The Verdict of the Diana Inquest, April 2008

[ghost_night554]

Originally Posted by Jo of Palatine

Interesting reasoning, only the French and British investigation found out that there were no "Powers to Be" involved, that's what the inquest heard as well. Diana was definately not pregnant but on the pill and had menses shortly before her death - that was made very plausible at the inquest. Most people questioned about the "engagement" Fayed claimed thought at the inquest that she would never have gotten engaged without talking to her sons before and that she didn't do. Maybe she wanted to become engaged, maybe not - but she was not about announcing either a pregnancy nor an engagement anytime soon. What she could have been announcing was that Fayed had promised to finance a couple of hsipices to be called "The Diana hospices". But noone knows for sure, as she told anybody a different story.

That's exactly what came to my mind, same goes for the big annoucement Dodi was going to tell his lawyer about.The fact the Fayed name would be behind it for Dodi I could see being exciting and important news at that time again if that's what he meant. There are alot of weird pieces of evidence that came out of the inquest that we can only guess what they could have meant. For example the telephone calls and letters Trevor got after the accident, one would think it would be the establishment but the evidence given right before made me think it could be Mr Fayed because I beleive Mr Murell had said Fayed had told them to tell Trevor to keep his mouth shut and that's exactly what this person was saying in these letters and phone calls. Same goes for the phone call Mr Klein received telling him Diana had been pregnant although for some reason I find that was someone just messing around. We'll never get proper answers for things like that we can only assume.

[TheTruth]

British Diana judge thanks France for its help

British Diana judge thanks France for its help - Yahoo! News UK

[judith14011]

I was wondering if the term "unlawful killing" is equivalent to the United States legal concept of "wrongful death?" Given that Al Fayed finally let it go, was it just a matter of semantics to him? Ironically enough, if it was "wrongful death," the accused would be Al Fayed, The Ritz and his security detail, The Spencer family and the Princes would have cause to sue Al Fayed for failing to protect the Princess.

[ghost_night554]

Actually I do think the Spencer family could sue Fayed if they wanted to but I think they'd rather not since he finally let it go, they probably don't want to start anything.

The whole repossi ring thing is still bothering me for some reason lol I still don't get it really.

I also read The mercedes is being destroyed once they finalize that Mr Fayed will not press any other legal charges.

[Skydragon]

Paul Burrell will NOT be charged with perjury apparently and the investigation has been concluded. The reason given is that there is insufficient evidence!

[TheTruth]

Well isn't a video an evidence of his "red herrings" as he said ? This is very unfair. They almost made the Queen, Prince Charles and the whole RF come to the Inquest and this disgusting man isn't forced to go and explain himself ?!

Originally Posted by TheTruth

British Diana judge thanks France for its help

British Diana judge thanks France for its help - Yahoo! News UK

Pictures of the event :

Pic 1 * Pic 2 *

[Al_bina]

Great photos of stunning Rachida Dati! I am pleased to know that the line has been drawn in this case.

[Mermaid1962]

Probably the LAST thing anyone wants is to give Paul Burrell a chance to perjure himself again...and again...and dish dirt--which might or might not be true. I think that they're letting sleeping dogs lie; or maybe there's been a quiet deal made with Mr. Burrell that we'll hear about later.

[ghost_night554]

I'm shocked actually..but best nothing start I suppose, I wouldn't want to hear more lies then I already have from him.

[TheTruth]

I have to disagree with the opinion that it's better to do nothing so as to keep it quiet. I'm not afraid to hear other hideous things on Diana, that's what covered the newspapers for the past 10 years so I assume we are getting used to it anyway. I feel like we've been turning around Burrell forever and it would be the unique occasion to show to everyone that this man is a pure and simple liar and that he created a lot of problems with his conspiracy theories and secret letters coming from nowhere. He should be punished for the lies he told and for his dirty work with Diana's personal belongings.

[ghost_night554]

^True so much has already been revealed about Diana, guess it wouldn't bother me but I meant I wouldn't want to start up anything as in more conspiracy theories and such.But then again if it could prove that many of the conpsiracy theorists were wrong then that would be a great opportunity.

[TheTruth]

Yes, it's what comes from it that will show us if it was worth it. We have the video to support the idea of lies and it's a great start. If they dig a little more, I'm sure they could find terrible evidences of his game. I believe that Burrell encouraged those conspiracy theories so that Diana's "spirit" would never die. When you look at some pictures, even some with his wife (picture 1, 2 ), it's obvious that these people were very close and I think he never accepted that time would eventually let Diana vanish from the spotlight. (and him at the same time )

[TheTruth]

News Releases :
Diana's butler won't face perjury probe - Yahoo! News UK
Paul Burrell Will Not Face Police Action Over Diana Inquest Perjury Claims |Sky News|UK News
Burrell is in the clear over Diana inquest 'perjury' | the Daily Mail

[ghost_night554]

Sorta random but after all this time I still found myself sitting tonight going but what if it's all a lie suppose we'll never know, then I thought of the effort, preparation, the aftermath etc could they pull it off? And then I thought about it and came to the conclusion that all we have is the evidence some people choose to beleive it others don't and beleive it's all been a huge cover up for me I guess they'll always be that little doubt in the back of my mind and I don't know why. I guess after so many years of beleiving one thing it's sorta hard to drastically change your mind. I mean from what I saw over the past 6 months or so I'd say accident but then you always have that little thing going but what if. Sorry I know it was kinda weird I sorta just switched the topic but it's been in my mind all night and I felt like expressing myself.

[TheTruth]

I must say I sometimes feel like you. There are so many facts, so many "evidences" that it makes it all so confusing. For example, the letter she wrote about Charles willing to kill her ; I'm not sure what to think about it. Is it true or is it just Burrell ? And Diana's personality and character doesn't help us at all either. She seemed so humor-unbalanced (Borderline disorder ?) that it's very hard to tell if she could have done it or not. Her friend, Lucia Flecha de Lima told she could never have written such things :
Source : Telegraph

During questioning on Tuesday, the letter was shown to Lucia Flecha da Lima, the wife of the former Brazilian ambassador to London and one of the princess's closest confidantes. She said that the princess had never expressed fears for her safety.

"I still don't believe in it," she said. "Paul Burrell was perfectly capable of imitating Princess Diana's handwriting. I don't believe she was fearing for her life, especially from Prince Charles, the future king of your country."

[Warren]

We need to put the "Charles murder plot" in its context. The letter that is mentioned in the Paget Report stated that the targets were to be Diana and Camilla so that Charles could marry Tiggy Legge-Bourke. If Diana really did think this at the time we can put it down to a moment of stress as no-one could possibly take such a claim seriously.

[TheTruth]

I agree Warren. And she wrote it in 1993, i.e. nothing near the time of her death.

[Mermaid1962]

Yes; and by the time she died, she might have forgotten that she ever wrote it--if she in fact did write it.

Originally Posted by TheTruth

I agree Warren. And she wrote it in 1993, i.e. nothing near the time of her death.

[ghost_night554]

Ya I don't think it was something she actually meant if she did write it.

I must say I sometimes feel like you. There are so many facts, so many "evidences" that it makes it all so confusing.

Thanks, good to know I'm not the only one who feels like that sometimes.

[judith14011]

Originally Posted by TheTruthI must say I sometimes feel like you. There are so many facts, so many "evidences" that it makes it all so confusing. For example, the letter she wrote about Charles willing to kill her ; I'm not sure what to think about it. Is it true or is it just Burrell ? And Diana's personality and character doesn't help us at all either. [COLOR=royalblue

She seemed so humor-unbalanced (Borderline disorder ?)[/color] that it's very hard to tell if she could have done it or not. Her friend, Lucia Flecha de Lima told she could never have written such things

Can you clarify why believe "humor-unbalanced" means that Diana had Borderline Personality Disorder?

Am I mistaken or was there a letter written in Diana's hand on KP stationary re: a plot to kill her or cause an incapacitating head injury?