the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > Prince William and Prince Harry





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #181  
Old 04-20-2005, 06:10 AM
cute_girl's Avatar
cute_girl cute_girl is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrissy57
Some people claim that due to various clauses in the Marriage Acts of 1949 and 1953 that members of the British Royal Family can't contract a legal marriage in a civil ceremony, in England, but the highest legal official of the government, the Lord Chancellor, has advised otherwise. Unless a court rules differently, which personally I doubt that they will now but who knows with courts, then the marriage is legal and Charles remains the heir to the throne with Camilla to be his official consort. There is a minister of the Church of England who has put in a number of protests about the marriage and he may take the matter to court but unless the court rules the marriage illegal it is legal.
does that mean that marriage without the religous ceremony is legal in UK?the children from such a marriage wont be considered as illegimiate
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 04-20-2005, 06:20 AM
Alice Vilghelmina's Avatar
Alice Vilghelmina Alice Vilghelmina is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cute_girl
does that mean that marriage without the religous ceremony is legal in UK?the children from such a marriage wont be considered as illegimiate
I'm afraid in this case no more children:)

so if this marriage will be confirmed legal the origin of the future Queen ( I mean William's future wife) will be not such important and burning.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 04-20-2005, 06:36 AM
chrissy57's Avatar
chrissy57 chrissy57 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cute_girl
does that mean that marriage without the religous ceremony is legal in UK?the children from such a marriage wont be considered as illegimiate
With the exception of the Royal Family there is no question that a civil ceremony is a legal marriage and all children from that marriage are legitimate.

The question that some people are raising is whether or not it is legal for a member of the Royal Family to marry anywhere but in a Church ceremony in England. At the moment the legal advice the government and Royal Family has it that it is legal and therefore Charles and Camilla are legally man and wife but if a court ruled otherwise then their marriage would not be legal and would therefore be a non-marriage. It would not affect Charles' succession rights as he had the consent of the Queen in Privy Council based on legal advice but it would affect Camilla's position. That is why I don't think a court would rule that it wasn't legal now.


You and I can certainly marry in a civil ceremony in England and not have a religious ceremony if we want to do so or we could have a religious ceremony only, so long as the minister was registered to perform weddings.

In the extrememly unlikely circumstance that Charles and Camilla have a child now (I know that the chances of that happening are very minute but....) that child would follow Harry in the order of succession and be ahead of Andrew as it would be the legitimate issue of a legal marriage recognised as such by the government of the day.

Tom and Laura have no place in the order of succession or other role in the Royal Family other than that of being the step-children of the heir to the throne.
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 04-20-2005, 07:13 PM
ksenia ksenia is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: los angeles, United States
Posts: 53
Default

my post was wallis specific. of course there are more pressing reasons why King Edward abdicated but we were talking about Wallis SImpson specifically. That was a different time and the way society was governed was sticter than today IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 04-20-2005, 07:42 PM
Piewi's Avatar
Piewi Piewi is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Entre Rios, Argentina
Posts: 1,370
Send a message via MSN to Piewi Send a message via Yahoo to Piewi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binky
Thanks for the info Binky !!
Anyway I till belive that it´s bad:( , but it is they country:o
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 04-21-2005, 05:06 PM
blondebeauty123 blondebeauty123 is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 27
Default The Rf expectations...

I have wondered this... When William and Harry bring a girl to meet their grandmother what does she look for and the whole rf look for in a girl. Do they give William or Harry permission to date the girl or to they let them judge for their own sake. The appearance of the entire RF would go down if a girl were to embarrass them with her background. I have also wonderedn this as well dod you think that William has ever been attracted to a poor commoner before? Or harry.
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 04-21-2005, 05:49 PM
karla64's Avatar
karla64 karla64 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lynnwood, United States
Posts: 710
Default

What stand for Rf???? Thank you karla64
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 04-21-2005, 06:23 PM
Yennie's Avatar
Yennie Yennie is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Skåne, Sweden
Posts: 3,068
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karla64
What stand for Rf???? Thank you karla64
rf probably stands for royal family
__________________
Life is like a box of chocolates... you'll never know what you're gonna get
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 04-21-2005, 06:23 PM
Gisela Gisela is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: , Canada
Posts: 48
Default

I would assume RF stands for 'Royal Family'.
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 04-21-2005, 10:25 PM
gaggleofcrazypeople gaggleofcrazypeople is offline
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,093
Default

Well, they have to be "princess material"- kind, supportive, and willing to give their social life to the royal family. With the circles that William and Harry are in, it is very unlikely that they would marry anyone who was from a very poor family. But the average commoner would be approved if they had what it takes to be princess.
With both, there is also the all the emotional baggage that came with their parent's marrige and divorce. William kept it inside, so if he doesn't have anyone to vent toand to lean on at times, it is likely that is will have a breakdown later in life. Harry, on the other hand is so in love with the memory of his mother that he has basically developed a permanent Oedipial complex. This may create a problem, due to the fact that he will probably want to marry someone very much like his mother, who wasn't the best suited for the job of princess.
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old 04-22-2005, 12:48 AM
chrissy57's Avatar
chrissy57 chrissy57 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 823
Default

My real fear is that one or both of them will marry as a duty to provide an heir and repeat the mistakes of the past.

If not then they may never marry as the woman they marry will always be compared, unfavourably, I suspect to their mother.
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 04-24-2005, 12:05 PM
blondebeauty123 blondebeauty123 is offline
Commoner
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 27
Default Harry and Wills...

I worry for Harry and Wills becuase when the time comes to pick a future princess for England the boys will want to marry a girl some what like their mother. That will create problems with the entire Royal Family because a girl like Diana would mean that she would not be well suited for the job in their eyes. The weren't too fond of Diana in the end and tried to cut her almost completely out of the boy's lives. She was too determined to let that happen. Harry has developed basically a image that can never be erased from his mind about his mother and he wants a girl like that image. So I simply worry for them and the Royal Family that they might end up like their father and marry the first girl who the Royal Family likes.


(I am sorry if I offended anyone in any way I am just stating my opinion.)
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 04-24-2005, 01:17 PM
Nathalian's Avatar
Nathalian Nathalian is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 416
Default

Hummmm...blonde, I´m also afraid of that...but, I think that they´ll get married for love and choose right. They´ve seen the problems and mistakes that their parents did...so, I do not belive in such mistakes.....
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 04-24-2005, 02:07 PM
lamass's Avatar
lamass lamass is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: jonesboro, United States
Posts: 206
Send a message via Yahoo to lamass
Default

i think that harry will marry someone like his mother but wills will marry for love whether she looks like diana will probably not matter to him
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 04-24-2005, 03:14 PM
sara1981's Avatar
sara1981 sara1981 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Little Rock, United States
Posts: 3,556
Send a message via AIM to sara1981 Send a message via Yahoo to sara1981
Default

I would agree with posts

but William would chose Kate but she really beautiful girls and he told her will become Princess and become Queen of England if he will marry her.

Sara Boyce
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 04-24-2005, 07:00 PM
chrissy57's Avatar
chrissy57 chrissy57 is offline
Courtier
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 823
Default

I wouldn't be surprised if neither of them actually marries.

They are very conscious of the pressure that was put on their mother and they also know that whomever they choose will always be compared to Diana and probably unfavourably.

I hope both of them marry for love but the girl concerned will have to met certain standards as well - which is why I don't think Harry would be allowed to marry Chelse (her family connections are just too unsavoury, unfortunately IF it is true love).

I also wonder if either of the princes really wants to put another lady in the position of their mother with the attendent press intrusion into their lives.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 04-25-2005, 11:45 PM
Elspeth's Avatar
Elspeth Elspeth is offline
Administrator
Articles Editor in Chief
Book Club Advisor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United Kingdom
Posts: 14,125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cute_girl
how can some1 be divorced but still married?sorry but I couldnt get this
At the time she was involved with Edward VIII, Wallis Simpson was divorced from her first husband, Earl Winfield Spencer, and still married to her second husband, Ernest Simpson. She divorced him during Edward's first year as king, and it was the realisation that she'd be free to remarry before the coronation that sparked the crisis about whether Edward would be permitted to marry her and remain king.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 04-26-2005, 12:40 AM
cute_girl's Avatar
cute_girl cute_girl is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth
At the time she was involved with Edward VIII, Wallis Simpson was divorced from her first husband, Earl Winfield Spencer, and still married to her second husband, Ernest Simpson. She divorced him during Edward's first year as king, and it was the realisation that she'd be free to remarry before the coronation that sparked the crisis about whether Edward would be permitted to marry her and remain king.
thanks for the explanation,I thought the king was her second husband
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 04-27-2005, 06:19 PM
Feberin's Avatar
Feberin Feberin is offline
Gentry
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore, United States
Posts: 67
Default

The royal family would want them to marry a virgin, non-catholic, wealth and well educated girl.
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 04-27-2005, 06:23 PM
Reina Reina is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,838
Default

I think they are a little easy on the virgin part. I think there are many suitable ladies that William is surrounded by, which means he will marry for love. Kate is a middle-class girl, but affluent.
____________