Why? Because if a commoner is involved with a royal, that commoner's mother must automatically be a social-climbing, scheming Machiavelli figure? I don't know that Carole has shown herself to be someone urging her daughter to marry a royal to advance the family, and I think that's what you're implying.
Actually this is usually the case but it is not often that a commoner of lower middle-class would even dream of becoming the Queen of England, usually the person has been quite satisfied to be the mistress of the royal involved, it has happened over and over again. In the time of Charles II, admittedly many years ago, there was even snobbishness among the mistresses of noble birth and common.
It is a a little difficult, I believe, in many cases for people from the US to actually understand how the relationship between royalty and the people works in Britain. Perhaps it will change in these modern times, but I don´t believe it is going to change that quickly unless it becomes a Republic
and if BRF does bring itself to the same level as their people then it will be a republic. If that is good or bad I really don´t know, some people feel more comfortable with tradition, I do, but then many don´t.
It was said about Christmas time that instead of Kate being
THE girlfriend she is now regarded as
A girlfriend, but so far no hawk-eyed journalist or photographer has managed to find another one.
In any case, in Britain at least, the royal always comes off best and untouched and Kate had a warning when it was said they broke up because Prince Charles allegedly said that if William had no intention of marrying Kate it would be better to break it off straight away instead of keeping her hoping.