The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #121  
Old 08-31-2017, 07:18 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 5,681
Things are changing but Britain is still class obsessed (especially the tabloids) Meghan and her family will have to get used to it as will the people in America who support her.

Harry no doubt is preparing Meghan on what is to come.
__________________

  #122  
Old 08-31-2017, 07:47 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
That settles it. I am going to stick to praising Meghan's beauty and glamour and adorable doggies, guessing about how they spent their time on holiday, observing how happy Harry looks, speculating about which tiaras she will be permitted by HM to wear and offering my giddy opinions on possible venues for the wedding if I come here at all.

It's the safe thing to do. I won't be a party the the "harassment" of Harry's lady love or her family.

Not me, no way!

So a Spring or early Summer Wedding?


LaRae
__________________

  #123  
Old 08-31-2017, 07:55 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
So a Spring or early Summer Wedding?


LaRae
I vote for the late spring
  #124  
Old 08-31-2017, 08:05 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,908
Hmmm so it probably won't be April (W&K married in April) ...so I vote May.



LaRae
  #125  
Old 08-31-2017, 08:15 PM
Blog Real's Avatar
Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 1,817
Will the engagement announcement be this year?
__________________
Acclamation Manuel II of Portugal: 6 May 1908
  #126  
Old 08-31-2017, 09:01 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
Hmmm so it probably won't be April (W&K married in April) ...so I vote May.



LaRae
Me too! My wedding anniversary is in May, so I'm partial. But it is a lovely month for a wedding and IF they announce an engagement after Suits is finished filming, that gives enough time to plan it.
  #127  
Old 08-31-2017, 09:24 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,908
The announcement will be tricky ...might be after the first of the year.

Sept is the Invictus Games...then it's already been announced W&K&H all have an increased schedule including trips out of the country starting Sept/Oct. Then the Queens big wedding anniversary is in November....so...they don't want to overshadow that.

They could do December...but might be Jan. Either way if they announce I look for a short engagement.

My wedding anniversary is in May too!


LaRae
  #128  
Old 08-31-2017, 09:36 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blog Real View Post
Will the engagement announcement be this year?
We have no clue! Everybody have to wait for the couple and Kensington Palace to make that announcement.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #129  
Old 08-31-2017, 11:20 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Alexandria, United States
Posts: 119
I think we should also consider an engagement of Jack and Eugenie. If they announce an engagement, I don't think Harry would want to overshadow that. In my opinion, I think he would wait until after Eugenie's wedding to announce anything.
  #130  
Old 08-31-2017, 11:33 PM
Somebody's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Somewhere, Peru
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyalHighness 2002 View Post
I think we should also consider an engagement of Jack and Eugenie. If they announce an engagement, I don't think Harry would want to overshadow that. In my opinion, I think he would wait until after Eugenie's wedding to announce anything.
Wouldn't the other way around be more likely? Harry and Meghan are probably more in a hurry (because of age), so maybe Jack and Eugenie are happy to wait a little longer. So far, they haven't been in a rush.. And if they would announce their engagement after Harry and Meghan (which would be smart if they want to reduce media attention), Jack could even join his fiancée at the wedding before having their own a little while later...
  #131  
Old 08-31-2017, 11:39 PM
LauraS3514's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Jose, CA, United States
Posts: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyalHighness 2002 View Post
I think we should also consider an engagement of Jack and Eugenie. If they announce an engagement, I don't think Harry would want to overshadow that. In my opinion, I think he would wait until after Eugenie's wedding to announce anything.
Zara and Mike announced their engagement just two months after William and Catherine so I'm not sure either Harry or Eugenie will take their cousin's announcement into account.
  #132  
Old 08-31-2017, 11:48 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 112
Every month there can be some type of important event or someone's birthday or anniversary or holiday, one would hope that life doesn't have to stand still for anyone just because of it.
  #133  
Old 09-01-2017, 12:07 AM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: central valley, United States
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraS3514 View Post
Zara and Mike announced their engagement just two months after William and Catherine so I'm not sure either Harry or Eugenie will take their cousin's announcement into account.
Eugenie doesn't seem that interested in the limelight & if she announced just after Harry (as Zara did just after William) she'd avoid a lot of attention as it would naturally be directed at her cousin, so if Eugenie and Jack are planning on marriage I wouldn't be surprised if they announced near in time to Harry, assuming, of course, that Harry and Meghan are as serious as we suspect.
  #134  
Old 09-01-2017, 12:08 PM
MaiaMia_53's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
Why do some Brits think Americans "froth at the mouth" about Royalty, much less Harry and Meghan??!

I can assure anyone who believes this that you are wildly off the mark. Only the handful of Americans on online Royal boards even know or care who Harry dates.

We comprise only a very, very tiny fraction of the population I assure you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
MAYBE .01 percent of the population...and that might be over estimated! LOL

In my circle of friends/family in real life...I am the only person who cares anything about any royal families. 1 or 2 of them actually even know the names of the major figures ..and they won't even know all the main members of BRF royal family.

On my online groups (not on FB) I know of 1 other American who knows....on FB a few more but they are Europeans.
True. And anyway @Pranter, wasn't your first reference to not having yet seen anyone "foaming at the mouth," in direct response to my comment regarding people taking exception to Meghan's background in some quarters? And I responded by saying there are plenty of 'crazies foaming at the mouth' on Internet sites and on the comment sections of tabloid made-up & rehashed reports about H&M's romance.

The 'crazies foaming at the mouth' are not specific to any one country in the world, by the way. There are plenty of people with goodwill toward H&M all over the world, just as there are a percentage of 'crazies' many of whom are just jealous, all over the world. Antiquated views and/or jealousy toward Harry & Meghan being happy together can not be attributed to any specific national or ethnic group! There are all kinds of people with all kinds of different characters, upbringings and perceptions based on ignorance and/or prejudice. Just as there are likely overwhelmingly many many people of wonderful character who would hold goodwill toward any young couple in love regardless of the couple's backgrounds or status in life.
  #135  
Old 09-01-2017, 04:24 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,335
Quote:
has certainly offered the royal family a chance to heal on many levels

How MARVELLOUS that a 'universal panacea' has presented herself in this way !

Do you not think that 'loading expectations' on anyone might be a bad idea, given the demands made upon the late Princess of Wales, by an enraptured and 'starry eyed' public ?
  #136  
Old 09-01-2017, 04:36 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 5,681
Meghan Markle has a long way to go for Britons to be 'enraptured' with her
  #137  
Old 09-01-2017, 04:40 PM
MaiaMia_53's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
How MARVELLOUS that a 'universal panacea' has presented herself in this way !

Do you not think that 'loading expectations' on anyone might be a bad idea, given the demands made upon the late Princess of Wales, by an enraptured and 'starry eyed' public ?
It's not about Meghan herself, but about the emotions that are being raised by her dating Prince Harry. And it's about the larger issues generated by her background, which once again she is not precipitating nor generating in anyway herself. She is simply being herself and privately sharing in a low profile relationship with a high profile member of the British royal family.

Your perceiving what I said in a negative, prejudicial manner nets you misunderstanding and misinterpretation.

There are a number of variant emotions operating on a number of levels regarding H&M's relationship among the current fairly small percentage of royal followers, royal journalists and gossipmongers who are reacting to and commenting on it. I just think it might be helpful for us all to individually reflect upon our emotions and motivations and maybe stop over-projecting or mindlessly arguing without learning anything. I know that I am learning some things about myself and about cultural attitudes, and as well new things about the royals that I didn't know before that have enhanced my understanding of royal life. I don't specifically attribute all that I have learned directly to Ms. Markle, but I do think she's a positive role model.

Also, I'm not putting expectations about 'universal healing' directly on Meghan personally. The 'Diana-like hounding' and harassment by the press will in no way be tolerated by Prince Harry or the royal family. And frankly, I do not expect H&M to become more open with their private relationship, even should they marry. If they do marry, they will surely (not unlike Will & Kate) do everything they can to continue conducting a low-profile private life while engaging in public duties dutifully in as low-key a way as possible. And I expect H&M to devote a lot of positive energy and effort to their humanitarian projects, as well.
  #138  
Old 09-01-2017, 04:49 PM
Commoner
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Winston-Salem, United States
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
Meghan Markle has a long way to go for Britons to be 'enraptured' with her
Well, I don't think that any of this matters to Harry. He just wants to be happy. Marrying for love, not convenience, is what he has always wanted. Harry is well aware of the excruciating pain, a loveless marriage brought to his late mother. I wish him well.
  #139  
Old 09-01-2017, 04:57 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,908
Yeah I don't think I'd be basing relationship decisions on whether or not Britons are 'enraptured' with my girlfriend/boyfriend....Harry is the one that has to live with and build a life with that other person, not the public or the courtiers.


LaRae
  #140  
Old 09-01-2017, 05:07 PM
MaiaMia_53's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranter View Post
Yeah I don't think I'd be basing relationship decisions on whether or not Britons are 'enraptured' with my girlfriend/boyfriend....Harry is the one that has to live with and build a life with that other person, not the public or the courtiers.
Yep, what has 'enraptured Britons' got to do wid it? Got to do wid it!?

There's no accounting for misinterpretations and exaggerations, as well as deflections and projections.

Harry's personal relationship, as he already said is about 'his life and hers.' He cares about other people, but that's beside-the-point in who he chooses to date and to marry.

I was only referencing people's attitudes generally/ culturally, and I was also referencing the royals in the sense that merely by happenstance and serendipity, a young prince who has fallen in love won't have to be dissuaded or prevented from marrying the person he loves due to antiquated notions, prejudice, or disapproval by anyone, certainly not by opiners on an Internet forum.
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Harry and Meghan: The Love Story" eya Royal Library 20 09-13-2017 04:21 PM




Popular Tags
albania assassination beatrice (1986- ) beatrice borromeo bernadotte best outfit birthday crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion crown princess mette-marit crown princess victoria hats cymry denmark duchess of cambridge evening wear duke of cambridge e-mail english books fascism fashion poll fashion poll october 2016 fashion suggestions fashio poll killing monarchy myth november november 2016 october 2016 picture of the week pierre casiraghi prince charles prince felix prince harken in canada princess charlene princess charlene eveningwear princess claire of luxembourg princess margriet princess mary princess mary fashion princess sofia prince william queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia suits queen margrethe queen mathilde queen mathilde daytime fashion queen mathilde fashion queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania fashion rohans royalties sally bedell smith state visit succession sweden swedish royal family the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises