The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #621  
Old 09-06-2017, 11:35 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 View Post
I am sorry to agree.

The Cambridges photographed a couple of years ago schmoozing with JayZ and Beyonce at a Knicks game pretty much sealed it even though it started years ago.

The celebrification of the Windsors will not begin with Meghan Markle.

It started with Princess Margaret in the Swinging 60's, hanging out with the Beatles and the Burtons and the Rolling Stones and partying on Mustique, and reached it's zenith with Diana Princess of Wales in the 80's-90's.
Oh, much much earlier than that. King Edward VIII when Prince of Wales was friendly with actors and musicians as was his younger brother the Duke of Kent. And Lady Mountbatten had lovers from show business.
__________________

  #622  
Old 09-06-2017, 11:38 AM
Gentry
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 54
I'm a fan of Meghan's but I like to think that I can also be objective!

A day after the event & I'm still struggling to understand the point of this Vanity Fair cover story. She is not promoting her show or talking about her charities. If she wants to be known for her work & not who she is dating I think it's rather bizarre the article barely touches on her work. Meghan is an intelligent woman who usually comes off as very articulate, however I don't think this piece does her any justice & it comes across as quite shallow. It's a fluff piece that is poorly written & most of the quotes are coming from other people & old interviews. I don't know who had the final say over the editorial but it just seems very rushed & like they were only interested in getting a few good quotes about Harry.

If this is supposed to be a rollout I would have expected a meatier piece with some new information about her work, charities & outlook. But what we got is just a rehash of old stories & fluffy revelations like the sauce she buys. It's really not a good read, however in fairness to Meghan I don't think the final edit was her decision.
__________________

  #623  
Old 09-06-2017, 11:39 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 8,910
Lets take a look at this from another angle. According to the Oxford dictionary, the word "celebrity" is defined as:

1A famous person, especially in entertainment or sport.
‘he became a sporting celebrity’
as modifier ‘a celebrity chef’
More example sentencesSynonyms
1.1mass noun The state of being well known.
‘his prestige and celebrity grew’

Although primarily associated in 2017 as people in entertainment and sports, it would also be appropriate to state "Prince William is a more of a royal celebrity than Prince (fill in the blank with a princely name from a more obscure country).

When using the word celebrity, we can usually define it better with an adjective such as a sports celebrity, a TV celebrity, a royal celebrity, a socialite celebrity. Other words that could be used are "stars" and "luminaries". Celebrity and being a celebrity means that they have a certain amount of renown that is notable and known by the masses.

Reflecting back on the Vanity Fair article, one statement does stand out for me where Meghan is asked about the notoriety of her relationship with Harry. She replies:

“We’re two people who are really happy and in love. We were very quietly dating for about six months before it became news, and I was working during that whole time, and the only thing that changed was people’s perception. Nothing about me changed. I’m still the same person that I am, and I’ve never defined myself by my relationship.

Meghan is not just proclaiming that they are "in love" but are two individual people that are "in love". The Meghan that Meghan was before she met Harry is the same person she is today. The same with Harry. Neither one of them is seeking to change, alter, transform or change the image of each other. They love each other because of who they are and not because of what they could be or turn themselves into. This has been a pitfall before in a royal marriage and we don't see this here. It tells me that this couple is very much grounded in reality.

I don't think Harry could ask for a more well grounded, self confident and congenial person to share his life with and all that his life entails. If it takes a "celebrity" to enhance, support and add to the British royal family, in my eyes it is a good thing all around and a very positive asset.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #624  
Old 09-06-2017, 11:50 AM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 7,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curryong View Post
Oh, much much earlier than that. King Edward VIII when Prince of Wales was friendly with actors and musicians as was his younger brother the Duke of Kent. And Lady Mountbatten had lovers from show business.

George Duke of Kent was said to be especially...close...with Noel Coward. You are right, Royalty and show biz go even farther than I thought!
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". Martin Luther King Jr. 1929-1968
  #625  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:07 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 345
And Prince Charles was good friends with the late Joan Rivers.
Royalty and singers/actors/dancers can be friendly and it is not a problem so long as personal details aren't shared with the press.
And Royals use "celebrities" to further their charities.
  #626  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:10 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: pinner, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,335
Ms Markle will be the first 'sleb' to marry into the BRF [if Harry does propose, and she accepts]...
  #627  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:18 PM
Nobility
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen E View Post
I'm a fan of Meghan's but I like to think that I can also be objective!

A day after the event & I'm still struggling to understand the point of this Vanity Fair cover story. She is not promoting her show or talking about her charities. If she wants to be known for her work & not who she is dating I think it's rather bizarre the article barely touches on her work. Meghan is an intelligent woman who usually comes off as very articulate, however I don't think this piece does her any justice & it comes across as quite shallow. It's a fluff piece that is poorly written & most of the quotes are coming from other people & old interviews. I don't know who had the final say over the editorial but it just seems very rushed & like they were only interested in getting a few good quotes about Harry.

If this is supposed to be a rollout I would have expected a meatier piece with some new information about her work, charities & outlook. But what we got is just a rehash of old stories & fluffy revelations like the sauce she buys. It's really not a good read, however in fairness to Meghan I don't think the final edit was her decision.
I think it was not meant to be a full biography of Meghan. They were coming from now--she is winding down her career as an actress and will need to adjust the focus of her charitable endeavors-she is moving on and the primary thing is her relationship with Harry.
  #628  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:21 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 4,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
This reminds me of when Michelle Obama touched the Queen. The Queen didn't seem to mind, but the people freaked out.
Well you know us Americans....we don't worry about that sort of thing!


LaRae

Quote:
Originally Posted by O-H Anglophile View Post
I think it was not meant to be a full biography of Meghan. They were coming from now--she is winding down her career as an actress and will need to adjust the focus of her charitable endeavors-she is moving on and the primary thing is her relationship with Harry.
I saw it as an introduction to folks...'why' could be asked about anyone who does an article for VF ...including members of the BRF.


LaRae
  #629  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:26 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 8,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
Ms Markle will be the first 'sleb' to marry into the BRF [if Harry does propose, and she accepts]...
Meh. A sleb, an aristo, a Yank or a Brit. All terms that can be tacked onto a person to describe a bit about themselves. As there's been a history of aristos and gentry or commoner marriages in the royal family where some went over like a lead balloon and some that persevered, who is to say that a 'sleb isn't going to be a good match? Its who the person is and not how the public defines them that makes the world of difference.

If the BRF can survive and prosper after Diana, Princess of Wales (an aristo), I think they can handle just about anybody.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #630  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:30 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: st. paul, United States
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen E View Post
I'm a fan of Meghan's but I like to think that I can also be objective!

A day after the event & I'm still struggling to understand the point of this Vanity Fair cover story. She is not promoting her show or talking about her charities. If she wants to be known for her work & not who she is dating I think it's rather bizarre the article barely touches on her work. Meghan is an intelligent woman who usually comes off as very articulate, however I don't think this piece does her any justice & it comes across as quite shallow. It's a fluff piece that is poorly written & most of the quotes are coming from other people & old interviews. I don't know who had the final say over the editorial but it just seems very rushed & like they were only interested in getting a few good quotes about Harry.

If this is supposed to be a rollout I would have expected a meatier piece with some new information about her work, charities & outlook. But what we got is just a rehash of old stories & fluffy revelations like the sauce she buys. It's really not a good read, however in fairness to Meghan I don't think the final edit was her decision.
I really appreciate you being objective and acknowledging that this was a questionable decision. And while the intention might have come from a good place the final product deserves to have mixed reactions. It's hard to converse with those that take the stance of "I'm a fan of this person don't you critique any of their actions, if you object to something - who cares!"

So kudos.
  #631  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:33 PM
Moonmaiden23's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles, United States
Posts: 7,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyevale View Post
Ms Markle will be the first 'sleb' to marry into the BRF [if Harry does propose, and she accepts]...
''

That is true, but the BRF has had deep blue blooded aristocrats like Diana who eventually morphed in a "sleb"...then you have commoners like the Duchesses of Gloucester and Wessex who sometimes out-Royal the Royals in their sense of dignity and decorum.

We will have to wait and see what happens with Harry's beloved. I have my ideas of how it will turn out if/when she marries in, but nothing (good) will come of sharing them here right now.
__________________
"Be who God intended you to be, and you will set the world on fire" St. Catherine of Siena

"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". Martin Luther King Jr. 1929-1968
  #632  
Old 09-06-2017, 12:46 PM
soapstar's Avatar
Super Moderator
Picture of the Week Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, United States
Posts: 3,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoasneeze View Post
I like it, tbh. Meghan and Harry aren't acting like a ring on her finger would change her as a person. She's not going to be hidden in the shadows, she is her own person, has her own voice, even without a ring.

I don't think they've acted coy or secretive at all. Right from the start PH stated that Meghan is his girlfriend. They've openly travelled to see each other. Nothing coy about that at all.
But it has changed her. She's become less open. She shut down her website, stopped posting on twitter/Instagram, discontinued her clothing line and has given fewer interviews than in the past. And if she marries into the BRF, she'll have to be careful about the things she says and the causes she takes up. She'll also be giving up her acting career and any possibility of ever having a private life. I'm sure she feels it's well worth it, but we can't pretend that dating/marrying into a royal family doesn't change a person.

This conversation about Meghan's suitability is nothing new. Kate got hammered by it for years (not only from royal watchers but also by the media). Even Sophie had to deal with questions about whether she was a good fit. But just like Kate and Sophie, if Meghan marries into the BRF, questions about her suitability will subside and folks will find other things to criticize (like her clothes, or whether she does enough engagements).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
Which makes me wonder just why exactly Meghan would be a threat to Catherine?
What does Catherine have that must be protected at all costs (against the 'claws' of Meghan)?
She's not a threat. This type of thing happens whenever there is someone new for the media/royal watchers to focus on. Diana was pitted against Fergie. In fact, when Fergie first came into the picture, she was seen as a breath of fresh air...the fun one. Next it was Diana and Sophie. Then came Kate and Chelsy and Kate and Beatrice/Eugenie.
  #633  
Old 09-06-2017, 01:03 PM
ROYAL NORWAY's Avatar
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: somewhere, United Kingdom, Norway
Posts: 2,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqui24 View Post
This reminds me of when Michelle Obama touched the Queen. The Queen didn't seem to mind, but the people freaked out.
In fact, it was the Queen who first touched Michelle Obama, not the other way round.
__________________
The Queen is the most wonderful, forgiving, non judgmental person I know. Sarah Ferguson speaking in 2011.
  #634  
Old 09-06-2017, 01:08 PM
duchessrachel's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Birmingham, United States
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osipi View Post

If the BRF can survive and prosper after Diana, Princess of Wales (an aristo), I think they can handle just about anybody.
That is the truth!
  #635  
Old 09-06-2017, 01:08 PM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,056
Pictures:
Miss Meghan Markle's Portraits from the Vanity Fair Magazine-
The Royal Watcher

I hadn't seen the other 4 pictures. Beautifully done of course!
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #636  
Old 09-06-2017, 01:14 PM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by soapstar View Post
But it has changed her. She's become less open. She shut down her website, stopped posting on twitter/Instagram, discontinued her clothing line and has given fewer interviews than in the past. And if she marries into the BRF, she'll have to be careful about the things she says and the causes she takes up. She'll also be giving up her acting career and any possibility of ever having a private life. I'm sure she feels it's well worth it, but we can't pretend that dating/marrying into a royal family doesn't change a person.

This conversation about Meghan's suitability is nothing new. Kate got hammered by it for years (not only from royal watchers but also by the media). Even Sophie had to deal with questions about whether she was a good fit. But just like Kate and Sophie, if Meghan marries into the BRF, questions about her suitability will subside and folks will find other things to criticize (like her clothes, or whether she does enough engagements).



She's not a threat. This type of thing happens whenever there is someone new for the media/royal watchers to focus on. Diana was pitted against Fergie. In fact, when Fergie first came into the picture, she was seen as a breath of fresh air...the fun one. Next it was Diana and Sophie. Then came Kate and Chelsy and Kate and Beatrice/Eugenie.
Oh, I don't think that she's a threat. I was simply responding to two posters who expressed this feeling that Meghan is supposedly being seen by some as a 'threat' to Catherine. I wonder sometimes why certain persons can't just co-exist. Like Victoria and Sofia in Sweden. Victoria was The Holy Woman and Sofia was the Devil in Person who must be kept away from it all as far as possible. That was the mood at the time.

As for a possible engagement, I will only believe it when I see it. I don't think this interview indicates anything per se, it's just unprecedented.
  #637  
Old 09-06-2017, 01:31 PM
Tamara77's Avatar
Commoner
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Appalachian Mountains, United States
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Observer7 View Post
Some of you need to stop being so negative! Harry is happy with Meghan and that is all that should matter here. Harry is dating her and probably will marry her and there is nothing anyone can do about it.


Exactly. This was a carefully controlled interview by the looks of it. Meghan is being introduced to the public. Whether or not any one of us agrees on how it was done, does not matter. Harry and Meghan's relationship with the public and what they allow to be seen/known will be done according to their wishes, and through the advice of their PR teams.

We have heard ourselves that William and Harry are bringing the monarchy into the 21st century. Things will be done a different way. Some of us will be disappointed. It will never be the same to some.

I am over the moon ecstatic about this interview. She is a lovely woman. I could not be happier for the both of them. It's high time Harry is finally happy and ready to settle down.
  #638  
Old 09-06-2017, 02:08 PM
SLV's Avatar
SLV SLV is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,017
I am not familiar with the term 'sleb'. What is it?
  #639  
Old 09-06-2017, 02:12 PM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 8,910
Its kind of a shortened version of celebrity into one syllable.

Kind of like the use of 'sup now to mean what's up.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #640  
Old 09-06-2017, 02:18 PM
SLV's Avatar
SLV SLV is offline
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,017
Thanks.
To me it feels negative. Is it, or is that just my interpretation?
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests)
Lady Gudgeon
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Harry and Meghan: The Love Story" eya Royal Library 20 09-13-2017 04:21 PM




Popular Tags
albania best outfit birthday carl gustaf crown princess mary crown princess mary fashion current events denmark fashion poll general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie's fashion & style infanta leonor infanta sofia king abdullah in new zealand king felipe king felipe vi king juan carlos letizia monarchy multiple births new zealand nobel november 2016 october 2016 october and november 2016 picture of the week picture of the week december prince charles prince leka princess marie daytime outfit princess mary princess mary daytime fashion princess mary fashion princess of asturias princess sofia queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen letizia gala dresses queen mathilde queen mathilde daytime fashion queen mathilde fashion queen mathilde visits jordan queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen rania daytime fashion queen rania fashion queen silvia queen sofia shaikh zayed bin hamdan bin zayed al nahyan spanish state visit to japan state visit state visit to spain succession sweden swedish royal family thailand the duchess of cambridge casual wear the duchess of cambridge daytime fashion the duchess of cambridge fashion the duchess of cambridge hats tiara zog


Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises