Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017

[Ish]

Question: is this Prince Harry's first relationship, while working for the BRF and actively doing official engagements?

That's... hard to define really.

He dated Chelsy from I believe 2004-09 and Cressida from 2012-14.

He enlisted early on in his relationship with Chelsy, and remained in the Armed Forces until after he and Cressida broke up. But even in all of that he was still doing official engagements - while with Chelsy he was appointed as a Counsellor of State and represented the Queen at the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Malta, he launched Sentebale while with Chelsy, he began working with Centrepoint, and he took up his role with the Rugby Football Union. The Foundation of Prince William and Prince Harry was founded after Harry and Chelsy split, but before Harry and Cressida got together. While with Cressida he represented the Queen at several official foreign tours, he worked with HALO Trust, did a lot for the Queen's jubilee, and did the Walking Wounded trek to the South Pole.

His royal role has stepped up more in the last year than it has while he was with Chelsy and Cressida, but that's only because in 2015 he left the Armed Forces. While with Chelsy and Cressida, he was doing his royal duties and being in the army; now he's not juggling both roles.

 

[USRoyalWatcher]

Harry to 'propose to Meghan Markle with ring made from Diana's tiara' | Daily Starhttp://http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/595825/Prince-Harry-Diana-tiara-engagement-ring-Meghan-Markle-royal-wedding

Is this the U.K. Version of Star Magazine?

 

[Osipi]

Inside Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Jamaican love cave | Daily Mail Online

"Inside the ultimate romantic retreat for the Prince and his girlfriend"

What a beautiful place for a couple of young lovers to spend time together. Once again, the Daily Mail excels in its photography and the place is absolutely gorgeous. I do have to complain though that reading the menu of the foods they serve makes me very, very hungry as they sound mouthwatering.

 

[Jacknch]

Please note that posts regarding a possible engagement ring have been moved to the following thread:

http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f132/tiaras-and-jewels-for-prince-harrys-future-wife-1862.html

 

[Rudolph]

I used to watch 90210 all the time but this is the remake, not the original series.

Meghan Markle is seen performing sex act in a CAR on 90210 | Daily Mail Online

 

[Dman]

Yes, I do remember the episode. The work you get as an actor!

 

[lilacmagnolia]

I have never watched the show but from what I'm reading no one really cares because the scene is only implying and not showing anything plus it being not real helps...Compared to how other actresses start out I thought it was tame.She never knew she would date a Prince so it's not her fault.This was a decade ago and not a big deal...If this was anytime before 1990 it would probably be a bigger deal though.It tells you a lot about T.V. these days though when after the scene I had to question "That's all?"

 

[Dman]

Of course none of it matters. The problem is the media is trying to exploit her acting career as some sort of risqué activity.

 

[Rudolph]

Again, it's all part of the vetting process. If Chelsy's background was relevant, and Cressida's background was relevant, and Catherine's background was relevant, then Meghan's background is relevant.

Part of Meghan's background is she's an actress. People are free to make their own judgments on what's appropriate and what's not.

 

[AlowVera]

So are they only concerned with sex scenes? They do understand that its acting. What if MM played a murderer would they hold that against her? 90210 was a teen pg-13 show, its not that big of a deal.

 

[Curryong]

Yes, if Meghan played Lizzie Borden killing her parents with an axe, that means she has homicidal instincts, of course! If she plays a demi monde, as Nichole Kidman did in Moulin Rouge, she's immoral. Heaven forbid that she should have a part as a street walker. That would make her a disgraceful and disgusting human being.

It is all acting, and plenty of actresses when they start off get sex scene parts. Most people realise this. There have been no porn films, no appearances nude in men's magazines. Just a young actress getting a start in a TV show that was watched by teens.

 

[Osipi]

I would think that when it comes down to it, even the smuttiest implied sex scene that Meghan could have in her career would show less than the pictures published of Harry in his altogether in Vegas. The past works both ways for both people.

The past doesn't really matter for either one of these people. Its who they are now that defines what their relationship is and where they want it to go.

 

[Rudolph]

Look at Sweden. It recently had a model marry into the family. Part of modelling means taking your clothes off. The people of Sweden are still free to make up their owns minds.

There was a lot of debate about Sofia but it turns out she appears to be popular.

I'm not sure why some people are trying to declare Meghan 'hands off'. If the British and Commonwealth public don't care Meghan is an actress, it won't be an issue.

 

[AlowVera]

If MM is Harry's choice and non-negotiable then seriously what more needs to be said. I support his right to make his choice. I truly find all this commotion over the 5th in line to be rather peculiar. William and Kate and Charles and Camilla are the primary focus. Are they so lacking that pressure must be put on Harry to marry a virgin pixie dream princess?

 

[miss whirley]

Again, it's all part of the vetting process. If Chelsy's background was relevant, and Cressida's background was relevant, and Catherine's background was relevant, then Meghan's background is relevant.

Part of Meghan's background is she's an actress. People are free to make their own judgments on what's appropriate and what's not.

Yeah, I seem to remember the tabloids making a big deal over a pre-Harry acting role that Cressida had where she played a naughty schoolgirl willing to trade sexual favors.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...-risqu-film-role-comes-back-to-haunt-her.html

Expecting Meghan to get different treatment seems a little naive.

I really doubt Harry cares about any past roles or he wouldn't keep dating actresses.

 

[AlowVera]

As always it is the female who must be pure as the driven snow. None of the males are held to the same standard. Barring any REAL controversy like actual nude pics I hope MM and Harry brush this silliness off their shoulders.

 

[Curryong]

Nobody's calling for Meghan to get special treatment. And nobody's shocked. It's not a sex scene, as Meghan's not seen doing anything. It was also almost a decade ago.

However, some seem to want hands up in the air in horror and a collective 'LOOK AT what Meghan's been seen doing NOW! Is she a fit person to be in the BRF? Is this appropriate!'
Well, yes it is! She's an actress, for God's sake and everybody here that has responded to this being posted realises it.

 

[AlowVera]

The sentiment was that this was the smoking gun that would banish MM from Harry's life. tumblr fans found the video, posted it and then notified the press about the existence of the video. So this is basically stans trying create enough controversy so that MM and Harry break-up.

 

[Rudolph]

Yeah, I seem to remember the tabloids making a big deal over a pre-Harry acting role that Cressida had where she played a naughty schoolgirl willing to trade sexual favors.

Cressida Bonas's Risqué Film Role Comes Back To Haunt Her - The Daily Beast

Expecting Meghan to get different treatment seems a little naive.

I really doubt Harry cares about any past roles or he wouldn't keep dating actresses.

Yup. All royal girlfriends go through it. Not just in the UK but other royal houses as well.

 

[AmberG]

The main problem to me is that she somehow didn't evolved as the actress, in the Suits she is also involved in some hot scenes. She is not some actress but she could invest her free time in acting courses and envolve into some serious acting, beside the Suits she has a line or two in other project. I can not belive she is satisfied with it..

 

[miss whirley]

As always it is the female who must be pure as the driven snow. None of the males are held to the same standard. Barring any REAL controversy like actual nude pics I hope MM and Harry brush this silliness off their shoulders.

They aren't totally oblivious to the men. The tabloids got into a tizzy when Mike Tindall posed bare-chested and oiled-up for a charity calendar. He was "Mr. June".

 

[Dman]

Look at Sweden. It recently had a model marry into the family. Part of modelling means taking your clothes off. The people of Sweden are still free to make up their owns minds.

There was a lot of debate about Sofia but it turns out she appears to be popular.

I'm not sure why some people are trying to declare Meghan 'hands off'. If the British and Commonwealth public don't care Meghan is an actress, it won't be an issue.

This have nothing to do with Meghan being "hands off" but it have more to with people not understanding the differences between real and fantasy. People have to understand acting in tv shows and movies aren't real. It's totally unfair and inappropriate for people to pass judgements on her because she's pretending in tv shows and movies.

It's a total difference from real life actions.

The Sun recently had to be checked on people trying to apply scenes from Suits into a porn website.

 

[Curryong]

There are a lot of hot scenes in many films and TV shows now. It's practically par for the course. And anyway, if Meghan marries Harry she won't need to bother about other roles, acting courses or anything else. She won't be allowed to act at all.

 

[American Observer7]

Why even bother to post the link here? What are you trying to do? I don't care about Meghan sex scenes. She's an actress. It's her job! So enough said. Actors and actresses do it all the time. Big deal.

 

[Rudolph]

This have nothing to do with Meghan being "hands off" but it have more to with people not understanding the differences between real and fantasy. People have to understand acting in tv shows and movies aren't real. It's totally unfair and inappropriate for people to pass judgements on her because she's pretending in tv shows and movies.

It's a total difference from real life actions.

The Sun recently had to be checked on people trying to apply scenes from Suits into a porn website.

It was done to Cressida. You know the drill, Dman.

 

[lilacmagnolia]

I know we aren't supposed to mention other sites BUT there is a group of 5-10 Psychos("Older Women") who are so jealous of this relationship they are sending these links to the press and they are pushing now for them to show her CSI from a decade ago as well...Ironically they showed it months ago but they want it shown again.Then it backfired on them because people are pointing out how they don't care because it's acting so they admittedly go to the sites themselves and post hateful comments since they think Meghan herself is making the positive posts like she has time for that.They have claimed she is Glenn Close's character from Fatal Attraction holding Harry hostage in this relationship...I have never seen hatred go this far and never knew it existed this way over someone else's life choice.

 

[Dman]

It was done to Cressida. You know the drill, Dman.

Still don't make it fair and appropriate. Judge these ladies on real life actions. If Meghan beats someone up in the street or burns a house down, then let's judge her for some inappropriate actions.

We have to grow up and understand the difference between the work of fact and the work of fiction.

 

[lilacmagnolia]

Sorry for double posting but it's very obvious she has asked to lay off the more intimate scenes on suits and that shows she respects her relationship so they need to get off a decade old scene!

 

[AlowVera]

I know we aren't supposed to mention other sites BUT there is a group of 5-10 Psychos("Older Women") who are so jealous of this relationship they are sending these links to the press and they are pushing now for them to show her CSI from a decade ago as well...Ironically they showed it months ago but they want it shown again.Then it backfired on them because people are pointing out how they don't care because it's acting so they admittedly go to the sites themselves and post hateful comments since they think Meghan herself is making the positive posts like she has time for that.They have claimed she is Glenn Close's character from Fatal Attraction holding Harry hostage in this relationship...I have never seen hatred go this far and never knew it existed this way over someone else's life choice.

Most of the comments on the usually rabid DM have been supportive of MM and the fact that she was acting...they must be dissapointed by the lack of reaction.

 

[miss whirley]

I know we aren't supposed to mention other sites BUT there is a group of 5-10 Psychos("Older Women") who are so jealous of this relationship they are sending these links to the press and they are pushing now for them to show her CSI from a decade ago as well...Ironically they showed it months ago but they want it shown again.Then it backfired on them because people are pointing out how they don't care because it's acting so they admittedly go to the sites themselves and post hateful comments since they think Meghan herself is making the positive posts like she has time for that.They have claimed she is Glenn Close's character from Fatal Attraction holding Harry hostage in this relationship...I have never seen hatred go this far and never knew it existed this way over someone else's life choice.

They did the same thing to Cressida. They said that Cressida and the Yorks were forcing Harry to date her. That Cressida showed up uninvited to Harry's birthday party. That Cressida forced Harry to be pictured with her returning from Missy's wedding while wearing Harry's clothes because she wanted to send a message to Chelsy. etc

Catherine and Chelsy are also victims to some twisted royal watchers who are constantly sprouting far-fetched conspiracy theories.

None of this is new. It's a good thing this is happening now, so Meghan is getting a good view of what life with Harry will entail. It's no fairytale. The British press has well-earned it's venomous reputation.