The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #3741  
Old 02-06-2017, 03:13 PM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze View Post
She seems to have a nice taste and likes decorating. She's been snapped a few times buying fresh flowers, too.

Do we have any idea or guesses how long she's stayed with Harry this time? Or how long have they stayed together, wherever that has been? New Years?


Her Instagram gives the impression that she gets herself fresh flowers once a week, at least while in Toronto.
__________________

__________________
  #3742  
Old 02-06-2017, 03:20 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
She couldn't have been - she went to India for a week was it?
All the reports I've read said they've been in London since before New Year with the exception of her India trip and their Norway trip. It's likely at this point she'll stay with him until she has to return for filming, which will be late March unless she has some other work commitment before then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by miss whirley View Post
"Alternative Facts"

The CoE started to allow divorcees to remarry in 2002. Charles and Camilla married in 2005. So this part of your argument is untrue.
I stand corrected. I got my timing mixed up. Oh well, at least I didn't make up something that's never happened. Lol

Anyways, my point about the situation being different still stands. I don't think the church would've granted Charles and Camilla a church wedding anyways because of their affair and how publicized it was. Harry obviously didn't play a part in the breakdown of that marriage. Plus, Meghan was never married in the Church of England. I don't know if they do the same thing as the Catholic Church where if you weren't previously married in the church, that's less of a problem.
__________________

__________________
  #3743  
Old 02-06-2017, 03:45 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 41
It seems to me that she quickly enters into living with someone...like she can kt stay alone for too long... maybe she needed some time to see why two significant relationships, marriage and Corey, didn't work...

I have no doubt that she will marry him, not sure it is good for her. She has already started to look and dress like Chelsy and Cress ( jeans, ancle boots, ) she can better...plus maybe rejected certain job offers to be available for him... she needs little bit time of her own...
__________________
  #3744  
Old 02-06-2017, 03:48 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nashville, United States
Posts: 290
Charles and Camilla not having a church wedding really tells us nothing about Harry and the kind of wedding he would have. Given that Harry would be marrying for the first time, I think the odds are pretty high for a church wedding. Meghan being a divorcee won't affect that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
All the reports I've read said they've been in London since before New Year with the exception of her India trip and their Norway trip. It's likely at this point she'll stay with him until she has to return for filming, which will be late March unless she has some other work commitment before then.
Yeah I think so too. They obviously won't be able to see each other as much once Meghan is back filming, so it makes sense that they would want to spend as much time as possible together now.
__________________
  #3745  
Old 02-06-2017, 03:56 PM
Lumutqueen's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
Royal Blogger
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Carlton, York, United Kingdom
Posts: 18,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmberG View Post
Probably she is jobless until new shooting starts...
Wouldn't really call it jobless (as she still has one), probably taking a well earned break from quite a hard shooting schedule.
__________________
We Will Remember Them.
  #3746  
Old 02-06-2017, 04:18 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 453
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmberG View Post
It seems to me that she quickly enters into living with someone...like she can kt stay alone for too long... maybe she needed some time to see why two significant relationships, marriage and Corey, didn't work...

I have no doubt that she will marry him, not sure it is good for her. She has already started to look and dress like Chelsy and Cress ( jeans, ancle boots, ) she can better...plus maybe rejected certain job offers to be available for him... she needs little bit time of her own...
It would be stupid of her to stay anywhere else but at Harry's place when she's in London, visiting him.

We have no clue how her relationship with her ex husband started, how it progressed and why it ended. They were together for many years, though.

I'm making a bet, that Meghan has been wearing jeans and ankle boots for years, and it has nothing to do with anyone else but Meghan. She seems to have a good sense of her own style and she likes to mix it up.
__________________
  #3747  
Old 02-06-2017, 05:05 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,554
Why does everyone assume they will marry in England ? She might want to marry in America if it comes to marriage at all.
__________________
  #3748  
Old 02-06-2017, 05:18 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
Why does everyone assume they will marry in England ? She might want to marry in America if it comes to marriage at all.
It's highly unlikely that a senior member of the British royal family would marry abroad. Even the Danish royal family hasn't gone that far yet.
__________________
  #3749  
Old 02-06-2017, 05:24 PM
miche's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
Why does everyone assume they will marry in England ? She might want to marry in America if it comes to marriage at all.
What she wants won't matter at all if she plans on marrying a senior member of the BRF
__________________
  #3750  
Old 02-06-2017, 05:42 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Waterford, United States
Posts: 1,071
I find it interesting that she may well lend up married to him; if she's living with him, that is often a major step towards marriage and if she's lived with him since December, certainly she's approved of since before her, Sophie was allowed to move in and get used to palace life.
__________________
  #3751  
Old 02-06-2017, 05:48 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
It's highly unlikely that a senior member of the British royal family would marry abroad. Even the Danish royal family hasn't gone that far yet.

I'm curious why you singled out the Danish royal family. Why would they be more likely to marry abroad than other royals ?

Incidentally, in the UK, even the royal princesses who were normally married to foreign princes generally had their wedding ceremony in the United Kingdom rather than overseas. Victoria, Princess Royal, married for example the Crown Prince of Prussia (and future Emperor of Germany) at the Chapel Royal of St James's Palace; Princess Helena married Prince Christian of Schleswig-Holstein in the private chapel at Windsor Castle, and both Princess Beatrice and Princess Alice (the two other daughters of Queen Victoria who were married to German princes) married, I believe, in the Isle of Wight.
__________________
  #3752  
Old 02-06-2017, 06:25 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
Why does everyone assume they will marry in England ? She might want to marry in America if it comes to marriage at all.
I think their wedding location could be interesting. Because Meghan is a divorcee, I have doubts that the CoE would want them to marry at Westminster Abbey. Their most sacred location. So that opens up some alternative options.

Anne and Zara married in Scotland. The Duke of Kent married in Yorkshire. The Duke of Gloucester married in Northamptonshire. Prince and Princess Michael married in Vienna.

Unlike Charles and William, I could see Harry and Meghan being given a lot more creative freedom to pick their venue and guest-list size. I do believe it would be held in the UK, and not in a place where security costs would be astronomical. But other than that, I think HM would give them a lot of free rein.

Super-sized wedding vs intimate wedding. City wedding vs rural wedding. Church wedding vs. civil ceremony & blessing. They could have a lot of fun options.

It would be nice to see them pick something besides St. George's. Because there is a good chance Eugenie will marry before Harry, and she'll probably choose St. George's because it's close to Andrew's home. So some variety would be appreciated.
__________________
  #3753  
Old 02-06-2017, 06:26 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
I'm curious why you singled out the Danish royal family. Why would they be more likely to marry abroad than other royals ?

Incidentally, in the UK, even the royal princesses who were normally married to foreign princes generally had their wedding ceremony in the United Kingdom rather than overseas. Victoria, Princess Royal, married for example the Crown Prince of Prussia (and future Emperor of Germany) at the Chapel Royal of St James's Palace; Princess Helena married Prince Christian of Schleswig-Holstein in the private chapel at Windsor Castle, and both Princess Beatrice and Princess Alice (the two other daughters of Queen Victoria who were married to German princes) married, I believe, in the Isle of Wight.
They are the only royal family I could remember off the top of my head who had multiple marriages to foreign commoners. If both parties are from royal family, it's slightly different. When royals marry these days, it's more of a celebration for the entire nation than just the couple and family and friends. And even with the Swedish royal family, Princess Madeleine married in Sweden even though her and her husband lived in New York early on in their marriage.
__________________
  #3754  
Old 02-06-2017, 06:30 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,452
I think the media and the rest of us are waiting to see when Harry and Meghan will make their big public debut. I think it's one of the reasons why the media is spreading a little talk about them attending Pippa's wedding in May. Plenty of opportunities are on hand.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #3755  
Old 02-06-2017, 06:43 PM
Mermaid1962's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NearTheCoast, Canada
Posts: 6,242
That's true re Meghan being a divorcee. Considering the fuss about Harry's father's second marriage, I don't see them making an exception for Harry and Meghan.

I do see the wedding being held in London, though, simply because there'll be so many people wanting to line the route. It won't be the occasion of the marriage of an Heir to the Throne, but Harry's extremely popular.


Quote:
Originally Posted by miss whirley View Post
I think their wedding location could be interesting. Because Meghan is a divorcee, I have doubts that the CoE would want them to marry at Westminster Abbey. Their most sacred location. So that opens up some alternative options.
__________________
  #3756  
Old 02-06-2017, 06:58 PM
HRHHermione's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 2,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mermaid1962 View Post
That's true re Meghan being a divorcee. Considering the fuss about Harry's father's second marriage, I don't see them making an exception for Harry and Meghan.



I do see the wedding being held in London, though, simply because there'll be so many people wanting to line the route. It won't be the occasion of the marriage of an Heir to the Throne, but Harry's extremely popular.


I think for Charles, it was less about the divorce and more about the special circumstances of the public breakdown of his marriage involving his current wife along with the death of his first wife. It can't really be compared to any other situation- it was quite unique.

Harry's going to become a senior member of the royal family- he has to, as one of only two sons of the next King. I'm sure this will be almost as elaborate as William's wedding (though not quite since Harry's not a direct heir to the throne)

I was actually thinking I wouldn't be shocked if they used St. Paul's Cathedral if they do get engaged.
__________________
  #3757  
Old 02-06-2017, 07:11 PM
miche's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 814
St. Paul's Cathedral is bigger than Westminster Abbey.
I think its also farther away from BP than the Abbey
__________________
  #3758  
Old 02-06-2017, 07:15 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRHHermione View Post
I think for Charles, it was less about the divorce and more about the special circumstances of the public breakdown of his marriage involving his current wife along with the death of his first wife. It can't really be compared to any other situation- it was quite unique.

Harry's going to become a senior member of the royal family- he has to, as one of only two sons of the next King. I'm sure this will be almost as elaborate as William's wedding (though not quite since Harry's not a direct heir to the throne)

I was actually thinking I wouldn't be shocked if they used St. Paul's Cathedral if they do get engaged.
Then his wedding will be more expensive for the taxpayers than William's. Security for St. Paul's is a big undertaking, it's a bigger place and a longer route.

I'm not sure that would go over well with the public. Then again, Harry did detour to Toronto after his tour. So if he wants St. Paul's, he might not give a hoot about public backlash.
__________________
  #3759  
Old 02-06-2017, 07:18 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,894
I can't see St Paul's for Harry and Meghan. Too vast, too expensive. I can remember that, even at the time of Charles's wedding, questions were raised about the venue and cost, and that was a State Wedding of a POW!

I can however see the Abbey, religious questions aside. Divorcees can now marry within the Church of England if the vicar of the parish concerned is amenable. I believe Harry, as a senior and very popular Royal will marry in London in order that the crowds can see them, or Windsor, same thing, and there will probably be a balcony appearance at BP.

I'm not so sure that Eugenie, who is a very modern princess, will be marrying within the next couple of years or that she will wed in St George's. I can see Eugenie and Jack going for something completely different perhaps, and Sarah backing their ideas up, though Andrew might wish for a traditional wedding. I'm not so sure the York princesses' weddings will be televised either. They are not very popular with the British public, unfortunately.
__________________
  #3760  
Old 02-06-2017, 07:24 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
I can't see St Paul's for Harry and Meghan. Too vast, too expensive. I can remember that, even at the time of Charles's wedding, questions were raised about the venue and cost, and that was a State Wedding of a POW!

I can however see the Abbey, religious questions aside. Divorcees can now marry within the Church of England if the vicar of the parish concerned is amenable. I believe Harry, as a senior and very popular Royal will marry in London in order that the crowds can see them, or Windsor, same thing, and there will probably be a balcony appearance at BP.

I'm not so sure that Eugenie, who is a very modern princess, will be marrying within the next couple of years or that she will wed in St George's. I can see Eugenie and Jack going for something completely different perhaps, and Sarah backing their ideas up, though Andrew might wish for a traditional wedding. I'm not so sure the York princesses' weddings will be televised either. They are not very popular with the British public, unfortunately.
It wouldn't be televised in the traditional way. But Sarah could always sign a wedding tv deal with Oprah.
__________________

__________________
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
albania birthday carl gustaf catherine chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria crown princess victoria daytime fashion current events denmark duchess of cambridge style duchess of york earl of snowdon general news grand duchess maria teresa hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king carl gustaf king felipe king felipe vi king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy news noice prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess diana lady spencer princess estelle princess eugenie princess leonore princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary hats princess of asturias princess sibilla princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima queen silvia sofia state visit state visit from argentina stephanie sweden swedish royal family the duchess of cambridge hats uae wildlife victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises