The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #241  
Old 09-04-2017, 06:46 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 11,980
For all we know, hearing the news of the Cambridges' expanding family just may trigger an urgency to have children of their own in Harry and Meghan's minds. It wouldn't surprise me as they both have mentioned wanting a home and family life of their own.

It wouldn't surprise me either now that Harry and his future family are moving further down the line of succession that this couple decides to go the route that Edward and Sophie did with having their children titled and styled as children of a Duke and Duchess rather than prince or princess. It would fit more in line of them wishing to have as "normal" of a life as possible.

Then again, they're not even engaged yet (that we know of) and shouldn't jump the gun on anything and let the normal progression of things happen.
__________________

__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #242  
Old 09-04-2017, 06:53 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbruno View Post
That is actually a fair point. Both Victoria and Carl Philip had to wait a long time until their respective marriages became acceptable to their father and to the Swedish public. Harry should drop the secrecy if he wants the Brutish public to warm up to Meghan.

I don't see any secrecy, what I see is privacy, and imo they're two completely different things.

I don't get why British public needs to warm up to Meghan, when they're not engaged, as the British public don't have any say in whom Harry marries or dates.
__________________

  #243  
Old 09-04-2017, 07:03 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, United States
Posts: 4,359
Let's face it, we won't know whether Meghan is suitable unless she and Harry get married, and we see how she handles it.

Everyone thought Diana was perfect, and look how that turned out.

Meghan may turn out to be ideal, or she may be a disaster; there's simply no way to tell in advance.
As someone said, if worse comes to worst, they will divorce and move on.
  #244  
Old 09-04-2017, 07:57 AM
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere in, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,013
Are we allowed to post tweets here? I'm sorry if this isn't allowed, and will delete if not appropriate.



Emily Andrews @byEmilyAndrews

2m
Harry spent 31 Aug at KP with Meghan, and then they went away for the w/end together hence why he hasn't seen #kate this morning... #royals
  #245  
Old 09-04-2017, 08:24 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, United States
Posts: 4,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie View Post
And if twins Harry won't need permission at all.
Harry might be sixth in line next year, but, when William is king, he will be back to 4th (unless W&K have a fourth child, which I think is unlikely). More significantly, there is a non-negliblle chance that William might actually become king before any of his children come of age, especially now that there is growing pressure on Charles to abdicate. So, unlikely though as it may be, there is still a possibility that Harry might be in a position where he could potentially become regent if needed. In any case, he is still likely to be at least a counsellor of state for quite some time, either under his father's or his brother's reign. So maybe he's not that unimportant after all.
  #246  
Old 09-04-2017, 08:35 AM
xenobia's Avatar
Courtier
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Near the artic circle, Sweden
Posts: 850
I would say that the person who is most affected by the news of baby #3 for the Cambridges would be Andrew. Once the child is born, he doesn't need the Queens permission to (re)marry. That opens up interesting possibilities.

When it comes to Harry and Meghan, I have no reason to think that the Queen wouldn't give them permission to marry. I assume that Harry has already discussed this with his grandmother. The new baby Cambridge arrival - I guess around april? - might have an impact on a possible wedding date for Meghan and Harry, should they become engaged this fall. I'm sure that Harry would want both his brother and sister-in-law to attend, so I would say that june is the earliest possible date if there's a wedding next summer.
  #247  
Old 09-04-2017, 08:36 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 6,940
As long as Kate is fertile everything is likely.
  #248  
Old 09-04-2017, 08:55 AM
Dman's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 14,349
It's so good to hear Harry got to spend the anniversary of his mums passing with Meghan. Her presence must've meant a lot to him.

When you cut out all the bull, people should be happy for Harry. He got some personal happiness in his life again. Meghan appears to be very happy too. At the end of the day that's what it's all about; the happiness of the couple. Everything else falls into place after that.

No one have to worry about Meghan being suitable for a possible role as a senior royal.
__________________
"WE CANNOT PRAY IN LOVE AND LIVE IN HATE AND STILL THINK WE ARE WORSHIPING GOD."

A.W. TOZER
  #249  
Old 09-04-2017, 08:57 AM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,151
June is a super busy month royal wise with Trooping the Colour. Ascot week, Garter Service. Highly unlikely
  #250  
Old 09-04-2017, 09:45 AM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Canada, Canada
Posts: 167
Edward and Sophie were married in June. There's always going to be some event occurring in any month.
  #251  
Old 09-04-2017, 09:48 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 9,564
My bet if the marry early in the year is March or May.


LaRae
  #252  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:03 AM
Skippyboo's Avatar
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Atlanta, United States
Posts: 4,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeT View Post
Edward and Sophie were married in June. There's always going to be some event occurring in any month.


They had a very small wedding in Windsor. A bigger wedding in London during a high terror alert time is a different thing. A more low key wedding outside the capital would be easier to carry out on shorter notice.
  #253  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:10 AM
Osipi's Avatar
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 11,980
Maybe a February wedding at St. George's Chapel at Windsor. I think that would be the perfect setting for Harry and Meghan. Royal enough but yet on a smaller, intimate scale to minimize the crowds and security risks.
__________________
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature. Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.

~~~Ralph Waldo Emerson~~~
  #254  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:16 AM
Majesty
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: *******, Canada
Posts: 7,590
This cracked me up

Duchess Mary @princesspleats
After finding out Harry will soon fall to 6th in line to the throne, Meghan Markle changes her mind 😂
  #255  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:39 AM
Madame Verseau's Avatar
Serene Highness
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisville, United States
Posts: 1,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolph View Post
This cracked me up

Duchess Mary @princesspleats
After finding out Harry will soon fall to 6th in line to the throne, Meghan Markle changes her mind 😂

The comment doesn't make sense because Meghan would have never had the chance to become queen anyway.
  #256  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:41 AM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,929
Yes, I've read princesspleats occasionally (know where she's coming from) and I expected that you would find that amusing, Rudolph. Actually, after three weeks in Africa Harry and Meghan are obviously getting on extremely well together.
  #257  
Old 09-04-2017, 10:56 AM
Countessmeout's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: alberta, Canada
Posts: 8,990
Honestly if there was any chance the queen wouldn't give her approval I dont think it would have gone even this far. Honestly this far from the throne, I think the queen's main concern is her grandkids are happy.

In this day and age, even Charlotte has minimal chance of seeing the throne. Spares in modern age of medicine and lack of assassinations and royals going to war, are very uncommonly actually needed. Since marrying a divorcee is allowed, no worry George would pull a King Edward.

I think may wedding at earliest. Possibly June if they go with a wedding say at Windsor. May choose a smaller wedding like Edward.
  #258  
Old 09-04-2017, 11:12 AM
Pranter's Avatar
Majesty
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 9,564
Yep I agree...they would of parted ways way before now if there was a family issue.


LaRae
  #259  
Old 09-04-2017, 12:21 PM
Emme's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: East Coast, United States
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by M. Payton View Post
Did I miss an engagement, a wedding and babies and now a divorce all in the space of a few minutes? Darn they are fast workers now aren't they....
Perfect summation of this thread of late.
  #260  
Old 09-04-2017, 12:27 PM
Emme's Avatar
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: East Coast, United States
Posts: 115
Just my opinion...

I think Harry and Meghan are engaged. I think an announcement will be made by Harry’s birthday in September. I think they will wed somewhere between November and February.

Again, just my opinion.
__________________

Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Books on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex eya Royal Library 45 05-09-2018 07:03 PM




Popular Tags
british royal family britishroyals camilla caracciolo chris o'neill clothes commonwealth games crown princess victoria current events documentary duchess of sussex duke of york earl of snowdon fashion felipe and letizia forum grand duchess maria teresa helena hereditary grand duchess stéphanie hereditary grand duke guillaume hereditary prince alois infanta cristina iñaki urdangarín juan carlos king philippe king willem-alexander ladies-in-waiting liechtenstein lord snowdon meghan markle member miguel urdangarin nobel 2017 pablo urdangarín plantagenets porphyria prince charles prince daniel prince harry prince harry of wales prince laurent princenapoleon prince nicholas prince of belgium prince sebastian princess alexandra of luxembourg princess alexia princess beatrice princess claire princess claire of luxembourg princess victoria queen elizabeth queen maxima quizz remarriage royal royal ancestry royal geneology royal wedding smith state visit stephanie sweden swedish royal family swedish royal registry tom bower tradition visit to spain wedding windsor castle



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018
Jelsoft Enterprises