the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81  
Old 09-24-2006, 12:38 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England and Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 8,702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RubyPrincess168
What I have read of them comes from British press (a bit bias?) and American tabloids (the truth?).
The press print stories it thinks will make people buy their papers, I don't believe any of them are able to tell the truth, whether they are British, American or the upper reaches of the moon. Be that as it may, to base your dislikes solely on what you have read, without even thinking their might be two, three or four sides to the story, is IMO, a little shortsighted.

Camilla is Charles' wife, they make each other happy it would seem and who would want anyone to live a miserable life.
__________________
The Past is the Past
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers
?
They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 09-24-2006, 09:54 PM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RubyPrincess168
My opinion hasn't changed since they got married. I think it's still disgraceful that he was allowed to marry his mistress (to use a polite word) and that she is allowed to be his Queen Consort should he become King. What I have read of them comes from British press (a bit bias?) and American tabloids (the truth?). I don't think it matters how much of a makeover some one does or how many jewels she is seen wearing, she's still his mistress.
Pretty strong words here. I agree with the others, since they're married now, Camilla can hardly be called Charles' mistress.

Mind you, I used to have a dim view of affair-makers marrying each other but after seeing a lot of second marriages that were a lot better than the first I came to the realization that the people in question had the affair because they were better suited for each other than they were for the people they married in the first place.

Does it make it right? Not exactly, it would have been better if they had gotten divorces sooner, but ending even a bad marriage is not as easy as it looks from the outside.
__________________
"One thing we can do is make the choice to view the world in a healthy way. We can choose to see the world as safe with only moments of danger rather than seeing the world as dangerous with only moments of safety."
-- Deepak Chopra
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 09-25-2006, 05:20 AM
AgnesK's Avatar
AgnesK AgnesK is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wroclaw, Poland
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RubyPrincess168
I think it's still disgraceful that he was allowed to marry his mistress

Allowed? He is a grown man and saying that he should or shouldn't be allowed to marry is really funny.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 09-25-2006, 06:11 AM
Henri M.'s Avatar
Henri M. Henri M. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eindhoven / Maastricht, Netherlands
Posts: 1,909
Send a message via MSN to Henri M.
Default Mistress (maîtresse)

A mistress (a maîtresse) is a woman who has a continuing, extramarital (sexual) relationship with one married man, in an exclusive and continuing liaison.

The Prince of Wales was an unmarried man since the mid-1990's so Camilla was almost for a decade no longer a mistress avant-la-lettre.

By the way: 'an exclusive and continuing liaison' with one extramarital partner seems much more preferrable to me than the endless promiscue row of 'lovers' the late Diana, Princess of Wales had, but that is a purely personal opinion, of course.

Last edited by Henri M.; 09-25-2006 at 06:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 09-25-2006, 08:08 AM
Madame Royale's Avatar
Madame Royale Madame Royale is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,969
Default

I may hold a different opinion to yours RubyPrincess168, but I respect it

Last edited by Madame Royale; 09-25-2006 at 08:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 09-25-2006, 09:40 AM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henri M.
A mistress (a maîtresse) is a woman who has a continuing, extramarital (sexual) relationship with one married man, in an exclusive and continuing liaison.

The Prince of Wales was an unmarried man since the mid-1990's so Camilla was almost for a decade no longer a mistress avant-la-lettre.

By the way: 'an exclusive and continuing liaison' with one extramarital partner seems much more preferrable to me than the endless promiscue row of 'lovers' the late Diana, Princess of Wales had, but that is a purely personal opinion, of course.
I don't see why Diana should be brought up here? We were talking about Camilla.
__________________
"One thing we can do is make the choice to view the world in a healthy way. We can choose to see the world as safe with only moments of danger rather than seeing the world as dangerous with only moments of safety."
-- Deepak Chopra
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 10-01-2006, 01:03 AM
JALyles JALyles is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: long Beach, United States
Posts: 3
Default

My opinion has not really changed I tolerate Camilla. But I do love Charles.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 10-03-2006, 12:45 AM
Queen Katherine Queen Katherine is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Broome, Australia
Posts: 18
Default

Camilla is the Duchess of Prudence.
__________________
If I rule, I rule ALONE!

There's not a cloud in the sky, it's as blue as your blue goodbye, and I thought that it would rain, the day you went away.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 10-03-2006, 01:28 AM
Gecko's Avatar
Gecko Gecko is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Katherine
Camilla is the Duchess of Prudence.
Okay, I'll bite! What do you mean exactly? She's discrete, frugal or she's only looking after her own interests?
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 10-03-2006, 02:08 AM
crisscross1's Avatar
crisscross1 crisscross1 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 651
Default

I don't really give Camilla much thought so I guess my opinion hasn't changed about her. I do think they are well suited to each other and will always be content and happy together.
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 10-03-2006, 03:46 AM
Australian's Avatar
Australian Australian is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Katherine
Camilla is the Duchess of Prudence.
I'm baffled by this statement. Can you enlighten us?
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 10-28-2006, 06:56 PM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Australian
I'm baffled by this statement. Can you enlighten us?
I would interpret it to mean that Camilla doesn't talk to the press about her private life or makes embarassing scenes in public. The operative words here being 'to the press' and 'in public'.
__________________
"One thing we can do is make the choice to view the world in a healthy way. We can choose to see the world as safe with only moments of danger rather than seeing the world as dangerous with only moments of safety."
-- Deepak Chopra
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 12-21-2006, 12:55 PM
shaan shaan is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: singapore, Singapore
Posts: 32
Default Do you think that camilla has become more acceptable now?

Since her marriage in april 2005 somehow camilla seems to have taken over the limelight quite well and is getting on with it - do you think that people are beginning to appreciate her a lot more and is she becoming more and more popular now than ever before.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 12-21-2006, 01:40 PM
alex001's Avatar
alex001 alex001 is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Plymouth, United Kingdom
Posts: 241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaan
Since her marriage in april 2005 somehow camilla seems to have taken over the limelight quite well and is getting on with it - do you think that people are beginning to appreciate her a lot more and is she becoming more and more popular now than ever before.
Yes, I think our image has certainly changed of her - she's no longer the diana's marriage wrecker, but the women who's made Charles happy.
__________________
"Those who imagine that a politician would make a better figurehead than a hereditary monarch might perhaps make the acquaintance of more politicians."
Margaret Thatcher
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 12-26-2006, 05:20 PM
lauren grace lauren grace is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hemet, United States
Posts: 2
Default Charles and Camilla a perfect pair

Charles and Camilla are a perfect pair.I believe they work well together and fit each other well.She is a support and help to the Prince and I understand that she is so down to earth and caring.She certainly showed that when she and Charles came to Lousiana and the Gulf after Katrina. It was so much appreciated here in the States that they took the time to visit the stricken areas.That means alot.I am just getting to know Camilla's patronages, and I was thrilled to see that she visited Emmaus Homeless community.What a great Patron she will make.I was homeless my self at one time and I know the feeling.She seems to be a very caring individual and she does Her Husband and her country proud.As an American who also loves Queen and Country-due to my early raising by a British Uncle and American Aunt I appreciate all that they do.My hat's off to them.I wish them Peace in their life together.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 12-27-2006, 04:50 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,336
Default

Welcome to the Forums Lauren Grace.
I see you've got into your stride with your second post. It gets much easier once the initial "first post nerves" have been overcome. Enjoy.
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs.
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
Have a chat here: Chat Room and for those with something in common: Social Groups
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 12-27-2006, 04:23 PM
milla Ca's Avatar
milla Ca milla Ca is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 1,460
Default

Welcome Lauren Grace !
It´s nice to read your post and to see that there is one more who thinks that the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall are great!
__________________
´We will all have to account for our actions to our children and grand-children, and if we don´t get this right, how will they ever forgive us?´
Prince Charles in a speech, 6th December 2006
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 12-27-2006, 04:36 PM
sirhon11234's Avatar
sirhon11234 sirhon11234 is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn, United States
Posts: 1,571
Default

I've always had a soft spot for Charles. But my opinion hasn't change for Camilla, I don't like her but I still respect her.
__________________
Diana, Princess of Wales - She became an icon in life and a
legend in death.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 12-27-2006, 05:14 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England and Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 8,702