pinkie40
Nobility
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2007
- Messages
- 423
- City
- Dallas
- Country
- United States
I would have thought the people in charge would have taken multiple tissue/fluid samples of the princess simply because certain questions (specifically this one) would have not even been part of the diaglouge this many years onward. Anyway, her DNA profile would have been useful for storage for any questions of future descendants....and how much space would that take up in her medical records???
Now comes the news the letters from the DOE never existed....despite what Paul Burrell and Simone Simmons attest to what they have seen. Maybe the DOE might need to be compelled to testify. If the letters do not appear, that will be something I would find highly suspicious. Surely people like the Duke kept copies of his correspondence to Diana so it could not be disputed or twisted by her paranoia/moods in the future.
I also hope the inquest answers the question posed by Simone Simmons as to why the tunnel was washed clean after the wreck.
One could also ask Rene Delorm or any servants/stewards on the Jonikal or at any of the land residences if Diana drank any alcohol. Diana would not harm a pregnancy by drinking, imo.
Now comes the news the letters from the DOE never existed....despite what Paul Burrell and Simone Simmons attest to what they have seen. Maybe the DOE might need to be compelled to testify. If the letters do not appear, that will be something I would find highly suspicious. Surely people like the Duke kept copies of his correspondence to Diana so it could not be disputed or twisted by her paranoia/moods in the future.
I also hope the inquest answers the question posed by Simone Simmons as to why the tunnel was washed clean after the wreck.
One could also ask Rene Delorm or any servants/stewards on the Jonikal or at any of the land residences if Diana drank any alcohol. Diana would not harm a pregnancy by drinking, imo.
Last edited: