![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal | Royal Articles | Royal Calendar | Register | FAQ | Members List | Royal Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#241
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#242
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually, they got a little ugly at the paps at/during/around the funeral. I clearly thought that that was justified. Those paps have sold their souls and are in it for the money.
|
|
#243
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jayne Fincher mentions in her absolutely lovely tribute book (published after Diana died) of her own frustrations in her attempts to "get the Palace to do something" about the paparazzi to "cease and desist" from hounding Diana after losing the HRH status...Unfortunately, to no avail.
There is the PBS documentary which was shown in the USA eerily shortly before Diana died called. "The Princess and The Press"..... I am fascinated by the people not called as witnesses in the inquest....Get this young Asian man up there and let him answer some questions...He sounds like a key element. I would also see Rita Rodgers take the stand and reveal what questions Diana and Dodi wanted "guidance" for before they died. So many people, so many questions.... |
|
#244
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What a pity you didn't see the word 'may' in my post. That suggests that there is a possibility that this is why this person is not coming forward. Considering the death threats that have been made to Camilla both before and after her marriage to Charles (reported by CH and to Scotland Yard) and the threats made this year if she attended the Memorial service then I think a reasonable person could very well fear for their lives from some fanatic. Most normal human beings, whether fans of Diana or not, wouldn't do so but a fanatic could very easily. Just because someone hasn't done something now doesn't mean that they couldn't in the future if this man made a confession that he was driving a white fiat uno in the tunnel that evening and clipped a black Mercedes. Personally I wouldn't come forward in those circumstances. Just seeing the vitriol that is written on this board towards anyone who disliked Diana is enough to make sure that I would fear for my life with the number of people in society today who have access to the means to do real harm to people and seem to think that Diana was the perfect human being. I have never hidden my dislike of Diana and I have been verbally attacked for that belief on this board and through PMs but I soldier on. I have had enough personal abuse here however to make me think that my sanity isn't worth the hassle if people can't do something as simple as actually reading the words written rather than just skimming the piece. I gave a suggestion as to why a person mightn't come forward and was then attacked for it. |
|
#245
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As this is a British inquest they can't force anyone who isn't a British citizen to give evidence and this Vietnamese man knows this. As he hasn't given evidence to the French inquiry he certainly won't give evidence at this one and I don't blame him - personally I would run a mile away from giving evidence myself in his circumstances as I would fear for my life. |
|
#246
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
. . .
|
|
#247
|
||||
|
||||
|
The hard copy and downloads are available to anyone.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/news/nol/...ana_report.pdf Operation Paget inquiry report published : Directgov - Newsroom
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three |
|
#248
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I can well understand the mans reluctance to come forward and having seen the baying pack in London a couple of days after the accident, think it was a wise decision.
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three |
|
#249
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks! ![]() |
|
#250
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Warren; 11-01-2007 at 08:38 AM. Reason: ed quote block |
|
#251
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, sometimes things get a bit heated, but on the whole we don't encourage vitriol.
__________________
. . .
|
|
#252
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think that, if members are being attacked personally, it should be publicised, and names named.
There is a big difference between disagreement, conflicting opinions and cowardly personal abuse. The former is par for the course on a public discussion board; the latter, simply offensive. |
|
#253
|
|||
|
|||
|
All people in the public eye must be wary of some "nut" attacking them. Actors, muscians, politcians and royal families. It is not an unknown thing. My objection was not to someone's safety being compromised, which it certainly could, but that they be catorgorized as "Diana fanatics". Perhaps, they might do these things becuase they are mentally unstable. I, believe, that when people do these bizarre things, it is not so much that they are a particular fan, but because they are unwell. When President Reagan was shot many years ago, the young man who shot him was a "Jodi Foster Fanatic", of course, he is in a mental hospital now. Because he had this thing for Jodi Foster didn't make him any more likely to hurt someone, it was his mental illness. If someone who liked Diana were to harm anyone involved they, too, would most undoubtedly, be mentally ill. It wasn't the word "may" that I missed, it was idea that people who liked Diana were more capble of harm than others. I, frankly, don't see why anyone can get that involved in the whole thing. Diana is dead 10 years and, but, for this never ending inquest, it might be put to rest. If, everyone, who can testify, would do so, it would clear up any of the doubts, reasonable and unreasonable and it would end. I do not beieve there was a conspiracy, but if new info keeps surfacing and people who could testify hide, it will cast doubts.
|
|
#254
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three |
|
#255
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Warren; 11-02-2007 at 05:15 AM. Reason: ed quote to relevant part |
|
#256
|
||||
|
||||
|
The inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales has sparked an international row after the French government was accused of using "subterfuge" to protect key witnesses
French accused of Diana inquest 'subterfuge' - Telegraph Jack Straw, the Secretary of State for Justice, is considering whether to personally intervene in a row over the non-appearance of French witnesses at the inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales Jack Straw may intervene in Diana inquest row - Telegraph
__________________
The Past is the Past Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers? They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three |
|
#257
|
||||
|
||||
|
|