duchess of Lancaster would be closer to what people are used to and would avoid having to even bother making up a title just for Camilla.
Reply With Quote
  #845  
Old 09-12-2015, 02:45 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 6,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
[...] She rarely gives interviews [...]
That is a BIG plus actually. Has Queen Elizabeth ever, ever given an interview?

The interview which was given by the previous Princess of Wales almost destroyed the monarchy, so that was not a too big success either...



As no other media, the British love to frame everything. When they decide that a certain lady is too forceful, she becomes "Princess Pushy". The Duchess of Cornwall experiences the same. She is the most natural, most approachable and most easy-going of the lot. She seems to have a good sense of humour and an infectuous laughter. Yes, I think she will come closer and closer. The Princess Lilian of 1978 was no comparison to the Princess Lilian of 2008. Times change. People too.
Reply With Quote
  #846  
Old 09-12-2015, 04:26 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 5,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARG View Post
I wouldn't bet the house on those polls. At the last General Election all polls had the Opposition winning by a landslide and then . . . .
Clearly Clarence House pays attention to polls regarding Camilla otherwise we would all be calling her the Princess of Wales right now.
Reply With Quote
  #847  
Old 09-12-2015, 05:05 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 7,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Clearly Clarence House pays attention to polls regarding Camilla otherwise we would all be calling her the Princess of Wales right now.
I could be totally wrong but if I remember right, it was Camilla's choice to use the Duchess of Cornwall title and in no way a reaction to public opinion. In 2005, it had only been 7 years since Diana's death and being known by a different title no only respected the memory of Diana but also put to rest any kind of indication that Camilla was trying to step into Diana's shoes.

JMO of course.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #848  
Old 09-12-2015, 05:21 AM
AfricanAUSSIE's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Clearly Clarence House pays attention to polls regarding Camilla otherwise we would all be calling her the Princess of Wales right now.
I agree.

Camilla may have chosen her current title hoping to placate the public. The Palace concurs because of the polls.
Reply With Quote
  #849  
Old 09-12-2015, 05:36 AM
eya eya is online now
Majesty
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: -, Greece
Posts: 6,958
Camilla excluded to take the title of Princess of Wales. She had to respect as he said and osipi memory of Diana. But the Queen's title is different. I see no reason why not get him. All these years showed dedication and work for the monarchy. I think that it deserves.
Reply With Quote
  #850  
Old 09-12-2015, 06:05 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 6,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Clearly Clarence House pays attention to polls regarding Camilla otherwise we would all be calling her the Princess of Wales right now.
Nonsense, already before her marriage it was informed that the new Princess of Wales is known as Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Cornwall (Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Rothesay in Scotland) and they have simply maintained it, with or without any poll. It was also communicated that it was Camilla's wish - apparently out of respect for the mother of her stepsons.
Reply With Quote
  #851  
Old 09-12-2015, 06:19 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post
I'm of the opinion that when the time does come, no matter what title is chosen and used for Camilla, it will be what it is and if there is controversy surrounding what she is known as, it won't be Camilla or Charles that instigates it.

Regardless of if she's called HM, Queen Camilla or HRH The Princess Consort or just plain Gladys, her role and support of her husband will be the same as it is now.
I wonder though if other continental European royal princes will curtsy to Camilla if the British court chooses to refer to her as Princess Consort regardless of whether she is legally Queen or not. I remind you that James and Louise for example are styled as children of an earl even though they should be legally HRHs.
Reply With Quote
  #852  
Old 09-12-2015, 06:29 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 7,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
I wonder though if other continental European royal princes will curtsy to Camilla if the British court chooses to refer to her as Princess Consort regardless of whether she is legally Queen or not. I remind you that James and Louise for example are styled as children of an earl even though they should be legally HRHs.
I would think the best example of protocol would be to look at how Prince Philip is regarded in the pecking order. His role and title now are the closest to what Camilla's would be as a Princess Consort I bet.

James, if all goes according to plan, will eventually inherit the title of Duke of Edinburgh and once Edward is created DoE, Louise will be Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #853  
Old 09-12-2015, 06:40 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,085
As for Camilla, I suppose her low profile is striking to us outside Europe maybe because we got used to high profile royal ladies in the continent like Maxima, Mathilde, Mary, or, to stay in Camilla's generation, Sylvia of Sweden. Camilla , who is not very qualified academically either, pales in comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #854  
Old 09-12-2015, 08:28 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 6,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
I wonder though if other continental European royal princes will curtsy to Camilla if the British court chooses to refer to her as Princess Consort regardless of whether she is legally Queen or not. I remind you that James and Louise for example are styled as children of an earl even though they should be legally HRHs.
At most European Courts the révérence or the bow has disappeared but okay: when it is done, it is done to the Consort too. People curtsied to Prince Philip, Prince Henrik, the late Prince Claus, the late Prince Bernhard, etc. It is not the title, it is the precedence. I can imagine King Charles III issue the following:

"WHEREAS in testimony of the great love which We bear towards Our most dearly beloved spouse Camilla Rosemary Mountbatten-Windsor, being sensible of the high regard and affection in which she is held by Our loving subjects, We are desirous of conferring upon her a style and dignity appropriate to her rank and station.

NOW KNOW YE that We, of Our especial grace certain, do by these presents give and grant unto Camilla Rosemary Mountbatten-Windsor the title and dignity of Princess Consort to be held and enjoyed by her during Our joint lives in all places and on all occasions as her proper title and dignity.

AND We do further of Our royal favor and affection grant unto her, Our said most dearly beloved spouse, that by the said title of Princess Consort she shall have and enjoy the rank, place, pre-eminence and precedence of a royal consort."

Reply With Quote
  #855  
Old 09-12-2015, 08:36 AM
AdmirerUS's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
I wonder though if other continental European royal princes will curtsy to Camilla if the British court chooses to refer to her as Princess Consort regardless of whether she is legally Queen or not. I remind you that James and Louise for example are styled as children of an earl even though they should be legally HRHs.
Whereas I just wonder how frequently Charles and Camilla will be face to face with the Continentals to even share a curtsy...
Reply With Quote
  #856  
Old 09-12-2015, 08:52 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 5,148
Here is the issue some experts have with 'Princess Consort'. The title does not exist in common law.

The constitution already provides a title and precedence for Camilla.

The wife of a King has the highest rank and dignity in the realm after her husband assigned to her by law.

The highest rank and dignity after a king is a queen not 'princess consort'

The reason 'Prince Consort' exits is because the constitution completely ignores the husband of a Queen.

(The Duke of Edinburgh was never created Prince Consort btw but a Prince of the United Kingdom)

Will the government allow Charles to just invent the title out of thin air?
Reply With Quote
  #857  
Old 09-12-2015, 11:17 AM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Here is the issue some experts have with 'Princess Consort'. The title does not exist in common law.

The constitution already provides a title and precedence for Camilla.

The wife of a King has the highest rank and dignity in the realm after her husband assigned to her by law.

The highest rank and dignity after a king is a queen not 'princess consort'

The reason 'Prince Consort' exits is because the constitution completely ignores the husband of a Queen.

(The Duke of Edinburgh was never created Prince Consort btw but a Prince of the United Kingdom)

Will the government allow Charles to just invent the title out of thin air?

The other issue is that in creating the title and denying her the use of the title of Queen, Charles is creating morganatic law in Britain.
Reply With Quote
  #858  
Old 09-12-2015, 11:33 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 6,449
In 1857 Queen Victoria created her spouse Albert Prince-Consort. I fail to see why King Charles can not create his spouse Camilla Princess-Consort. He can litterally use the Letters-Patent of 1857 and just adapt it to the current situation...

The monarchy is much more flexible than often is thought on these boards. The Prince of Wales marrying for a second time with a divorced lady? No problem. The children of the heir to the Heir also become a Prince of the UK? No problem. Making the succession gender neutral? No problem. Allowing successors to marry Catholics? No problem. Making Camilla a Princess-Consort? That will be no any problem at all, otherwise the Court would not have hinted this intention.
Reply With Quote
  #859  
Old 09-12-2015, 11:39 AM
Duc_et_Pair's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: City, Christmas Island
Posts: 6,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
The other issue is that in creating the title and denying her the use of the title of Queen, Charles is creating morganatic law in Britain.
No he is not because morganatic law does not exist. Almost all approved marriages in the British royal family are with "commoners" and have been for several generations. Note that Camilla fully shares in all the Prince of Wales' titles but "is known as" the Duchess of Cornwall or the Duchess of Rothesay, this dismisses any "morganatic" claim. Note that Peter Phillips and Zara Phillips have no any title at all but are nevertheless very much in the line of succession.
Reply With Quote
  #860  
Old 09-12-2015, 02:00 PM
cepe's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,660
Holding a poll at the beginning of September, when the papers are reporting the anniversary of the death of Diana is poor practice.

As with all polls, the wording of the questions and the timing will influence results.
__________________

__________________

This precious stone set in the silver sea,......
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England,
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
camilla, duchess of cornwall, public opinion


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
albania andrew scott cooper ascot 2016 bernadotte best gown best gown september 2016 best hat best outfit birthday brunei royal family child constantine ii coup d'etat crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion denmark duchess of cambridge duke of cambridge fashion poll game king abdullah ii king carl gustaf king carl gustaf and queen silvia king philippe king willem-alexander member introduction monarchy new zealand norway november 2016 october 2016 opening of parliament picture of the week prince charles princess charlene outfits princess eugenie outfit princess marie princess mary princess mary casual style princess mary daytime fashion princess mary fashion princess mary hats princess sofia queen frederika queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen margrethe queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima at the women deliver conference queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania daytime fashion queen rania fashion queen silvia september 2016 state visit succession sweden the duchess of cambridge the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises