![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#761
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am also not a supporter of the couple but if they are happy together they should be just let enjoy their company and life.
|
|
#762
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the Duchess has more experience and maturity to take the role of let's say a partner of the Prince of Wales. She is also only doing what she has to do and avoiding much public exposure with the support of the staff I guess.
|
|
#763
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three |
|
#764
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wife is one thing, but being the partner of the Prince of Wales in respect to his public duties e.g. support for his work and initiatives is another.
We probably hardly know the Duchess as a wife - unless one of us has met her. And I have not. I know her as a public figure and except for her charities I do not know her official and personal opinion on let's say global warming. That's why I said "partner" because just the word "wife" refers to something else. She has supported his word not just as a wife but as a partner. Last edited by inka7; 05-19-2008 at 03:14 PM. |
|
#765
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You can read here in the threads much about her and also if you open the Pow website: (So maybe you will understand what i mean ) The Prince of Wales - Charities and Patronages
__________________
´We will all have to account for our actions to our children and grand-children, and if we don´t get this right, how will they ever forgive us?´ Prince Charles in a speech, 6th December 2006 |
|
#766
|
||||
|
||||
|
On that we will have to disagree. To truly be a wife, support in many areas, (beliefs, ideals, work) is a major factor.
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three |
|
#767
|
|||
|
|||
|
If my husband likes car racing (that's not his main hobby) but I hate the noise, the hectic, the crazyness of this sport as an individual I have the choice not to go and not to support him. I did not pledge by marrying him I will be going to all those crazy for me events. I have nothing against him going and nothing against the sport - it is just not my cup of tea.
A partner is someone who is also into that....the Duchess is not just the wife, she is the buddy, she goes a long. |
|
#768
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three |
|
#769
|
|||
|
|||
|
But that's why he also has his other friends, his partners.
As a wife I obligatory go where I have to go to support him. And that's what I meant by partner initially ... We do not know the duchess as a wife, the way she is at home or privately with the Prince of Wales. We know her officially.... as a partner. In her situation she doesn't have that much freedom. A man/wife is a more tender relationship than what we see in public. |
|
#770
|
|||
|
|||
|
It will help to have his wife at his side who can chose to go or not to go.
A partner goes. |
|
#771
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Things must be different in your country, here a wife and/or partner can choose whether to attend or not, even a royal wife, Marriage is/should be a partnership, IMO.
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three |
|
#772
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly. Marriage isn't the total sacrifice of oneself to the other's will. There has to be an independance to it or else it's all too clingy and it ends up in disaster. As we've already seen...
__________________
Abnormal Service has been resumed. |
|
#773
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
'To dare is to lose one step for but a moment, not to dare is to lose oneself forever' - Crown Prince Frederick of Denmark in a letter to Miss Mary Donaldson as stated by them on their official engagement interview. |
|
#774
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well Camilla chose for herself. She wasn't forced into anything. She remains her own woman as well as being a wife, mother and consort.
__________________
Abnormal Service has been resumed. |
|
#775
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Duchess cannot chose not to attend something she is obliged to attend as a wife - that's what I was saying.
And we do not know her as a wife. The public doesn't know her as a wife. |
|
#776
|
||||
|
||||
|
Noooooo, luckily not !!!
( Jo´s and my marriages seem to be the best examples... ![]() )
__________________
´We will all have to account for our actions to our children and grand-children, and if we don´t get this right, how will they ever forgive us?´ Prince Charles in a speech, 6th December 2006 |
|
#777
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() As Abba said Quote:
![]() ![]() I am relieved to know that, along with some other very dear German friends!
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three Last edited by Skydragon; 05-19-2008 at 04:52 PM. |
|
#778
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
We know a fair bit about the public lives of Charles and Camilla as "working partners" in their royal duties. We know very little about their private life at home as husband and wife. Yes, they are also husband and wife in public, but in public we only see a small aspect of their lives. If my mom and dad worked together in public, they wouldn't act identically to the way they act at home. Public behaviour is never a full and fair representation of private behaviour. |