on that basis she shouldnt have a call on the UK people unless carrying out royal business - so no security etc.
Agreed...If she's only a 'part- timer'...
on that basis she shouldnt have a call on the UK people unless carrying out royal business - so no security etc.
Why should she have to give up her career and life though? She should be able to continue to act, if that is what she wants to do.
The expectation that a woman who marries has to give up their life for their royal spouse while a man marrying a royal is able to continue with his previous occupation is plainly sexist and should be unacceptable in this day and age.
She also shouldn't have to give up her nationality and be forced to more to the UK. That should be a decision made between the two of them based on what both of them want to do not on who is family is.
Sure if she wants to give up everything she has personally built for a life of being a low-level royal who has to give way to a large number of people who have done nothing much other than be born to the right parents that is fine but if she wants to continue with the life she has built for herself she should be able to do that as well.
Harry and Meghan will be 'second team' royals before they know it.
Harry said in an interview something along the lines of "he only has a few years before George and Charlotte take over "
So Harry knows the Cambridge children are going to eclipse him, just like W&H eclipsed Andrew.
Harry and Meghan will be 'second team' royals before they know it.
Harry said in an interview something along the lines of "he only has a few years before George and Charlotte take over "
So Harry knows the Cambridge children are going to eclipse him, just like W&H eclipsed Andrew.
Harry and Meghan will be 'second team' royals before they know it.
I honestly don't get what the big deal is. Celebrity slope? we hardly see her! Also Will did GQ along with glossy photos, Kate did Vogue, Harry did Newsweek. Promotion is part of Meghan's job to begin with she has been on the cover of several magazines. The article was basic and pedestrian highlighted by her admitting that she and Harry are happy and a couple. I kind of like that two almost middle aged adults are not playing coy. I hope this signals them becoming semi official similar to how Sophie and Edward where before they even got engaged.
I can't wait to hear about Harry spending his first American holiday with his American family in the US before, after, and while married namely, "Thanksgiving". I wonder if he know what African-Americans like to enjoy on holidays like that such as chittlings. And Meghan's mother is from down south so Harry is going to ne exposed to African-American culture. I can't wait to read about his reactions. LOL!
Major culture shock for him perhaps?
I have the impression that with the VF Interview she has no intention to marry Harry.
Yes, and wait until Meghan is confronted with kedgeree, black pudding, bubble and squeak, bangers and mash, and for dessert, spotted dick!
I wouldn't call Harry a low level royal. His prominence will not fade until the Cambridge children are grown. If George picks up royal duties the same time his father did, it'll be almost 25 years from now. In that time, Charles will start phasing his siblings out from royal duties, and he's only got two sons. If Charles passes in that time, William will only have his adult brother to rely on.Why should she have to give up her career and life though? She should be able to continue to act, if that is what she wants to do.
The expectation that a woman who marries has to give up their life for their royal spouse while a man marrying a royal is able to continue with his previous occupation is plainly sexist and should be unacceptable in this day and age.
She also shouldn't have to give up her nationality and be forced to more to the UK. That should be a decision made between the two of them based on what both of them want to do not on who is family is.
Sure if she wants to give up everything she has personally built for a life of being a low-level royal who has to give way to a large number of people who have done nothing much other than be born to the right parents that is fine but if she wants to continue with the life she has built for herself she should be able to do that as well.
I see a difference because Kate had been the Duchess of Cambridge for a few years before appearing in VOGUE. We generally don't hear from a royal girlfriend "in her own words" until the engagement interview.
Promotion is part of Meghan's job as an actress, but I don't think that it should be part of her relationship with Harry. I'm afraid that this foray might lead to even more pressure being put on both of them to make an engagement announcement sooner rather than later. Once someone reveals something to the media, the media--and those who consume it--can become fixated on those few words.
In other words, if Harry and Meghan don't marry, these words will come back to haunt her.
I see a difference because Kate had been the Duchess of Cambridge for a few years before appearing in VOGUE. We generally don't hear from a royal girlfriend "in her own words" until the engagement interview.
Promotion is part of Meghan's job as an actress, but I don't think that it should be part of her relationship with Harry. I'm afraid that this foray might lead to even more pressure being put on both of them to make an engagement announcement sooner rather than later. Once someone reveals something to the media, the media--and those who consume it--can become fixated on those few words.
In other words, if Harry and Meghan don't marry, these words will come back to haunt her.
The photo shoot with Vogue was part of a collaboration between Vogue and the National Portrait Gallery which Kate is the patron of. It was also only a photo shoot. She didn't give an interview. So she used her image to bring awareness to one of her patronages just like William's interview with GQ to bring awareness for their mental health companion. In both cases, the magazines were British magazines.
What is Meghan bring attention too? Some people may say herself? If she is trying to introduce herself to the British people, why an American magazine not a British one? Why such stylized photos? Why not use more realistic natural photos instead of barefoot in a gown?
Oh my! You forgot haggis! I think though that with being partially vegan, she'll have an "out" for bypassing some things that just don't appeal to her foodie sensibilities. Then again, she may jump on it all with both forks firing. If I remember correctly, both she and Harry have been reported to dine on local foods wherever they travel but don't quote me on that one.
The photo shoot with Vogue was part of a collaboration between Vogue and the National Portrait Gallery which Kate is the patron of. It was also only a photo shoot. She didn't give an interview. So she used her image to bring awareness to one of her patronages just like William's interview with GQ to bring awareness for their mental health companion. In both cases, the magazines were British magazines.
What is Meghan bring attention too? Some people may say herself? If she is trying to introduce herself to the British people, why an American magazine not a British one? Why such stylized photos? Why not use more realistic natural photos instead of barefoot in a gown?
And this is what I don't like about this we are making her out to be something she's not and doesn't need to be. She doesn't have to be beautiful or sympathetic to everyone or very intelligent or some wonderful person. Harry has fallen in love with her enough said.
Hmmm I'm not sure she's vegan...seems like I saw her talking in an article about eating meat (chicken etc).
LaRae
Harry said in an interview something along the lines of "he only has a few years before George and Charlotte take over "
So Harry knows the Cambridge children are going to eclipse him, just like W&H eclipsed Andrew.
Harry and Meghan will be 'second team' royals before they know it.
Harry said in an interview something along the lines of "he only has a few years before George and Charlotte take over "
So Harry knows the Cambridge children are going to eclipse him, just like W&H eclipsed Andrew.
Harry and Meghan will be 'second team' royals before they know it.
The photo shoot with Vogue was part of a collaboration between Vogue and the National Portrait Gallery which Kate is the patron of. It was also only a photo shoot. She didn't give an interview. So she used her image to bring awareness to one of her patronages just like William's interview with GQ to bring awareness for their mental health companion. In both cases, the magazines were British magazines.
What is Meghan bring attention too? Some people may say herself? If she is trying to introduce herself to the British people, why an American magazine not a British one? Why such stylized photos? Why not use more realistic natural photos instead of barefoot in a gown?
she sure is a mess in that photo