The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #3641  
Old 02-04-2017, 02:20 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Marietta, United States
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Marmalade View Post
Run, Harry, run. This is one royal wedding I would not watch if they got engaged. He could do so much better than Hollywood.
Lucky for them your one less view will not be noticed since they would have over a hundred million viewers if televised...He might not even have a big wedding but his choice in bride isn't up to you.
__________________

__________________
  #3642  
Old 02-04-2017, 02:35 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Marmalade View Post
Run, Harry, run. This is one royal wedding I would not watch if they got engaged. He could do so much better than Hollywood.
What Hollywood?
__________________

__________________
  #3643  
Old 02-04-2017, 02:55 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Marmalade View Post
Run, Harry, run. This is one royal wedding I would not watch if they got engaged. He could do so much better than Hollywood.
He's doing better now.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #3644  
Old 02-04-2017, 03:03 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by miche View Post
I remember plenty of photos of them during their dating days walking together and getting taxis together when they went out together. There were even videos/paparazzi of them walking together. So truly I don't understand what game they were playing
Yes, they did those things, I remember quite vividly. They went out in groups of friends for a VERY long time. For those who did not know about Kate, the thought was that whoever William was dating was in amongst the group of friends but she would not be identified... people knew/ or suspected that it the girl with the brown curly hair ie, Kate Middleton
__________________
  #3645  
Old 02-04-2017, 03:09 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,457
I think this kind of stuff happens because the media and the public aren't used to seeing royals dating and marrying outside of the norm.

Meghan Markle isn't a threat to Harry and the royal family because she's an B-List actress. She hasn't done anything for Harry to run away from. Right now, two mature individuals are dating and exploring what's there for them and what they can build upon together.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #3646  
Old 02-04-2017, 03:44 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nashville, United States
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
While there are some people that have serious relationship without contemplating marriage, it's highly unlikely that's what is going on here. Main reason being that both Harry and Meghan want marriage and children. I highly doubt they are going to rush into marriage, but to think they are just dating without thinking that's a direction they might consider once they've gotten to know each other and what royal marriage would entail is just not in sync with what both have publicly said they want in the past.
Agreed. I've said it before but I imagine that they've already had conversations about what they both are looking for long term. I doubt Harry would be wasting Meghan's time, or vice versa, if he didn't think marriage and children were a possibility for them at some point.

As for the paps pics of them, I think they look lovely together. The hand holding is sweet and shows they are comfortable with people knowing they are a couple. I don't think Meghan is uncomfortable with the paps. If you look at some of the previous pap pics of her alone, she looks quite comfortable, even smiling in some of them. I just think she's keeping her head down now because she doesn't want to give the press or naysayers anything to read into. There have already been comments about how she loves the attention, is using Harry for her career, etc. and she probably wants to avoid anything that would feed into that. I think when we start getting candid shots of them at events together, we'll get a better sense of their chemistry and natural interaction.
__________________
  #3647  
Old 02-04-2017, 03:48 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 41
We are all different, I would never ever find her suitable for my member of my family.

Except her education, nothing else is remarkable about her since there are many better actresses, much more educated and much more involved into charities ...

She wants like children now but she had 10 years with Trevor and 2 with Corey to get a child but she didn't but now she wants...

I agree with Rufolph, also.
__________________
  #3648  
Old 02-04-2017, 04:12 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbigail View Post
Agreed. I've said it before but I imagine that they've already had conversations about what they both are looking for long term. I doubt Harry would be wasting Meghan's time, or vice versa, if he didn't think marriage and children were a possibility for them at some point.
Are you implying that any couple who is on a steady relationship without considering marriage and children as a possibility for them at some point is basically wasting their time ? If that is the case, I know plenty of adult men and women who are "wasting their time".
__________________
  #3649  
Old 02-04-2017, 04:26 PM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmberG View Post
We are all different, I would never ever find her suitable for my member of my family.

Except her education, nothing else is remarkable about her since there are many better actresses, much more educated and much more involved into charities ...

She wants like children now but she had 10 years with Trevor and 2 with Corey to get a child but she didn't but now she wants...

I agree with Rufolph, also.
Here is the beautiful thing of growing up. You grow up. What you wanted even five years ago might not be what you want now. Just because she didn't have kids with her husband means nothing. Just because you aren't ready for kids at thirty doesn't mean you won't be at thirty five. Or perhaps you realize the man you are with is not the right one to have kids with. You think after two year relationship you should be ready for kids or clear sign you aren't serious?

Nothing extraordinary about her does there have to be? You marry for brains, there will always be someone smarter. You marry for looks, there will always be someone hotter. You marry a celebrity, there will always be someone more famous.

Again a sign of maturity. You realize you don't look for the extraordinary perfect woman or you will be alone as they don't exist. You find someone you love and can spend your life with. people wanted him to date someone educated,succesful, worldly and who didn't come from his usual blonde aristo background. He found an university educated, succesful actress and blogger, worldly ambassador for two major charities, who is as far away from the rich blondes he dated. And are the complainers happy? No. Educated but what no masters? Succesful actress but what no Emmy? UN and world vision. What she hadn't cured a disease?
__________________
  #3650  
Old 02-04-2017, 04:26 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nashville, United States
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
Are you implying that any couple who is on a steady relationship without considering marriage and children as a possibility for them at some point is basically wasting their time ? If that is the case, I know plenty of adult men and women who are "wasting their time".
Lets not be obtuse about this, please. We aren't talking about any couple. We are talking about this couple in particular, consisting of two people who have publicly said they want a family of their own. Hence, why I doubt either would carry on a high profile relationship without considering its long-term viability.
__________________
  #3651  
Old 02-04-2017, 04:45 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Countessmeout View Post
Here is the beautiful thing of growing up. You grow up. What you wanted even five years ago might not be what you want now. Just because she didn't have kids with her husband means nothing. Just because you aren't ready for kids at thirty doesn't mean you won't be at thirty five. Or perhaps you realize the man you are with is not the right knee to have kids with. You think after two year relationship you should be ready for kids or clear sign you aren't serious?

Nothing extraordinary about her does there have to be? You marry for brains, there will always be someone smarter. You marry for looks, there will always be someone hotter. You marry a celebrity, there will always be someone more famous.

Again a sign of maturity. You realize you don't look for the extraordinary perfect woman or you will be alone as they don't exist. You find someone you love and can spend your life with. people wanted him to date someone educated,succesful, worldly and who didn't come from his usual blonde aristo background. He found an university educated, succesful actress and blogger, worldly ambassador for two major charities, who is as far away from the rich blondes he dated. And are the complainers happy? No. Educated but what no masters? Succesful actress but what no Emmy? UN and world vision. What she hadn't cured a disease?
I agree with you basically except with this part "He found an university educated, succesful actress and blogger, worldly ambassador for two major charities, who is as far away from the rich blondes he dated. " Her CV is blown out of proportion to me, same as Amal's...her career fading out... many successful bloggers are around...many charitable persons and ambasadors including me...unsuitable to me...

Point is she is the woman he loves but until November, nobody but Suits fans heard of her, or she was world known charitable person, except in her circles...I don't say that is bad or less but stating now oh she is this or that is litlle funny..
__________________
  #3652  
Old 02-04-2017, 04:50 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 453
It really seems like Harry's future wife should have PhD, work as a pro bono lawyer,never had dated anyone in her life, be a supermodel beautiful, act like a PR pro, but on top of this all, be ready to dump her career the moment Harry asked for her phone number. Nothing short of this wouldn't be enough.

What good would it do to Meghan, had she won an Oscar, for her relationship with Harry? She's not the most beautiful woman in the world, of course she isn't. It doesn't matter. She's involved in charity work, but it's not good enough. It seems like she gets picked apart for every single thing, tbh.
__________________
  #3653  
Old 02-04-2017, 04:59 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze View Post
It really seems like Harry's future wife should have PhD, work as a pro bono lawyer,never had dated anyone in her life, be a supermodel beautiful, act like a PR pro, but on top of this all, be ready to dump her career the moment Harry asked for her phone number. Nothing short of this wouldn't be enough.

What good would it do to Meghan, had she won an Oscar, for her relationship with Harry? She's not the most beautiful woman in the world, of course she isn't. It doesn't matter. She's involved in charity work, but it's not good enough. It seems like she gets picked apart for every single thing, tbh.
There's no woman that's good enough for these British princes, according to some people. The exact same stuff that's being said about Meghan, was also said about Catherine.

I think folks just have to calm down and let love and friendship do it's job. Let's hope Harry and Meghan continue to be happy and wish them well. No matter what happens.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #3654  
Old 02-04-2017, 05:08 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nashville, United States
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmberG View Post
I agree with you basically except with this part "He found an university educated, succesful actress and blogger, worldly ambassador for two major charities, who is as far away from the rich blondes he dated. " Her CV is blown out of proportion to me, same as Amal's...her career fading out... many successful bloggers are around...many charitable persons and ambasadors including me...unsuitable to me...

Point is she is the woman he loves but until November, nobody but Suits fans heard of her, or she was world known charitable person, except in her circles...I don't say that is bad or less but stating now oh she is this or that is litlle funny..
I don't think anyone has claimed she is a world-famous actress or that she is known for her charity work. Pointing out that she is a successful actress who had her own life, career, ambitions before Harry came along is merely fact. The only people who seem to care so much about how famous or known she is are those who don't think she's good enough for Harry. *That* is rather funny.
__________________
  #3655  
Old 02-04-2017, 05:12 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Whoa nelly! There are going to be a whole lot of disappointed people on here if these two don't get married.


I actually think Meghan being an actress is a hindrance more than anything else.

Celebrities get married all the time after dating for 6 months or whatever. They divorce a year later and get married again after a couple of years. No big deal.

I don't see anything to suggest to me that Meghan takes dating Harry any more seriously than if she was dating some sitcom actor.

I'm not hating on Meghan, it's just world wind romances are the norm in 'Hollywood'. It's nothing for celebrities go from dating, to engagement, to divorce in three years.

And no matter how much attitudes have changed with society and the BRF, Harry would need a divorce like a hole in the head.


I agree I have said from the start it's the acting that worries me
What happens if they marry have a baby then split she takes baby back to US and starts acting again.
It would be loverly if it all worked out but fairytales are few and hard to find
__________________
  #3656  
Old 02-04-2017, 05:12 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alisa View Post
I agree. It made me think back to the KP announcement and how he stated he wanted to protect her. It is very charming to see it in action😍

By the way, Meghan's hair looks AMAZING in those pics! It is so lush, full, and shiny!

If they marry...we'll have another royal princess for everyone to talk about how they like/don't like her hair down etc.


LaRae

Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
I agree I have said from the start it's the acting that worries me
What happens if they marry have a baby then split she takes baby back to US and starts acting again.
It would be loverly if it all worked out but fairytales are few and hard to find

It's not like she's Jennifer Aniston. She's had one 'notable' role (and most of us had never heard of her prior to Harry)....not sure how the acting is an issue.

If they were to divorce...they'll work out how to handle visitation of any children. Who's to say she would come back to the US? Who would care if she went back to acting...and really you think a mostly unkown actress who leaves the profession for 10 years can come back to Lala Land, in her 40's no less, and pick up where she left off???

LaRae
__________________
  #3657  
Old 02-04-2017, 05:42 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
If they marry...we'll have another royal princess for everyone to talk about how they like/don't like her hair down etc.


LaRae
Right to the point and very true.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #3658  
Old 02-04-2017, 06:09 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 453
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle hold hands while leaving Soho House in London

I've been reading Lainey's write ups with an interest, she IMO has a good read of Harry and Meghan.


Quote:
Harry and Meghan had dinner inside and were not precious about being seen – just as they weren’t precious about being papped on their way out. I’ve been told by a couple of people that when they saw photographers, there was no attempt to separate, no attempt to be like Leo and run into a trash can. Instead, it looked like Harry held on even tighter, seemingly well aware that these would be the first shots of them holding hands.
Interesting little bit.
__________________
  #3659  
Old 02-04-2017, 06:18 PM
Marty91charmed's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Near Verona and Venice, Italy
Posts: 6,074
I read that the pics might be old (from December). I don't know if "The Snn" pror any other publication,would gain something by pubishing old pics, but what doI know about the journalistic market.

On another note: I don't see anything unusual from Harry and Meghan's deportment towards the paparazzi. The know the media know, Harry released a powerful press realese about the matter, they simply look bothered from the flashes. Don't know why people look for things...
__________________
"Yet, walking free upon her own estate
Still,in her solitude, she is the Queen".
  #3660  
Old 02-04-2017, 06:22 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 453
The pics aren't from December. There's absolutely no reason that Sun would've held onto them for 2 months. They would have been even hotter commodity in December. Besides, their clothes and the security officer are different.
__________________

__________________
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
albania birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events denmark duchess of cambridge style duchess of york earl of snowdon family general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king carl gustaf king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy news prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince nicholas prince of wales prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire princess claire of luxembourg princess diana lady spencer princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary daytime fashion princess mary hats princess of asturias princess sibilla princess sofia princess sofias hats princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima queen silvia rohans sofia state visit state visit from argentina stephanie sweden swedish royal family the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge hats victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises