The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #241  
Old 09-04-2017, 07:46 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,393
For all we know, hearing the news of the Cambridges' expanding family just may trigger an urgency to have children of their own in Harry and Meghan's minds. It wouldn't surprise me as they both have mentioned wanting a home and family life of their own.

It wouldn't surprise me either now that Harry and his future family are moving further down the line of succession that this couple decides to go the route that Edward and Sophie did with having their children titled and styled as children of a Duke and Duchess rather than prince or princess. It would fit more in line of them wishing to have as "normal" of a life as possible.

Then again, they're not even engaged yet (that we know of) and shouldn't jump the gun on anything and let the normal progression of things happen.
__________________

__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 09-04-2017, 07:53 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
That is actually a fair point. Both Victoria and Carl Philip had to wait a long time until their respective marriages became acceptable to their father and to the Swedish public. Harry should drop the secrecy if he wants the Brutish public to warm up to Meghan.

I don't see any secrecy, what I see is privacy, and imo they're two completely different things.

I don't get why British public needs to warm up to Meghan, when they're not engaged, as the British public don't have any say in whom Harry marries or dates.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 09-04-2017, 08:03 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 3,807
Let's face it, we won't know whether Meghan is suitable unless she and Harry get married, and we see how she handles it.

Everyone thought Diana was perfect, and look how that turned out.

Meghan may turn out to be ideal, or she may be a disaster; there's simply no way to tell in advance.
As someone said, if worse comes to worst, they will divorce and move on.
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 09-04-2017, 08:57 AM
Nobility
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 401
Are we allowed to post tweets here? I'm sorry if this isn't allowed, and will delete if not appropriate.



Emily Andrews @byEmilyAndrews

2m
Harry spent 31 Aug at KP with Meghan, and then they went away for the w/end together hence why he hasn't seen #kate this morning... #royals
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 09-04-2017, 09:24 AM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 2,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
And if twins Harry won't need permission at all.
Harry might be sixth in line next year, but, when William is king, he will be back to 4th (unless W&K have a fourth child, which I think is unlikely). More significantly, there is a non-negliblle chance that William might actually become king before any of his children come of age, especially now that there is growing pressure on Charles to abdicate. So, unlikely though as it may be, there is still a possibility that Harry might be in a position where he could potentially become regent if needed. In any case, he is still likely to be at least a counsellor of state for quite some time, either under his father's or his brother's reign. So maybe he's not that unimportant after all.
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 09-04-2017, 09:35 AM
xenobia's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Near the artic circle, Sweden
Posts: 705
I would say that the person who is most affected by the news of baby #3 for the Cambridges would be Andrew. Once the child is born, he doesn't need the Queens permission to (re)marry. That opens up interesting possibilities.

When it comes to Harry and Meghan, I have no reason to think that the Queen wouldn't give them permission to marry. I assume that Harry has already discussed this with his grandmother. The new baby Cambridge arrival - I guess around april? - might have an impact on a possible wedding date for Meghan and Harry, should they become engaged this fall. I'm sure that Harry would want both his brother and sister-in-law to attend, so I would say that june is the earliest possible date if there's a wedding next summer.
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 09-04-2017, 09:36 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 5,711
As long as Kate is fertile everything is likely.
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 09-04-2017, 09:55 AM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 13,290
It's so good to hear Harry got to spend the anniversary of his mums passing with Meghan. Her presence must've meant a lot to him.

When you cut out all the bull, people should be happy for Harry. He got some personal happiness in his life again. Meghan appears to be very happy too. At the end of the day that's what it's all about; the happiness of the couple. Everything else falls into place after that.

No one have to worry about Meghan being suitable for a possible role as a senior royal.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 09-04-2017, 09:57 AM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,096
June is a super busy month royal wise with Trooping the Colour. Ascot week, Garter Service. Highly unlikely
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:45 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 115
Edward and Sophie were married in June. There's always going to be some event occurring in any month.
Reply With Quote
  #251  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:48 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 5,570
My bet if the marry early in the year is March or May.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 09-04-2017, 11:03 AM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeT View Post
Edward and Sophie were married in June. There's always going to be some event occurring in any month.


They had a very small wedding in Windsor. A bigger wedding in London during a high terror alert time is a different thing. A more low key wedding outside the capital would be easier to carry out on shorter notice.
Reply With Quote
  #253  
Old 09-04-2017, 11:10 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 9,393
Maybe a February wedding at St. George's Chapel at Windsor. I think that would be the perfect setting for Harry and Meghan. Royal enough but yet on a smaller, intimate scale to minimize the crowds and security risks.
__________________
“In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him.”
~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
Reply With Quote
  #254  
Old 09-04-2017, 11:16 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 5,860
This cracked me up

Duchess Mary @princesspleats
After finding out Harry will soon fall to 6th in line to the throne, Meghan Markle changes her mind 😂
Reply With Quote
  #255  
Old 09-04-2017, 11:39 AM
Madame Verseau's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
This cracked me up

Duchess Mary @princesspleats
After finding out Harry will soon fall to 6th in line to the throne, Meghan Markle changes her mind 😂

The comment doesn't make sense because Meghan would have never had the chance to become queen anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #256  
Old 09-04-2017, 11:41 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,728
Yes, I've read princesspleats occasionally (know where she's coming from) and I expected that you would find that amusing, Rudolph. Actually, after three weeks in Africa Harry and Meghan are obviously getting on extremely well together.
Reply With Quote
  #257  
Old 09-04-2017, 11:56 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,530
Honestly if there was any chance the queen wouldn't give her approval I dont think it would have gone even this far. Honestly this far from the throne, I think the queen's main concern is her grandkids are happy.

In this day and age, even Charlotte has minimal chance of seeing the throne. Spares in modern age of medicine and lack of assassinations and royals going to war, are very uncommonly actually needed. Since marrying a divorcee is allowed, no worry George would pull a King Edward.

I think may wedding at earliest. Possibly June if they go with a wedding say at Windsor. May choose a smaller wedding like Edward.
Reply With Quote
  #258  
Old 09-04-2017, 12:12 PM
Pranter's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 5,570
Yep I agree...they would of parted ways way before now if there was a family issue.


LaRae
Reply With Quote
  #259  
Old 09-04-2017, 01:21 PM
Emme's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: East Coast, United States
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by M. Payton View Post
Did I miss an engagement, a wedding and babies and now a divorce all in the space of a few minutes? Darn they are fast workers now aren't they....
Perfect summation of this thread of late.
Reply With Quote
  #260  
Old 09-04-2017, 01:27 PM
Emme's Avatar
Gentry
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: East Coast, United States
Posts: 79
Just my opinion...

I think Harry and Meghan are engaged. I think an announcement will be made by Harry’s birthday in September. I think they will wed somewhere between November and February.

Again, just my opinion.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 34 (7 members and 27 guests)
Alliec76, AlowVera, American Observer7, JuliSt, O-H Anglophile, Princess of Durham, teddymac
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Harry and Meghan: The Love Story" eya Royal Library 30 10-28-2017 02:39 AM




Popular Tags
affair best outfit birthday carl gustaf chris o'neill crown princess mary crown princess victoria current events denmark duchess of cambridge style duke of cambridge dutch earl of snowdon fashion poll general news hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duchess stéphanie's fashion & style hereditary grand duke guillaume infanta cristina infanta leonor infanta sofia iñaki urdangarín king abdullah in australia king felipe king felipe vi king philippe king willem-alexander letizia liechtenstein monarchy news official visit picture of the week prince alexander prince carl philip prince daniel prince felix prince gabriel prince harry prince nicholas prince oscar princess beatrice princess claire princess claire of luxembourg princess estelle princess leonore princess madeleine princess of asturias princess sofia princess victoria queen elizabeth ii queen letizia queen letizia casual outfits queen letizia daytime fashion queen letizia fashion queen mathilde queen maxima queen maxima casual wear queen maxima daytime fashion queen maxima fashion queen maxima hats queen maxima style queen rania queen silvia state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family united kingdom victoria



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2017
Jelsoft Enterprises