the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > Diana, Princess of Wales
Portal Royal Articles Royal Calendar Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read




Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-01-2007, 06:02 PM
sirhon11234's Avatar
Serene Highness
Brooklyn - United States
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,481
Default The Diana Inquest: October 2007 - April 2008

Inquest Into Princess Diana`s Death Finally Begins
Javno - World

AFP: Diana inquest to open as murder theories linger
__________________
Diana, Princess of Wales - She became an icon in life and a
legend in death.
  #2  
Old 10-01-2007, 06:42 PM
georgiea's Avatar
Nobility
Grand Rapids - United States
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 441
Default

I hope the inquest can finally put closure to the whole sad situation of Diana's and Dodi's deaths!
  #3  
Old 10-02-2007, 02:19 PM
Skydragon's Avatar
Majesty
England and Scotland - United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,854
Default

Support For Diana Conspiracy |Sky News|UK News

Diana Inquest Is 'Like No Other Before' |Sky News|UK News
__________________
The Past is the Past
Pulvis et umbra sumus - We are dust and shadow
  #4  
Old 10-02-2007, 04:03 PM
pinkie40's Avatar
Nobility
Dallas - United States
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by georgiea View Post
I hope the inquest can finally put closure to the whole sad situation of Diana's and Dodi's deaths!
Unfortunately, the long wait for the inquest itself bears some responsibility for the enduring dialogue amongst conspiracy theorists.

Had not Prince Harry himself voiced his thought of that he probably will never know what happened in the tunnel in the Matt Lauer interview this past June, then I would have not have revisited some of my concerns.
  #5  
Old 10-02-2007, 05:04 PM
selrahc4's Avatar
Courtier
- United States
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkie40 View Post
Unfortunately, the long wait for the inquest itself bears some responsibility for the enduring dialogue amongst conspiracy theorists.

Had not Prince Harry himself voiced his thought of that he probably will never know what happened in the tunnel in the Matt Lauer interview this past June, then I would have not have revisited some of my concerns.
Saying he'd never know what happened is quite different from saying he thinks there was some kind of conspiracy or that it was anything but an accident.
__________________
aka Janet on some other forums
  #6  
Old 10-02-2007, 06:19 PM
Duchess's Avatar
Serene Highness
xx - Canada
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,410
Send a message via MSN to Duchess Send a message via Yahoo to Duchess
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by selrahc4 View Post
Saying he'd never know what happened is quite different from saying he thinks there was some kind of conspiracy or that it was anything but an accident.
i wonder why he would say this? it could almost be interpreted to mean that he questions the "official" version?
__________________
Duchess
  #7  
Old 10-02-2007, 06:39 PM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
L A - United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by selrahc4 View Post
Saying he'd never know what happened is quite different from saying he thinks there was some kind of conspiracy or that it was anything but an accident.
Definitely. He could well be satisfied with the police report, but still have questions, i.e. "What the hell was my mum thinking, going all over Paris like that instead of staying put in a safe place and having a full night of sleep?" Or how about, "Why the hell didn't they have a better decoy plan in place, one that would have succeeded in fooling all paparazzi?" Or try this on for size: Why was Henri Paul drunk? Why was he driving so damn fast? Why weren't any of them except the bodyguard wearing a seatbelt?
__________________
Ashley Tatiana Marie Claire Eva Zara Chewster RS
Chewster Castle
  #8  
Old 10-02-2007, 07:31 PM
Nobility
Spring Hill - United States
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 463
Default

We really don't know what he thinks. Perhaps, he has some questions about all of the happening. We will never know.
  #9  
Old 10-02-2007, 10:02 PM
pinkie40's Avatar
Nobility
Dallas - United States
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 387
Default

When there is an accident where there should not have been an accident...considering the high level of degree of training that goes into to protection high profile guests of the Ritz or the fact that the Al-Fayed private security services should be more than adequate (thus the reason for Diana to feel secure and safe in the company of Dodi)..the fact that there have been questions is only "normal" and expected.

I don't think it is sinister or in any way disrespectful to want to know what happened or theorize what might have happened as there have been direct assassinations of members very close to the Royal Family (Lord Mountbatten). I do think it has been wrong and unkind for Mr. Al-Fayed, despite his immense grief, to lay blame upon certain members of the Royal Family since he has been cagey in bringing forth any evidence to the general public.

This juried, semi-public inquest will cause a course to be established where certain evidence can be presented in a legal, legit way.

It is far from over.....We will be talking about the inquest for decades to come.....(sigh)

Last edited by pinkie40; 10-02-2007 at 10:07 PM.
  #10  
Old 10-02-2007, 10:11 PM
pinkie40's Avatar
Nobility
Dallas - United States
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by selrahc4 View Post
Saying he'd never know what happened is quite different from saying he thinks there was some kind of conspiracy or that it was anything but an accident.
People like Prince Harry who live with a cocoon of safety built around them 24/7/365 might have even more questions that we do.

He might even now have a good grasp of the reality of how intensely Diana was detested by the people surrounding his father...and stepmother.
  #11  
Old 10-03-2007, 04:38 AM
Warren's Avatar
Administrator
Sydney - Australia
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,644
Default A deepening conspiracy...

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkie40 View Post
He might even now have a good grasp of the reality of how intensely Diana was detested by the people surrounding his father...and stepmother.
[my bolding] Now there's a thought! Since Al Fayed has pointed the finger of blame at both the Duke of Edinburgh and the Prince of Wales, how long will it be before Camilla is accused of being a co-conspirator?
__________________
The Forum's Community rules and Member FAQs.
Seeking information? Have a look at the TRF's extensive Royal A-Z.
  #12  
Old 10-03-2007, 04:48 AM
Skydragon's Avatar
Majesty
England and Scotland - United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,854
Default

Princess Diana told her solicitor that both she and Camilla Parker Bowles were going to be "got rid of" so Prince Charles could marry Royal nanny Tiggy Legge-Bourke, her inquest heard.
In a meeting with Lord Mishcon two years before her death, Diana claimed she would be “put aside” in a car accident involving “brake failure” and also insisted the Queen was about to abdicate in favour of Prince Charles.

Princess Diana said she would be 'got rid of' - Telegraph
__________________
The Past is the Past
Pulvis et umbra sumus - We are dust and shadow
  #13  
Old 10-03-2007, 06:21 AM
fanletizia's Avatar
Heir Apparent
Madrid - Spain
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,442
Default

The last image of Lady Diana

http://estaticos02.cache.el-mundo.ne...403626_g_0.jpg

First on scene

Fotobanka isifa image service

Last edited by fanletizia; 10-03-2007 at 07:16 AM.
  #14  
Old 10-03-2007, 08:46 AM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
L A - United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,324
Default

It's bizarre if Diana actually took it into her head the idea of Charles marrying Tiggy. I mean, when was the last time a Prince of Wales and Heir Apparent to the Throne married the royal "social secretary"/nanny? I know times change, but do they change that much? And whatever made Diana think Charles had those kind of thoughts about Tiggy? By 1996/97 he had been going strong with Camilla for many years and didn't seem to have apparent plans of changing that. The idea of him hooking up with Tiggy seems rather random and odd, considering the context of everything that was happening, doesn't it?

But back to the topic of this Inquest news, I have a thought about the "last photos" from the car of them all alive. What does Henri Paul look like a triumphant maniac, smiling like he's enjoying driving like that? Dodi cowers in the back no doubt hoping they get to his apt. fast and it'll be over soon. Trevor is blinded by the bright lights from the motorcycle headlights and the camera flashes. But Henri Paul is the strangest person in these pics.... He looks like a kid delighting in a chase.
__________________
Ashley Tatiana Marie Claire Eva Zara Chewster RS
Chewster Castle
  #15  
Old 10-03-2007, 10:19 AM
Skydragon's Avatar
Majesty
England and Scotland - United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,854
Default

As you might imagine, there are already some people looking at that last photo and saying that Diana was egging Henri-Paul on to drive faster, like a game and that's why she is watching the media and HP is laughing.
__________________
The Past is the Past
Pulvis et umbra sumus - We are dust and shadow
  #16  
Old 10-03-2007, 10:40 AM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
L A - United States
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,324
Default

Lord Justice Scott Baker Royal Coroner

Michael Burgess Coroner for Surrey
http://www.surreycoroner.info/

Michael Mansfield QC representing 'Mo' al-Fayed
Who are the 11 other barristers representing 'Mo' and "other interested parties?"(Cited: Raynor, Gordon of The Telegraph, 3 Oct'07)

Eleven jurors

Lady Sarah McCorquodale leaving the court, and the Daily Mail says it's Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton behind her but that man does not look like him to me.

The Telegraph: Full Coverage links to articles, videos, and news relating to the Inquest
__________________
Ashley Tatiana Marie Claire Eva Zara Chewster RS
Chewster Castle
  #17  
Old 10-03-2007, 11:07 AM
Newbie
london - United Kingdom
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Default re:the inquest

this is what really happened that night, no need for an inquest!

Who Killed Diana? DVD=
  #18  
Old 10-03-2007, 11:28 AM
Al_bina's Avatar
Courtier
Taraz/Almaty - Kazakhstan
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydragon View Post
Princess Diana told her solicitor that both she and Camilla Parker Bowles were going to be "got rid of" so Prince Charles could marry Royal nanny Tiggy Legge-Bourke, her inquest heard.
In a meeting with Lord Mishcon two years before her death, Diana claimed she would be “put aside” in a car accident involving “brake failure” and also insisted the Queen was about to abdicate in favour of Prince Charles.

Princess Diana said she would be 'got rid of' - Telegraph
The predictions or suspicions of Princess Diana were more or less accurate in describing her own fate.
__________________
Similar to tea ceremony, perfection should have an element of chaos to be absolute.
  #19  
Old 10-03-2007, 01:24 PM
Aristocracy
Distrito federal - Mexico
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
Default

I read that Princess Diana had an accident car in 1996
  #20  
Old 10-03-2007, 01:36 PM
pinkie40's Avatar
Nobility
Dallas - United States
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren View Post
[my bolding] Now there's a thought! Since Al Fayed has pointed the finger of blame at both the Duke of Edinburgh and the Prince of Wales, how long will it be before Camilla is accused of being a co-conspirator?
I am not pointing the finger at Camilla as a "co-conspirator" but I do believe Camilla, and many other people, would not have minded being rid of a pesky Diana. I rather believe Camilla had enough self assurance in her role in Charles' life for her not to worry at all about Diana.

Prince Harry was a mere child of almost 13 when his mother passed away and now has a much more candid view of his mother and her behaviour and how that behaviour was not deemed suitable by many in his royal midst.

Prince Harry might also have questions of how his mother could perish in the security forces equal to those he has lived in every day of his life.

Last edited by pinkie40; 10-03-2007 at 01:39 PM.
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Late Diana, Princess of Wales, News Thread 7: October 2007-June 2008 Warren Diana, Princess of Wales 237 06-15-2008 06:18 AM
The Verdict of the Diana Inquest, April