the royal forums

Go Back   The Royal Forums > Reigning Houses > British Royals > Prince William and Prince Harry





Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #161  
Old 08-13-2008, 09:14 AM
Menarue's Avatar
Menarue Menarue is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 1,417
Default

Muriel perhaps we should start commenting on her being permanently at work which is interfering with her long holiday.
Many well to do British take more than one holiday a year it is what they are accustomed to and I feel that Kate, considering her background, has become accustomed to it. Perhaps the word holiday gives the idea that someone has actually been doing something and they need a break, it may be better to call it travelling or perhaps a "Grand tour" broadening the mind as they did in centuries past. The only trouble is that broadening your mind abroad isnīt usually limited to lying on the beach and lazing around on boats.
It may seem that people are being a bit hard on her but if she wants to become a future Queen consort I think it is time for her to think about it a bit harder, it is not just being a fashion plate. Also I donīt think it is really fair on her, what if something happens and she doesnīt get her prince, I really think that she should try to be independent and just try to be more practical and not live in a dream world. Sycophants all saying what a wonderful addition to the royal family she will make, how beautiful she is etc etc are really not doing her (the young lady) many favours.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 08-13-2008, 09:33 AM
ysbel's Avatar
ysbel ysbel is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New York, United States
Posts: 5,367
Default

I seriously doubt if Clarence House is making any decisions about William's future without Buckingham Palace's heavy involvement.

They seemed to have a good plan with Prince Charles. He gave a speech to Parliament before he was 20, did several important engagements before he graduated and then spent some years in the Navy as military man. When he got out, he formed the Prince's Trust which has been a focus over most of his life.

I don't know why they are deviating from the course with William. Yes, he is not Prince of Wales but if it worked for Charles, I don't see why they can't follow the course for William. As far as I know, he hasn't been to a State Dinner which is the most visible part of a monarch's duty as Head of State; playing host to other Heads of State. Or he can start representing Britain abroad in some key areas.
__________________
"One thing we can do is make the choice to view the world in a healthy way. We can choose to see the world as safe with only moments of danger rather than seeing the world as dangerous with only moments of safety."
-- Deepak Chopra
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 08-13-2008, 09:51 AM
Amelia Amelia is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: -, Ireland
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Menarue View Post
Muriel perhaps we should start commenting on her being permanently at work which is interfering with her long holiday.
Many well to do British take more than one holiday a year it is what they are accustomed to and I feel that Kate, considering her background, has become accustomed to it. Perhaps the word holiday gives the idea that someone has actually been doing something and they need a break, it may be better to call it travelling or perhaps a "Grand tour" broadening the mind as they did in centuries past. The only trouble is that broadening your mind abroad isnīt usually limited to lying on the beach and lazing around on boats.
It may seem that people are being a bit hard on her but if she wants to become a future Queen consort I think it is time for her to think about it a bit harder, it is not just being a fashion plate. .
What does it matter how often Kate goes on holidays? Is there some new law in the UK that says you can only take one holiday a year that she is breaking? What business is it of anyones how many holidays Kate takes, where she goes and what she does when she is there? She is a law-abiding private citizen and is not answerable to the public as long as she remains so.
Quote:
Also I donīt think it is really fair on her, what if something happens and she doesnīt get her prince, I really think that she should try to be independent and just try to be more practical and not live in a dream world.
How is she living in a dream world? She is living in her world, going about her life the way she wants, in a way that works for her. If she and William don't get married she will simply continue to live her life. She lived, quite well, before William, and she will continue to live after William. I'm sure Kate knows exactly where her future is headed and if she doesn't, well if she's as calculating and manipulative as some like to say she is, she'll be just fine.
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 08-13-2008, 10:36 AM
Menarue's Avatar
Menarue Menarue is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 1,417
Default

Kate as a private citizen can go on holidays and it is of no interest to anyone. The wife of the future King of England does interest the public, and she has been pushed under our noses as this by the media, I really donīt know her well enough to be able to comment on how she lived either before or after William in fact I donīt know the young lady at all, I only see pictures of her always on holiday at weddings, at parties. She may do something else how could I know, but I still believe that if her ambition is to marry the future King of England it is about time she showed another side to her character. Her life at the moment waiting around, not working so that she can be free to do whatever William is doing, could be interpreted as short sightedness as we are always being told that the life of a senior royal is centred on duty.
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 08-13-2008, 10:50 AM
Odette's Avatar
Odette Odette is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 1,578
Default

I think that with privilege come responsibilities. I agree that if someone like Kate is so close to the Prince with obviously hopes the relationship will mature to something official and permanent, William, she and her family should keep up appearances.
What is disheartening to me, is the attitude that no one is responsible or accountable and one can do whatever seems nice and enjoyable with no regard to how much criticism they may generate.
The younger generation does not seem so careful or respectful of the rules that gave them all these privileges. It is unfortunate that they can take what was handed to them and assume they earned it.
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 08-13-2008, 11:28 AM
Amelia Amelia is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: -, Ireland
Posts: 454
Default

I guess for me it depends where those privileges come from. William benefits a lot from his position in the royal family, from being second in line. He receives a certain amount of luxury curtsey of the British tax-payers and as such owes them something in return. Something that he will have probably repaid a thousand times over by the time he dies. However I do think that because of the Diana factor he and his brother tend to get away with things now that his father and uncles/aunt would not of at his age, things that will probably not be tolerated from his cousins either.

Kate is another story. Her privileges come from her family. Her parents have worked hard for everything, they built up their business and made it successful. If they want to enjoy the fruits of their hard work, they why shouldn't they? Why shouldn't they want their children to enjoy their lives? The Middletons should not be ashamed to live a lifestyle they have worked hard for.

Quote:
What is disheartening to me, is the attitude that no one is responsible or accountable and one can do whatever seems nice and enjoyable with no regard to how much criticism they may generate.
People are held responsible for their actions if those actions are against the law, if they cause harm to another, well mostly they are, but not doing something because someone mightn't like it is going a bit far. Criticism is part of everyday life for us all because of the very different sets of values and beliefs that we all have. Things I view as fun, others view as an outrage and I have many things that I don't like that others do. I really don't think it is possible for a person to live a life free of criticism, sometimes you just have to say to hell with them and live.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 08-13-2008, 11:45 AM
Menarue's Avatar
Menarue Menarue is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 1,417
Default

Not if you want to be the Queen of England.
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 08-13-2008, 12:32 PM
kimebear's Avatar
kimebear kimebear is online now
Administrator
Assistant Newsletter Editor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Albany, United States
Posts: 1,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel View Post
I seriously doubt if Clarence House is making any decisions about William's future without Buckingham Palace's heavy involvement.

They seemed to have a good plan with Prince Charles. He gave a speech to Parliament before he was 20, did several important engagements before he graduated and then spent some years in the Navy as military man. When he got out, he formed the Prince's Trust which has been a focus over most of his life.

I don't know why they are deviating from the course with William. Yes, he is not Prince of Wales but if it worked for Charles, I don't see why they can't follow the course for William. As far as I know, he hasn't been to a State Dinner which is the most visible part of a monarch's duty as Head of State; playing host to other Heads of State. Or he can start representing Britain abroad in some key areas.
I could not agree with you more. I find it hard to believe that more educational official engagements cannot be found for William to carry out. Not on a grand scale, but certainly more than he does now. He is not a strong public speaker. Better for him to practice now, than when he is Prince of Wales. It seems as if Harry's niche has been found first, what with his stronger military career and Sentebale. I understand that perhaps BP wants to give William a more rounded program, but he is already at an age when many of his peers have long since started their lifetime careers. He should be involved in at least one thing that lasts more than a few months.
__________________
I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 08-13-2008, 01:03 PM
Odette's Avatar
Odette Odette is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 1,578
Default

[quote=Amelia;810763]I guess for me it depends where those privileges come from.
The fact that he was born into a royal family destined to reign someday.
William by accident of his birth has a lot of priviledge and as a result a lot of responsibilities. As an extension, if he has plans to marry Kate, it is up to him to groom her into the role she would play next to him someday.

Kate is another story. Her privileges come from her family. Her parents have worked hard for everything, they built up their business and made it successful. If they want to enjoy the fruits of their hard work, they why shouldn't they? Why shouldn't they want their children to enjoy their lives? The Middletons should not be ashamed to live a lifestyle they have worked hard for.

No one expects the Middletons to not enjoy the fruits of their labour. The point is that if their daughter is destined to become Queen, they should avoid stepping into some mines along the way, to better pave her road.


People are held responsible for their actions if those actions are against the law, Not everyone who commits errors is a criminal. There is a legal mistep and misteps we all commit along the way that may stretch the limits of good taste for example.

Criticism is part of everyday life for us all because of the very different sets of values and beliefs that we all have. Things I view as fun, others view as an outrage and I have many things that I don't like that others do. I really don't think it is possible for a person to live a life free of criticism, sometimes you just have to say to hell with them and live.

That may be something you and I can get away with, since, frankly no one gives a hoot, but a royal who expects to be respected and kept on the job by his/her subjects, public criticism should be of the utmost importance.
If you look at most good politicians, they act with one eye on the polls and every thought towards the next election. Royals can also find themselves in a position when they may have to face their peoples' choices and to "hell with them I want to live" attitude may come back to bite them where it hurts.
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 08-13-2008, 01:08 PM
Odette's Avatar
Odette Odette is offline
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, United States
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kimebear View Post
I could not agree with you more. I find it hard to believe that more educational official engagements cannot be found for William to carry out. Not on a grand scale, but certainly more than he does now. He is not a strong public speaker. Better for him to practice now, than when he is Prince of Wales. It seems as if Harry's niche has been found first, what with his stronger military career and Sentebale. I understand that perhaps BP wants to give William a more rounded program, but he is already at an age when many of his peers have long since started their lifetime careers. He should be involved in at least one thing that lasts more than a few months.
You are both correct. One day there were photos of him chasing drug dealers in the Caribbean and next day he was sailing in Mustique.
With the worldwide economy going down the tubes how do the 26 year olds in the UK who go to work and pay taxes feel about this?
Reply With Quote
  #171  
Old 08-13-2008, 01:47 PM
Ella Kay's Avatar
Ella Kay Ella Kay is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anywhere, United States
Posts: 311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Menarue View Post
Not if you want to be the Queen of England.
Personally, I feel like a lot of these judgments should be held off until we find out that she actually is going to be a future queen. None of us has any idea how she will or will not cope with the stresses and responsibilities of that job until she actually starts doing it.
__________________
Royal book reviews: The Royal Reader
Crazy royal hats: Mad Hattery!
Royal romance gossip: The Wills & Kate Update
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:03 AM
CasiraghiTrio's Avatar
CasiraghiTrio CasiraghiTrio is offline
Heir Apparent
TRF Author
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: L A, United States
Posts: 5,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ysbel View Post
I don't know why they are deviating from the course with William. Yes, he is not Prince of Wales but if it worked for Charles, I don't see why they can't follow the course for William. As far as I know, he hasn't been to a State Dinner which is the most visible part of a monarch's duty as Head of State; playing host to other Heads of State. Or he can start representing Britain abroad in some key areas.
Context is everything. The people working for CH today are from a different generation than the people who guided young Prince Charles in the late 60s/early 70s. Hence they come with different experience and attitudes, and these lead to different kinds of advice. Then there are other differences, political differences, which do effect the decisions of CH whether people wish to admit it or not. There are different modes of "political correctness" and trends and "how to be in touch with modern perspectives" and so forth. It is all down to context.
__________________
~ Whatever you fight, you strengthen. What you resist, persists.
Eckhart Tolle
A New Earth
~ Fight for what you want, not against what you don't want. ~ CT
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 08-14-2008, 06:07 AM
Skydragon's Avatar
Skydragon Skydragon is offline
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England and Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 8,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Odette View Post
I think that with privilege come responsibilities. I agree that if someone like Kate is so close to the Prince with obviously hopes the relationship will mature to something official and permanent, William, she and her family should keep up appearances.
What is disheartening to me, is the attitude that no one is responsible or accountable and one can do whatever seems nice and enjoyable with no regard to how much criticism they may generate.
The younger generation does not seem so careful or respectful of the rules that gave them all these privileges. It is unfortunate that they can take what was handed to them and assume they earned it.
Catherine is simply a young woman who happens, at the moment, to be dating a young man from a privileged background. He doesn't own her, nor she him and by that token WE certainly don't own her in any way and have no right to be demanding anything.

William could decide to marry Arabella Chalmondly Smyth, whom we know nothing about, who also may not have been employed in any capacity and so all the demands some are making on Catherine would have been unfair to say the least.

The younger generation are no different to all the Kings, Queens , Prince's and Princesses from the past, none earned their positions, none have been respectful of who or what gave them any privileges. Just look at any of the royals, from Margaret to Charles, Anne, Andrew or Edward, they all believe that they have the right to be treated as superior, as royals!
__________________
The Past is the Past
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Who will watch the watchers
?
They started with me, it moved to you, who next?
Everything you wish for me, I send it back to thee times three
Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:00 PM
kpusa1981 kpusa1981 is offline
Nobility
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arcadia, United States
Posts: 439
Default

A real three years wouldn't to much to do meaning. Even in the current "war time" enviorment.
Sanhurst-11months
B&R-6 months training and 6 months barracks duty
RAF- 8 months
RN- 8 month
Other Army- 4 months ( SAS SBS IRR AAC and MoD)
Royal Marines 1 year
one year at Whitehall with 300 royal duties
After that 1000 royal duyies.
Couldn't this have worked even at the time we was going in? Could have have done any pre deployment with out being being deployed but as a gadge his leadership skills etc?
__________________
USA
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:04 PM
Bella Bella is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Plymouth, United States
Posts: 1,092
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella Kay View Post
Personally, I feel like a lot of these judgments should be held off until we find out that she actually is going to be a future queen. None of us has any idea how she will or will not cope with the stresses and responsibilities of that job until she actually starts doing it.
Precisely!
Reply With Quote
  #176  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:34 PM
Menarue's Avatar
Menarue Menarue is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cascais, Portugal
Posts: 1,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella Kay View Post
Personally, I feel like a lot of these judgments should be held off until we find out that she actually is going to be a future queen. None of us has any idea how she will or will not cope with the stresses and responsibilities of that job until she actually starts doing it.
I am not judging, I am just answering this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amelia
sometimes you just have to say to hell with them and live.
If Kate Middleton wants to be Queen of England she cannot say this.

Last edited by Elspeth; 08-14-2008 at 10:15 PM.. Reason: Fix quote tags
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old 08-14-2008, 04:47 PM
Isana Isana is offline
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Potsdam, Germany
Posts: 192