The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #41  
Old 12-04-2005, 10:39 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incas
Didn't Morton or his publisher produce manuscripts with notes from Diana?
diana send to morton 6 cassettes. with that (and photos from spencer family and diana's friend words about her royal life) morton write the book.
__________________

__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #42  
Old 12-04-2005, 10:44 PM
regardez's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 318
Well she made a lot of mistakes with manipulating the press, I can understand why the Queen didn't like her for that. But didn't they have differences even before Diana started that stuff?
__________________

__________________
now that the lilacs are in bloom,
she keeps a bowl of lilacs in her room
  #43  
Old 12-04-2005, 11:29 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: , Canada
Posts: 1,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by corazon
diana send to morton 6 cassettes. with that (and photos from spencer family and diana's friend words about her royal life) morton write the book.
I seems to recall seeing a documentary about how the book came about. It concentrated interviews on Morton, his publisher, and a doctor who was the intermediary between Morton and Diana. It was the segments on that doctor that included shots of Diana's notes on the manuscripts. She made corrections on the '82 fall story among others. I remember the doctor mentioning a funny story about transporting the manuscripts Diana in his bicycle basket. He crashed the bike near KP and the paper went flying down the street. He eventually managed to collect all the paper.
__________________
  #44  
Old 12-04-2005, 11:31 PM
Margrethe II's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by regardez
Well she made a lot of mistakes with manipulating the press, I can understand why the Queen didn't like her for that. But didn't they have differences even before Diana started that stuff?
I dont think it can be said that HM the Queen didn't like her for that or anything, rather, was dissapointed that someone from within her inner circle broke that sanctity of trust that is expected to observed, especially by members of her own family.

The Queen didn't dislike Diana, but felt helpless, hurt and no doubt very concerned about the circumstances that both her son and daughter in-law were facing and as a consequence, 'the firm' & its image. I can understand this 110%. As Monarch, her position must come first and if someone decides to disgrace the Sovereign institution, they may just aswell slap the Queen in the face.

Until Diana's death, it wasn't uncommon for Diana to call the Queen for conversations and infact go and use the pool at either Windsor or Buckingham Palace, where afterwoods, she would have an audience with the Queen for around 15-20 minutes if possible.

Sovereign and subject (contrary to what many believe) where beginning to correspond and were making constant and sincere efforts to get to know each other again; just as she was with Charles. Diana may have not been an actual member of the immediate royal family anymore, but the Queen still felt the same concern and deep down, the same affection for her just as she did during happier times.

You are only ever hurt by those you love!

I said to a certain confidant on the board that I wasn't planning on posting in the British sub forums again any time soon, but I just wanted to add that little contribution.

My kind regards to all,

"MII"
__________________
  #45  
Old 12-04-2005, 11:45 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incas
I seems to recall seeing a documentary about how the book came about. It concentrated interviews on Morton, his publisher, and a doctor who was the intermediary between Morton and Diana. It was the segments on that doctor that included shots of Diana's notes on the manuscripts. She made corrections on the '82 fall story among others. I remember the doctor mentioning a funny story about transporting the manuscripts Diana in his bicycle basket. He crashed the bike near KP and the paper went flying down the street. He eventually managed to collect all the paper.
yes, of course that was a intermediary, morton said the true about diana's participation late diana's death. there is very good movie about the history of the book ''the biographer'' is based in morton's words.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #46  
Old 12-04-2005, 11:51 PM
corazon's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -In some dark place-, Argentina
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Margrethe II
I dont think it can be said that HM the Queen didn't like her for that or anything, rather, was dissapointed that someone from within her inner circle broke that sanctity of trust that is expected to observed, especially by members of her own family.

The Queen didn't dislike Diana, but felt helpless, hurt and no doubt very concerned about the circumstances that both her son and daughter in-law were facing and as a consequence, 'the firm' & its image. I can understand this 110%. As Monarch, her position must come first and if someone decides to disgrace the Sovereign institution, they may just aswell slap the Queen in the face.

Until Diana's death, it wasn't uncommon for Diana to call the Queen for conversations and infact go and use the pool at either Windsor or Buckingham Palace, where afterwoods, she would have an audience with the Queen for around 15-20 minutes if possible.

Sovereign and subject (contrary to what many believe) where beginning to correspond and were making constant and sincere efforts to get to know each other again; just as she was with Charles. Diana may have not been an actual member of the immediate royal family anymore, but the Queen still felt the same concern and deep down, the same affection for her just as she did during happier times.

You are only ever hurt by those you love!

I said to a certain confidant on the board that I wasn't planning on posting in the British sub forums again any time soon, but I just wanted to add that little contribution.

My kind regards to all,

"MII"
is true, for example the queen was VERY happy in william's confirmation when the phtoghapher taken the official photo. (the last photo of charles and diana with the queen was in 1994) charles and diana have a good relationship and the queen was happy for that and for them.
__________________
Today the world has embraced new royal Princesses in the form of Mary of Denmark and Maxima of the Netherlands. But it's questionable whether even these hugely popular, increasingly glamorous future Queens will ever capture the world's imagination in the same way as Diana.
As Mario acknowledges: "She really was a true Princess".
-www.theroyalist.net-
  #47  
Old 12-04-2005, 11:58 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 589
She should have not discuss her private matters with the media and journalists. She used the media to blame the Royal family and Charles for the problems in her marriage. It was an unfair opnion about what happened in the marriage. She should not have used William and Harry to revenge on Charles even he was unfaithful to her. She should have not taken so many lovers in her marriage but only claimed "there are three in my marriage. So it was bit crowded". She painted herself as the only victim and this was very biased and self-pity. I saw the pains but she should try to look back and think about her mistakes in the marriage.
__________________
  #48  
Old 12-05-2005, 01:17 AM
Margrethe II's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by love_cc
she should try to look back and think about her mistakes in the marriage.
Um... love_cc...I think that rather impossible, given her current condition :)

"MII"
__________________
  #49  
Old 12-05-2005, 02:07 AM
Avalon's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 5,905
I was a way too young to have watched the Bashir interview live or read the Morton book at the time it was published (though I did both a bit later). But my Mom and Aunt were (and are) great Diana fans. They always take her side in every single matter and there is no point to try and explain them that there might be a tiny little bit wrong about their judgments. Both my Mom and Aunt have read the Russian translation of the Morton book and it's even more pro-Diana than yo can imagine (yes, Russians sometimes translate not word-to-word bu what is closer to the plot, in their opinion. Good example are Harry Potter books). Anyway I read it in English and the very first impression I got was “for Heaven’s sake, stop complaining and do something”. I really thought it was too much. I mean Diana would blame everyone and everything except her. Sometimes it’s better to be self-critical rather then criticize the others.

And the Bashir interview made me just terribly sorry for her. But no in the way she meant it. I was sorry that a woman of such beauty, talents and possibilities is able to d things like that, to try and manipulate people, to play on the fact they felt sorry for her. I don’t think that exposing your personal life was the very best thing to do. I had the impression that everything was very carefully staged and it was not exactly a pleasant feeling. The Princess tried to sound natural but that exactly what she lacked. I really was sorry for Prince Charles. I suppose it was after I watched the interview that I tried to look at everything from his point of view.

All of the things I wrote are just my opinion. I admit that I criticized her a lot. I named only the things I didn’t like about her but there are loads of things for which I loved her very much. She was a very good person (I believe in that). Had her life not ended so tragically and unexpectedly, she might do great things in her life. She was no saint but she was a very good human.
__________________
Queen Elizabeth: "I cannot lead you into battle, I do not give you laws or administer justice but I can do something else, I can give you my heart and my devotion to these old islands and to all the peoples of our brotherhood of nations." God, Save The Queen!
  #50  
Old 12-05-2005, 05:20 AM
Idriel's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: around, France
Posts: 1,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Margrethe II
I said to a certain confidant on the board that I wasn't planning on posting in the British sub forums again any time soon, but I just wanted to add that little contribution.
Well M II, I hope you stay around. It is always a pleasure to read you clever and well spoken thoughts.
I dearly agree with your analysis of the Queen and Diana relationship.

I don't dislike Diana per se but I agree with some posters the major reason to dislike Diana (beside any judgement of her personal life), would be the way she acted with the media. No only it wasn't a safe move for her own interest and, more important, the monarchy interest but it was incredibly inconsiderate of her children feelings. Reading about your parents sex-life or nasty-meets-nastier divorce on a day to day basis is not the kind of things young boys need.
I would not have expected to be a silently suffering wife or whatever, but clearly she misunderstood or willingly disregarded what her role meant, what her duties were. I she had no remaining loyalty to her husband (and she shouldn't have imo), she should have had her loyalty to her sovereign intact. And exposing the Royal family dirty secrets through Richard Kay and Morton is not my definition of loyalty.

BTW: I'm glad this thread exist, and even happier that everyone is so courteous.
__________________

  #51  
Old 12-05-2005, 05:42 AM
wymanda's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,426
I was an avid follower of Diana from 1981 (scrapbooks & all) but I rapidly became disillusioned with her when the manipulation of the press became apparent. Tipping off the press when she was taking William & Harry out just so she could be portrayed as the "good parent" and using William as a sounding board to abuse his father really turned me off Diana. Whilst I will refrain from catagorising her as "a nut job" as someone earlier in the thread did, I think that Diana had a lot of emotional issues that would have made any marriage untennable let alone the one that she pursued & entered into which had such a huge public profile.
__________________
Everything I write here is my opinion and I mean no offence by it.
  #52  
Old 12-05-2005, 07:12 AM
Margrethe II's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 917
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idriel
Well M II, I hope you stay around. It is always a pleasure to read you clever and well spoken thoughts.
I dearly agree with your analysis of the Queen and Diana relationship.
Merci beaucoup mademoiselle

Je ne sais pas...lol. Oui, Je crois que oui.

Prends garde et bonne journée.

"MII"

Sorry about my bad French Idriel. Definitly wont take it up as a day job anytime soon.lol.
__________________
  #53  
Old 12-05-2005, 07:55 AM
ysbel's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by love_cc
she should try to look back and think about her mistakes in the marriage.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Margrethe II
Um... love_cc...I think that rather impossible, given her current condition :)

"MII"
I think part of the healing process when a person starts to get over the emotional difficulties like Diana's is realizing the mistakes you made and then choosing a new healthier path.

It was the lack of taking stock of herself and her situation during the period from 1992 to 1997 that was a little disturbing. Before that she hadn't taken matters into her own hands but after she tried some things that didn't work out one hoped for a little enlightenment of what was healthier for her and her sons.
__________________
  #54  
Old 12-05-2005, 08:43 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by corazon
is true, for example the queen was VERY happy in william's confirmation when the phtoghapher taken the official photo. (the last photo of charles and diana with the queen was in 1994) charles and diana have a good relationship and the queen was happy for that and for them.
In the last year of her life, by all accounts, the Queen and Diana had a very good relationship, much like with Prince Charles, and things were changing rapidly for the better.
__________________
  #55  
Old 12-05-2005, 09:51 AM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
I think the divorce shocked her back to reality and matured her. I think the Queen saw the good the princess can do and developed a relationship with her. I think she was hurt but I dont think they had a bad relationship. If she had lived I think things would have gotten better. If she wasnt so intent on hurting Charles and making his life hard and portraying herself as a perfect women with no faults a lot more people would like her. She should have been herself and blamed herself for her part. But, she is gone and time has moved on to a different Royal Family.
__________________
  #56  
Old 12-05-2005, 10:03 AM
fandesacs2003's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 3,159
I was not a fanatic supporter of Diana, when she was alive. Basically I found her not extremely clever, infantil and manipulator, and her marriage problems did not touch my very deeply, it's not the first timeb such problems arrive, and in women much weaker that her.

Of course she got married young, full of illusions, and she has been cheated on her fairytale expectations ...., this was bitter and difficult to handle for a young girl .... so, normal she became unstable and depressed...

On the other hand, she obtained a glorious divorce, of course it's sad to divorse, and after that she used all her energy to become an icon, but why it's bad? It's human and understandable for a person who considered herself as fully cheated.... So she did not face such an enormeous tragedy, she was not the only woman whose marriage broke up, it's quite commun. But she managed to present her story in the saddest way, and to gain full of sympathy, this was well prepared and well done with a dose of Machiavelism.

I watched also the Bashir interview, it was obvious for me that she made a wonderfull manipulating performance (make up, dressing, etc), but basically did she lie??? No, I do not think :( , she did tell the truth!

But now she is dead, and she left 2 young orphans, I do not know if it's really appropriate to continue talking about her, in any way, positive or negative. She was a public person, but what about her private side? What do you think that her boys would feel when reading all these topics? They have their own remembers from their mother, which may have been fully different in private that all these press images.

I think the best think we should do for the young Princes it's to forget her. History will come in a couple of years, and put her in her right position, but as WE ALL are not history writers, for William and Harry let her be forgotten. Only them have the right to remember her, not as a public icon, just as their mother.
__________________
  #57  
Old 12-05-2005, 10:14 AM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
They are not orphans, they do have a father. No one is critizing her role as a mother or private person. We are critizing her public life which by her fault includes a "tragic" version of her personal life. She should no be forgotten because she is a warning to keep quite, be gracious and rational and a reminder of the good that royalty can do.
__________________
  #58  
Old 12-05-2005, 11:02 AM
una una is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: london, United Kingdom
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by fandesacs2003

I watched also the Bashir interview, it was obvious for me that she made a wonderfull manipulating performance (make up, dressing, etc), but basically did she lie??? No, I do not think :( , she did tell the truth!
There were 'lies' in this interview, though I'm not sure that lies had the same import to Diana as to most of us, or even that she always knew she was doing it.
__________________
  #59  
Old 12-05-2005, 11:14 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,083
Of course Diana was only human, that is why this thread bothers me so! Let's discuss all of her faults that made us dislike her! I never considered her a saint and it's silly that people imply or think that she was. What people see through the eyes of the media or what the catch in person during a fleeting moment in time does not and should not define what you think of Diana for the rest of your lives. Everyone knows that the almost every media outlet exagerates every story out there. As for Diana asking for the sickest child, from a PR point of view as bad as it may sound the sickest looking child would certainly generate the most attention towards her charity cause. Charles may have never slandered Diana publically but he certainly did not defend her, the mother of his children either!
__________________
  #60  
Old 12-05-2005, 11:26 AM
Princejohnny25's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: , Antarctica
Posts: 2,033
This is a mature discussion to help others understand why some people are not fans of hers and dont like her as much as others. Why would charles focus extra time on a dead women. The truth is revealed and her good work continues. Charles would have to have been seriously depressed to not move on with his life and focus on his now wife and kids. Diana is gone and is fading into history. Her work continues and that is all that matters.
__________________

__________________
Closed Thread

Tags
diana princess of wales, princess diana


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diana on Magazine Covers sara1981 Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 170 03-25-2014 01:29 PM
Why do you like Diana? juliamontague Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 222 12-21-2011 02:40 AM
"Palais Royal!" (2008) French comedy loosely based on the death of Diana MihoshiMarie The Electronic Domain 19 08-11-2008 05:32 AM
The Late Princess Diana Yennie Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 171 02-20-2005 12:19 PM




Additional Links
Popular Tags
abdication birth charlene chris o'neill crown prince felipe crown prince frederik crown prince haakon crown princess letizia crown princess mary crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria current events fashion grand duchess maria teresa grand duke henri habsburg hohenzollern infanta sofia jordan king abdullah ii king albert ii king carl xvi gustav king felipe king felipe vi king harald king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander luxembourg ottoman pom prince albert prince albert ii prince carl philip prince constantijn prince felipe prince floris prince joachim prince laurent prince pieter-christiaan princess princess aimee princess alexia (2005 -) princess anita princess ariane princess beatrix princess catharina-amalia princess charlene princess claire princess laurentien princess letizia princess mabel princess madeleine princess margriet princess marie princess mary queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima queen paola queen rania queen silvia queen sofia royal russia spain state visit sweden wedding william


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014
Jelsoft Enterprises

Royal News Delivered to your Email!

You can get the latest Royal News right in your inbox.

unsusbcribe at anytime with one click

Close [X]