The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #4721  
Old 03-13-2017, 09:14 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,455
There are some Harrycentric and other royal sites that I have been posting on for years, since they started, royal rob, that have gone absolutely mad in the last few months. Before, they had posters whom I regarded as reasonably sane. No longer. Some have gone feral. So it's not exactly trolling.
__________________

  #4722  
Old 03-13-2017, 09:33 PM
XeniaCasaraghi's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 1729 Noneofyourbusiness Drive, United States
Posts: 2,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
I hope they live together for at least 6 months before they announce a engagement. Grabbing a few days here and there is very romantic but doesn't prepare you for being together all the time
I think all the post 80s relationships should follow the Edward and Sophie example of dating for almost a decade before an engagement. But seeing as how Harry and Megan are so late to the game, I'd say give it 3 years.
__________________

__________________
Princess Grace, April 19, 1956
Princess Margaret Rose, May 6, 1960
Crown Princess Mette-Marit, August 25, 2001
Jaqueline Bouvier Kennedy, September 12, 1953
Countess Stephanie of Belgium October 20, 2012
  #4723  
Old 03-13-2017, 09:42 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,455
I don't know that it was by Sophie's wish that her and Edward's dating period was so lengthy. I have read that she told a friend after she married that Edward felt the pressure. Every time someone would inquire as to when they were to marry she said he pulled away afterwards.

Meghan will be 36 this August. If they wait she will be within hailing distance of forty when they marry. As fertility slips in the late thirties, if they hope for a family of at least two, she and Harry will be marrying earlier than that.
  #4724  
Old 03-13-2017, 09:51 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Observer7 View Post
If an engagement happens, I hope does an interview just to put all the negative comments from all these people in their places.

What he needs to say is " You all need to mind your own business. This is my life not yours and I am going to do exactly what I want to do." (And that's me being nice)
Perhaps not in those exact words, however, in the November statement, Harry did make a comment referencing that it was his and Meghan's life. Harry's father, heir to the throne, Prince Charles made Camilla his non-negotiable, despite his position, family, public sentiment at the time etc. Perhaps Harry will take a page from his father's example with how to deal with naysayers.
  #4725  
Old 03-13-2017, 10:32 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
There are some Harrycentric and other royal sites that I have been posting on for years, since they started, royal rob, that have gone absolutely mad in the last few months. Before, they had posters whom I regarded as reasonably sane. No longer. Some have gone feral. So it's not exactly trolling.


Sorry I understand your position but I'm tired of posters complaining about the things said about her. They haven't been said on here and would be deleted if they were. So I do what I'm sure H and M do ignore them.
  #4726  
Old 03-13-2017, 10:45 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,455
Oh, I've left several sites in disgust, not even lurking there any longer. Life's too short. I agree this is an exceptional forum where people are polite to each other, well, most of the time!
  #4727  
Old 03-13-2017, 11:58 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 3,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
There are some Harrycentric and other royal sites that I have been posting on for years, since they started, royal rob, that have gone absolutely mad in the last few months. Before, they had posters whom I regarded as reasonably sane. No longer. Some have gone feral. So it's not exactly trolling.
How unfortunate for those who just want to discuss all things Harry to have to deal with this stuff.
  #4728  
Old 03-14-2017, 12:02 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Washington DC, United States
Posts: 335
Quote:
Originally Posted by XeniaCasaraghi View Post
I think all the post 80s relationships should follow the Edward and Sophie example of dating for almost a decade before an engagement. But seeing as how Harry and Megan are so late to the game, I'd say give it 3 years.
Harry and Meghan will not wait three years. They want kids. And I would bet odds they'll start trying to get pregnant soon after they marry.
  #4729  
Old 03-14-2017, 12:08 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,907
I don't think they will do 3 years either. I think they will marry, IF they marry, within/under 2 years from the time they started dating.


LaRae
  #4730  
Old 03-14-2017, 12:16 AM
royaldreams's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 29
They will be engaged before the end of 2017, married in 2018, and have their first child in 2019.
  #4731  
Old 03-14-2017, 12:17 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLLK View Post
How unfortunate for those who just want to discuss all things Harry to have to deal with this stuff.
Why do you have an illustration of me (the frustrated me) in your post, TLLK?
  #4732  
Old 03-14-2017, 12:37 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Torrance, United States
Posts: 3,227
I am a woman of sooooo many talents!!!
  #4733  
Old 03-14-2017, 01:29 AM
MaiaMia_53's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 317
Awww, definitely cute. 'Georgie Porgie puddin' and pie', he's the sweetest and cutest. I love how Prince George stared at PM Justin Trudeau, during the Cambridges' Canada tour, and refused to give Trudeau a high five simply because Trudeau expected it. It was as if George was thinking, "I really don't know who you are, man. I don't high five with just anyone."

Whether or not the linked story is true, the pictures are cute. And it really does sound like something that could have happened, since Meghan loves children, as we've seen in pictures of her with her friends' children and during her Rwandan visit.

We all know that Prince George loves his uncle, Prince Harry, so I'm sure that PH's Meghan would fit right in and bring a huge smile to George's face.
  #4734  
Old 03-14-2017, 04:08 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 8,910
I'm going to be honest here. I do not even lurk anywhere on social media anywhere nor do I care to visit other forums where Harry and Meghan are discussed and, for the most part, Daily Mail links that are posted get passed by.

I enjoy the intelligent conversations and the back and forth of opinions of everyone here immensely. I'll even admit to liking the fact that that through opinions posted here, I feel I get to "know" the people I see posting and I interact with almost on a daily basis and regardless of what the opinions are, I feel all of you are friends I'm getting to know even if I disagree with you sometimes.

The suggestion to just let social media and negative people that post their negativity be something that doesn't affect your own life and thoughts is a very good one and to be honest, I don't want to hear what trolls anywhere else think. If everything around you does affect your life and thoughts, its yourself you have to blame if you go seeking the negatives and no one else. In a general sense, this is the rule of thumb I follow.

Somewhere out there is probably a social media page that really disses and denigrates HM, The Queen but I have no clue where they are or who is on them because I admire HM very much and look up to her as a world icon of what a true head of state is like and I don't need or want to know how people see her negatively. But that's just me.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #4735  
Old 03-14-2017, 04:46 AM
Iluvbertie's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 10,966
I am the opposite - I believe that a rounded person will seek out all views on a person or subject (my Historian's training I suppose) as to ignore views that don't agree with your own means that you are only seeing an issue through a very narrow prism.

There are some sites at there that are very negative - which is no different to this one which only sees the good and doesn't allow negative comments to a large part about any royal anymore. It used to do so and it is that trend that has seen me take a break on a number of occasions.

I believe very much that you should read both the negative and positive to get a true picture of a person.
  #4736  
Old 03-14-2017, 05:45 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 8,910
On this point of the historical I totally agree with you 100%. To see everything from all sides. The difference is that to be historically accurate, the sources need to be credible ones (such as diaries, letters, video etc). Then we see both the negative and positive and the in betweens as the reality of a person's life and times and the rumors and the gossip and the innuendos have been eradicated.

We all see things from our own points of view and interests. You, Bertie, see it all from a historian's point of view. Its my journalistic training that guides me to seeking the credible information and ignoring the sensationalistic garbage.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #4737  
Old 03-14-2017, 05:45 AM
princesslily's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: West London, United Kingdom
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
I believe very much that you should read both the negative and positive to get a true picture of a person.
Completely agree!
  #4738  
Old 03-14-2017, 06:06 AM
MARG's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 6,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
I used to watch 90210 all the time but this is the remake, not the original series.

Meghan Markle is seen performing sex act in a CAR on 90210 | Daily Mail Online
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dman View Post
Yes, I do remember the episode. The work you get as an actor!
Exactly, an unattributed part in a TV show. Posting a supposedly salacious clip from a 2008 episode of a failed TV show is really quite, quite, strange. Strange in that it is somehow trying to present MM the actress as 'The Gorgeous and Scintillating Miss Meghan Markle' a la the Regency Romance definition of an "actress" being a euphemism for a professional mistress, somewhat ham-fistedly turning her into a woman of ill repute.

The DM have reached an all time low with this (not surprisingly) unattributed article which appears to suggest that MM is a porn star. As another of our poster commented, "Lizzy Borden" she is not! Apart from the article being the ultimate click-bait, it is borderline actionable. And I really would love to see them take action because this is malicious. Delusional, but nonetheless malicious.
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
  #4739  
Old 03-14-2017, 07:42 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Palace, Canada
Posts: 290
I do, however, love a good romance and from where I'm sitting, it looks like Harry just may have met someone that bodes for a promising future together.[/QUOTE]

My sentiments exactly
  #4740  
Old 03-14-2017, 08:31 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
I am the opposite - I believe that a rounded person will seek out all views on a person or subject (my Historian's training I suppose) as to ignore views that don't agree with your own means that you are only seeing an issue through a very narrow prism.

There are some sites at there that are very negative - which is no different to this one which only sees the good and doesn't allow negative comments to a large part about any royal anymore. It used to do so and it is that trend that has seen me take a break on a number of occasions.

I believe very much that you should read both the negative and positive to get a true picture of a person.
There is a difference between seeing both sides of the coin and character assassination, which tends to happen to royal girlfriends.
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
albania aristocracy best outfit best outfit october 2016 birthday catherine child christening crown prince frederik crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion crown princess victoria crown princess victoria hats denmark duke of edinburgh europe fashion poll kate king abdullah ii marriage maxima in australia and new zealand monarchy monarchy versus republic natural disasters nobel 2016 november 2016 october 2016 parliament picture of the week prince charles prince philip princessanne princess marie princess marie eveningwear princess mary princess mary eveningwear princess mary fashion princess mary hats princess sofia queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia cocktail dresses queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia eveningwear queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen mathilde daytime fashion queen mathilde fashion queen mathilde in jordan queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania fashion queen rania in australia rohan romanov royal wedding state visit succession sweden swedish royal family the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises