The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #601  
Old 08-22-2017, 07:22 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 11,576
I think this is a pretty fitting thing to do. The White Garden has been planted in memory of Diana and with her sons gathering with the charities that Diana supported in her lifetime, it reinforces the idea that her sons are her legacy that will continue her work into the future.
__________________

__________________
Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #602  
Old 08-22-2017, 07:53 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,791
I've been thinking about Diana every day, Dman, and of course feeling very sad that she was taken years too soon.

This is a little snippet from Sky news about the new documentary in which her sons speak of hearing of her death, the French paps, and their father and grandmother trying to protect them, hiding newspapers etc. at Balmoral.

Harry: Paparazzi chased Princess Diana then photographed her dying
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #603  
Old 08-22-2017, 08:07 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
I've been thinking about Diana every day, Dman, and of course feeling very sad that she was taken years too soon.

This is a little snippet from Sky news about the new documentary in which her sons speak of hearing of her death, the French paps, and their father and grandmother trying to protect them, hiding newspapers etc. at Balmoral.

Harry: Paparazzi chased Princess Diana then photographed her dying
Ah-Ha! And there you have it--Harry and William say their father and grandmother were there for them after their mother's death.
Reply With Quote
  #604  
Old 08-22-2017, 08:37 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 3,747
Statements that will hopefully put some of the speculation about their relationship with Charles, Elizabeth and Phillip to rest.
Reply With Quote
  #605  
Old 08-22-2017, 09:25 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,927
So Charles has a mention so everyone should be happy now.
Reply With Quote
  #606  
Old 08-22-2017, 11:07 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 14,231
That's the only reason why people were getting so upset. They hadn't mentioned their father yet. People should know that those boys love their father very dearly and of course he was there for them. Including The Queen and Prince Philip. The whole family rallied around them.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #607  
Old 08-23-2017, 07:38 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 7,319
It still doesn't all add up for me. Charles gets a mention but that doesn't explain why royal commentators said how hurt he is over William and Harry's comments and how it's impacted his popularity.

I don't like conspiracy theories but it appears to be some element of damage control being done.
Reply With Quote
  #608  
Old 08-23-2017, 07:48 AM
An Ard Ri's Avatar
Super Moderator
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An Iarmhí, Ireland
Posts: 20,476
William and Harry reveal reaction to Princess Diana's death

__________________
10th of July 1559-Death of Henri II ,King of France.
Reply With Quote
  #609  
Old 08-23-2017, 07:59 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 11,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
It still doesn't all add up for me. Charles gets a mention but that doesn't explain why royal commentators said how hurt he is over William and Harry's comments and how it's impacted his popularity.

I don't like conspiracy theories but it appears to be some element of damage control being done.
Exactly - this is too little too late. The damage to Charles has been done and if they had a brain between them these nearly middle-aged men would have realised that impact that they would be having on their father and his reputation and popularity. They simply don't care about him and this is simply damage control done as a reaction to the really negative press Charles has been receiving - no doubt they were ordered to say something positive about their father.
Reply With Quote
  #610  
Old 08-23-2017, 08:14 AM
hel hel is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Posts: 533
Since, according to Richard Palmer, the interviews for all three (2 documentaries + Newsweek) were done in March, I disagree that the BBC one is damage control.

I think it's more likely that:
  • in the ITV documentary they had control over they feared to antagonize people by mentioning Charles in a Diana hagiography,
  • in the Newsweek article, Harry simply didn't have editorial control -- there's no way to know whether or not he said something about Charles and it wasn't used.
https://twitter.com/RoyalReporter/st...49026322366465

Richard Palmer‏Verified account @RoyalReporter 5h5 hours ago
More
For those asking, I'm told all three sets of William and Harry interviews - ITV, BBC, and Newsweek - were done around the same time in March
Reply With Quote
  #611  
Old 08-23-2017, 08:30 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 7,319
So if all the royal Households were on board and the content of the interviews was know ahead of time, I don't understand why we had a months worth of articles over had bad it hurt Charles.

Check out the cover of Private EYe Magazine

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DH56bm6W...jpg&name=large

Charles and Camilla have been slammed in the press and opinion polls. Then voila, we get a very positive BBC story.
Reply With Quote
  #612  
Old 08-23-2017, 08:32 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,927
People read too much into things and throw around accusations for the sake of it.
Reply With Quote
  #613  
Old 08-23-2017, 08:39 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,545
Quote:
throw around accusations for the sake of it.
NO.. they do so for 'viewer numbers', print sales AND to sow division/damage reputations for their own purposes...
Reply With Quote
  #614  
Old 08-23-2017, 08:53 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Charlotte, United States
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
It still doesn't all add up for me. Charles gets a mention but that doesn't explain why royal commentators said how hurt he is over William and Harry's comments and how it's impacted his popularity.

I don't like conspiracy theories but it appears to be some element of damage control being done.
Well that tells me that royal commentators had no clue about how Charles was actually feeling. They took their own speculation and presented as fact.
Reply With Quote
  #615  
Old 08-23-2017, 09:39 AM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 14,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
It still doesn't all add up for me. Charles gets a mention but that doesn't explain why royal commentators said how hurt he is over William and Harry's comments and how it's impacted his popularity.

I don't like conspiracy theories but it appears to be some element of damage control being done.
I think the Royal commentators felt hurt for him, rather than the other way around. The thing is the media didn't give William and Harry the chance to fully air out their feelings in marking this anniversary.

It's obvious their father, Charles, gave them the comfort they needed in the aftermath of their mother's death. Did anyone in their right mind actually thought Charles was cold to his own kids after their mother passed?

The big problem is, the media decided that they hadn't heard Charles come up yet in the interviews, so they ran with an exciting story that the boys were getting some revenge on their dad.

Folks on social media ran with the idea that there's a rift between father and sons, without fully allowing William and Harry to say what they wanted to say in all their interviews that was filmed in March.

Royal reporters, correspondents and royal watchers online, went into their own battle corners and decided Diana, William and Harry is ganging up on Charles and Camilla.

I said from the beginning that's not what's happening.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #616  
Old 08-23-2017, 10:17 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 3,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by hel View Post
Since, according to Richard Palmer, the interviews for all three (2 documentaries + Newsweek) were done in March, I disagree that the BBC one is damage control.

I think it's more likely that:
  • in the ITV documentary they had control over they feared to antagonize people by mentioning Charles in a Diana hagiography,
  • in the Newsweek article, Harry simply didn't have editorial control -- there's no way to know whether or not he said something about Charles and it wasn't used.
https://twitter.com/RoyalReporter/st...49026322366465

Richard Palmer‏Verified account @RoyalReporter 5h5 hours ago
More
For those asking, I'm told all three sets of William and Harry interviews - ITV, BBC, and Newsweek - were done around the same time in March
Thank you hel for finding this information regarding the brothers' interviews.
Reply With Quote
  #617  
Old 08-23-2017, 10:56 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 9,380
The members of the press/media etc...should count themselves very fortunate for any cooperation given to them by William and Harry.



LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #618  
Old 08-23-2017, 11:21 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 2,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
Exactly - this is too little too late. The damage to Charles has been done and if they had a brain between them these nearly middle-aged men would have realised that impact that they would be having on their father and his reputation and popularity. They simply don't care about him and this is simply damage control done as a reaction to the really negative press Charles has been receiving - no doubt they were ordered to say something positive about their father.
Isn't this assessment a bit harsh?
__________________
"If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will.”

Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #619  
Old 08-23-2017, 11:41 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 9,380
I'd say more than 'a bit'.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #620  
Old 08-23-2017, 12:35 PM
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLLK View Post
Thank you hel for finding this information regarding the brothers' interviews.
If they were all done at the same time than it could be they didn't realise perhaps that they hadn't mentioned Charles or the Queen in all the interviews. By this I mean all 3 probably mould into one long interview in their minds so if they mentioned Charles and the Queen in the BBC one and it filmed first they might not have twigged how it would be perceived.

However, if the BBC interview was filmed after the other were broadcast then it does appear to be damage limitation IMO.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diana: The Most Beautiful or Famous Woman of the 20th Century? Daffodil Diana, Princess of Wales (1961-1997) 335 01-29-2018 01:22 AM
20th Wedding Anniversary of King Abdullah and Queen Rania - June 10, 2013 salma King Abdullah and Queen Rania and Family 23 06-05-2013 10:51 PM
20th Anniversary of the UN Child Convention in Stockholm: November 19-20, 2009 Ccile Royal House of Sweden 64 07-25-2010 03:49 PM
New books marking the tenth anniversary of Diana's death Hendrik-Jan77 Royal Library 82 10-03-2007 11:12 AM




Popular Tags
"chinese gordon" biography camilla chris o'neill cristina crown princess victoria current events family fashion general news germany gloucester grandchild grand duchess maria teresa grand duke jean guillaume harry and meghan hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta pilar infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín jacobite juan carlos king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia meghan markle news osborn porphyria prince prince charles prince charles; biographies; tom bower prince daniel prince gabriel prince harry prince harry of wales prince nicholas prince oscar princess claire of luxembourg princess diana princess eleonore princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sibilla princess victoria queen letizia queen mathilde queen maxima royal royal ancestry royal family royal geneology royal wedding shaikh zayed bin hamdan bin zayed al nahyan sofia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family victoria visit from sweden wedding



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises