the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > Prince William and Prince Harry



Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2005, 10:46 PM
Emily Emily is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ....., United States
Posts: 1,337
Default

Your original point was that he had to marry into the aristocracy and I disagree. Now you seem to be saying something different...that if a proposed marriage to a commoner is deemed unsuitable by the Establishment William would be told to move on. That might be the case depending on circumstances. I still maintain that the opinion of PC and QEII does matter to William. In several different interviews he has mentioned the high regard he has for both of them, how he frequently bounces ideas off of his father because he respects him, and most recently he said this in an interview as he prepared to leave St. Andrews.

I will leave my thoughts here since this has gotten off topic.
  #2  
Old 08-09-2005, 11:08 PM
Genevieve Genevieve is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 727
Default

I think that if William wants to live with his girlfriend, he should be allowed. Especially since he apparently sought permission and approval from his father and grandmother.

King or not, it's the 21st century and many couples live together before marriage in this day and age. Some couples end up getting married whiel others do not. But living together enables couples to know if they are compatible and can deal with the day to day annoyances that are bound to crop up when you have to get used to someone else's habits and quirks.

At the height of Diana's popularity there was a lot of praise for how compassionate she was and how she would hold people's hands and really talk to them without gloves or whatever. While the Queen and Princess Anne and Prince Charles were staid, cold and unapproachable individuals. There was great demand for the monarchy to change with the times and to take Diana's lead. Slowly the monarchy did evolve and since Diana's death we've seen the Queen and Charles's approach to their royal engagements soften and become more approachable.

So shouldn't the same standard be held for William? Shouldn't the monarchy change with the times now too and allow William's life to reflect that of thousands of other people his age who also live with their girlfriends and boyfriends prior to marriage? Living with Kate would not be any different than what Johnny Smith down the street is doing. William has a right to a personal life too, even if he will one day be king. And in that personal life he deserves to be happy and fully committed to the woman who will be his wife.

Charles wasn't fully committed to the (first) woman who became his wife and look at where that's gotten us.

I applaud Charles and Elizabeth for allowing William to live with his girlfriend. They are putting his happiness before the "family business" unlike with Charles, when they put the family business before Charles's happiness, putting a virgial aristocrat in his life rather than his true love.
  #3  
Old 08-10-2005, 02:40 AM
tiaraprin's Avatar
tiaraprin tiaraprin is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Near NY City, United States
Posts: 1,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Genevieve
I think that if William wants to live with his girlfriend, he should be allowed. Especially since he apparently sought permission and approval from his father and grandmother.

King or not, it's the 21st century and many couples live together before marriage in this day and age. Some couples end up getting married whiel others do not. But living together enables couples to know if they are compatible and can deal with the day to day annoyances that are bound to crop up when you have to get used to someone else's habits and quirks.

At the height of Diana's popularity there was a lot of praise for how compassionate she was and how she would hold people's hands and really talk to them without gloves or whatever. While the Queen and Princess Anne and Prince Charles were staid, cold and unapproachable individuals. There was great demand for the monarchy to change with the times and to take Diana's lead. Slowly the monarchy did evolve and since Diana's death we've seen the Queen and Charles's approach to their royal engagements soften and become more approachable.

So shouldn't the same standard be held for William? Shouldn't the monarchy change with the times now too and allow William's life to reflect that of thousands of other people his age who also live with their girlfriends and boyfriends prior to marriage? Living with Kate would not be any different than what Johnny Smith down the street is doing. William has a right to a personal life too, even if he will one day be king. And in that personal life he deserves to be happy and fully committed to the woman who will be his wife.

Charles wasn't fully committed to the (first) woman who became his wife and look at where that's gotten us.

I applaud Charles and Elizabeth for allowing William to live with his girlfriend. They are putting his happiness before the "family business" unlike with Charles, when they put the family business before Charles's happiness, putting a virgial aristocrat in his life rather than his true love.
I applaud your post Genevieve. It is the 21st century and some things must change, including the high divorce rate of the Royal Family. I think William needs to have some experience of how commoners deal with love, relationships and the like. He doesn't need his father's example, that is for sure. At least this is out in the open and honest. William needs to rack up all the normal experiences he can before he becomes King.

I also think this is good for Kate if she does marry William. It could be an "apprenticeship" like Sophie had. The Royal Family took their time with Sophie and really showed her the ropes, unlike Diana and Fergie. This could be the chance for Kate to learn and decide if this is what she wants and if she truly loves William. Only time and experience will answer that question.
  #4  
Old 08-10-2005, 01:09 AM
branchg branchg is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily
Your original point was that he had to marry into the aristocracy and I disagree. Now you seem to be saying something different...that if a proposed marriage to a commoner is deemed unsuitable by the Establishment William would be told to move on. That might be the case depending on circumstances.
My only point is that no matter how much the Queen and Prince Charles may want to grant William his personal happiness, it is a state matter when it comes to marriage. It may very well be times have changed, but whether the Establishment has changed and is prepared to allow a future King to marry a commoner, rather than an aristocrat, remains to be seen.
  #5  
Old 08-09-2005, 11:06 PM
gaggleofcrazypeople gaggleofcrazypeople is offline
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,279
Default

Didn't he already live with his girlfriend?
  #6  
Old 08-10-2005, 04:38 AM
Warren's Avatar
Warren Warren is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,719
Default Sources?

So our two sources for this information are "Spanish media" and the 'femalefirst' entertainment internet site.
I suppose then it must be true!
  #7  
Old 08-10-2005, 05:03 AM
segolen's Avatar
segolen segolen is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: EU, Bulgaria
Posts: 220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
So our two sources for this information are "Spanish media" and the 'femalefirst' entertainment internet site.
I suppose then it must be true!
...so far. It seems that the other media sources keep quiet.
  #8  
Old 08-10-2005, 06:24 AM
auntie's Avatar
auntie auntie is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Middlesex, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,078
Default

Freinds, open your eyes and look at all the other Crown princes of Europe, with the exception of Belgium they all married commoners, some with scandals and divorces, they obviously had intimate relations with them, and for sure some lived together prior to being married or engaged. I think that is what makes Philipe and Mathilde so attractive to me, their noble way of living before marriage.
  #9  
Old 08-10-2005, 07:18 PM
Regina's Avatar
Regina Regina is offline
Serene Highness
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 1,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by auntie
with the exception of Belgium they all married commoners, some with scandals and divorces, they obviously had intimate relations with them, and for sure some lived together prior to being married or engaged. I think that is what makes Philipe and Mathilde so attractive to me, their noble way of living before marriage.
I agree. Philipe and Mathilde are a really special couple, and I think they represent the Belgium Monarchy pretty well.
  #10  
Old 08-10-2005, 04:15 PM
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 17,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
So our two sources for this information are "Spanish media" and the 'femalefirst' entertainment internet site.
I suppose then it must be true!
Really, Warren, you're such a cynic...
  #11  
Old 08-10-2005, 07:43 PM
GrandDuchess's Avatar
GrandDuchess GrandDuchess is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somwhere, Sweden
Posts: 3,524
Send a message via ICQ to GrandDuchess Send a message via AIM to GrandDuchess Send a message via MSN to GrandDuchess Send a message via Yahoo to GrandDuchess
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
So our two sources for this information are "Spanish media" and the 'femalefirst' entertainment internet site.
I suppose then it must be true!
Yes, isn't it fab! Even better than the good, old and reliable Mirror
__________________
"The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams" Eleanor Roosevelt
The Royal Twist
  #12  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:03 PM
marezdote's Avatar
marezdote marezdote is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, United States
Posts: 1,550
Default

It is their lives and they can do what they want. Times have changed. Wills' great-great uncle had to abdicate the throne in order to marry a divorcee. Now the next King of England is married to a divorcee and he doesn't need to abdicate. Plus didn't they already live together when they were at St. Andrews?
  #13  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:19 PM
Reina Reina is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,731
Default

The Establishment is known as the British Royal Family.

Yeah I agree. Charles has set new and lower standards for the monarchy, so I guess WIlliam can marry whomever he wants.
__________________
*Under Construction*
  #14  
Old 08-10-2005, 12:36 PM
Alisa's Avatar
Alisa Alisa is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: , United States
Posts: 1,924
Default

I personally feel that William living together with Kate on royal property is a bad idea. Despite the fact that the royal standards have sunk considerably low, it still sends the wrong message. William is a young man and chances are that Kate will not be his last girlfriend.Will all of William's girlfriends be living in Clarence house after they have been dating for a while? Had William been in his 30s and planning to head down the aisle soon living together for a few months prior to the wedding would've been fine.
  #15  
Old 08-10-2005, 04:32 PM
sparks's Avatar
sparks sparks is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 56
Send a message via Yahoo to sparks
Default

People, People, we don't even know if this controversy is even real!!! get over yourselves!!!...You guys know how rumors work!!!
  #16  
Old 08-10-2005, 06:11 PM
Ariel's Avatar
Ariel Ariel is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 556
Default

Lots of royals want to get the best of both worlds. Getting all the benefits of being royal and living a normal life as a non royal would do. I agree that he will have lots of responsabilities when he becomes not just King of England but head of the anglican church and for that reason he must respect the principles and beliefs of the church, even when he does not agree with them.
  #17  
Old 08-11-2005, 12:51 AM
segolen's Avatar
segolen segolen is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: EU, Bulgaria
Posts: 220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariel
Lots of royals want to get the best of both worlds. Getting all the benefits of being royal and living a normal life as a non royal would do. I agree that he will have lots of responsabilities when he becomes not just King of England but head of the anglican church and for that reason he must respect the principles and beliefs of the church, even when he does not agree with them.
of course ! I like your point.
  #18  
Old 08-10-2005, 06:48 PM
Reina Reina is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,731
Default

Hehe. I love your subject line.
__________________
*Under Construction*
  #19  
Old 08-10-2005, 08:22 PM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,443
Default

OK iowabelle, i'll have to check my sources there. :) I thought they were accurate.
  #20  
Old 08-10-2005, 09:23 PM
Reina Reina is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,731
Default

Rumours swirl of wedding for Prince William http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...hub=TopStories
__________________
*Under Construction*
Closed Thread

Tags
prince william, relationships


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Godparents of royals royal_sophietje Royal Life and Lifestyle 166 11-06-2009 02:32 PM
Prince Eugen - The Painting Prince (1865-1947) GrandDuchess Swedish Royal History 14 10-01-2008 08:40 AM
Prince William current events 11: July-August 2006 Elspeth Current Events Archive 198 09-02-2006 09:30 AM
Charles And Camilla news and pics 1: Oct 2002 - Oct 2003 Lorraine Current Events Archive 134 10-31-2003 10:31 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM.



Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - RV Forum - Truck Conversion - U2 Music Forum - Fashion Industry Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009
Jelsoft Enterprises
Forums Directory
eXTReMe Tracker

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0