Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
See posts with no answers
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is an interesting article: http://www.thedailybeast....to-see-meghan-markle

It does rake Harry over the coals but it brings up an interesting point that Harry was willing to break the rules in order to visit Meghan in Toronto, it was not just a "booty call", it must have been about something important, maybe an agreement to move their relationship to the next level. Judging by both their smiles, it went well.
 
^
"The statement was, predictably, completely ineffective as to its stated aims"

With this I completely disagree. Harry called out the racist undertones, the sexism, and harassing Meghan's mother in his statement. I believe that has toned down.
I don't think Harry or Meghan thought, that his statement would stop the paparazzi, or interest in Meghan. But the tone of the articles written about her has changed.
 
I wouldn't start placing bets on any marriage quite yet either. Right now, these are two people that have extremely busy and fulfilling lives as individuals and have found that they enjoy being with each other in a long distance kind of relationship.

Right now, I think they're both just waiting to see which way the wind blows and if it could develop into something more permanent such as marriage and family. Both Harry and Meghan grew up with a divorce in their family. Both Harry and Meghan have commitments in their lives that they cannot just walk away from. Both Harry and Meghan know there are bumps in the road ahead once they step out in public as an "official" couple.

I think they're going to take their sweet time and make sure of things before jumping off the cliff into the public eye. Him with a UK flag parachute and her with a Stars and Stripes parachute.

Their "Geronimo!" will be heard around the world if and when it happens. :D
 
What is a bit marvelling about Harry, is that he seems to start a relationship very "fast" and in a passionate way... Hopefully it will get serious, but as of yet, I'm still wary...
 
I think Harry is wearing a bracelet with brown and white beads in the above photo.
 
The bracelets are different, the one of Meghan is blue and the one that takes Prince Harry is white with green stones

All this romance seems like a circus to me. The problem is that clowns do not make us laugh

When romance becomes serious, we will begin to see pictures of her naked with her first husband. Those photos are already being negotiated.

Will we see the Royal Family act to control this? Possibly. But the action will be to destroy this Meghan girl to avoid damage to the Royal Family. Nothing new of course.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What it all boils down to is that in reality, we know absolutely nothing concrete about this romance or relationship whatsoever. The media is looking under rocks and hard places to delve up anything they can find to write about and with that, putting concrete meanings onto things that most likely aren't even there such as the bracelets and the necklace.

The only thing that has been confirmed and can be taken as fact is that Harry and his people at KP have issued a statement asking people to cease and desist the harassment of people close to Meghan and refrain from derogatory slurs against her. This is the only indication really that there really is a relationship between Harry and Meghan.
 
With the technology of today, it is very easy to hack the Meghan IG or your twitter account and put photos of her naked or porn.
It is not difficult today and I think it pitifully will be the end of this romance.
When it becomes serious, scotland yard will safely act upon orders of the Royal Family to destroy this woman's morals and prevent damage to the Royal Family.
 
Al Capone 84 said:
When romance becomes serious, we will begin to see pictures of her naked with her first husband. Those photos are already being negotiated.
Click to expand...

As far as naked pictures and the onslaught of the Royal Family to destroy Meghan, that is pure speculation on your part with nothing substantial to back it up and, if I read the TRF rules right, very much frowned upon.

We do try to stick to credible sources and facts and not pay over much attention to gossip.

Welcome to TRF! I hope you enjoy your time here. :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The official sighting of them as a couple will be the next big story after the letter. The secret visits are nice, but there's nothing really there to write about. It's all private. Everyone is waiting on them emerging as a couple. Perhaps they will do this in the new year.
 
@Al Capone 84


And since when did Meghan do porn? She did sex scenes in a movie, what's wrong? Consecrated hollywood actresses like Nicole Kidman and Angelina Jolie have also done it. And why do you refer to dating as a circus? I do not see it like that. I see a girl full of qualities who has conquered one of the most coveted bachelors in the world and who is just trying to live her life normally.

As for the queen not approving the marriage, I think unlikely. Harry will never be king, he is the 5th in the crown succession. Times have changed. In the royal family there are several divorced, including 3 children of the queen. And then, she saw the fiasco that was the marriage of her children with noble people and judged ideal. So...
 
Al Capone 84 said:
With the technology of today, it is very easy to hack the Meghan IG or your twitter account and put photos of her naked or porn.
It is not difficult today and I think it pitifully will be the end of this romance.
When it becomes serious, scotland yard will safely act upon orders of the Royal Family to destroy this woman's morals and prevent damage to the Royal Family.
Click to expand...

Prince Charles said he wanted to be a tampon? should they remove him? This sounds like some soapdish speculation. Do you have any receipts?
 
The bracelet does not matter, just the fact that she is wearing a necklace with her initials already shows the safety she has and the stability of the relationship.
 
Please be reminded that we know very little concerning the relationship between Prince Harry and Ms Markle, much less concerning how the relationship is viewed by the Royal Family. As such, please avoid posting speculative comments not verified by fact or sources. Please let's return to the topic of the thread.
 
Ish said:
Louis had to give up his succession rights to marry Tessy not because she was an unwed mother but because she was a commoner - the marriage was morganatic. That's also why Noah doesn't have succession rights; when Louis gave up his, he did so for all his future children.

Friso marries without consent from Parliament, which is why he lost his succession rights automatically when he got married. This was done deliberately, as Mabel's past was seen as something that would hinder the consent from being granted, but still. If Harry were to dash off to Vegas with Meghan and get married he'd lose his succession rights as well for marrying without the permission of the monarch - until not too recently, the marriage wouldn't have been legal. The loss of succession rights is progress for the Brits.
Click to expand...

Louis gave up his succession rights as a matter of principle after his first son was banned from the Succession because he was born out of wedlock. His second son was born after the marriage and had Succession rights, but Louis in a dazzling display of maturity and emotional intelligence in light of the fact that he was barely out of his teens at the time, decided to sign away his rights as well as those of all his children.

He did not want his oldest child to feel discriminated against in any way because he had been born under circumstances that he had had no control over.

But it had nothing to do with Tessy being a commoner. Louis sought and received permission to marry her...but only after they had become parents to a child born outside wedlock. That's what triggered the Succession problems.As has been pointed out, Louis's mother is/was a commoner albeit a very wealthy and well-connected one.
 
Last edited:
We don't have a lot to go on but I think this romance is much more interesting than a potential Lady Araminta Very-Aristocratic/Harry would be.

Probably there are people tasked with making sure any skeletons in her closet are known before the press gets hold of them, but in an age were even a theoretical 23 year old "Lady Araminta" probably has an ex with camera phone images of her that she would rather no one else saw, photos her ex sells are not necessarily a deal breaker (and Prince Charles would be a hypocrite if he argued otherwise (and we have no idea of his thoughts on this romance either way). I would hope she has deleted any embarrassing images she holds within the last few months.

Lets not forget that the two women who came closest to wrecking the Monarchy in the last generation were "suitable girls" known to the BRF and those who at the moment who are succeeding are those who wouldn't have been considered so a generation ago.

I do hope any talk of an engagement is premature, I think a couple should at least live on the same continent for a few months before getting officially engaged and that Suits should have ended before it happens. Can you imagine trying to promote a finale when everyone wants to ask your opinion on your co star becoming Royalty, even if she didn't do the talk show circus herself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Meghan was spotted wearing her bracelet, then Harry is wearing his and it is the same. Neither were wearing them while he was in the Caribbean. That is a clue right there. This relationship is real and it is very serious!

And the Queen will not deny Harry's request. I actually think he has already made the request. We just don't know it.
 
Last edited:
People, calm down! Let Henry and Meghan enjoy their relationship! Don't expect an engagement in the next time! For me it would be too early to marry after a six-month-relationship!
 
I believe the Queen will have no problem with Meghan...Not saying the BRF is racist but I don't see anyway they could deny the relationship without it being seen as a racial thing since Camilla and Kate were accepted in.The BRF will NOT want to be seen as racist and I don't think they are...Secondly I think the Queen has been more lenient with the women William and Harry have chosen just because they have already lost the first woman they ever loved and would not want that happening again.Third,the Queen loves her grandchildren and would not want harry loveless and she is known to enjoy a good wedding and it could be one her last to be apart of even if it isn't a huge wedding due to her divorce...Finally I do not think ONE divorce will hurt their relationship...Everyone apart from the Queen and Edward have been divorced before.I can't see that as a big deal anymore.I also don't believe Meghan had many sexual partners in her life because she has had 2 long term relationships since she was 22 ...That's 2 men we know of for sure and CERTAINLY more than harry has had so it's obvious she hasn't "Slept around" assuming she was faithful(and I think she was).I don't see any issue with her at all...Her lifestyle is tame compared to other royals. She at least has the morals to have even lost roles for not wanting to show too much skin.Her acting is VERY modest because she requested it that way and that speaks volumes because any other actress would have stripped so quickly for a role and she hasn't...
 
OK. I did a little bit of sleuthing (another good reason why its good to be able to backtrack through the various threads) and discovered something.

When Harry visited Nepal earlier this year in March and if you look closely at the bracelet he is wearing in eya's post #33 there, it is identical to the one he is pictured wearing just recently in the article about Harry and Meghan having identical bracelets and its a "couples" thing.

So, its possible that this relationship is older than what has been reported or the media are putting meanings on things that just aren't there? Your guess is as good as mine is at this point. :unsure:

ETA: With a little bit more sleuthing, I found this explanation for Harry's bracelets over at Gert's Royals

"Harry wears a quite a few different bracelets. The rubber ones are mostly for the charities he supports, eg. Walking with the Wounded (white w/ red), Help for Heros (Light Blue) (Light blue, Dark Blue, Red) or for things like the Invictus Games (Black w/ Yellow) or the Household Calvary (Red and Blue w/ Yellow). I'm not quite sure what the significance of the other ones are, a think a bunch of them are ones he collected on his travels, esp. to Africa, or have some connection to his charities. "

http://gertsroyals.blogspot.com/2015_04_01_archive.html
 
Last edited:
I just know with the 2017 Invictus Games coming up in September 2017 and she has volunteered to be apart of it,if we will see them together before then...I would imagine Harry would want to introduce her as his girlfriend at an event like his father did with Diana in Early 1981... Pretty Woman style(Gorgeous Red Dress and all!) So if they are still together we have to get something before September and that's so exciting to me!!! Of course next month is fine too!!!
 
I've deleted a few posts. Please remember that this thread is about Harry and his relationships and not about whether Americans understand the British Royal family. Further off-topic posts will be deleted.
 
lilacmagnolia said:
I just know with the 2017 Invictus Games coming up in September 2017 and she has volunteered to be apart of it,if we will see them together before then...I would imagine Harry would want to introduce her as his girlfriend at an event like his father did with Diana in Early 1981... Pretty Woman style(Gorgeous Red Dress and all!) So if they are still together we have to get something before September and that's so exciting to me!!! Of course next month is fine too!!!
Click to expand...

There will be plenty of opportunities in 2017 for Harry and Meghan to show up together:

- Will they spend New Year’s together?

- Catherine’s 35 birthday. Harry has never been recorded at any of Catherine’s birthdays so I don’t expect them to make an appearance here.

- Will the couple go on a skiing holiday together?

-Eugenie’s 27th birthday. Harry and Eugenie are very close and he usually attends her birthdays, so this is a good possibility.

- William’s 35th birthday. Harry hasn’t been documented at any of William’s birthday celebrations since 2008, so this will be unlikely for the couple.

-Will Meghan watch Harry play polo in the Spring/Summer like Chelsy used to do?

-Since Meghan is a fan/friend of Serena Williams, will Harry and Meghan attend Wimbledon together to watch one of her matches?

- Will Harry bring Meghan as his date to Camilla’s 70th birthday bash? Harry was a no-show at her 60th party, but William brought then girlfriend Catherine. So I’ll put this in the maybe category.

-Will Harry bring Meghan as his plus-one to Skippy’s wedding?

-Will Harry visit Meghan routinely in Toronto while she films season 7? Harry only visited Chelsy in Leeds once. In the past he seemed to expect his girlfriends to come to him. It will speak volumes if he actually makes the effort for Meghan.

-Cousin Peter’s 40th birthday. For Peter’s 30th, William brought Catherine but Harry didn’t bring Chelsy. So this will be an interesting move on Harry’s part.

-Prince Philip and HM’s 70th wedding anniversary party. No way Meghan will get an invite unless she has a ring on her finger.

I’m sure I’m missing other opportunities, as well. But the actions of the couples are always a much better indicator than whatever tabloids are claiming with ‘inside’ sources. So we'll have to wait and see.
 
I can help think the bracelet thing seems more like something a teenager would do not a couple in their 30,s JMO


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
 
principessa said:
People, calm down! Let Henry and Meghan enjoy their relationship! Don't expect an engagement in the next time! For me it would be too early to marry after a six-month-relationship!
Click to expand...


Under other circumstances you may be right but Harry and Meghan are in their 30's. She is 35. He loves her and she him. Harry is not going to wait 2 years to marry. June 2017 will be a year of dating for me. The most he'll wait is a year I think at least, IF he waits that long.
 
Hendrik-Jan77 said:
We have not even seen one picture of the two together but you do seem to know a lot about Harry and Meghans' feelings.
Do you have inside information about their relationship?
Click to expand...

Nope. Just common sense here. Normally people want have have kids before turning 40.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

CyrilVladisla
Prince Heinrich of Bavaria and Henriette Gruse - April 22, 2017
Replies
0
Views
1K
CyrilVladisla
CyrilVladisla
muriel
Luxembourg RF jewels: Suggested changes and additions
Replies
13
Views
806
muriel
muriel
Marengo
  • Locked
Charles III: Coronation Information and Musings - Part 2
15 16 17
Replies
501
Views
53K
Marengo
Marengo
iceflower
Princess Estelle and Prince Oscar News Part 2: January 2024 -
Replies
6
Views
2K
LadyFinn
LadyFinn
iceflower
  • Sticky
Sweden: Birthday and Anniversary Wishes 2024
Replies
27
Views
1K
An Ard Ri
An Ard Ri

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom