The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #2301  
Old 12-17-2016, 03:17 AM
Ish's Avatar
Ish Ish is online now
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
You are absolutely right. Especially on the age thing. Nothing wrong with either woman's age, but a lot of things does come with age. Especially understanding yourself and finding your causes.

I'm a huge Suits fan, and that's why I've paid so much attention to this relationship. From everything we've heard, it doesn't seem likely an 8th season will happen. Now if that changed if this relationship driving up rating, which I doubt it will in long run, actors were probably only contracted until 7th season. That means Meghan would have an out if they are serious enough at that point. However, they have some time to figure that out if it ever comes down to that.
I've read that the creator and cast signed 2 year contracts before Season 6 started, so they're all under contract until the end of season 7 - Gina Torres is the exception, as she chose not to renew and left mid-way through season 6.

But I think 2 year contract renewals are kind of the norm, so cast member not being under contract past season 7 right now doesn't necessarily mean that there won't be seasons past it. My point is more that if the network decides to renew the actors' contracts for further seasons then that is something tangible that Meghan would have to consider giving up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
And it's not just suits she might be offered movie roles that she's longed for. She may be more than happy to give it all up for Harry just hope she's well aware of what her life will be and what she can and cannot say and do
I see your point and do agree with it, but I wouldn't bet on her being offered many movie roles. Actresses who are much more well known and much more successful have spoken about how hard it is to get roles the more they age - Maggie Gyllenhaal said in an interview last year that at the then age of 37 she had been deemed too old to play the love interest for a 55 year old man. This year Olivia Wilde revealed that she lost out on an opportunity to play Leonardo Dicaprio's love interest in Wolf of Wall Street because she was too old. Leo was 38 at the time, Olivia Wilde was 28.

There's actually a really good Forbes article on the issue here.
__________________

__________________
  #2302  
Old 12-17-2016, 03:32 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by royal rob View Post
And it's not just suits she might be offered movie roles that she's longed for. She may be more than happy to give it all up for Harry just hope she's well aware of what her life will be and what she can and cannot say and do


Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Agreed. Either way, she'd have to give up a lot. Especially seeing how passionate she is about some issues. Being a member of the royal family gives her a platform to do good, but she can't always get the issues she wants. She'd have to work with others and what they want whereas now she has good platforms as well. The difference is she can say whatever is on her mind. Most of her issues, i really don't see as political, but some do. For example, she specifically called out Trump for his misogynistic comments. It's only political because he was running for office. However, if he was just a celebrity and said the same things, I bet she'd say the same if asked.
__________________

__________________
  #2303  
Old 12-17-2016, 03:35 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by soapstar View Post
But there's already an actress in the family (Lady Frederick Windsor) and let's not forget that Mike Tindall has been on a few reality shows. So it's kind of hard to argue that Meghan is unsuitable because of her profession.
We should also mention that Andrew had longterm relationships with Koo Stark and Angie Everhart. He also has been casually linked to a number of models in recent years. And Prince Edward had a 5-year relationship with actress Ruthie Henshall, a 1-year relationship with model Romy Adlington, and he dated tv show presenter Ulrika Jonsson.

Harry's taste in women is hardly 'new' for the BRF. No one at BP is falling over in shock. Harry is a royal younger son, living like a royal younger son.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lilacmagnolia View Post
I thought I heard Kate was half Jewish herself did they bug her about that? Some will say she (Meghan) straightens her hair to look white but both Meghan and Kate have naturally curly hair and tanned skin...I've seen some Middletons darker than Meghan and she is still getting bashed...I've even heard she will never be a "princess" or accepted by the Queen because she has brown eyes (Which are a honey color to me) as if the heir to the throne Prince George doesn't have Brown eyes! It's a shame.
I want to comment on a couple of your claims.

Unfortunately, the Catherine is Jewish rumors have been debunked. The confusion came because of Carole's maiden name, Goldsmith. 'Gold' in surnames has old English roots (non-jewish) as well as old German roots (sometimes jewish). People were hoping she descended from the German, Goldschmidt, modern jewish spelling Goldsmith, but predictably she was traced to the non-Jewish Anglo-Saxon Goldsmiths.

As for the Middletons having naturally dark skin and being darker than Meghan.
Catherine, Pippa, and James tan and fake-tan, Pippa especially with fervor. If you want to get a idea of what their natural skin looks like, view their childhood pics. Some on this site have even called young Catherine pale and sickly looking. Chelsy's skin is also not naturally dark(sometimes orange).

So while Meghan has a beautiful natural skin tone, probably one that Chelsy and Pippa wish they had, the Middletons are run-of-the-mill white.
__________________
  #2304  
Old 12-17-2016, 04:57 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Marietta, United States
Posts: 139
I want to comment on a couple of your claims.

Unfortunately, the Catherine is Jewish rumors have been debunked. The confusion came because of Carole's maiden name, Goldsmith. 'Gold' in surnames has old English roots (non-jewish) as well as old German roots (sometimes jewish). People were hoping she descended from the German, Goldschmidt, modern jewish spelling Goldsmith, but predictably she was traced to the non-Jewish Anglo-Saxon Goldsmiths.

As for the Middletons having naturally dark skin and being darker than Meghan.
Catherine, Pippa, and James tan and fake-tan, Pippa especially with fervor. If you want to get a idea of what their natural skin looks like, view their childhood pics. Some on this site have even called young Catherine pale and sickly looking. Chelsy's skin is also not naturally dark(sometimes orange).

So while Meghan has a beautiful natural skin tone, probably one that Chelsy and Pippa wish they had, the Middletons are run-of-the-mill white.[/QUOTE]

The Middletons are definitely white by their parents and possibly even grandparents but I'm saying it looks like they could have had an ancestor with a different background with their darker features,curly hair and tanned skin which tans very easily...I could definitely be wrong but that's what it seems like.I have seen both Kate and Meghans "baby" pictures and It also looks like Meghan was a snow white baby...She obviously has naturally tanned skin because of her ethnicity but just like anyone else,she still tans her skin...If I were going to choose the "White baby" from baby pictures alone without knowing either of them, I would have assumed Kate was a European/jewish baby and Meghan confusingly enough looks like a pure white baby.The picture I'm referring to is one of Meghan laying on her dad's chest when she was a few months old...If you didn't clear the half Jewish rumor to me right now I would have still believed she was Jewish or either hiding that fact...Having family straight from Israel myself it was almost unmistakable to me even before they mentioned the possibility.....BUT I'm sure daily mail did her entire family tree like Meghans when her and William were together so if they found out something I can only assume they would have told it...Who knows.I know it's completely off topic but I just wanted to respond.
__________________
  #2305  
Old 12-17-2016, 05:18 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,396
[[/QUOTE]

The Middletons are definitely white by their parents and possibly even grandparents but I'm saying it looks like they could have had an ancestor with a different background with their darker features,curly hair and tanned skin which tans very easily...I could definitely be wrong but that's what it seems like.I have seen both Kate and Meghans "baby" pictures and It also looks like Meghan was a snow white baby...She obviously has naturally tanned skin because of her ethnicity but just like anyone else,she still tans her skin...If I were going to choose the "White baby" from baby pictures alone without knowing either of them, I would have assumed Kate was a European/jewish baby and Meghan confusingly enough looks like a pure white baby.The picture I'm referring to is one of Meghan laying on her dad's chest when she was a few months old...If you didn't clear the half Jewish rumor to me right now I would have still believed she was Jewish or either hiding that fact...Having family straight from Israel myself it was almost unmistakable to me even before they mentioned the possibility.....BUT I'm sure daily mail did her entire family tree like Meghans when her and William were together so if they found out something I can only assume they would have told it...Who knows.I know it's completely off topic but I just wanted to respond.[/QUOTE]

I don't see a snow white baby. Look at her baby pic in the Elle article Meghan wrote. Meghan Markle On Her Biracial Identity - Actress Meghan Markle Discusses Being Half Black Half White That is a biracial baby and that is something Meghan is proud of. It really feels like you are trying to underplay (maybe erase?) Meghan's ethnicity, with all this she can pass for white, and she whiter than other white people spiel. Maybe that's not your intention but it makes me a little uncomfortable, like you are justifying Harry's attraction to her.
__________________
  #2306  
Old 12-17-2016, 06:45 AM
Queen Claude's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA, United States
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
So actors and actresses who appear in Drama series on cable networks aren't actors and actresses? Perhaps you should argue that out with the producers of those shows! Acting is a profession in which there is a 95% unemployment rate at any one time. Would you characterise Cressida Bonas (another ex of Harry's) as an actress? After all, she's appeared on the London stage in a few productions. An actress? Or are only people who appear in prestigious productions 'true' actors and actresses.

Meghan has made her living from film and TV roles since the early 2000's. She's appeared in small parts in eleven films. She's also had roles in TV films and other shows. Not an actress, then, remembering the huge unemployment rate in the profession?

There are huge differences between Meghan and Princess Sofia. Without going into excruciating details, Sofia was a nude model for men's magazines as a teenager. She was a Miss Slitz in Sweden. She appeared in an extremely tacky reality show in which she kissed another woman. She, again without going into detail, led a very colourful private life during this time.

Slight differences? Can you point me to any nude modelling for men's magazines that Meghan has done? Any reality show work in which she showed herself off, to put it politely!
I support Harry and Meghan's relationship, and yeah there are differences between Meghan and Sweden's Princess Sofia but there are similarities as well.

First of all Sofia was not a nude model, she posed nude once and was not a teenager at the time.

While not a reality show, Meghan "showed herself off" on Deal or no Deal.

I could be wrong but I doubt if Meghan has been self-supporting since the early 2000s, even when taking into account that she worked as a calligrapher in addition to acting. Maybe Sofia's private life could be considered colorful vis a vis Meghan, but to me it looks like they both basically lived off wealthy men, and while doing so engaged in fun stuff, however both also have a social conscious and did activities in that area as well.

Kissing a woman on a reality TV show, posting a picture of spooning bananas the day the story breaks that you are dating the world's most eligible bachelor, potayto, potahto.
__________________
  #2307  
Old 12-17-2016, 06:55 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 6,328
Having darker skin complexion doesn't always have to do with having ancestors of color. My dad was German/Scots and he was darker skinned. Blue black hair. Some of the Celtic groups were known to have darker skin. So were some of the Germans.

I've never gone around assuming because someone has a darker (or lighter) skin tone it means they must have X ancestors. My husband has some Native American ancestry but he's very fair skinned, has blue eyes.

In my over 40 years, living in the midwest, I have maybe run into 4 or 5 people who care what race or color someone is.

I'm from the deep south originally, I go there a couple times a year. Aagin...no one I'm around cares what your skin color is.

It's irrevelant what ethnic background Meghan is. Everyone just needs to stop talking about it and focus on the actual relationship... the one poster here needs to stop bringing it up every 2 or 3 pages.

LaRae
__________________
  #2308  
Old 12-17-2016, 07:30 AM
SLV's Avatar
SLV SLV is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by miss whirley View Post

I don't see a snow white baby. Look at her baby pic in the Elle article Meghan wrote. Meghan Markle On Her Biracial Identity - Actress Meghan Markle Discusses Being Half Black Half White That is a biracial baby and that is something Meghan is proud of. It really feels like you are trying to underplay (maybe erase?) Meghan's ethnicity, with all this she can pass for white, and she whiter than other white people spiel. Maybe that's not your intention but it makes me a little uncomfortable, like you are justifying Harry's attraction to her.
Thank you for posting that link. An excellent article, very wel written.
__________________
  #2309  
Old 12-17-2016, 08:14 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Marietta, United States
Posts: 139
Not trying to make this about me and I'm sure this will all get deleted but I'm not trying to erase Meghans ethnicity I'm also from from the south,Georgia.I'm also African American and Irish so if anything I'm proud of her race too lol...The picture of Meghan as a "baby" with her dad she looks like a White baby,as a toddler(which is what you saw) her skin is yellow...It doesn't matter to me but I'm just stating my opinion.I wasn't trying to bring up skin color I was just making an example of Kate's features and that I was convinced she was Jewish until someone told me she wasn't.That's all.This topic should get deleted though because this will turn into a page...Sorry to the Moderator for starting it.
__________________
  #2310  
Old 12-17-2016, 09:25 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ish View Post
I see your point and do agree with it, but I wouldn't bet on her being offered many movie roles. Actresses who are much more well known and much more successful have spoken about how hard it is to get roles the more they age - Maggie Gyllenhaal said in an interview last year that at the then age of 37 she had been deemed too old to play the love interest for a 55 year old man. This year Olivia Wilde revealed that she lost out on an opportunity to play Leonardo Dicaprio's love interest in Wolf of Wall Street because she was too old. Leo was 38 at the time, Olivia Wilde was 28.
Its kind of fitting to bring up Olivia Wilde here in this conversation. Wilde first really came to be known as an actress in her role as Dr. Remy "Thirteen" Hadley in the Fox TV series "House" starring British actor Hugh Laurie. Although that series had ceased production, it still is seen on multiple channels here in reruns.

I equate "House" on par with the series "Suits" and even the most watched series "NCIS". The characters from these series become pretty much household names as even after production on the series stops, they are continued to be shown in marathons and reruns because they're so well liked.

To have a drama series that has continued to air into its 7th year is an accomplishment in this day and age where TV shows and series come and go pretty much without notice. It is work that Meghan Markle has a right to be proud of.

I just really hope that with this relationship that Harry and Meghan now have, the intense focus on these two doesn't play any kind of a part in their decision on which way the relationship goes. The press and public opinion did a whammy of a job to push the Prince of Wales to "make good" with his relationship with the then Lady Diana Spencer. The pressure to marry was extraordinarily high and we all know how that turned out in the long run.

Just one comment here on being biracial and having "dark" skin. As I see it, some people have naturally darker skin tones that a lot of pure white folks pay a lot of money to attain. So, to me, its kind of hypercritical to rant and rave about racial bias when they're digging deep into their pockets to attain the same look. Humans are a funny breed sometimes.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #2311  
Old 12-17-2016, 09:30 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Claude View Post
I support Harry and Meghan's relationship, and yeah there are differences between Meghan and Sweden's Princess Sofia but there are similarities as well.

First of all Sofia was not a nude model, she posed nude once and was not a teenager at the time.

While not a reality show, Meghan "showed herself off" on Deal or no Deal.

I could be wrong but I doubt if Meghan has been self-supporting since the early 2000s, even when taking into account that she worked as a calligrapher in addition to acting. Maybe Sofia's private life could be considered colorful vis a vis Meghan, but to me it looks like they both basically lived off wealthy men, and while doing so engaged in fun stuff, however both also have a social conscious and did activities in that area as well.

Kissing a woman on a reality TV show, posting a picture of spooning bananas the day the story breaks that you are dating the world's most eligible bachelor, potayto, potahto.
No. Sofia was not a teen when she posed nude. She was 20 when she was miss slits and posed with the boa. She was posing topless in bondage photos at 16. She also had her scenes in paradise hotel. And while not nude, barely covered bikini and such photos.

How you can compare that to wearing a fully covered cocktail dress and holding a suitcase is a joke. If nothing more than deal or no deal is a family friendly show on prime time. And paradise hotel was late night and had adult only warnings

Comparing her sex scenes on paradise hotel to a picture of bananas is not potato potatoe, it is cherry to watermelon. Only thing in common is was public
__________________
  #2312  
Old 12-17-2016, 10:37 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 3,844
I am not sure that Meghan, s profession
will be an issue.

It is well known that, after forty, leading roles dry up for actresses, even those in the top tier. She might be happy to move on to something else.
__________________
  #2313  
Old 12-17-2016, 10:52 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Claude View Post
I support Harry and Meghan's relationship, and yeah there are differences between Meghan and Sweden's Princess Sofia but there are similarities as well.

First of all Sofia was not a nude model, she posed nude once and was not a teenager at the time.

While not a reality show, Meghan "showed herself off" on Deal or no Deal.

I could be wrong but I doubt if Meghan has been self-supporting since the early 2000s, even when taking into account that she worked as a calligrapher in addition to acting. Maybe Sofia's private life could be considered colorful vis a vis Meghan, but to me it looks like they both basically lived off wealthy men, and while doing so engaged in fun stuff, however both also have a social conscious and did activities in that area as well.

Kissing a woman on a reality TV show, posting a picture of spooning bananas the day the story breaks that you are dating the world's most eligible bachelor, potayto, potahto.
Kissing a woman on reality TV and posting a pic of two spooning bananas isn't even close to being the same thing. And I'm puzzled as to how anyone came to that conclusion. Especially considering that most eligible bachelor was with her when she posted it and likely knew that was going to be posted and, from everything that's happened since, doesn't seem to see it as a problem.

As for living off of wealthy men, we don't know anything about Meghan's ex husband to make such a claim? And certainly if she was living off of a wealthy man, she wouldn't have to have held odd jobs like being a calligrapher, teaching gift wrapping, or do deal and no deal. Sounds like to me she is just like any other auditioning actor or actress in LA. And quite frankly, it's insulting to suggest anyone was living off of wealthy man without evidence. Especially considering no one has ever heard of his so called wealth or success.

Deal or No Deal is a game show, not nearly the same level of other reality shows that's started to show up. She stands there with a brief case. No tacky behavior required.
__________________
  #2314  
Old 12-17-2016, 10:53 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,643
I think there is really only one role where a woman becomes bigger and better as she ages and that is going from being a mother to a grandmother. Its just so much fun and less work.

There have been multitudes of people that start out in one profession and then find an even more rewarding field for them to pursue. Quite a few hip hop artists have become successful actors (Ice T as Odifin Tutuola on L&O:SVU and LL Cool J as Sam Hanna on NCIS:LA come to mind) and the popular psychologist TV doctor, Dr. Phil McGraw, whose previous career has spurned the new series "Bull".

Being a successful actress on a TV series put Meghan in Toronto where she crossed paths with Harry and that may lead to an even more fulfilling life than she's ever dreamed possible. We'll just have to wait and see what develops.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #2315  
Old 12-17-2016, 11:03 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Woodbridge, United States
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
Kissing a woman on reality TV and posting a pic of two spooning bananas isn't even close to being the same thing. And I'm puzzled as to how anyone came to that conclusion. Especially considering that most eligible bachelor was with her when she posted it and likely knew that was going to be posted and, from everything that's happened since, doesn't seem to see it as a problem.

As for living off of wealthy men, we don't know anything about Meghan's ex husband to make such a claim? And certainly if she was living off of a wealthy man, she wouldn't have to have held odd jobs like being a calligrapher, teaching gift wrapping, or do deal and no deal. Sounds like to me she is just like any other auditioning actor or actress in LA. And quite frankly, it's insulting to suggest anyone was living off of wealthy man without evidence. Especially considering no one has ever heard of his so called wealth or success.

Deal or No Deal is a game show, not nearly the same level of other reality shows that's started to show up. She stands there with a brief case. No tacky behavior required.
A woman in a 7 year relationship with one man while still working different jobs and getting small movie parts is called living off a wealthy man? Likewise when she was in suits she had a relationship with a professional chef who while famous in Canada he is no Jamie Oliver or Gordon Ramsey. If all Megan wanted was fame from the men she was with she is an UNDERACHIEVER! Forget Prince Harry if Meghan wanted only attention she could of went after Drake or a Toronto Raptor...she would of had fame, attention, money without all the bitter women taking swipes at her.
__________________
  #2316  
Old 12-17-2016, 11:20 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Norfolk, United States
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlowVera View Post
A woman in a 7 year relationship with one man while still working different jobs and getting small movie parts is called living off a wealthy man? Likewise when she was in suits she had a relationship with a professional chef who while famous in Canada he is no Jamie Oliver or Gordon Ramsey. If all Megan wanted was fame from the men she was with she is an UNDERACHIEVER! Forget Prince Harry if Meghan wanted only attention she could of went after Drake or a Toronto Raptor...she would of had fame, attention, money without all the bitter women taking swipes at her.
Not to mention, during the entirety of the relationship, she never spoke a about the chef or post any personal pic of the two on her social media. So clearly, while this woman shares some parts of her private life with fans, certain aspects have always been off limits.
__________________
  #2317  
Old 12-17-2016, 12:58 PM
Angel.10's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 108
lol lol lol Compare Sofia from Sweden with Meghan is totally ridiculous. To begin with, Sofia doesn't even know how to speak in public, Meghan has personality, ideas,is articulate, speaks very well, represents women in the ONU ... not to mention the rest
__________________
  #2318  
Old 12-17-2016, 01:04 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 453
Where does this idea, that Meghan was living off wealthy men come from? It's quite insulting and sexist, with no proof to back it up.
__________________
  #2319  
Old 12-17-2016, 01:18 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Marietta, United States
Posts: 139
I'm pretty sure she refused spousal support after her divorce from the producer...Meaning she didn't marry for money...If she did she would have gotten half but she didn't.Whoever even brought this up should be ashamed to assume that especially from an actress who has admitted to odd jobs until she found work...Sounds like a determined woman to me and in the end it paid off for her.She did something right.I think she did maybe 2-3 episodes of Deal or No Deal and quit because she found it degrading...She started small and then got a better role,that's the way to do it! She's proud of herself.Bottom line,she doesn't need a man's money or support,she made it on her own.
__________________
  #2320  
Old 12-17-2016, 01:36 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,643
With the relationship between Harry and Meghan now in full swing, I think we all need to step back a bit and think before we post. There are bound to be a gazillion different reports filled with innuendo and gossip and totally made up stories that a reporter pulls out of his hat to garner attention and have click bait.

As it is pretty much the rule of things here on TRF that we don't deal in gossip and speculation of the wild sorts, maybe we all should ask ourselves before we post the latest Sun article or Daily Mail article or TMZ rumors if it can even be seen as being credible in any way? I know there are a lot of yellow journalist out there that will print any little thing that comes across their desk regardless of its credibility but it is also up to ourselves to be discriminating enough not to pass on garbage.

I think it'd make for a more interesting and intelligent discussion if we can just veer away from the inane and the insinuations and the reports of a derogatory nature based on a person's misplaced self righteousness that comes out in print. Just because places like the Daily Mail print this kind of stuff doesn't mean it needs to be reposted here.

Lets be responsible folks.
__________________

__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





Popular Tags
albania birthday carl gustaf catherine chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria crown princess victoria daytime fashion current events denmark duchess of cambridge style duchess of york earl of snowdon general news grand duchess maria teresa hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king carl gustaf king felipe king felipe vi king juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy news noice prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire of luxembourg princess diana lady spencer princess estelle princess eugenie princess leonore princess madeleine princess margriet princess mary hats princess of asturias princess sibilla princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima queen silvia sofia state visit state visit from argentina stephanie sweden swedish royal family the duchess of cambridge hats uae wildlife victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises